Let's continue with the caucasity here...
** 2020 Iowa Democratic Caucus Election Results ** Part 2
by Anonymous | reply 600 | February 4, 2020 9:54 AM |
thanks r1. I hate when people don't link back.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | February 4, 2020 4:05 AM |
Well give the nice OP a WW then r2
by Anonymous | reply 3 | February 4, 2020 4:09 AM |
R1 A grateful nation thanks you
by Anonymous | reply 4 | February 4, 2020 4:09 AM |
OP, could you do an app?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | February 4, 2020 4:09 AM |
If they need to fill time Steve Kornacki could take off his shirt.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | February 4, 2020 4:10 AM |
There is something seriously going wrong here.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | February 4, 2020 4:10 AM |
Emergency meeting is about to take place in downtown Des Moines over "significantly different results" being reported between app reported numbers and called-in numbers. Per Jeff Zeleny campaign representatives are arriving to this private meeting now.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | February 4, 2020 4:12 AM |
I knew Bernie’s polling was way over inflated.
Go Pete!!!
by Anonymous | reply 10 | February 4, 2020 4:12 AM |
Bernie's gonna win
by Anonymous | reply 11 | February 4, 2020 4:12 AM |
Bernie Bros probably hacked the vote
by Anonymous | reply 12 | February 4, 2020 4:12 AM |
oh good lord, oh godammit, oh please don't do this fuck up, please Iowa, please America, listen to RuPaul and DON'T FUCK IT UP!!!!
by Anonymous | reply 13 | February 4, 2020 4:12 AM |
I have better luck with Grindr than the IDP has with this app.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | February 4, 2020 4:13 AM |
Shawn Sebastian:
I am the caucus secretary for Story County Precinct 1-1. I've been on hold for over an hour to report the results. We have 6 delegates
First Alignment
@BernieSanders - 111
@ewarren
- 82
@PeteButtigieg
- 47
Delegates
Sanders - 2
Warren - 2
Buttigieg 2
by Anonymous | reply 15 | February 4, 2020 4:14 AM |
The apps don't work so the precinct chairs are texting the results to the country chair who is driving to Iowa Democratic Party HQ right now.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | February 4, 2020 4:14 AM |
They blew it. Big time.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | February 4, 2020 4:15 AM |
MORE: Polk County precinct chairs are being advised to take pictures of the results and text them over to the Polk County executive director, who is driving them to the HQ, according to a Democratic operative familiar with the situation
by Anonymous | reply 19 | February 4, 2020 4:16 AM |
Just redo this with paper voting next Monday. Caucusing is dumb
by Anonymous | reply 20 | February 4, 2020 4:16 AM |
Apparently an Iowa county chair got hung up on on live television on CNN.
You can't make it up.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | February 4, 2020 4:16 AM |
A precinct captain was waiting an hour on hold to reach headquarters. A woman finally answers but hangs up because the precinct captain was yapping with Wolf Blitzer.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | February 4, 2020 4:16 AM |
[quote]They blew it. Big time.
It's okay. I can handle blowing no problem.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | February 4, 2020 4:17 AM |
Cntr Alt Del Iowa, Florida, Ohio off the map?
by Anonymous | reply 24 | February 4, 2020 4:17 AM |
Iowa sucks
by Anonymous | reply 25 | February 4, 2020 4:17 AM |
R6 I'm interested in Kornacki's entrance poll
by Anonymous | reply 26 | February 4, 2020 4:17 AM |
I wish CNN and MSNBC would release their full entrance polls at this point.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | February 4, 2020 4:17 AM |
"Officials from two Democratic campaigns tell CNN they were told the app to tabulate results had crashed. They said they had not been given any other information."
by Anonymous | reply 28 | February 4, 2020 4:17 AM |
R21.. I saw that. Hilarious. Fucking Blitzer was trying to talk him into letting CNN listen live when they hung up. Thanks, Wolf.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | February 4, 2020 4:17 AM |
That thread posted by r15 our beloved Poll Troll is very interesting
by Anonymous | reply 30 | February 4, 2020 4:17 AM |
Yeah, I heard that r21. Surprised no one else commented on it here on DL. It was astonishing to witness that LIVE on CNN.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | February 4, 2020 4:18 AM |
Cobbling together the partial results, it looks like a good night for Pete.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | February 4, 2020 4:18 AM |
[quote]The fun part of this is Buttigieg has the first of a half-dozen events tomorrow scheduled for 7 am in Nashua, so ultimate day-game- after-a-night-game scenario here.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | February 4, 2020 4:19 AM |
I'm laughing. I'm not happy, but I'm laughing. Oh, this fucking country is so fucking ridiculous at this point. I'm laughing. But I'm not happy.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | February 4, 2020 4:19 AM |
Amy’s speeching .going to NH!
by Anonymous | reply 36 | February 4, 2020 4:19 AM |
[quote]Polk County precinct chairs are being advised to take pictures of the results and text them over to the Polk County executive director, who is driving them to the HQ,
Why would he have to drive texts to the HQ? Why wouldn’t precinct captains just text the HQ?
by Anonymous | reply 37 | February 4, 2020 4:19 AM |
She's throwing her stapler and shaking!
by Anonymous | reply 38 | February 4, 2020 4:19 AM |
Klobuchar speaking now. She’s the first to do so (as has been advised by numerous anchors on CNN and MSNBC.) Hitting Trump and the impeachment.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
...Biden people bailed and went to Pete or Amy.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
Rachel Maddow had a good theory for the delay, since the app wasn't working so well more people called results in than they were expecting instead of using the app and they didn't have the personnel available to take all the phone calls.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
R33, I love that Cecile Strong’s impression of Gabbard is more resonate to me than Gabbard herself. That has never been true for me in the past.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
Other sites are attributing the faulty app to Robby Mook. Is that really true? (I'm not watching cable.)
by Anonymous | reply 43 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
R21 what happened? Who hungung up on who?
by Anonymous | reply 44 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
Dear fucking jeebus r37. Sweet fucking jeebus.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
2016 (finally) taught us that voting machines results can be electronically hacked.
