A reminder....
A reminder of how bad an actor Burt Lancaster could be?
by Anonymous | reply 1 | September 23, 2021 4:49 AM |
Judy was ROBBED!
by Anonymous | reply 2 | September 23, 2021 4:52 AM |
Didn't I read somewhere that Lancaster was a late substitute for Olivier, who couldn't do the movie for some reason?
by Anonymous | reply 3 | September 23, 2021 4:53 AM |
This was the film that the infamous British "Moors Murderers" Ian Brady and Myra Hindley saw on their first date.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | September 23, 2021 4:09 PM |
Monty and Judy in the same movie -- gay icon overload!
by Anonymous | reply 5 | September 23, 2021 5:12 PM |
Love dat Monty Meltdown.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | September 23, 2021 5:14 PM |
It’s a good movie. Sort of hits you over the head with a hammer. But that’s typical Stanley Kramer.
Should be seen in a double bill with Kramer’s other piece about Cynical-Nazis-Going-Straight-to-Hell, “Ship of Fools.”
That way you get Before and After.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | September 23, 2021 6:46 PM |
The finest film ever, I think. It slips into melodrama, but it has serious things to say, and it says them well.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | September 23, 2021 6:50 PM |
Interesting that both Lead Actor Oscars that year went to foreign performers, and both from Axis countries.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | September 23, 2021 7:04 PM |
[Quote]Monty and Judy in the same movie -- gay icon overload!
And MARLENE. Plus Maximilian Schell who was HAF.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | September 23, 2021 11:56 PM |
As much as I love Max Schell in the film I have never really understood what was Oscar-worthy about his performance. I suspect he won so the voters could give the film one major Oscar acknowledgement they didn't need to give to West Side Story.
Judy and Monty were both robbed of their Oscars here, especially Monty. Great dancer, but did George Chakiris have even one scene in WSS where he actually acted?
by Anonymous | reply 11 | September 24, 2021 12:05 AM |
Such a good film! I have not seen it in years.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | September 24, 2021 12:07 AM |
Why do you suppose Maximilian Schell never had much of a follow up in his career? Or did he and I missed it? He certainly had the talent and looks to be a huge star in the 1960s. I wonder if he just wasn't very ambitious or had a great disdain for Hollywood?
by Anonymous | reply 13 | September 24, 2021 12:07 AM |
MS loathed Hollywood like most European actors. He had a marvelous career. Worked right up until his death.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | September 24, 2021 4:35 AM |
R13, Max Schell was Oscar nominated 2 more times, for The Man in the Glass Booth (1975) and Julia (1977), and appeared in several other popular films like Topkapi, A Bridge Too Far, Counterpoint, The Odessa File, etc. But I think because of his background/accent, Hollywood opportunities were limited to WW2/Nazi/Cold War Espionage-related stuff, so he took on more character roles in order to avoid the typecasting rut. He also seemed to find more interest in writing, producing, directing.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | September 24, 2021 8:02 AM |
His Marlene documentary is great IMO. Available to rent at Amazon Prime
by Anonymous | reply 16 | September 24, 2021 8:22 AM |
S Hell was charming, paired with BD Wong in “The Freshman.”
by Anonymous | reply 17 | September 24, 2021 2:09 PM |
I remember that Max was in a 1968 film called KRAKATOA: EAST OF JAVA. I've never seen it, but I think it got bad reviews, and I never hear anyone speak of it. I just checked and it is available for streaming.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | September 24, 2021 3:29 PM |
KRAKATOA EAST OF JAVA was a laughable mess in its day, and is still regarded as such. Hammy acting, cheapo special effects, and dull writing continue to help make it an enduring struggle to watch.
And, to top it off, Krakatoa is actually WEST of Java, which everybody pointed out at the time….
by Anonymous | reply 19 | September 24, 2021 5:03 PM |
R19: Ha!! Yes, I remember reading about the east/west confusion. How the hell did they ever manage to make a huge, stupid mistake like that?
by Anonymous | reply 20 | September 24, 2021 5:26 PM |
I post this annually to remind people of what can happen if you remain apathetic to what is happening around you. "Where were we?" "What was a passing phase had become the way of life."
by Anonymous | reply 21 | September 24, 2021 5:37 PM |
Exactly, r21. Frustrating that Judgment at Nuremberg isn't currently available on any of the streaming services. It's a must-watch these days.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | September 24, 2021 5:47 PM |
The indifference here is appalling, R21 OP. Thank you for trying.
