Prince George Depicted As A Foul-Mouthed Brat In HBO Max’s Animated Show ‘The Prince’

The teaser is cringetastic; more lazy writing from the folks that brought you "Family Guy". George is basically Stewie Griffith with younger siblings.

I don't know, that looks pretty fucking funny to me. But then I'm easily amused.

You know he's just counting the days before he can replace that candy cane with a Virginia Slim and cunt at the servants all the livelong day.

The show’s based off the Instagram persona Gary Janetti, a Family Guy writer, has applied to George. But as noted above, he’s basically Stewie from Family Guy.

I dunno. This gimmick was cute a year ago on Instagram, but now seems tired.

Janetti created the sitcom VICIOUS starring Sirs Ian McKellen and Derek Jacobi. It managed to get a titter out of me every 3rd episode.

The accent is atrocious.

Delayed due to Philip's timely passing. They should just cancel it altogether. Not out of respect, just because it looks awful and unfunny.

He’s not even that interesting.

Tacky. I'll pass.

Racists! Oh, wait, making fun of the children of royals only becomes racist when you're 3% black. Can you imagine if they did this with Archie? Or, the future Veronica or Jughead Markle?

This is really tasteless and inappropriate. He's a child FFS.

MARY, R12!!!

Sorry r13 but it just seems wrong.

It used to be an unspoken rule that you didn't pick on the minor children of politicians.

"The Royals" is amusing, primarily because of the woman playing Camilla. One foul-mouthed satire of the BRF is sufficient, thanks.

Yep, he's Stewie grown-up, well, partly

Is this the little homosexual prince?

It's not my rule, R15.

I know I'm being a Mary, but I honestly think that the line is young children.

Whether you're Angelina Jolie's kid, Beyonce's kid, or Prince George, children should be off limits at least until they're 15-ish, unless they put themselves into the spotlight by starting a career in as a celebrity.

Some don't share your very grand morals, R20. Best to accept that.

Klan Grannie cunt @r11 making everything royal about race and the Sussex

God, you're tedious

[quote] Whether you're Angelina Jolie's kid, Beyonce's kid, or Prince George, children should be off limits at least until they're 15-ish

Peak ripeness.

[quote]Some don't share your very grand morals, [R20]. Best to accept that.

He's a child, you asshole. It's tasteless and kind of creepy.

It's not a matter of accepting morals, r21. You either have morals or you don't.

Is Kate portrayed as s cunt?

R24/R25=tedious cunting moralist.

R27 = amoral

I'll take that any day over a tedious cunting moralist.

I wish Archie had been born an albino. That would throw a wrench in the works.

Spanner.

The Windsors was funny because of the writing and talents of the actors. This guy has never once made me laugh, and I agree with the others who think that putting words into the mouth of a famous child is creepy. His IG was always off-putting and the joke went on for too long. Same as when that person who did a Suri Cruise character when she was a kid.

It's unseemly and tacky. And it looks like this is just Stewie from Family Guy anyway.

And they are camping him up, a seven year old. Tacky and obnoxious.

And that person in California whose mother thought he would be but is not and never will be a prince.

I hope they make fun of Camilla.

It's wrong to exploit a child. And, in this case, with his prominence, it's awful.

[quote] Are there any boundaries left?

Yes!

In that cartoon at R8, Meghan is the only one that they haven't made a real caricature of. Let me guess, she'll be off limits for jokes.

Harry is well-captured in this drawing. Hilarious. So is Charles.

[quote] Harry is well-captured in this drawing.

The drawing at R8.

R39 that's because she doesn't have odd features like Kate's razor sharp cheekbones or the inbreeding looks most of the other royals have. The queen, the kids, and Harry look like cartoon versions of themselves.

Wills looks like a ghoul because he is one.

Given MeGAIN's propensity to sue, they're playing it safe.

I never thought Janetti's Instagram was that funny. The only reason he got it made into a series was because of connections, not quality. They must be desperate for new content.

