Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Pretty pretty?

When the glasses are off the gorge comes out!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90October 25, 2020 2:12 PM

She is the epitome of the not so attractive gal with lots of power that wields it over those who do and makes their lives miserable. She is evil and ugly down to her very core.

by Anonymousreply 1October 24, 2020 5:26 PM

Does she have any real friends or people that like her. I bet she’s holding onto Vogue because she has nothing but that job. It’s not just the perks of being a fashion editor.

by Anonymousreply 2October 24, 2020 5:32 PM

Pretty ugly!

by Anonymousreply 3October 24, 2020 5:35 PM

She looks like Kim Hunter in “Planet of the Apes.”

by Anonymousreply 4October 24, 2020 5:38 PM

That hair can't be real.

by Anonymousreply 5October 24, 2020 5:42 PM

Why has she had the same page boy for fucking ever? If the Miranda Priestly character was based on her maybe she should try the same haircut and clothes as in the movie. Anna has never seem particularly stylish.

by Anonymousreply 6October 24, 2020 5:43 PM

[quote] Does she have any real friends or people that like her

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 7October 24, 2020 5:47 PM

Elizabeth Warren is older and looks 10x better.

Martha Stewart is almost 80 and looks 10x better.

AW got the face she deserves

by Anonymousreply 8October 24, 2020 5:52 PM

I bet her children hate and despise her and not just because she was mostly absent from their lives since she dedicated that to her job instead. I hope they had a kind hearted loving father and turned out alright. But a mother like that could put you in therapy for a lifetime.

by Anonymousreply 9October 24, 2020 6:04 PM

Not her hands.

by Anonymousreply 10October 24, 2020 6:06 PM

What's taters, precious?

by Anonymousreply 11October 24, 2020 6:48 PM

A lizard in a wig

by Anonymousreply 12October 24, 2020 6:50 PM

There's something low-class Brit (lager loutish?) about her face.

by Anonymousreply 13October 24, 2020 7:05 PM

Astonishing that she's still in that job.

by Anonymousreply 14October 24, 2020 7:05 PM

Too big to fail!

by Anonymousreply 15October 24, 2020 7:14 PM

Passe

by Anonymousreply 16October 24, 2020 7:21 PM

Does she need to be pretty? She’s astonishingly successful, has remained in control of her position for decades and is in a steady position of power within her industry. So everyone gangs up on her supposed ugliness? Lol u gals need to find your own happiness. Btw projection is more interesting when it’s less obvious.

by Anonymousreply 17October 24, 2020 7:21 PM

Yeah, poor little rich girl.

by Anonymousreply 18October 24, 2020 7:23 PM

She knows where all the bodies are buried. Every. Last. One.

by Anonymousreply 19October 24, 2020 7:28 PM

Gollum, Gollum

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 20October 24, 2020 7:30 PM

R17, are you new to DL? We've been dumping on that old cunt for years. Nothing personal, it's just the DL bitchiness. Are you some Vogue intern?

by Anonymousreply 21October 24, 2020 7:32 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 22October 24, 2020 7:35 PM

R21 no I’ve been here a while. Making fun of a woman for how she looks always seemed a bit lazy and uninspired. I mean there’s a lot to go in on when it comes to AW, her total vapidity in the face of celebrity, questionable ideas around the concept of women’s self esteem - her complicity in creating mythology around NY social types and helping to further their political endgames etc etc. isn’t gay gossip supposed to be a little bit more self aware?

TL;DR making fun of women for being ‘ugly’ and therefore bad people is straight man territory leave it in their box.

by Anonymousreply 23October 24, 2020 7:37 PM

You are thinking too hard, R23. Just let out your inner bitch; save the rest for Daily Kos.

by Anonymousreply 24October 24, 2020 7:39 PM

R1 nails it.

She doesn’t have to be pretty, but this is a woman who has singlehandedly given a lot of women inferiority complexes because they don’t measure up to her Gollum Highness’s impossible beauty standards that SHE has created. It’s a matter of physician heal thyself.

