EXCLUSIVE - Megyn Kelly LANDS Tara Reade Interview

TWO CUNTS LIVE!

Where does Megyn Kelly broadcast now, RT?

Probably myspace, r2. It feels like a myspace show.

She broadcasts from her bedroom.

You can donate to her Patreon.

R4 she is a multi-millionaire thanks to NBC

Megyn doesn’t care for Trump, so this might be interesting.

The fact that she is interviewing the Megyn Kelly just tells you she has, in the words of mother Maxine Waters, NO CREDIBILITY!

Megyn doesn't care for Biden either

Reade landing on anyone sounds painful. Glad it's the white Santa claus lady.

This is such a dead story.

Megyn Kelly is a MeToo believer, so that's why this is going on.

When Fox fucking news cancels your interview it speaks volumes. Tara Reade is a loon.

Hmm, I wonder what’s inside their buttholes.

Megyn will be respectful and allow her to tell what was done to her.

I hope Megyn discusses black face and Tara's wedding to Putin. It would be interesting to watch the alternate realities these stupid bitches could create.

Where is this going to take place. And I'm officially done with Tara and all of the Bernie Bros after this nonsense. They have lost all credibility.

in a clip that has been released Tara Reade is calling on Biden to step down

On taking a polygraph Tara Reade says "I'm not a criminal"

But when Biden takes one, I'll take one.

Here's the only report you need to see regarding the paid-off heifer and her crap complaint. Kelley couldn't add anything to this very well written expose'.

I never bought into this bs, but it was really over when this cow revealed she didn't claim sexual harassment in that claim.

Megyn Kelly can get bitchy, so I wouldn’t count on her being totally sympathetic to Mizz Reade.

Apologies to cows. They don't deserve the comparison. Some heifers are even pretty.

This one is just a lying liar being paid off by lying liars. Read the agonizing truth in R19, because this shit is not to be believed. McGann takes her complaint apart and destroys her.

She looks like fucking Tiny Tim and you know that no one ever wanted to tiptoe through that bitch’s tulip. That’s why she’s so angry.

call me wrong, I think quite some democrats would secretly hope Biden would drop out so another candidate can step in, so her calling him out isn't completely without any support among democrats.

AOC believes her, for what it’s worth.

Megyn played kiss and make up with Trump and absolutely wants to tank Biden. So this interview will be a couple of carefully planned faux-pressing questions to keep up the facade of her being a tough interviewer, and the rest will be softball nonsense.

Why were Tara Reade's accusations not common knowledge back in 2008 when Biden was tapped for VP? The timing of all of this says everything.

BernieBros aren’t “quite” Democrats.

You know what, I think I’m coming to the point that allegations of sexual assault from decades ago, without clear and convincing evidence or without supplementing an allegation of more recent sexual misconduct, have no place in political discourse. That belongs in a court of law, not in the court of public opinion. I’m sorry if it actually happened to you, but if you had spoken out then, even if the predator was never held accountable, perhaps the predator would never have advanced to where he is now. But there is no way for the public to be fair to both parties.

I'd love it if Biden does step down and then the DNC nominates Elizabeth Warren. Why do the Bernie Bros expect that Bernie would be the nominee if he stepped down?

Meghan Kelly is a nobody now and Tara Reade, as mentioned above, is DOA.

Next!

R29, because they are delusional and don't actually know anything about politics. They thought Bernie could sail to the nomination with a support percentage ceiling in the 30s and that young voters were going to show up in numbers never seen before.

[quote]Tara's wedding to Putin

That wasn't her on the Dr Phil show, though. It doesn't even look like her.

I too wish Biden would go away. Why do the Democrats have such a dreadful candidate? Why do they love destroying themselves? And I fear Biden has the beginnings of dementia which will only get worse. The Republicans are really playing it up. And yes I believe Trump has it as well so I agree it is rich. Why pick Biden such an old man with such baggage? I will vote for him but I will hate doing so. Isn't it still possible for another candidate?

And Kelly loathes Trump. He made her frightened for the safety of her family and literally for her own life. She has been very open about this. It is very shocking and Republicans have been ignoring it.