Perhaps they think the Resistance will have a YouTube channel.😢
by Anonymous | reply 23 | September 24, 2021 5:48 PM |
Max's sister Maria Schell was a leading star of German cinema and was given and the big movie star build-up in Hollywood pictures, but I don't think she's as remembered today as her little brother.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | September 24, 2021 5:50 PM |
Max also made a documentary about his sister Maria and like his doc on Marlene, it's very good.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | September 24, 2021 5:57 PM |
Whenever I watch Burt Lancaster do an emotionally powerful scene, I'm never quite convinced that he's a good enough actor to pull it off. I'm sure he expected Oscar gold for his performance in Judgment at Nuremberg, but he was left off all the major awards list.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | September 24, 2021 5:58 PM |
[quote]I'm never quite convinced that he [bold]was[/bold] a good enough actor to pull it off.
Correcting myself.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | September 24, 2021 6:04 PM |
Max and Maria Schell (Swiss) both loathed Hollywood, but like most European actors they liked appearing in American films shot in Europe ($$$), many of them at Cinecitta studios in Rome.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | September 24, 2021 8:16 PM |
This film was a major influence in my life, and I still think it's excellent.
My dad was stationed in Germany in the early 60s, and we went to the first playing at the base theater. Our next break from school was a trip to Dachau, then to Buchenwald.
He was in the occupation forces at the end of WWII, and wanted us to understand why such devestation should never happen again.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | September 24, 2021 9:55 PM |
My grandfather's brother testified at Nuremburg. He was a non-Jewish political prisoner who spent 4 years in various camps. It's a miracle he survived. His story is fascinating.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | September 24, 2021 10:05 PM |
What is never mentioned anymore is that this film was originally a roadshow presentation, with reserved seats, and Overture/Intermission/Entr’acte and Exit music. Not to mention a souvenir program, and a soundtrack release, both of which, for those who are interested, can be found fairly reasonably on E-Bay.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | September 24, 2021 10:37 PM |
The 1961 film was an adaptation of a Playhouse 90 teleplay that aired live on CBS in 1959. That one also starred Maximilian Schell as the defense attorney, so it was a dress rehearsal of sorts for his Oscar-winning movie performance.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | September 24, 2021 10:52 PM |
this graphic is one of the great ad campaigns of the era
by Anonymous | reply 33 | September 24, 2021 10:59 PM |
^^ fabulous.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | September 24, 2021 11:02 PM |
My parents took me to see this when I was 9 or 10. The Nazi story was being revealed throughout the 1950s and '60s and I was fascinated with it. My mother's father was from Austria and would not allow German to be spoken in his home, and I was curious.
I found it very believable that the Nazis had done to Monty's character what he described. Maximilan Schell was so beautiful, so boy-bonerlicious. But he looked so Jewish, I couldn't wrap my 10-year-old mind around the fact that he hadn't ended up in a concentration camp.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | September 24, 2021 11:18 PM |
At least Maximilian Schell got to cuckold Steve McQueen with the wife who actually cared about Steve
by Anonymous | reply 37 | September 24, 2021 11:31 PM |
[quote] It hits you over the head with a hammer. But that’s typical Stanley Kramer.
Yes, portentous preaching.
Stark Black and White.
Glum.
With Endless Talk trapped in one set.
Stanley has been hitting us over the head for two hours and then wheels on two carnival cameo appearances from two vey damaged individuals which tips the ordeal into farce,
by Anonymous | reply 38 | September 24, 2021 11:35 PM |
^^ perhaps you'd prefer a musical adaptation?
by Anonymous | reply 39 | September 24, 2021 11:43 PM |
It's a festival of noses.
Beaky noses, straight noses, and retroussé.