So why, in 2020, did they turn simple caucusing results over to an app?
by Anonymous | reply 46 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
Smart Amy. Act like a winner!
by Anonymous | reply 47 | February 4, 2020 4:20 AM |
Amy was smart - she's giving a victory speech because no results are in.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | February 4, 2020 4:21 AM |
Failed Clinton campaign chair Robby Mook came up with the app that has been such a disaster tonight.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | February 4, 2020 4:21 AM |
[quote]Shawn Sebastian: I am the caucus secretary for Story County Precinct 1-1. I've been on hold for over an hour to report the results. We have 6 delegates
This idiot was so busy complaining to Wolf Blitzer on LIVE TV! and playing the hold Muzak for CNN, that when the hotline answered in the middle of his whine, you could hear the woman say "Hello, hello" six times and he never even answered her. Then we heard her hang up.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | February 4, 2020 4:21 AM |
Amy’s hubs not how I pictured
by Anonymous | reply 53 | February 4, 2020 4:21 AM |
R44, the operator clearly asked for someone to speak and after Sebastian failed to answer, she hung up.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | February 4, 2020 4:21 AM |
This will be Trump's talking point tomorrow night. Ugh
by Anonymous | reply 55 | February 4, 2020 4:22 AM |
Has it occurred to the brain trusts at CNN and MSNBC that it might take longer this year than four years ago because then there were only three candidates and this year there are 427 which have to be split up and then regrouped?
by Anonymous | reply 56 | February 4, 2020 4:22 AM |
Has a Presidential candidate ever been successful with a theme color of green?
by Anonymous | reply 57 | February 4, 2020 4:22 AM |
Will this be the end of Amy? Wasn't the Corn Belt supposed to be her people?
by Anonymous | reply 58 | February 4, 2020 4:22 AM |
And we wonder why the republic party wins.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | February 4, 2020 4:22 AM |
[quote]Other sites are attributing the faulty app to Robby Mook.
Hillary there Amy's comb at him... poked his eye out.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | February 4, 2020 4:23 AM |
What is she doing? She needs us Midwesterners... don't leave me Amy~
by Anonymous | reply 61 | February 4, 2020 4:23 AM |
R59 is an idiot.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | February 4, 2020 4:23 AM |
Oh No. Amy is pulling an all nighter...
by Anonymous | reply 63 | February 4, 2020 4:23 AM |
And yes the king of Denmark
by Anonymous | reply 64 | February 4, 2020 4:23 AM |
Every time I hear Klobuchar speak, I like her less and less.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | February 4, 2020 4:23 AM |
Just when Mook thought he was going to make a comeback.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | February 4, 2020 4:23 AM |
I can’t get past her treatment of her staff. Nice speech, though.
by Anonymous | reply 67 | February 4, 2020 4:24 AM |
The staff members that are allowing someone to hold up a poster in front of Amy's face is really going to get it tomorrow.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | February 4, 2020 4:24 AM |
She would have set Iowa straight. I STILL BELIEVE IN YOU MARIANNE
by Anonymous | reply 69 | February 4, 2020 4:24 AM |
The party has acknowledged there is a delay, R56, and it has nothing to do with the number of candidates.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | February 4, 2020 4:24 AM |
Amy has no real appeal outside the Midwest. It's such bullshit that we pander to just that one part of the country with very few people as the only real Americans who's opinion counts as American.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | February 4, 2020 4:25 AM |
BERNIE
by Anonymous | reply 72 | February 4, 2020 4:25 AM |
Amy actually looks pretty good
by Anonymous | reply 73 | February 4, 2020 4:25 AM |
Amy has been on TV all day and looks it.
by Anonymous | reply 74 | February 4, 2020 4:25 AM |
R49 Thanks! And omg...
by Anonymous | reply 75 | February 4, 2020 4:26 AM |
You can't blame this on trans.
by Anonymous | reply 76 | February 4, 2020 4:26 AM |
seriously, if this is actually Robert Mook, can some gay guy slap him from here to South Carolina? Why does that bitch suck so much at everything, and why does everyone keep thinking she doesn't?
by Anonymous | reply 77 | February 4, 2020 4:26 AM |
K, I'm already up past my bedtime and I don't think they're gonna straighten this out anytime soon. Good night ppl.
by Anonymous | reply 78 | February 4, 2020 4:26 AM |
Amy shaking that they took the secret stapler away from inside the podium.
by Anonymous | reply 79 | February 4, 2020 4:26 AM |
Precinct captain Joan Crawford gave them a piece of her mind after she was on hold for over one hour.
by Anonymous | reply 80 | February 4, 2020 4:26 AM |
But Amy is NAILING her target audience. You have to give her that. It might not be your cup of tea but she is fighting.
by Anonymous | reply 81 | February 4, 2020 4:27 AM |
Amy is shaking a lot less tonight - did she take her Levodopa?
by Anonymous | reply 82 | February 4, 2020 4:27 AM |
Amy’s victory speech with NO RESULTS YET!