R43 she wouldn't sue over a parody. She sued over the Mail on Sunday publishing her personal records, which was illegal and is why she won.

Obviously if she was sue-happy she'd go after all the obsessive trolls who pen wild fantastic tales slandering her every move and utterance with conspiracy theories, misogyny, anti-Americanism, and racism.

Gary's instagram was all about the little George character making vicious fun of Meghan, mostly her fashion sense. He got tons of likes, had Lisa Rinna replying "Gary!" to every post, and that Scotty guy going "LOLOLOL." Then one day Gary posted a black square, took a long break, and then never mentioned Meghan again. What happened, Gary?

BLM happened (you didn't know that's why everyone was posting a black square?) and around that time the tenor about Meghan had changed from disdain to active insane murderous hatred so he probably wisely thought he should back off.

R47 of course I know about the black square, dummy. Gary put his finger to the wind, and did indeed back off, not for any noble reason as you suggest.

The Meghan haters have opened the door wide to this. Their leering bigotry has brought the BRF into the gutter and that’s where it will stay.

Soon we’ll have animated porn of sex in the RF.

It isn't bigotry, for the millionth time.

[quote]R20 I honestly think that the line is young children.

Yeah. Especially talking about how dark their skin color will be before they’re even born, and how acceptable or not that skin color will be.

Get fucked r51. That wasn't what was actually said, and it has nothing to do with this topic anyway. Go take your righteous anger someplace else.

For people who claim to hate her, you really can't stop talking about her. Why is that?

Why do so many DLers think Prince George is gay?

Everything about this seems a bit sick because these are real children. If you want to say they can afford to be made fun of because they're so well off and doing so much better than everyone else, how do you know?

Nice surroundings don't completely innoculate you from sad, miserable, lonely feelings. They're real people.

Why do we do this anymore? Royalty has outlived it's usefulness. They're patriotic celebrity birth to death celebrity representatives at this point.

This reminds me of Spitting Image.

Canadians can't stand the BRF especially Racist Philip and Pedo Andy.

I wish George had a proper British accent which, if they are going to do this stupid project, would make his caustic remarks even more biting. I hate the terrible voice actors. I'm hoping this will be an animated Windsors.

I'm sure there will be a few laughs but it's definitely got a dry well aura about it.

R54 Gary Janetti has said he thought George had a very expressive face and gestures, and that lent itself to making George gay in his Instagrams. Given that Janetti brought us “Vicious,” an endless stream of gay stereotypes (which was made bearable only by the brilliant actors), I suppose it’s not surprising.

"Why do so many DLers think Prince George is gay? "

I can't imagine...

I think he'll be encouraged to pursue manly activities as he grows up; enter the world of men. He'll grow to like it.

^ If that doesn't work perhaps they can just pray the Gay away

He'll need a mentor to keep him on the straight and narrow.

It's really creepy that a grown man is obsessed with a child

And Prince George's classmates will make fun of him for this. He'll have enough problems growing up, without this show

It's a big fucking mistake to do this. It's going to go wrong somewhere. And a real child is involved. The whole world will hate this guy. And he'll deserve all of it

The "whole world" doesn't give two shits about this kid or his family, just you British Fraus

R65 it's cute how you think the BRF is just a normal family with normal problems and poor insulated, privileged wealthy George is somehow going to be traumatized with a six episode series on a pay cable network in the US.

I'm sure that is the most powerful memory he will look at when he's 35, anorexic, and smoking cocaine-laced cigarettes in a Swiss chalet while having his third hooker of the night take a dump on his chest. "If only HBO hadn't used a caricature of me in that series!"

R48 sure, it is much more logical that Meghan, through Sunshine Sachs (which hasn't worked for them except once ages ago) is somehow a mafioso-level doyenne who controls what random people put on their Instagram feeds, but can't control the British press at all and in fact moved countries to get away from the constant daily intrusions. You're right, she's a mad genius and Janetti was clearly told to back off by The Powers That Be, led by Meghan, who is now the all-powerful Queen of the US.