Nobody has taken this hag seriously in decades but because she’s blackmailing Cy Newhouse the 12th or whoever the fuck at Conde Nast for the past 20 years we’re all stuck with this bitch. It’s like being gaslighted that this insect has dictated people’s style for as long as she has.

by Anonymousreply 25October 24, 2020 7:40 PM

I don't see much wrong with calling out the aging hag on her looks since she is now being accused of not hiring or promoting people on the basis of their weight and skin color. See r22.

by Anonymousreply 26October 24, 2020 7:44 PM

R26 I don’t doubt that she has practiced that type of discrimination in her past, why not let that be the subject of the thread then rather than her face?

R24 maybe you’re right.

by Anonymousreply 27October 24, 2020 7:48 PM

Obviously a high school dropout who's had the same haircut since 1961 is the best person to run a fashion publishing empire, right?

by Anonymousreply 28October 24, 2020 7:50 PM

Because youth is face of innocence but as you age, you end up with wiht the face you earned and now deserve.

by Anonymousreply 29October 24, 2020 7:51 PM

That mug!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 30October 24, 2020 7:51 PM

Exactly r28. She’s made it seem high class to have extremely garbagey, superficial values.

R25

by Anonymousreply 31October 24, 2020 8:00 PM

Doesn't her daughter have a serious eating disorder too?

by Anonymousreply 32October 24, 2020 8:03 PM

[quote]this is a woman who has singlehandedly given a lot of women inferiority complexes because they don’t measure up to her Gollum Highness’s impossible beauty standards that SHE has created.

That she created?? The fashion magazines Vogue and Harpers have been around for over a 100 years. Long before Wintour. Both BTW have been historically headed by women.

In OP's photo she looks perfectly fine for a 70 year old woman photographed unflatteringly.

[quote]who's had the same haircut since 1961

Yep. That is how you create a personal brand. Lagerfeld, Suzy Menkes, Warhol, Vreeland, Queen Elizabeth etc....you create a personal style and stick with it, oblivious to trends. Your look becomes a caricature of itself...that's what you want. Anne Slater had the same hairstyle and wore the same blue sunglasses for decades. Always instantly recognizable.

by Anonymousreply 33October 24, 2020 8:04 PM

Why does she dress like shit?

by Anonymousreply 34October 24, 2020 8:07 PM

That’s a MAN.

by Anonymousreply 35October 24, 2020 8:09 PM

Does the same go for Trump, R33?

by Anonymousreply 36October 24, 2020 8:21 PM

Kill this roach.

by Anonymousreply 37October 24, 2020 8:26 PM

My gorge certainly rose 🤢

by Anonymousreply 38October 24, 2020 8:28 PM

Totally agree, r23, but give-up.

I've been here for almost 20 years.

I still hang-out here for the best politics threads on the internet but the commentary on celebrities and other assorted famous people has been declining for a long time.

No wit, depth or fresh takes. It's all surface, obvious comments.

by Anonymousreply 39October 24, 2020 8:29 PM

Less hair would be more, sweetie.

by Anonymousreply 40October 24, 2020 8:29 PM

R33 Yes, Absolutely. In fact I was going to list him. The clownish makeup. The cotton candy hair. The blue suit with red tie. As distinctive and impossible looking as Andy Warhol, Alice Cooper, Tiny Tim and Quentin Crisp. It is smart branding.