I love her now. Bish is brassy!
by Anonymous | reply 83 | February 4, 2020 4:27 AM |
r71 FUCK YEAH! WE ARE WORTHLESS!
by Anonymous | reply 84 | February 4, 2020 4:28 AM |
seriously, I would put Joan Crawford in charge of this bitch if I thought it could help. What the hell is happening with this goddamn party?
by Anonymous | reply 85 | February 4, 2020 4:28 AM |
Warren and Biden speaking shortly. Pete and Bernie to go last.
by Anonymous | reply 86 | February 4, 2020 4:28 AM |
Amy Klobuchar may actually be the least funny person on the planet.
by Anonymous | reply 87 | February 4, 2020 4:29 AM |
Inconsistencies in the reporting of the three sets of vote totals from each precinct.
by Anonymous | reply 88 | February 4, 2020 4:30 AM |
R71
A large segment of voters live in that part of the country, and that elitist attitude is what cost us the election last time, so drop it!
by Anonymous | reply 89 | February 4, 2020 4:30 AM |
Update: There are many precinct chairs still on hold trying to report results. Phone lines are jammed and reporting is going VERY slowly, per source
by Anonymous | reply 90 | February 4, 2020 4:30 AM |
well in fairness, I think we knew that going in r87
by Anonymous | reply 91 | February 4, 2020 4:30 AM |
I liked Amy's speech
by Anonymous | reply 92 | February 4, 2020 4:30 AM |
MSNBC is now interviewing this Sebastian guy from the Wolf Blitzer phone call. He’s STILL on hold.
This is amazing.
by Anonymous | reply 93 | February 4, 2020 4:31 AM |
Joe!! Go Joe!!
by Anonymous | reply 94 | February 4, 2020 4:31 AM |
Put that BITCH of a vote tally where a vote tally ought to be!
by Anonymous | reply 95 | February 4, 2020 4:31 AM |
How many media outlets did Shawn Sebastian run to?
by Anonymous | reply 96 | February 4, 2020 4:31 AM |
You should see her eat a salad with a comb. Comedy gold. Nathan Lane is going to play her in drag in raucous new Broadway musical, Not-so Funny Girl.
by Anonymous | reply 97 | February 4, 2020 4:31 AM |
Why are parties so incompetent with technology? The "app" just needs to function as a one-way text message, not too complicated!
by Anonymous | reply 98 | February 4, 2020 4:32 AM |
[quote]A precinct captain in Dubuque tells me the app to report results didn’t load and nobody helped her troubleshoot. She’s now on hold with the state party.
[quote][bold]State party assures no hack.[/bold]
by Anonymous | reply 100 | February 4, 2020 4:32 AM |
Biden and Warren getting onstage now. There won’t be any results tonight. They’re all just giving up and getting on planes for NH.
by Anonymous | reply 101 | February 4, 2020 4:32 AM |
I love this bitchy gay who's talking to Rachel right now. He's so done with all this.
by Anonymous | reply 102 | February 4, 2020 4:33 AM |
Pete WILL get the LAST WORD!
by Anonymous | reply 103 | February 4, 2020 4:33 AM |
Biden cutting off Warren's speech. Lol.
by Anonymous | reply 104 | February 4, 2020 4:33 AM |
Cannot wait for SNL.
by Anonymous | reply 105 | February 4, 2020 4:33 AM |
Joe.....Stop reading from your notes!!
by Anonymous | reply 106 | February 4, 2020 4:33 AM |
But, technology is the king of everything!!! Get it, Boomer!?! I'm not gonna vote on any paper or nuthin' like that. Give me my phone or give me death. I think one of the old presidents from the 60s said that! Or, ya know, whatever. *back to Instagram* Ha...funny Shakira tongue meme...hahaha.
by Anonymous | reply 107 | February 4, 2020 4:33 AM |
Is there no one the silly little bitch won't complain to?
Too bad while he was talking to Rachel Maddow about how long he's been on hold, Joe Biden's speech started and Rachel had to bow out.
by Anonymous | reply 108 | February 4, 2020 4:33 AM |
Maybe a DNS server attack?
by Anonymous | reply 109 | February 4, 2020 4:33 AM |
Biden: “Folks...” 3 times.
by Anonymous | reply 110 | February 4, 2020 4:34 AM |
I would have thought this app would be stress tested, and everyone trained, well before things got even close to caucus day.
by Anonymous | reply 112 | February 4, 2020 4:34 AM |
R98 Russian Bernie Ho's hacked it. They don't like to lose.
by Anonymous | reply 113 | February 4, 2020 4:34 AM |
honestly, and I don't want to make too much of this r98 as an eldergay myself, but I suspect cootishness is probably part of the problem here. I am going to seriously suggest this is some old fucks with some old ideas favoring some old candidates who cannot get their shit together long enough to make a perfectly easy thing happen.
could be wrong.
by Anonymous | reply 114 | February 4, 2020 4:35 AM |
Will Joe remind us to turn on our record players when we get home?
by Anonymous | reply 115 | February 4, 2020 4:35 AM |
“And FOLKS...”
by Anonymous | reply 116 | February 4, 2020 4:35 AM |
Thank god for paper trails. They are just making sure the Is are dotted and the Ts crossed. We have to be patient.
by Anonymous | reply 117 | February 4, 2020 4:35 AM |
"Folks"
"Folks"
"Folks"
Jesus, drop out you old geezer.
by Anonymous | reply 118 | February 4, 2020 4:35 AM |
Yummy Brett Baier! 😋
by Anonymous | reply 119 | February 4, 2020 4:35 AM |
[quote]How many media outlets did Shawn Sebastian run to?