Because genius at R33, that is not the way the process works. We started out with a clown car primary and a ton of different choices. Joe Biden was beat up and bruised in that primary. Given negative press, called old out of touch, racist. just about everything else under the sun, and his campaign was just about DOA until South Carolina, but the democratic voters in South Carolina and then the primary states in Super Tuesday changed everything.

I'm sorry that you don't like the end result and I'm sorry that you don't like Biden, but you need to get the fuck over it. Biden could have murdered little children in the past. Biden could have raped and tortured Girl Scouts for all I care. Biden could be a drooling coma patient and I don't care. He is still better than Trump. RBG is one or two hospital stays away from death, I'd rather have Biden name her replacement than that orange mother fucker and Mitch McConnell.

Get it together. Get over the nonsense. Do you want 4 more years of Trump or are you gonna kvetch about Biden's imperfections, which compared to other guy running, ain't really imperfections at all.

And, R33, if you are a Bro or one of the leftover Liz Warren supporters... wake the fuck up. Accept the fact that they were niche candidates without broad appeal to democrats. Neither one was ever going to win a general.

Well said R34

Yes I wish it had been Warren but as I said I will vote for Biden. I just sometimes think he is not going to hold it together over a long intensive unrelenting campaign. Trump will always be consistent in his derangement and a large group of American will be happy with that but I agree anybody will be better than him. Still I fear Biden may crash and burn.

So Tara Reade was brave enough to come forward but not brave enough to tell the full story? Being made to feel uncomfortable is very different than an assault.

so ole old tara wants biden to "step down" but doesn't want THEE president with more then 40 allegations against him including proof of sexual assault on a tape to step down and not run for re-election? is that how it works? i don't think so! so there goes her argument out the window!..

Thank you, R34, for injecting Reality into the thread. W&W

R23, Your "I think" is your premise. Who cares that you "think" that "quite some Democrats" wish Joe would "drop out"?

I'm sure you can find some Internet Search Engine to help you learn about the 2020 Democratic Primaries.

Then you can look up recent polls of "Biden vs Trump."

Perhaps you can incorporate these searches into your at-home Distance Learning lessons. You get Wi-Fi in your mother's basement, right?

[quote] call me wrong, I think quite some democrats would secretly hope Biden would drop out so another candidate can step in, so her calling him out isn't completely without any support among democrats.

You're not wrong, R23. But you're not supposed to say it out loud.

Tara Reade was busted for writing bad checks just before she left the job in Biden's office, and there are now suggestions she may have been quietly asked to leave because of it.

Her behavior seems consistent with being someone who has experienced a traumatic event like a sexual assault.

Her behavior seems consistent with someone who is a moron.

Old news.

"Mr. Trump also foreshadowed more developments that he suggested would involve presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.

"There's more to come from what I understand, and they're going to be far greater than what you've seen so far," Mr. Trump said."

R34 Agreed, I plan to enthusiastically vote for Biden in November. Anyone who cares about our country should have this same mindset right now. This is about getting rid of Trump and corrupt enablers out of our federal government.

That where my mind is. We can worry about the other bullshit later. But Trump has to be defeated in the upcoming election.

So Megyn is just interviewing people for free now? She's really desperate. She ruined her whole career and she's been trying to claw her way back to relevance ever since.

She pissed the left off with her behavior at Fox News. And then she pissed the right off after pressing Trump at that debate. She's pissed both sides of the aisle off and that's a no go in cable news. The same thing happened to Peirs Morgan and it killed his career here in the US, back to the UK he had to go. Megyn is in the same boat and no one wants her.

At least she's made her money. Hopefully she'll never come back from her bullshit.

[quote]Her behavior seems consistent with being someone who has experienced a traumatic event like a sexual assault.

In her interview with Megyn they talk about Reade's previous marriage where she endured domestic abuse and she was given a new name and social security number so she and her daughter could create a new life. It sounds like she's a fantasist.

If any of this is true, then why in years past did she tweet her praise of Biden for his efforts in fighting violence against women?