Like Queen Elizabeth you'll pick him out of a crowd from a long distance.

by Anonymousreply 41October 24, 2020 8:32 PM

Post R41 meant for R36

by Anonymousreply 42October 24, 2020 8:35 PM

I have Louise Brooks on the phone. She she says she's wanted her famous 1920s bob back for quite a few decades now.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43October 24, 2020 9:06 PM

I don't know, R41, I think Trump and Wintour are closer to clown masks than style icons.

by Anonymousreply 44October 24, 2020 9:15 PM

R44 Note that I did not use the word "style icon".. because that's not what they are. You simply don't get the point.

by Anonymousreply 45October 24, 2020 9:18 PM

This is like the third hit piece about Anna / VOGUE since March. I have to say it’s been effective. As of a few months ago, I’m now a former subscriber of VOGUE, and for the first time since I was 13 I haven’t been following the fashion industry at all (no interest in the collections or designers these days).

by Anonymousreply 46October 24, 2020 9:19 PM

Linda Hunt can play her in the Netflix series.

by Anonymousreply 47October 24, 2020 9:21 PM

[quote]That hair can't be real.

And in other breaking news, water can't be dry.

by Anonymousreply 48October 24, 2020 9:21 PM

I DO get the point, R45, and I don't credit them for looking like shit for 50 years on end.

by Anonymousreply 49October 24, 2020 9:22 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50October 24, 2020 9:27 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 51October 24, 2020 9:28 PM

R51, see r22.

by Anonymousreply 52October 24, 2020 9:30 PM

[quote]And as I type the headline at the Daily Mail, that bastion of superb journalism

The DailyMail is reporting exactly what the NYT reported. Read the complaints. Some of them are really ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 53October 24, 2020 9:42 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 54October 24, 2020 9:45 PM

[quote]The DailyMail is reporting exactly what the NYT reported.

No, the Daily Mail is simply reposting what the NYT reported. The DM doesn't do investigative reporting. They just repost what other real journalists have posted with much better pictures. At least they generally give credit to the original sources they are plagiarizing and post links at the bottom of stories to the original sources.

by Anonymousreply 55October 24, 2020 9:53 PM

r17: Hi, Anna!

by Anonymousreply 56October 24, 2020 9:59 PM

She look like a man!

by Anonymousreply 57October 24, 2020 10:01 PM

R55 You don't understand the word "plagiarizing ".

by Anonymousreply 58October 24, 2020 10:07 PM

Of course I do, r58. Would you have your panties less in a wad if I had said copying with attribution?

by Anonymousreply 59October 24, 2020 10:11 PM

[quote]if I had said copying with attribution?

LOL. Looks like you don't understand the word "copying" either.

by Anonymousreply 60October 24, 2020 10:19 PM

Looks like you have started you Saturday evening libations early.

by Anonymousreply 61October 24, 2020 10:33 PM

Her flared nostrils are tres chic!

by Anonymousreply 62October 24, 2020 11:10 PM

Do you think she ever gets bored thinking all day about.....clothes.....

by Anonymousreply 63October 24, 2020 11:45 PM

Matchy matchy?

by Anonymousreply 64October 24, 2020 11:48 PM

A cross between Julie Christie during the 60s and a donkey. Emphasis on the donkey.

by Anonymousreply 65October 24, 2020 11:54 PM

R17 = Why Frauen don't belong here.

"Projection"

"lol"

"astonishingly successful"

"need to find your own happiness"

"Btw"

And, in full, "projection is more interesting when it’s less obvious."

The entire range of smug cunt "humanity" babbling out, misunderstanding the point of the thread while hectoring judgment with presumption and fat-ass self-regard.

As if.

She types fat AND ugly.

by Anonymousreply 66October 25, 2020 12:16 AM

Golly. I just meant she's a good-looking gal who doesn't need to hide behind the dark glasses for effect. She looks like Lee Grant. Of course she's a mature woman who doesn't need to play the beauty game herself - fashion is not about beauty, anyway.

But there is something Warholic about her, too.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Of course the race shit is absurd. Clueless interlopers trying to push the one thing they have into every area to cover their ineptitude, lack of capacity and poor work skills.

ALL of costuming and dress and fashion has relied on "appropriation" ever since Alexander stepped out of his Macedonian armor and played the Egyptian god.