Shawn Sebastian is an even bigger diva than DL fave Shawn Mendes.
by Anonymous | reply 120 | February 4, 2020 4:35 AM |
Biden's campaign feels incredibly anemic and enthusiasm for him seems noticeably listless. Even Jill seems kind of bored. I'd gladly support him if he were the nominee, but it doesn't seem like he's got much momentum at the moment.
by Anonymous | reply 121 | February 4, 2020 4:36 AM |
Folks....
by Anonymous | reply 122 | February 4, 2020 4:36 AM |
Biden's rambling now
by Anonymous | reply 123 | February 4, 2020 4:36 AM |
Speech rank— Amy>Biden
by Anonymous | reply 124 | February 4, 2020 4:36 AM |
Aren't caucuses where you stand next to people to vote and then people count people and write the number down on paper? They fucked up counting. Get some kindergarteners in there, stat!
by Anonymous | reply 125 | February 4, 2020 4:36 AM |
Joe gives a shout out to the gays!
by Anonymous | reply 126 | February 4, 2020 4:36 AM |
omg how many times has he said “FOLKS”? I’ve lost count.
by Anonymous | reply 127 | February 4, 2020 4:36 AM |
I hope this Robby Mook thing isn't true. He seems like a nice person, but nobody can be this defective! TWICE.
by Anonymous | reply 128 | February 4, 2020 4:37 AM |
Jill looks wonderful, Biden seems tired.
by Anonymous | reply 129 | February 4, 2020 4:37 AM |
inconsistencies in the reporting of 3 sets of results WTF
so human error?
can no one count in Iowa?
by Anonymous | reply 130 | February 4, 2020 4:38 AM |
I get the impression that the second round votes simultaneously showing add’l viable candidates AND fewer votes freaked some folks out at the party.
by Anonymous | reply 131 | February 4, 2020 4:38 AM |
[quote]A large segment of voters live in that part of the country, and that elitist attitude is what cost us the election last time, so drop it!
Elitists? Please, stop using Republcvian talking points. People on the West and East coast vastly outnumber those in the Midwest. That dose not make they all elitists, that makes them half of America. Just as entitled to be pandered to as the Midwest.
by Anonymous | reply 132 | February 4, 2020 4:38 AM |
Biden looked deflated. Hard to miss that look of defeat. Kept staring down at his notes. No energy.
by Anonymous | reply 133 | February 4, 2020 4:39 AM |
Pete's stalling to go last. Pete lasts.
by Anonymous | reply 134 | February 4, 2020 4:39 AM |
good friggin god. NOT a good look.
by Anonymous | reply 135 | February 4, 2020 4:39 AM |
and this is why we call the midwest except Chicago and Minneapolis "Flyover country"
by Anonymous | reply 136 | February 4, 2020 4:39 AM |
Iowa Dem party: "we found inconsistencies in the reporting of the results" who wants to bet Bernie supporters are responsible??
by Anonymous | reply 137 | February 4, 2020 4:39 AM |
Ew, I hate watching people give bad speeches! It gives me soo much anxiety.
by Anonymous | reply 138 | February 4, 2020 4:39 AM |
Uncle Joe had better choose an exceptional running mate
by Anonymous | reply 139 | February 4, 2020 4:39 AM |
well, you are not entirely wrong r136, but you know, it's also why Hillary is not president. Careful what you despise.
by Anonymous | reply 140 | February 4, 2020 4:40 AM |
This is where it helps to be 38 instead of 78, or whatever Biden is. That was an awful Biden speech.
by Anonymous | reply 141 | February 4, 2020 4:40 AM |
Did Warren seriously talk about slavery?
by Anonymous | reply 142 | February 4, 2020 4:41 AM |
What in the dickens is going on up there?
by Anonymous | reply 143 | February 4, 2020 4:41 AM |
[quote]Amy>Biden
I'm just gonna predict:
Pete>Warren>Bernie>Amy>Biden
by Anonymous | reply 144 | February 4, 2020 4:41 AM |
Why can't they show us Elizabeth?
by Anonymous | reply 145 | February 4, 2020 4:41 AM |
Is Robby Mook really involved or are you guys fucking around?
by Anonymous | reply 146 | February 4, 2020 4:42 AM |
actually, r142, as a Warren fan, I'm gonne be okay if it wasn't Trans slavery.
by Anonymous | reply 147 | February 4, 2020 4:42 AM |
[quote]Biden looked deflated. Hard to miss that look of defeat. Kept staring down at his notes. No energy.
Well, it is three hours past his bedtime.
by Anonymous | reply 148 | February 4, 2020 4:43 AM |
R142 I dunno. Anderson Cooper/CNN cut her speech off.
by Anonymous | reply 149 | February 4, 2020 4:43 AM |
I want a speech from TOM!!!!!!
by Anonymous | reply 150 | February 4, 2020 4:43 AM |
I am surprised MSNBC hasn’t played Warren.
by Anonymous | reply 151 | February 4, 2020 4:43 AM |
[quote]That was an awful Biden speech.
Biden looked like he was presiding at his own funeral.
by Anonymous | reply 152 | February 4, 2020 4:43 AM |
Bernie!
by Anonymous | reply 153 | February 4, 2020 4:44 AM |
Ambition vs. their capability. I love Rachel.
by Anonymous | reply 155 | February 4, 2020 4:44 AM |
anyone got actual results?
by Anonymous | reply 157 | February 4, 2020 4:45 AM |
R151 CNN played part of her speech then cut her off.
by Anonymous | reply 158 | February 4, 2020 4:45 AM |
WOOO PETE!!
by Anonymous | reply 159 | February 4, 2020 4:46 AM |
This does not portend well for the general election.
by Anonymous | reply 160 | February 4, 2020 4:46 AM |
Where is Bernie's fat, bald. unemployed bastard Levi?
by Anonymous | reply 161 | February 4, 2020 4:46 AM |
Bernie is giving me the Evita feels.
by Anonymous | reply 162 | February 4, 2020 4:46 AM |
Well, the glitch will work in Biden's favor. The news cycle of distressful headlines won't have such a heavy impact.
by Anonymous | reply 163 | February 4, 2020 4:47 AM |
[quote] Aren't caucuses where you stand next to people to vote and then people count people and write the number down on paper? They fucked up counting.