Stop dragging Elizabeth Warren and/or her supporters into this mess. They've had nothing to do with promoting any of it.

[quote]I'd love it if Biden does step down and then the DNC nominates Elizabeth Warren.

And there goes any chance we might have in November.

I like Liz and I could vote for her. But I'm not the majority of voters. She didn't even win her won state primary.

When people make statements like these, they should provide rational and reality-based explanation how she (or Bernie) will get 270 electoral college votes, having in mind they may not be targeted with sexual assault scandals but you better be sure they'll be tarred and feathered as socialists, communists, baby killers who want to take your rights and liberties away - the possibilities are endless.

*She didn't even win her OWN state primary.

Also, explain how Dems can flip the Senate with LIz or Bernie top of the ticket.

Also, if the Dems don't flip the Senate, explain how Liz / Bernie will be able to pass M4A or any of their progressive platform through Congress?

Anyone suggesting that Biden should step aside, that Democrats want him to step aside, that a Democratic victory would be more assured were he to step aside---needs to study his Donald Segretti and Lee Atwater more assiduously.

Oooh, expert at r43!

And only a mere 27 years after the alleged event! Or is that 28? 26? There must have been SOME event Biden attended that can be used!

Ryan Grim and Katie Halper need to be fired. Grim is so entrenched in this that he's seriously trying to say the check fraud came after the firing, and I'm not sure if it was from Grim or one of his flying monkies who said it was because she needed money after she was fired. The dates are right there...check fraud first then firing.

Not Ryan Grim.

Yes, Ryan Grim.

Here we go again: the BernieBros told us that if we didn't nominate Bernie, they'd burn the party down. BELIEVE THEM. They found a damaged person and are using her to tar Biden with acts that were perfectly calculated to hurt Biden specifically while letting his opponent, who has admitted, on television no less, to raping women and young girls not just get away with it, but ascend to the highest office in the world.

There is no low too low for BernieBros.

[quote] AOC believes her, for what it’s worth.

That's worth nothing. AOC has been in government for, what, like 3 years? Her opinion has 0 relevance. Ditto to the rest of the squad.

Not even two years, r60. She was elected in 2018.

R61, and the bitch think she knows everything. Nancy Pelosi must talk so much shit about her.

[quote] Nancy Pelosi must talk so much shit about her.

Obviously, not enough shit. Nancy! Finish AOC off please!!!

Good Lord. That Cortez woman has only been in office for one year and four months at this point. It feels like it’s been 16 years or more we’ve been putting up with her. She has not endeared herself to anyone.

[quote]AOC believes her, for what it’s worth.

AOC doesn't say she believes her story about the sexual assault. AOC says “certainly seems like something happened”. What is that 'something'? Well, she's quoted as saying "it's not clear what that was".

And she says 'I'm still going to vote for him [Biden]".

Why is megyn always trying to interject herself into everything in the news. This bitch is really desperate to be relevant again. I don't see her getting hired ever again by any credibil news organization.

Maybe fox news, maybe even oan. But not the big three. She's pretty much done in mainstream news media.

The media keeps trying to portray AOC as the voice of a generation. They need to stop. She isn't even liked in NYC! She was elected by a bunch of hipsters in an election with like 15% turnout--hardly impressive. Some troll on DL claimed that we are all threatened by AOC because she's a "working woman from the Bronx". She's not fucking working class, she grew up upper middle-class. The idiotic portion of the left needs to quit appointing these people as saviors.

She's been smart, or opportunistic enough, to latch on to the metoo bandwagon.

[quote] AOC says “certainly seems like something happened”.

She shouldn't even say that.

r52, you took my comment OUT of context. I made that statement for Bernie bros that seem to think that if Biden steps down Bernie will be the nominee. You are a fucking jackass.

If you consent to be interviewed by Megyn Kelly, you have lost any credibility you have may have once had.

R71 Agreed.

At least this interview put Tara just one degree of separation from her beloved Vlad. Who was Kelly's first interview on NBC if I remember correctly.

[quote]It sounds like she's a fantasist.