But they're all facing in the one direction. Shouldn't the Americans ('the goodies') be facing to the right and the Germans ('the baddies') be facing left?
by Anonymous | reply 40 | September 24, 2021 11:43 PM |
I was actually a lowly intern on the Broadway version of this film in 2000. I thought it was a fabulous production though, admittedly, I may have been too close to be objective. We didn't run long, I can't remember what the reviews were like but I imagine not stellar for whatever reasons.
Max Schell was in it but he played the Burt Lancaster role. I remember him as a towering courtly figure, silver-haired by then (I guess he was around 70?) and very courteous and respectful to one and all, even if he never quite learned everyone's names.. He arrived a few days late from Europe and was suffering from a bad cold or bronchitis or something throughout rehearsals but delivered by opening. Marthe Keller (Swiss movie star who was a former flame of Al Pacino) played the Dietrich role and George Grizzard was the judge (Spencer Tracy in the film). Michael Hayden (Billy Bigelow from the Lincoln Center Carousel) played Max's original role and Robert Foxworth played the Richard Widmark role . The Monty and Judy roles were played by young actors. A great memory for me!
by Anonymous | reply 41 | September 24, 2021 11:44 PM |
Did Max play Ming the Merciless in the Flash Gordon movie in the late 70s or 80s?
Dear god I had the biggest crush on the guy who played Flash. I think he was the subject of my first wet dream.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | September 24, 2021 11:45 PM |
[quote] I remember him as a towering courtly figure
Max was so handsome but I'm confused at how tall he was. He looked to be short compared to Richard Beymer in this film—
by Anonymous | reply 43 | September 24, 2021 11:49 PM |
R41. Wonderful story. Maximilian Schell seems quite gentlemanly in the Marlene doc in which M gives him mucho mierda.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | September 24, 2021 11:51 PM |
R44 He had to be 'gentlemanly' to Marlene because she was highly likely to shut down the film if he didn't kowtow to her demands.
It's hardly a 'film' when she refused to be shown on camera. He wasn't even allowed to film her hands or show her in sillhouette. Marlene had turned into Miss Havisham
by Anonymous | reply 45 | September 24, 2021 11:55 PM |
Eldergay Alert!
I can remember having seen this one on the 4:30 movie on WABC Channel 7. Had never heard of the Holocaust at that age, but it was on in the background while I cooked up Creepy Crawlers. My one specific memory of the film was the song Du Du Licht Mir in Herzen (sorry for spelling).
by Anonymous | reply 46 | September 24, 2021 11:58 PM |
r43, Max may literally not have been terribly tall (though I'd swear he was at least 5'11") but his presence in the room definitely was "towering."
His Marlene doc is fascinating and extraordinary, perhaps even more so because she's so uncooperative!
by Anonymous | reply 47 | September 24, 2021 11:58 PM |
My twink ass would have cruised Maximilian so hard he would have felt compelled to nail me to the cross.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | September 25, 2021 12:05 AM |
[quote] A reminder of how bad an actor Burt Lancaster could be
Suppose I should be pleased when an uber-virile grinning American millionaire producer patronises English and European directors and writers (such as Visconti and Rattigan).
But I bristle when he PRETENDS to be European (as in the Visconti films). And I bristle when he pretends to suppress his much-advertised virility by playing an old man ('Birdman of Alcatraz' and 'Judgement')
by Anonymous | reply 49 | September 25, 2021 12:09 AM |
[quote] hits you over the head with a hammer
I never choose to watch this on TV even though it has 4 or 5 interesting stars in it.
Kramer hits us over the head with a hammer but it’s even more painful when interrupted by lively color advertisements.
I'm trying to remember if the Dietrich character is essential to the story? Or whether she's just another guest star cameo like Clift and Garland?
by Anonymous | reply 50 | September 25, 2021 12:20 AM |
[quote] perhaps you'd prefer a musical adaptation?