That is just the first round, then they have to figure out which candidates are not viable, the voters for those candidates then either go home or caucus with another candidate, then they count those numbers then use a formula to divide up how many delegates go to each candidate for that caucus. Then those numbers get reported to headquarters.
by Anonymous | reply 164 | February 4, 2020 4:47 AM |
Reasons for delay of Iowa Caucus results
-Not enough personnel to take calls and tally
-Inconsistency in reporting of three separate results
-App crashes
-Hacking
Then, after pressuring Sanders’ campaign to not declare victory too soon, I.e. no speech, they trot out Amy and Joe to give speeches. These fucking people.
by Anonymous | reply 165 | February 4, 2020 4:47 AM |
I’m so glad I live on west coast time.
It’s near 1:00 am there, and the candidates have to be on the trail early tomorrow.
I think a lot of what has happened up until now is theory instead of practice. So how do these candidates do traveling from state to state, eating fried twinkies at the state fair, staying up night after night, shaking hands with people with the flu, and making speeches until they lose their voices? My money is on some of these seventy-somethings not being able to keep up the pace.
This might turn out to be a big game of Survivor, with the older and weaker ones not being able to keep up.
by Anonymous | reply 166 | February 4, 2020 4:47 AM |
Did not want to admit it, cause reasons, but New Hampshire, SAVE US!!
by Anonymous | reply 167 | February 4, 2020 4:47 AM |
Sick and ti-yud!
by Anonymous | reply 168 | February 4, 2020 4:48 AM |
Wow, first time I've liked Bernie. Testify, brother!
by Anonymous | reply 169 | February 4, 2020 4:48 AM |
Can you believe Bernie had his wife and kid on welfare and testifying on the stand for better quality welfare to a judge!!? He's a crackpot dinosaur with broken ideas.
by Anonymous | reply 170 | February 4, 2020 4:48 AM |
CNN and MSNBC playing Bernie’s speech and not cutting him off like CNN did to Warren.
Did MSNBC even play any of Warren’s speech?
by Anonymous | reply 171 | February 4, 2020 4:48 AM |
#Be Better
by Anonymous | reply 172 | February 4, 2020 4:48 AM |
Isn't in funny the same people who keep throwing shade at Biden for his age are backing the other old man who actually had a heart attack?
by Anonymous | reply 173 | February 4, 2020 4:48 AM |
How much does the market drop tomorrow? 200 points? 500?
by Anonymous | reply 174 | February 4, 2020 4:49 AM |
R154, that looks way more complicated than it needs to be. Iowa's whole caucus system is weird.
by Anonymous | reply 175 | February 4, 2020 4:49 AM |
21 min ago
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Big WIN for us in Iowa tonight. Thank you!
by Anonymous | reply 176 | February 4, 2020 4:50 AM |
Now Bernie’s on to CLIMATE CHANGE.
by Anonymous | reply 177 | February 4, 2020 4:50 AM |
I would like Bernie more if it wasn't for his cultish and overbearingly unpleasant supporters.
by Anonymous | reply 178 | February 4, 2020 4:50 AM |
Bernie: Free stuff. Free stuff. Wealthy bad.
Perverted game of Duck, Duck, Goose.
by Anonymous | reply 179 | February 4, 2020 4:50 AM |
ya know what, ain't that upset. Iowa is a pain in the ass. New Hampshire is a pain in the ass. We'll get through these damn stupid things and then South Carolina where there are actually significant Democratic voters, and then we will see. We're good. Embarrassed though. Shit, and seriously, is this really Robert Mook, cause if so, stop!
by Anonymous | reply 180 | February 4, 2020 4:50 AM |
Will no one comment on Jane’s cute son-in-law?
by Anonymous | reply 181 | February 4, 2020 4:51 AM |
Bernie has been the most inspiring speaker so far, by light years.
He is electric and I believe he could absolutely shred plump in a debate and election. This is the first time I’ve heard him speak in a while.
He is the most clear and effective messenger of the lot. Democrats are luck because all these candidates are good choices.
by Anonymous | reply 182 | February 4, 2020 4:51 AM |
[quote]I am surprised MSNBC hasn’t played Warren.
dont nobody want to hear that old bitch this late at night
by Anonymous | reply 183 | February 4, 2020 4:52 AM |
R171, not yet. Relegating the woman again.
by Anonymous | reply 184 | February 4, 2020 4:52 AM |
I hate that Bernie pronounces human rights as "you-man rights" instead of "hugh-man rights".
He also says shtraight instead of straight and shtreet instead of street.