Very much so. When she talks about witness protection and the FBI telling her that her ex was a person of interest in a series of murders, she sounds exactly like your garden-variety internet fantasist. It's embarrassing that some people believe her story.

i absolutely missed this. i thought miss kelly retired with her piles of money after her talk show failed. she ever had anything to say of value.

And in such appropriate attire, r73!

We’re getting dangerously close to the gay community leaving the Democratic Party. It’s literally becoming the Republican Party of the early 90s. It’s become the “moral majority” and no I’m not saying we’ll all become Republicans but we’re about to become the former British Labour supporters who had to leave after the party elected an antisemite as its leader and became the Jew-hater Party.

She did not retire, R75. She was run out of NBC by the management after her stupid and ham-fisted comments about blackface.

In the interim, she's been lying low, staying out of view, biding her time for the blackface brouhaha to pass and for the moment in history to change. As this is an election year and her specialty has been divisive politics, she's testing the waters, hoping that her exile can be ended.

very strange attire for the occasion r76

R76's pic, wow!

She's a whore, not a journalist. Nothing should surprise about the dress she's wearing for the boys in R76's photo.

[quote]We’re getting dangerously close to the gay community leaving the Democratic Party.

No, actually we aren't, R77, although you certainly are trolling here in a desperate attempt to try to make it happen.

[quote]It’s literally becoming the Republican Party of the early 90s

It's neither "literally" nor figuratively becoming anything even remotely like the Republican Party. Some other gems from your posting history:

[quote]Trump and Biden Tied Nationally. Is this good or bad?

[quote]What happened to Biden? Did he really deteriorate that much in one year?

[quote]get out of your liberal bubble.

[quote]Whether or not it's true, the videos of Biden touching women and children in a creepy manner are everywhere. That, on top of everyone believing he has dementia is going to sink him.

[quote]Democrats did it to themselves. They pushed believe the women.

[quote]You’re in for a rude awakening come November.

[quote]538 = Nate Silver, which means this doesn’t mean shit.

[quote]We’re still months out but this is looking worse than Hillary. The public truly believes he’s mentally incompetent and now a sexual predator.

R76’s photo shows standard Fox News reporter/bimbo attire.

R77 is probably that troll who is posting on the other thread that Biden should drop out and Bernie and Warren should be the nominees instead. Moron.

When is this happening? It already feels like old, discounted news.

R83 Megyn did that interview for NBC, not Fox.

Well she’ll always be a Fox Girl at heart.

Now Tara says it was not from the top of the skirt (I think that was her previous story?) but from the bottom of the skirt. She now says she was wearing 'lingerie' underwear (thong? Kelly asked her if it was crotchless LOL) and no pantyhose.

The whole attire situation becomes more ridiculous by the minute. There's a reason women who were in similar professional environment at the time have expressed doubts about the possibility of her not conforming to dress code.

At this point, I'm shocked Tara hasn't claimed Joe's hands turned into tentacles which raped every orifice while he professed his devotion to Satan.

Waiting to do an October Surprise with that info, maybe? But Trumpers and Bros want Biden to drop out NOW, WAHHHHHHHHH!

She shows up to interview a world leader in a party dress and then complains she is propositioned at work. Megyn may not have any sense but her producers ought to have told her that dress and her body language is not the right look for the event,

The reality is she along with others would never have got their positions if they didn't put. This is not harassment, it is the oldest profession known to man.

"did not put out"

lol at R88. You know Megyn was like “what the fuck kind of underwear was this crazy bitch wearing?”

Okay, from that little clip alone . . . Reade is completely unbelievable. "No, like, yeah, so, yeah. It was like, lingerie underwear so yeah, like, it wasn't an issue."

Vicky Pollard playing Linda Tripp, R93

This occurred in the early 90s and Tara was dressing for a position in a a senator's office but not wearing panty hose? And she was wearing Victoria's Secret style underwear because she was seeing her boyfriend later?

Yeah, right. She doesn't sound believable.

[quote] [R77] is probably that troll who is posting on the other thread that Biden should drop out and Bernie and Warren should be the nominees instead. Moron.