It worked nicely for Gone With the Wind.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | September 25, 2021 12:20 AM |
R50, she’s a love interest for Tracy. Her character could be removed without disrupting the story.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | September 25, 2021 12:30 AM |
R42 No, Schell was not Ming. It was Max von Sydow
by Anonymous | reply 53 | September 25, 2021 12:48 AM |
The Dietrich character is not a love interest for Tracy. IIRC she plays an impoverished aristocrat who hosts Tracy to tea and begs him to understand that she and those of her class were helpless in stopping the rise of Hitler.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | September 25, 2021 1:22 AM |
I saw that at the Paris, r16. Here he is in Five Finger exercise with Roz...
by Anonymous | reply 56 | September 25, 2021 1:41 AM |
She’s all that r55, and a love interest. It’s implied that they are growing romantically fond of each other.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | September 25, 2021 1:57 AM |
Dietrich played a widow whose husband, a Nazi general, was executed by the Allies for war crimes. Marlene supposedly was so sickened by her character's line about how the German people were not aware of the Nazi atrocities that she didn't think she could go through with it. Her daughter, Maria, advised her to simply think of her mother. So Marlene played the part as if she were dear old Mutter.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | September 25, 2021 2:30 AM |
R7 I don't think I'd like to sit next to Kramer at a dinner party. I suspect he's talk loudly and for for too long. I doubt he'd be capable of dialogue, subtlety or humor.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | September 25, 2021 2:48 AM |
Kramer fell into the David Lean Syndrome of being unable to make a short movie.
And the Otto Preminger Syndrome of cramming too many box-office names into small movie.
I do wonder if Stanley Kramer is the precursor to Steven Spielberg? — I don't know, I've been avoiding Spielberg's stuff for 15 years.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | September 25, 2021 2:55 AM |
Schell also directed feature films (as well as the documentaries already mentioned) and theater and opera productions. He worked with Leonard Bernstein on TV programs and concerts about Beethoven's life and music. He had something cooking on a lot of burners.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | September 25, 2021 3:02 AM |
And Max was marveling at her youthful and delicate décollatage.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | September 25, 2021 3:23 AM |
^ He is utterly gorgeous.
I liked it when he beached his hair blond.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | September 25, 2021 3:24 AM |
Though I love the photos of Max, Joan Crawford and the Oscar, I'm a bit confused. I believe he presented her with Anne Bancroft's Oscar when Miss Bancroft couldn't be present at the ceremony, but my old crumbling mind seems to remember Joan wearing a sparkling rhinestone gown at the event, not that simple black frock seen in r62 and r63. Am I misremembering?
by Anonymous | reply 67 | September 25, 2021 3:33 AM |
Watching Kramer film like this and thinking it is too melodramatic and doesn't hold up.... is like complaining Noh Theater isn't realistic. Although black and white in an era of color, it wasn't neo-realism or new wave. It was Morality Play.
And Lancaster... was so incredibly over the top and bad he was sometimes good. The large gesture... the teeth that ate the Universe. A hoot, a trickster, a cartoon.... a star.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | September 25, 2021 3:42 AM |
R67, You're not misremembering. Max did indeed present Joan with Anne's Oscar. The above photos were drom the previous year when Max won.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | September 25, 2021 3:45 AM |
*from
by Anonymous | reply 70 | September 25, 2021 3:45 AM |
Wow, r69! So Joan had 2 Oscar moments with Max? He should have made a documentary about her.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | September 25, 2021 3:47 AM |
^ But Joan wouldn't have allowed Max to film her sad, wrinkled face and liver-spotted hands.
by Anonymous | reply 72 | September 25, 2021 3:50 AM |
In a Elizabeth Taylor bio pic I was surprised to learn that Elizabeth named her daughter Maria after "my friend Maria Schell.". This surprised me. Where did these two become so close?
by Anonymous | reply 74 | September 25, 2021 4:24 AM |
Liz may have met Maria Schell when they were doing Raintree County and the awful The Brothers Karamazov on the Metro lot in 1958.
Maria had a very heavy jawline which she tried to hide by smiling constantly. Her constant smiling in every film became extremely irritating regardless of the mood of the scene.