So for that reason, it's a no from me.
by Anonymous | reply 185 | February 4, 2020 4:52 AM |
Bernie is the only one who speaks from the heart.
by Anonymous | reply 186 | February 4, 2020 4:52 AM |
just out of curiosity r182, did you think that before Bernie ever actually uttered a word?
by Anonymous | reply 187 | February 4, 2020 4:53 AM |
Bernie has more hair than usual.
by Anonymous | reply 188 | February 4, 2020 4:53 AM |
This could be a good thing, if it wakes up the Dems to the very real prospect of general election malfeasance.
by Anonymous | reply 189 | February 4, 2020 4:53 AM |
It’s time to wrap it up, Bernie.
by Anonymous | reply 190 | February 4, 2020 4:53 AM |
So much for the Bernie camp narrative that MSNBC favors Elizabeth Warren over him. Her speech has been completely bypassed for his.
by Anonymous | reply 191 | February 4, 2020 4:53 AM |
Now it’s The CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM and IMMIGRATION REFORM and REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS and... the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX and... he’s going down the whole laundry list.
by Anonymous | reply 192 | February 4, 2020 4:53 AM |
And more good news for Pete! Ben Halle @bhalle87 9m UPDATE: @PeteButtigieg won West Des Moines precinct 115. This is a rare flip from Romney to Clinton. Pete is winning in pivot counties and counties that are becoming more blue. #IACaucus
by Anonymous | reply 193 | February 4, 2020 4:53 AM |
Even if Bernie is elected President he would get exactly zero of those proposals passed congress and into law.
by Anonymous | reply 194 | February 4, 2020 4:54 AM |
[quote]Bernie has been the most inspiring speaker so far, by light years.
He's been saying the same thing for at least 20 years. What has he done since that time to make his rhetoric happen?
by Anonymous | reply 195 | February 4, 2020 4:54 AM |
Two New Yorkers going head to head in a general election seems fitting.
by Anonymous | reply 196 | February 4, 2020 4:54 AM |
R194 Bernie’s never passed anything in his life.
by Anonymous | reply 197 | February 4, 2020 4:56 AM |
Amy>Bernie>Biden
by Anonymous | reply 198 | February 4, 2020 4:56 AM |
r191 Maddow said that because Warren started her speech just after Biden began, they'll show her full speech later.
by Anonymous | reply 199 | February 4, 2020 4:56 AM |
R182 he's an 80-year-old who just a heart attack AND intensive heart surgery!! The man has got one foot and in the grave. Being president of the US AGES you at rate of 2 years PER year!! Terrible..
by Anonymous | reply 200 | February 4, 2020 4:56 AM |
Just in: Biden’s lawyers are writing a letter to the Dem party questioning the results.
by Anonymous | reply 201 | February 4, 2020 4:57 AM |
oh come on, nobody thinks Amy came in first. Don't be ridiculous.
by Anonymous | reply 202 | February 4, 2020 4:57 AM |
I wouldn’t be surprised if Bernie dies before November.
by Anonymous | reply 203 | February 4, 2020 4:58 AM |
and DEMANDING that they get to know the primary results before the public.
Fuck that.
by Anonymous | reply 204 | February 4, 2020 4:58 AM |
Sanders co-chair Nina Turner says that Sanders will come back out and speak again if the results come in tonight.
by Anonymous | reply 205 | February 4, 2020 4:58 AM |
If I had to choose between the three I'd hope Pete gets the nomination, but I'm fine with Bernie as long as he has a damn good team behind him. The man won't last long so he needs to have things in order and a fit VP ready to usurp him when he kicks the bucket a year into his presidency.
If his puppeteers are all AOC types we're fucked once he wins. Washington will be in even more chaos.
by Anonymous | reply 206 | February 4, 2020 4:58 AM |
R202, in speech quality, IMHO.
by Anonymous | reply 207 | February 4, 2020 4:58 AM |
He's fine, he sends his love r200. He actually looks really healthy. Old, but very healthy.
by Anonymous | reply 208 | February 4, 2020 4:59 AM |
Then Biden and his lawyers are idiots because there are no fucking results yet to question.
by Anonymous | reply 209 | February 4, 2020 4:59 AM |
It would be fucking hilarious if Bernie were to get the nomination and then die before November.
by Anonymous | reply 210 | February 4, 2020 4:59 AM |
I told ya! This glitch works for Biden. He'd better listen and exploit this save that was given to him
by Anonymous | reply 211 | February 4, 2020 4:59 AM |
r202 That poster was ranking speeches...
by Anonymous | reply 212 | February 4, 2020 4:59 AM |
Did they skip Pete’s speech?
by Anonymous | reply 213 | February 4, 2020 4:59 AM |
r165 you know nothing. Amy and Biden and Bernie don't need permission to speak, it's an internal campaign decision. On a night like this if they get in front of a microphone the News will cover their speech. Bernie and Pete need the validation of a win so they are keeping their asses quiet. Bernie might get upset by Pete or Pete might come close so there is no reason to move forward. Biden has been embarrassed with reports of multiple precincts where he wasn't viable. It sounds like only Bernie and Pete have been viable throughout the night. Hopefully both of them go away once Super Tuesday knocks some sense into these crazy campaigns. A gay man or a socialist against a united Republican Party with record low unemployment and a healthy market? Get the hell out of here with that nonsense!
by Anonymous | reply 214 | February 4, 2020 4:59 AM |
It’s just been since like 2016 when I last heard him do a barn burnerlike that. . And he seemsyounger And more vibrant than 4 years ago for some reason. He really let it rip. I like where he stands.
by Anonymous | reply 215 | February 4, 2020 5:00 AM |
Pete also was leading the precinct in the gym of Drake University in Des Moines. Beating Bernie.
by Anonymous | reply 216 | February 4, 2020 5:00 AM |
why did the DNC makes this so confusing? Just make it like a regular primary and proportion out the delegates based on the votes
by Anonymous | reply 217 | February 4, 2020 5:01 AM |
we need actual results. they are not forthcoming. this is a problem.
by Anonymous | reply 218 | February 4, 2020 5:02 AM |
While they wait for Pete's speech, they should be showing Elizabeth's. What gives?!
by Anonymous | reply 219 | February 4, 2020 5:03 AM |
It is shocking that MSNBC hasn’t played Warren. They must think Pete is imminent.
by Anonymous | reply 220 | February 4, 2020 5:03 AM |
r217 Because the IDP decides if it's going to be a caucus or a primary, not the DNC.