Wrong. I’ve repeatedly said that even though Biden has serious issues, I don’t think Bernie would be any better and that I didn’t know who would be a better alternative to run against Trump out of the Democratic field.

And yes, the Democratic Party has become the moral police with the crackpot SJWs communist wing trying to destroy it. The party is pandering to them and woke Twitter. Watching the Dem candidates come out on stage announcing their pronouns was insane. It’s become the party of oppression. They’ve already tried erasing us from Stonewall. If you’re not a tranny POC, you’re scum.

Yeah, the pantyhose thing may seem trivial to people today - but is a huge red flag because of the realities of the time period and her place of work. It's not like it was a 2 people office in small town Nebraska. Tons of women worked there at that time period and remember what it was like to dress for that workplace.

The other huge glaring red flags for me are: 1) The fact that she seems to have had roughly one story for decades (harassment in Biden's office, unclear by whom exactly but explicitly said not Biden), and that story suddenly changes into graphic sexual assault at a very interesting moment in politics 26 years later. 2) She kept changing the description of her alleged complaint in 1993. Doesn't help that no such paperwork has so far been produced. and finally 3) She's filed a police report after she changed her story- but according to NYT who say they were shown the report, she doesn't name Biden specifically for the sexual assault allegation. (Afaik the NPR story that she names Biden was based on what a police source told them, not that they could verify on the paperwork).

Even if I wave away the first two red flags, and if NYT is correct about the police report: It is beyond any legal and common sense that she wouldn't name Biden in the police report when she's already told the media and she's demanding the public believe exactly that 'Biden grabbed me by the pussy in 1993'.

[quote] It is beyond any legal and common sense that she wouldn't name Biden in the police report ...

No, it's a crime to file a false report with the police. Since she will name Biden on Fox News, but not in the police report, the conclusion everyone can make is that no sexual assault was perpetrated on this woman by Joe Biden.

Yes, R98, what I meant was 'it's beyond any legal and common sense IF the story she demands us to believe now is the actual truth.'

IF NYT is correct about the report, you're exactly right why it wouldn't name Biden.

Also why didn’t she file her report with the capital police since that’s where it supposedly happened. I’ve noticed some blue checks starting to walk away from the story.

Two other huge red flags:

When she approached TimesUp in 2019 (I think), they did take her seriously and referred her to lawyers. The lawyers also took her seriously BUT she didn't want them to sue Biden or anyone of sexual harassment or assault. Who she wanted to sue was twitter 'conspiracy theorists' attacking her on SM! She wanted a PR lawyer, that's why none of these lawyers took her on - she didn't have a legal case against potentially protected speech. When she finally found representation, her lawyers are playing a PR game but aren't launching a lawsuit against Biden, as far as I know.

Then, instead of making the new accusation when Biden entered the Dem race in 2019 (a timing one would expect even when the accuser for some reason waited 26 years and slept through Biden's TWO VP terms), she came out only when Bernie, whom she supported, lost any realistic path to the nomination. Just before the new allegation, she tweeted to the Intercept guy, "Timing.. Tick tock". It indicates a very specific political intent behind the allegations, basically a political hit job. It isn't what an innocent traumatized assault victim would tweet and the choice of timing is particularly egregious. The fact that Bernie surrogates and far-left outlets amplified her fresh new allegation is only the cherry on top.

Will Megyn bring up Tara's russia connections?

Seriously, anyone sticking their fingers in a random crotch runs the risk of encountering a tampon or pad. No man wants to hit that wall.

I'm not sure why Biden would assault her in a Senate corridor. Wouldn't that be open public space where anyone can saunter by at any time, including reporters? This was at the time of Sen. Packwood's sexual assault scandal to boot, one would think Senators of average intelligence would be wise to keep their sexual assaults to more private locations.

She should've gone for a lockable office supply cabinet version from the get-go in order to have some slight chance at credibility.

I will watch this. I think Megyn will be fair and neutral with her interviewing. She wants to be seen as a credible journalist and restore her reputation. She’s not a Trump shill.

Not only that, r104, it it supposedly happened yards from the capitol police. Grim and Halper allowed themselves to be trolled. Not sure if they can be taken seriously going forward.