Though she did have an unhappy end.
by Anonymous | reply 75 | September 25, 2021 4:36 AM |
R74, Maria Burton was adopted from Augsburg, Germany, and arranged by Maria Schell, or rather, Schell's private secretary.
by Anonymous | reply 76 | September 25, 2021 4:36 AM |
What I want to know is whether Judy sat in that old man’s lap!
by Anonymous | reply 77 | September 25, 2021 4:52 AM |
Maria Schell was on the cover of "Time" in 1957. She and Taylor were both much-photographed at the Cannes Film Festival that year too.
by Anonymous | reply 78 | September 25, 2021 4:54 AM |
How could Swiss Maria help with an adoption in Germany? These two don't seem like natural friends as the Schells were considered intellectuals.
by Anonymous | reply 79 | September 25, 2021 5:02 AM |
Elizabeth Taylor and Maria Schell had the same agent, Kurt Frings. Taylor and Eddie Fisher flew to Germany to meet with Maria Schell, who would assist them in adopting a German orphan. But by the time the adoption was finalized, Taylor had left Fisher for Burton.
by Anonymous | reply 80 | September 25, 2021 5:16 AM |
I wonder why Liz wanted a German orphan?
by Anonymous | reply 81 | September 25, 2021 5:31 AM |
[quote]What I want to know is whether Judy sat in that old man’s lap!
S-s-s-stop it...STOP IT!
by Anonymous | reply 82 | September 25, 2021 7:15 AM |
R81, because the Romanian ones were all taken.
by Anonymous | reply 83 | September 25, 2021 7:25 AM |
Eddie Fisher said he and Taylor first tried to adopt a boy (whom Elizabeth named Alexander) in Greece, but their application was eventually refused because they were Jewish. They returned to Rome, where Taylor was filming "Cleopatra", and `their friend Maria (who was was living in Munich at the time, not Switzerland) helped them find the girl in Germany. And in 1964 Fisher and Maria had an affair in Paris, where she was playing the title role in Somerset Maugham's play, "Caroline". Fisher said, "Maria was one of the few women who had something nice to say about me once our romance was over."
by Anonymous | reply 84 | September 25, 2021 7:39 AM |
R81, Darfur orphans weren't yet in vogue.
by Anonymous | reply 85 | September 25, 2021 12:43 PM |
Can I just say: how weird that Elizabeth, who already had three young children of her own, felt a need to adopt another. I wonder if it somehow had to do with trying to "legitimize" her marriage to Eddie without having to go through another pregnancy?
by Anonymous | reply 86 | September 25, 2021 2:31 PM |
R86, According to Kitty Kelley, Eddie found out about Elizabeth's quickie affair with writer Max Lerner and confronted her about it. To show him that her love for him was rock solid and to cement their marriage, she wanted to have his baby, but she had her tubes tied after having Liza. According to a "friend," Elizabeth was not exactly the mothering type: "She likes babies, puppies, and kittens, and doesn't always diffentiate among them. They're all pets to her."
by Anonymous | reply 87 | September 25, 2021 3:30 PM |
Now that sounds like the Elizabeth we know, r87.
by Anonymous | reply 88 | September 25, 2021 7:51 PM |
Marlon Brando supposedly wanted the part of Hans Rolfe, the defense attorney, and reached out to Stanley Kramer and screenwriter Abby Mann. They initially entertained the idea of casting Brando, but ultimately decided to stick with the lesser known Maximilian Schell because he did a smash-up job playing the part in the Playhouse 90 TV version. Brando and Schell had previously acted together, playing Nazi soldiers in "The Young Lions" (1958), with Monty Clift.
When Schell won the Oscar for Best Actor, he became the lowest-billed lead category winner in history, ranked fifth, after Richard Widmark and Dietrich, whose roles were secondary to the leads.
by Anonymous | reply 89 | September 25, 2021 8:10 PM |
I know that it’s a preachy film in that Stanley Kramer way, but I still watch it whenever it’s on—I find it powerful and love the acting. I am surprised by all the hate for Lancaster—I thought he was fairly restrained here. Tracy has some of the most thankless dialogue—he has to be Mann’s “Porte parole”—the character who speaks for the author and it gets tiresome. I think both Clift and Garland should have won Oscars—neither Chakiris’ nor Moreno’s performances have any depth to them, but since they were the only nominees from WSS, they were part of the sweep (and neither Wood nor Beymer deserved to be nominated).