That's much more logical!

I know a palace insider, and everything he's said seems to indicate there's quite a bit of truth in this cartoon. The young prince is a royal bitch already, and a big queen, too.

[quote]I know a palace insider

Doubtful.

"Are there any boundaries left?"

Can't criticize or even hint at criticizing black people.

R68 That's your fantasy. More likely he just read the room and thought to himself, "uh oh."

Poor MeGAIN! Forced to leave the UK and reduced to constantly leaking to the press for attention! Where will the bigotry end?!?!?

[quote] It isn't bigotry, for the millionth time.

She’s half black and even worse, a SEPTIC. For the millionth time, it’s bigotry.

No it ain't r74. Being a shameless famewhore grifter is what irritates people about her.

Meghan Markle has never been black a fucking day in her life.

Why does prince George have brown eyes? Odd, since both of his parents have blue.

[quote] Being a shameless famewhore grifter is what irritates people about her.

Unlike conniving to marry the future King of England of course. Nothing in the least fame whorey about THAT.

Do us a favor — your hypocrisy is a mile high.

r78 your whataboutism is ridiculous and you know it.

Kate has done an exemplary job in her role. She didn't bolt after a few months and whine about eveything.

Well they got you there. Kate plotted and schemed and allowed herself to be made a fool of to get herself a future king. If you want to talk about grifters, there is no worse grifter than a grifter, like Kate, who allowed herself to be humiliated the way Will humiliated her. And if DL had active archives, I would link to the threads where all of you who are defending her now, were trashing the fuck out of her 10-15 years ago. And the way you would still be trashing her, if Megan were full on white.

Have we forgotten the Duchess of Cambridge’s years as a layabout whilst enjoying the Royal Family wealth?

He's cute.

[quote] [R78] your whataboutism is ridiculous and you know it.

Yes the extreme whataboutism of marrying into the royal family vs marrying into the royal family — what a textbook example of apples and apples comparison!

r84 Kate knew the score, she knew what life in the Royal Family would entail and she has always acted accordingly. She knew that it wasn't a star-making role and a stepping stone to cheap fame and celebrity.

r84 Meghan treated entry into the Royal Family as a star-making performance. She was sorely mistaken. The BRF isn't Hollywood.

R85 so you're saying she studied the family and was fully aware of the sacrifices she would be making to attract, date, stick around for ten years while he sowed his royal oats, then marry the cad Wills anyway because she wanted to do it for England? No self interest there!

r87 please quite while you're ahead.

The show was probably partially "inspired" by that Showtime cartoon show about TRump.

r88 I agree, you're making yourself look ridiculous!

[quote]Meghan treated entry into the Royal Family as a star-making performance. She was sorely mistaken. The BRF isn't Hollywood.

That’s bullshit and you know it. She came in the same as others, and the drama only started when she could no longer endure the fire hose of diarrhea pointed at her from people just like you, and the ignorant nativist press, which Kate was not subjected to because she’s white, upper middle, and English.

r91 just quit while you're ahead.

People should tell Prince Andrew to leave the kids alone.

It would've been funnier if the show was meant to satire the royal family in a "wink wink, nudge nudge" kind of way, without the characters actually being real life people.

Like having the main character be a fictional child prince and throwing in a mention about his grandmother being assassinated in a car crash or something. Turning a real-life child into a crude cartoon is not just icky and low, it's lazy. This shit is going to bomb.

r92 Just quit while you're ahead.

Yeah, it's like when they took the "shit my dad says" Twitter account and tried to make a TV show out of it.

It's a dumb concept and really inappropriate.

Leave the children out of it.

Ha! Ha!

God you people are transparent.

How r100?

Prince George is also depicted as a brat in Newzoids.

When does it air?

Poor little George has a life of being lampooned in the tabloids to look forward to.

'Turning a real-life child into a crude cartoon is not just icky and low, it's lazy. This shit is going to bomb.'