If you're talking about a national primary, that wouldn't work because you could get a winner who only got a 20% of the total vote or some weird result like that. Obviously that person can't end up being the nominee.
by Anonymous | reply 221 | February 4, 2020 5:03 AM |
The fix is in.
by Anonymous | reply 222 | February 4, 2020 5:04 AM |
It looks like Pete's campaign is retweeting his wins in lieu (at least for now) of him giving a speech. Here's another one:
by Anonymous | reply 223 | February 4, 2020 5:04 AM |
I wonder if there will be ANY results out of this mess.
by Anonymous | reply 224 | February 4, 2020 5:04 AM |
It is yuge problem. Yuge.
by Anonymous | reply 225 | February 4, 2020 5:04 AM |
[quote]I'm fine with Bernie as long as he has a damn good team behind him.
+
[quote]If his puppeteers are all AOC types we're fucked once he wins.
= what do you think?
by Anonymous | reply 226 | February 4, 2020 5:04 AM |
[quote]Sanders co-chair Nina Turner says that Sanders will come back out and speak again if the results come in tonight.
Thanks for the warning, Nina.
by Anonymous | reply 227 | February 4, 2020 5:05 AM |
Faux News: "Republicans are going to be very happy that his is such a debacle....Winners tonight Donald Trump and Bloomberg."
by Anonymous | reply 228 | February 4, 2020 5:06 AM |
The Democratic party is a circus. We've fallen apart post-Obama, and despite that we still have such awful hubris. We need to get our shit together and re-examine the party if we want to prevent another GOP takeover.
by Anonymous | reply 229 | February 4, 2020 5:06 AM |
Biden screaming “RIGGED!” is not a good look.
by Anonymous | reply 230 | February 4, 2020 5:06 AM |
58,000 fewer Iowans came to caucus for this year than they did in 2008, that is worrisome. You would think more candidates would mean more people showing up.
by Anonymous | reply 231 | February 4, 2020 5:06 AM |
“...moments ago...”. Really Rachel?
by Anonymous | reply 232 | February 4, 2020 5:07 AM |
Do you have a link r231?
by Anonymous | reply 233 | February 4, 2020 5:07 AM |
Terry McAuliffe saying on CNN that he thinks Pete probably did very well tonight and that Iowa may be a close 1st and 2nd between Pete & Bernie.
by Anonymous | reply 234 | February 4, 2020 5:07 AM |
r217 we need to clarify it was the Iowa DNC that messed this up. They know that getting dusty old campaign workers to use an App is a disaster. I've run door knocking canvassing, the Apps scare the hell out of people over 60. If someone needs to put on their glasses to read a text on their phone, then they are likely not someone you want to use an app before a national election. Then to have said app crash and no backup call centers. The Iowa Democratic Chair should resign by the end of the week.
by Anonymous | reply 235 | February 4, 2020 5:08 AM |
LOL is he really? R230
by Anonymous | reply 236 | February 4, 2020 5:08 AM |
Twitter: dont expect results tonight
by Anonymous | reply 237 | February 4, 2020 5:08 AM |
at this point I'm fine with anyone if there is a goddamn fucking result. Iowa, get your mother fucking shit together. TIA.
by Anonymous | reply 238 | February 4, 2020 5:08 AM |
It looks like Pete's campaign is retweeting his wins in lieu (at least for now) of giving a speech.
by Anonymous | reply 239 | February 4, 2020 5:08 AM |
Do you have a link [R231]?
that is what they are reporting on MSNBC
by Anonymous | reply 240 | February 4, 2020 5:09 AM |
Are the Taliban totally up the vote in Flyoverstan?
by Anonymous | reply 241 | February 4, 2020 5:09 AM |
r231 2008 had high quality candidates. Not one of the people running can match Hillary or Obama. When you deliver stale candidates people tend to stay home.
by Anonymous | reply 242 | February 4, 2020 5:09 AM |
Are we going to get a result before the New Hampshire vote?
by Anonymous | reply 243 | February 4, 2020 5:10 AM |
Axelrod: Pete is being "victimized by this".
Santorum [blech]:"Pete should be out there declaring victory!"
by Anonymous | reply 244 | February 4, 2020 5:10 AM |
I hope that the problems tonight don't distract us from the Trans Women of Color who founded this nation and cast the first vote at stonewall.
by Anonymous | reply 245 | February 4, 2020 5:10 AM |
No results tonight. Official
by Anonymous | reply 246 | February 4, 2020 5:10 AM |
I grew up in a teepee.
by Anonymous | reply 247 | February 4, 2020 5:10 AM |
here's an idea. everyone who is connected, and part of the central committee, and down with the people who are great and make things happen FUCK OFF!!!! You clearly are part of the problem. So please in all respect fuck off.
by Anonymous | reply 248 | February 4, 2020 5:11 AM |
Warren said "baby daughter of a janitor." She is just the fucking corniest.
by Anonymous | reply 249 | February 4, 2020 5:12 AM |
[quote] Just 172,000 Democrats participated in the caucuses in 2016, which was way down from the record set in 2008, when 239,000 turned out.
by Anonymous | reply 250 | February 4, 2020 5:12 AM |
Sick and ti-yud! of this app and bad reporting chat.
by Anonymous | reply 251 | February 4, 2020 5:12 AM |
Her dad was a janitor now?