BTW, the father of lesbian left-wing radio host Stephanie Miller was one of the judges at the actual trials (as well as being Goldwater’s running mate in 1964).
by Anonymous | reply 90 | September 25, 2021 9:12 PM |
I like the scene where Dietrich’s character tells Tracy that she didn’t know about the death camps and Tracy replied with something like, it seems nobody knew anything. He shouts dien her character’s claim that she and Lancaster’s character were good Germans.
by Anonymous | reply 91 | September 25, 2021 10:56 PM |
[quote] I know that it’s a preachy film
[quote] It was Morality Play.
It has so little entertainment value that you never want to see it again.
by Anonymous | reply 92 | September 26, 2021 12:01 AM |
[quote] They initially entertained the idea of casting Brando
That would have been a mistake.
Brando started going nutty after he spent time in Japan in '57. He was erratic and Kramer would not have been able to control him.
by Anonymous | reply 93 | September 26, 2021 12:31 AM |
In the end it really is an ensemble film and Brando in that particular role would have unbalanced that unnecessarily. I probably need to rewatch the film but I'm really surprised Schell wasn't nominated for Supporting, though I guess they didn't want him competing in the same category as Monty.
by Anonymous | reply 94 | September 26, 2021 3:35 AM |
When people criticize Stanley Kramer's films as being heavy-handed, I think they're confusing content with style. I haven't seen JUDGMENT AT NUREMBERG in years, so I won't comment on that one specifically, but I have recently re-watched INHERIT THE WIND several times. I think it hold up beautifully, and I can't imagine how or why someone would make a "subtle" film about the Scopes trial or the Holocaust. And if someone tried to do so, I think the film would be ridiculous.
by Anonymous | reply 95 | September 26, 2021 3:37 AM |
"Inherit the Wind" had entertainment value because we could laugh at how stupid Southerners are.
But I've forgotten if Kramer was pushing some morality onto us.
by Anonymous | reply 96 | September 26, 2021 3:41 AM |
R96, the "morality" that's "pushed" in INHERIT THE WIND is the idea that religion should not hold sway over science and education. All of that is in the script, and as I noted in my earlier post, to downplay it or try to get the message across in a "subtle" way would have been ludicrous.
by Anonymous | reply 97 | September 26, 2021 3:59 AM |
Marlene is so powerful in her last scene sitting silently while watching the phone ring. Max, years later, played Lancaster’s role on Broadway.
by Anonymous | reply 98 | September 26, 2021 4:12 AM |
Just saw this pic of Marlene today - fabulous!
by Anonymous | reply 99 | September 26, 2021 4:18 AM |
[quote] Marlene today
I think you mean Marlene 1961.
by Anonymous | reply 100 | September 26, 2021 4:25 AM |
r98, please see my reminiscence of the Broadway production with Max.
by Anonymous | reply 101 | September 26, 2021 4:27 AM |
I think the saddest thing is when a celebrated beauty is forced to hide.
Garbo agreed to appear on Broadway in the 1950s on the proviso that the first ten rows of seats be forbidden from sale.
Dietrich appeared with gauzy filters briefly in this bad movie from 1978 but she was terrified of exposing her face to Max in 1984.
by Anonymous | reply 102 | September 26, 2021 4:32 AM |
It might make a good opera, with a set in ruins and the witnesses singing their hearts out.
by Anonymous | reply 103 | September 26, 2021 4:32 AM |
[quote] It might make a good opera
Cynics have said the so-called 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission' in South Africa was a soap opera.
People came and 'sang out' their woes but there was no tangible result.
I looked up the Nuremberg trials on Wiki and it says 'In the end, the international tribunal found all but three of the defendants guilty. Twelve were sentenced to death, one in absentia, and the rest were given prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life behind bars. Ten of the condemned were executed by hanging on October 16, 1946.'
by Anonymous | reply 104 | September 26, 2021 4:37 AM |
I love DataLounge because I can find an entire thread of over more than 100 replies about Judgment at Nuremberg (even if a good many are about hot Max Schell).
by Anonymous | reply 105 | September 26, 2021 4:39 AM |
Marlene in the 1980s. She was still beautiful.
by Anonymous | reply 106 | September 26, 2021 7:32 AM |