Now please let Anna alone. She's just a strong woman who's done a heck of a fine job carrying the industry on her little back.

by Anonymousreply 67October 25, 2020 12:25 AM

Go buy some "Live, Laugh, Love" signs, R67.

by Anonymousreply 68October 25, 2020 12:28 AM

Thanks, [R17]. You saved me the trouble of saying exactly that, although I couldn't have been as succint.

by Anonymousreply 69October 25, 2020 12:29 AM

R17 Agreed.

R67 True.

by Anonymousreply 70October 25, 2020 12:37 AM

I’m shocked at the number of AW apologists here.

by Anonymousreply 71October 25, 2020 12:40 AM

I think it's two people, maybe one.

by Anonymousreply 72October 25, 2020 12:42 AM

She looks like Edward G. Robinson.

by Anonymousreply 73October 25, 2020 12:43 AM

I have never once,in my entire life,given a seconds thought to Anna Wintour. I vaguely knew who she was and what she did ,but since I wasnt a Fashionista she had no real impact on my life. I have to assume all you bitches blasting her must have spent your whole lives perusing Vogue and GQ like it was some sort of bible . Otherwise ,why such hatefulness to a woman who only really matters to a very small segment of the population ? Quite frankly I like her hair and her style ,she looks damn good for a 70 year old . Other than that , who cares ?

by Anonymousreply 74October 25, 2020 12:56 AM

She is an extremely well known bitch. They made a Hollywood movie about what a cunt she is. She is totally fair game.

by Anonymousreply 75October 25, 2020 1:29 AM

R75 Diana Vreeland, Grace Mirabella, Franca Sozzani, Liz Tilberis, Helen Gurly Brown, Carine Roitfeld, Graydon Carter...I'm sure they were all sweethearts.

The sharks who do these jobs aren't Walmart greeters.

by Anonymousreply 76October 25, 2020 1:38 AM

And here I thought the Cardi B stans were the worst thing possible.

by Anonymousreply 77October 25, 2020 1:40 AM

R74, it would just take too much time to do it right, so:

Oh, dear x 157.

by Anonymousreply 78October 25, 2020 3:03 AM

[quote] Now please let Anna alone.

Sorry, no: instead I'm going to do what I and everyone else always do here , which is to say exactly what I think about a celebrity here, whether or not she's your personal favorite.

She's a cold, entitled, nasty [bold]CUNT.[/bold]

by Anonymousreply 79October 25, 2020 3:12 AM

Lets be real, she'd spit on you, make fun of your blouse, and call you a fat slob, R74.

by Anonymousreply 80October 25, 2020 4:17 AM

R79, the post about letting Anna alone obviously was intended to be sarcastic.

Of course, be who you are. You're here, after all.

And for me Wintour is a supreme example of cunning over quality. She should be forced to wear burlap and marched up Fifth Avenue for the fucking Met "Gala" alone.

by Anonymousreply 81October 25, 2020 4:25 AM

She’s a monster. The soul of a monster, the looks of a monster, the spirit of a monster. I wish she would die, but evil ones always live on. Look at Trump.

by Anonymousreply 82October 25, 2020 4:49 AM

Every one of you cunts would trade places in a nanosecond for the power this woman has.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 83October 25, 2020 4:53 AM

If you say no, you're lying.

by Anonymousreply 84October 25, 2020 4:54 AM

Linda Hunt?

by Anonymousreply 85October 25, 2020 4:55 AM

Power? To run some print media? We can harass people just fine here on DL. No need to go to marketing meetings.

by Anonymousreply 86October 25, 2020 4:57 AM

Lol R66 who says ‘as if’ anymore - you must be at least 55.

by Anonymousreply 87October 25, 2020 4:59 AM

People who think harassing and firing others equals competence are the ones who got us President Trump. Power, give me a break.

by Anonymousreply 88October 25, 2020 5:00 AM

"The List" is real.

Anna will be at Vogue until Anna decides to leave Vogue.

by Anonymousreply 89October 25, 2020 5:52 AM

She should be killed for allowing that Kartrashian trash to infiltrate the magazine.

by Anonymousreply 90October 25, 2020 2:12 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!