[quote]lol at [R88]. You know Megyn was like “what the fuck kind of underwear was this crazy bitch wearing?”

I couldn't follow that part at all. "Did he push the underwear to the side?" "No. They were lingerie panties." "Are you saying they were crotchless?" "No." "There wasn't much to them?" "Right".

Hoe, you just quoted Biden as saying he wanted to fuck you, but you're coy about panties? If they were crotchless Biden would still have to push the material aside to get his fingers up there even if it was the flimsiest of material.

I don't know why Biden would touch her, period. And he didn't. She tried it though. She really fucking did.

I’ve heard enough about this cow’s snatch.

R105, that is never going to work here.

[quote]Grim and Halper allowed themselves to be trolled.

Very actively so.

[quote]I will watch this. I think Megyn will be fair and neutral with her interviewing. She wants to be seen as a credible journalist and restore her reputation. She’s not a Trump shill.

Bless your heart.

credible journalists do not show to up to interview a world leader (despot) wearing a party dress short enough to expose their thighs.

Halper is a failed stand-up comic turned podcaster. Not a trained or experienced reporter.

I doubt she was trolled. She's a Bernie shill who propped Reade while running interference against actual reporters investigating Reade’s story.

Who are Grim and Halper?

Ryan Grim is the chief reporter for Glenn Greenwald's pro-Bernie webzine, The Intercept. He used to be a reporter for the HuffPost.

To summarize Tarable's story: 1. No evidence. 2. No witnesses despite taking place in a busy building in a public hallway loaded with cameras. 3. Never filed a complaint about rape/assault. 4. Can't recall the location, month, date, or time. 5. Claims to have been assaulted by seven people, including her father and two women. 6. Involved in financial scams. 7. Changed her story five times. 8. Continued to praise Biden through 2017. 9. Bernie Sanders supporter - waited until he lost to talk about Joe.

That would/will never fly in a court of law.

I’m sure it’s just a mere coincidence that she now claims she brought these accusations to the two leading candidates for Vice President. Of course there’s no record of it, just Tara’s word.. like everything else.

R117 None of these matters, the democrats already digged a big hole with Christine Blasey Ford, they will never ever be able to get out.

r119

Where is the interview?

on youtube

CBF didn't change stories. She didn't publicly praise her assaulter during most of the intervening period. She produced her therapist with corroborating notes going back decades. She wasn't politically motivated (Mitch would've selected another right winger in BK's place). She didn't run to SM, didn't run to the mass media, didn't tweet "Timing... Tick tock" to the Intercept. She resisted going public, and only did that after. being threatened with outing. She didn't taint her 'corroborators' recollections by coaching them with new allegations. She didn't refuse a polygraph, and testified under oath.

It's called "Two Bitches Sittin' Around Lyin' About Getting Molested".

"digged a big hole".

Fucking Russian bots.

[quote]None of these matters, the democrats already[bold] digged [/bold]a big hole with Christine Blasey Ford, they will never ever be able to get out.

English still not good enough, Yevgeny.

R103

I think Reade is a fantasist, but that's still a ridiculous claim. Plenty of straight men don't think about the possibility of a woman menstruating at any given time.

Uhhhhh... And plenty of gay men don't want to think about it either, R127.

Blecccchhh.

Lol.

Grim and Halper were trolled?

Many women, especially the Fox-type women, have lost all sense of what's appropriate dress for the occasion. You see them wearing what should be considered cocktail dresses to work, and it's just embarrassing to see them. There is some weird mindset that makes them think "dressing up for work" means showing leg and wearing Louboutins. Kelly looks like a clown. Maybe Republicans think that women are only allowed to do their jobs if they're eye candy as well.

r84, no it wasn't and you took that comment out of context, asswipe

People who continue to draw a false equivalence between the Blasey-Ford and Reade situations are trolls and need to be banned. All it takes is 5 seconds of research to know that Blasey-Ford's claims were legitimate while Reade is an opportunist.

[quote] All it takes is 5 seconds of research to know that Blasey-Ford's claims were legitimate while Reade is an opportunist.

Oh, my.