You'd be fine with it if it was about Archie. Never will be, though. He's been taken out of public life while Bald and Stepford just push George into the spotlight all the time.

Moron r105 George is the future King. Of course he's going to be in front of the cameras. A show like this about Archie would also be tasteless. But nobody would care enough to do that anyway.

[quote]while Bald and Stepford just push George into the spotlight all the time.

JFC Americans really think the Monarchy is a reality show

The Monarchy IS a reality show.

An increasingly tacky one, at that.

R106 you called him a moron but you totally missed his point because you have Meghan-Insanity.

r109 you're not too bright.

Okay, r110 🙄

George is not pushed into the spotlight. He is the future King. Sorry r109/111 but you're wrong.

R105... "taken out of public life", ie, we named our company after him and namedrop him in press releases constantly.

If that poor girl comes out looking like Doria and not Diana, I will feel very sorry for her. Meghan will be a Mommie Dearest nightmare if that happens.

'taken out of public life", ie, we named our company after him and namedrop him in press releases constantly.'

There are about four pictures and two videos of Archie in his first two years of life. George has millions of pictures. Completely over-exposed.

George is the FUTURE KING. What part of that don't you understand?

[quote]There are about four pictures and two videos of Archie in his first two years of life. George has millions of pictures. Completely over-exposed.

Again, Americans confusing the Monarchy with common celebrity.

Kate and Bald have certainly turned their family into a reality show with that youtube channel. I'm surprised the queen approved it. The instagram too. Both just so Kardashian.

R112 actually I'm not, because you are still arguing over the wrong thing, because you MISSED THE POINT OF HIS POST.

🍆🍆👨🏿

🍆🍆

'Americans confusing the Monarchy with common celebrity.'

I'm British and anti Monarchy. Those senior royal bitches are worse than celebrities because they don't earn their own money - they sponge off the public purse. The title of 'king' will hopefully be abolished before the little Nazi gets a chance to sit on the throne.

🍆🍆👦🏼

R117 they're celebrities, but they're like celebrities that you don't want and can't get rid of. Celebrities enforced by law. The Monarchy is a waste of the people's money and is just there because of Royalists clinging to the past when Britain was an empire and not the fading irrelevancy it is quickly becoming.

🍆🧸

🚦🚧

Meghan is a less interesting and much less funny Chrissy Teigen. And at least Chrissy admits she's an attention whore, unlike the Duchess of Privacy

R114 with any luck she'll be like Aimee Osborne and tell her famewhore parents to fuck off

This thread stinks of fish.

[quote] because you MISSED THE POINT OF HIS POST.

And that would be?

George is one fabulous sister, he'll love the biting satire. Don't clutch your plebeian pearls for him!

That little sassafrass is gonna want a cameo.

r127 yes, that's why Meghan is so active on her Twitter account and other social media. What, she's not?? But she still wants to do some good in the world and not just stop existing?

I'm so unsurprised that you'd despise Teigen too. Any other headstrong women you'd care to bash while you're at it?

Despising Chrissy Teigen is de rigueur for anyone with a modicum of taste.

r134 As is despising woman-hating trolls.

Just because someone has a vagina doesn't mean they can't be an insufferable waste of oxygen, dear.

R133 I like Chrissy and think she's funny. She's also an attention whore and doesn't deny it. Meghan denies that she's an attention whore (daily press releases about her every fart) and has no sense of humor.

Really, daily? How dare she continue to exist!

[...]

"It made me uncomfortable. "

Heaven forbid you should be uncomfortable. Perhaps it's those scratchy wool knickers you wear

[...]

[quote] Again, Americans confusing the Monarchy with common celebrity.

No, the Cambridge's are celebs. They're the ones who have gone Hollywood

They hired a professional crew to create this slick video. It actually puts the big Hollywood studios to shame

It's along the lines of the most upscale perfume commercials seen in Europe

This video proves it was William who asked about the baby's skin color

r142 the Monarchy is still the Monarchy.

