He is a narrator on the PBS "Christmas With the Tabernacle Choir." Either that ugly mole has been covered with make up or he finally had it cut off.
Richard Thomas
| by Anonymous | reply 21 | December 25, 2020 3:40 AM |
It’s still there, look closer.
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | December 25, 2020 1:53 AM |
Pic?
| by Anonymous | reply 2 | December 25, 2020 1:54 AM |
I've never understood why people who can afford to have their disgusting moles removed, especially huge ones on their faces, don't do it.
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | December 25, 2020 2:02 AM |
Because they can sometimes make you famous, R3.
| by Anonymous | reply 4 | December 25, 2020 2:06 AM |
We would approve of its removal.
| by Anonymous | reply 5 | December 25, 2020 2:09 AM |
It’s the only really distinctive thing about him.
| by Anonymous | reply 6 | December 25, 2020 2:11 AM |
"Distinctive" isn't a compliment with Richard,
| by Anonymous | reply 7 | December 25, 2020 2:15 AM |
Dr. Pimple Popper had a teenage kid from Pennsylvania with a large birthmark on his neck. Mother showed photo when he was young, it was small. She ignored it, now he wears hoodies to hide it. Mother wants him to think of it as "unique." Dr Lee was able to scrape the hairs and crud off, but the large brown area is still there. This is child abuse.
| by Anonymous | reply 8 | December 25, 2020 2:19 AM |
I saw that show, as well. Somehow, he managed to move his face microphone so it was right on top of his mole. In close-up shots you could see the mole, with a bit of makeup on it.
| by Anonymous | reply 9 | December 25, 2020 2:20 AM |
Do you think Grandpa Walton ever slipped his foot between John Boy's legs when they hung out naked in that natural jacuzzi they had on the mountain?
| by Anonymous | reply 10 | December 25, 2020 2:21 AM |
Because not all moles are simple to remove. In some instances, you have to cut so deep to remove them, you're left with scarring or a crater in your face.
| by Anonymous | reply 11 | December 25, 2020 2:21 AM |
Well, then they can sand the damn thing down a bit at least! Yuck.
| by Anonymous | reply 12 | December 25, 2020 2:25 AM |
When Enrique Iglesias got rid of his, it rendered him unrecognizable. I think it was a big mistake.
| by Anonymous | reply 13 | December 25, 2020 2:41 AM |
I never found John Boy's mole to be unsightly at all.
| by Anonymous | reply 14 | December 25, 2020 2:43 AM |
Sand them down?
By a manicurist or a carpenter?
| by Anonymous | reply 15 | December 25, 2020 2:49 AM |
How about a corn pad or wart remover?
| by Anonymous | reply 17 | December 25, 2020 2:53 AM |
What he has is not a typical mole. It's Nevus, a birthmark consisting of slightly raised reddish/brown pigmentation. If he tried to have it removed the resulting scar would be far worse looking than the birthmark.
| by Anonymous | reply 18 | December 25, 2020 2:57 AM |
Either one, R15. If necessary, they can spackle in the hole afterward.
| by Anonymous | reply 19 | December 25, 2020 3:01 AM |
R18, ex DL fave Drew Brees also has a nevus. He has said he won’t remove it because he wants kids who have them not to be ashamed because of them.
| by Anonymous | reply 20 | December 25, 2020 3:39 AM |
[quote] When Enrique Iglesias got rid of his, it rendered him unrecognizable.
It also made him a thousand times better looking.
| by Anonymous | reply 21 | December 25, 2020 3:40 AM |