[...]

What do meghan and harry have to do with any of this? Nothing

You fools who even mention them in this thread are deranged. You are all as creepy as the guy behind this show about Prince George

[...]

Yes R146, he's just like you

[...]

Chrissy Teigen is a walking abortion.

[quote] Amy Carter and Chelsea Clinton would like a word

What about?

This is tasteless. I'd say the same if it was any other kid, regardless of it being about Archie, Honey booboo, or any other celebrity offspring. Children shouldn't be targeted by media. It reminds me of that Autistic environmental girl having a porn drawing of her basically being raped that was made when she was underaged. It's too far.

Meghan is behind this. She resents the attention Prince Whorge gets, so she used Harry's media contacts in the UK and got them to produce this show.

What’s the average age of the posters on this thread?75?

I’m glad that deference to these inbred parasites has declined.

Clearly you aren't familiar with history, r150.

I see nothing wrong with a show proving what a terrible mother Kate is.

R151 yes, this lighthearted show about a bitchy Royal child is exactly the same as brutal drawings of a precocious tween being raped.

R152 you're totally right. She's so powerful in Hollywood she can get entire series made just to slightly sully her Royal family's reputation, but also so weak and helpless she can't do anything about the UK press making up stories about her or the Palace leaking false stories about her to keep stories about bad behavior by Wills from being published. It all makes sense now.

[...]

'What’s the average age of the posters on this thread?75?'

Yes, if not older. It's a Klan Granny thread.

Episodes were posted yesterday.

It's nowhere near as funny as The Windsors, but the episldes are short and mildly amusing. Prince George is actually the least funny character...and unfortunately, Gary Janetti's friends like Kelly Ripa and Lisa Rinna make appearances (ugh, there's even an Andy Cohen reference).

The characters are portrayed as:

QE2: Foul-mouthed bitch

Prince Charles: Buffoon with mommy issues

Camilla: Mute and target of QE2's acid tongue

Prince Philip: Old and belligerent

Kate: Unhappy bitch who drinks and hates her husband (and Meghan)

Prince William: Awkward buffoon who hates his wife

Princess Charlotte: Mysterious odd-man-out

Prince Louis: Mean odd-man-out

Meghan: Sweet, struggling actress...very Californian

Prince Harry: Out of touch idiot

Ugh, Gary Janetti's IG posts with Prince George were a highlight of the early days of the pandemic. However, the show sucks. It also exclusively features gay men in a stereotypically frivilous light.

Verdict: LAME!

[Quote]It's disgusting American has people who can't take pressure represent them.

Interesting perspective, R125. 3 words: Duke of Sussex

Of course they have to make Meghan a positive or the show would be pulled as racist.

[quote]The show’s based off the Instagram persona Gary Janetti, a Family Guy writer, has applied to George.

No, it is based [bold]ON[/bold] the Instagram persona Gary Janetti, a Family Guy writer, has applied to George.

R162 not the case. She looks as white as them. Please stop.

Gary stopped teasing Meghan on Instagram last summer. It’s obvious why.

R164, even though I personally like Meghan, I do feel like the show goes out of its way to portray her in a positve light. I attribute it to the recent heavy-handed attempts by Hollywood to be "woke" or whatever.

In Janetti's IG characterization, Meghan was portrayed as trashy, scheming, and ALWAYS drawing George's ire. In the show they barely interact and his putdowns are rather benign.

Because Meghan has been mistreated and people see it.

R167 Maybe, but that's not why

Gross...episode 7 has an Andy Cohen cameo.

"She does voice work..?"

The lack of traction in this thread says a lot. I've watched 8 episodes and have only had a few genuine laughs.

At least the opening credits are pleasant.

It’s not funny but is entertaining.

Weird the episodes are 13 minutes.

I like Family Guy, but this seems kind of tasteless - it would have been better if it was about the adults.

I liked it but it wasn’t very funny.