Glad her invisible soldier brothers made another appearance.
by Anonymous | reply 252 | February 4, 2020 5:13 AM |
Talking heads can't sign off for the night....lol. In case...there's news.
by Anonymous | reply 253 | February 4, 2020 5:14 AM |
[quote]58,000 fewer Iowans came to caucus for this year than they did in 2008, that is worrisome. You would think more candidates would mean more people showing up.
I said over and over in the last 3 years that the Dems will lose this thing again if they cannot get people to the polls; DO NOT depend on the candidate to get voters to vote. We are not in the magical Clinton and Obama era anymore people. Republicans have the shittiest candidates ever, but their network is set up make sure that Republicans turn out no matter what.
by Anonymous | reply 254 | February 4, 2020 5:14 AM |
CNN: Running commercials with "Awaiting: Pete Buttigieg" chyron
MSNBC: Warren talking
by Anonymous | reply 255 | February 4, 2020 5:15 AM |
R197---maybe he's passed a kidney stone or two.
by Anonymous | reply 256 | February 4, 2020 5:15 AM |
What's delaying Pete?
by Anonymous | reply 257 | February 4, 2020 5:15 AM |
Lizzy is heading into uncanny valley territory with every passing day
by Anonymous | reply 258 | February 4, 2020 5:15 AM |
Politico’s Natasha Korecki:
An aide to one of the campaigns said the IDP “hung up on campaigns” when pressed for a release time. The party on the call said just 35% of the results were in and none yet verified. “They literally have no verified results... so we won’t know anything until sometime Tuesday.”
by Anonymous | reply 259 | February 4, 2020 5:15 AM |
You're a li-yuh, R251!
by Anonymous | reply 260 | February 4, 2020 5:16 AM |
Black church lady for Pete.
Pete is frickin THIRSTY!
by Anonymous | reply 261 | February 4, 2020 5:16 AM |
For what it’s worth, took part in the caucus tonight. At my precinct, only 4 of the candidates ended up viable and they were Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, and Biden (w/Biden at the lowest). When the people who had been going for non-viable candidates realigned, Buttigieg had the biggest jump in supporters (went up by 26 people, where Warren went up 7 and Sanders went up 5).
by Anonymous | reply 262 | February 4, 2020 5:16 AM |
Is it possible that Iowa’s overall population is down? Most flyover states are bleeding people.
by Anonymous | reply 263 | February 4, 2020 5:17 AM |
Fucking TUESDAY!!?
by Anonymous | reply 264 | February 4, 2020 5:17 AM |
Every candidate's subreddit - apart from Pete's - is now in full-on "Why this delay is actually good for us" mode. 😄
by Anonymous | reply 265 | February 4, 2020 5:17 AM |
r263 No, Iowa's population is increasing, though I don't think all those Latinos much care for caucuses.
by Anonymous | reply 266 | February 4, 2020 5:18 AM |
Well, technically it will be Tuesday in only 41 more minutes.
by Anonymous | reply 267 | February 4, 2020 5:18 AM |
R264 It’s Tuesday on the east coast.
by Anonymous | reply 268 | February 4, 2020 5:18 AM |
[quote] I said over and over in the last 3 years that the Dems will lose this thing again if they cannot get people to the polls;
Yeah, not really.
Hillary won the PV by over 3 million votes. But she didn’t win where it counted. We need to sway the swing states. That’s all that matters.
by Anonymous | reply 269 | February 4, 2020 5:19 AM |
Where is Pete??
by Anonymous | reply 270 | February 4, 2020 5:19 AM |
Support or oppose any of the candidates - showing results Tuesday (after the night I mean) is unacceptable. Clearly the campaigns know. Flat out horrible behavior.
by Anonymous | reply 271 | February 4, 2020 5:19 AM |
Can we give Bloomberg credit for avoiding this drama! He's like fuck them basic ass first states!
by Anonymous | reply 272 | February 4, 2020 5:20 AM |
I was out for dinner so I haven't been watching. What's the hold up?
by Anonymous | reply 273 | February 4, 2020 5:20 AM |
Just in: Warren’s camp is questioning the results because they weren’t being counted correctly.
by Anonymous | reply 274 | February 4, 2020 5:21 AM |
[quote]Where is Pete??
He's about to speak on CNN.
by Anonymous | reply 275 | February 4, 2020 5:21 AM |
No Chasten?
by Anonymous | reply 276 | February 4, 2020 5:21 AM |
r273 App used for reporting crapped out. They're doing everything manually now.
by Anonymous | reply 277 | February 4, 2020 5:21 AM |
What a shit show... I keep telling myself "Rush Limbaugh has lung cancer".
by Anonymous | reply 278 | February 4, 2020 5:22 AM |
this is why I'm focusing on New Hampshire
by Anonymous | reply 279 | February 4, 2020 5:22 AM |
Speech rank updated: Amy>Bernie>Biden>Warren
Damn, that was a long speech for Warren. I find it amazing how enthusiastic her people are.
The reliance on the teleprompter diminishes her impact.
OK. I see why MSNBC waited to play this dirge.
Jesus Christ, lady. Wrap it up!
OK, speaking time disproportionate with results and prominence. Good stuff. Too much of it.
by Anonymous | reply 280 | February 4, 2020 5:22 AM |
Pete got him some black people!
by Anonymous | reply 281 | February 4, 2020 5:22 AM |
Pete!
by Anonymous | reply 282 | February 4, 2020 5:22 AM |
Yeah, where's Chasten?
by Anonymous | reply 283 | February 4, 2020 5:22 AM |
Just in: Nevada's using the same vendor to report their caucuses.
by Anonymous | reply 284 | February 4, 2020 5:23 AM |
Pete's speaking? Bathroom break!
by Anonymous | reply 285 | February 4, 2020 5:23 AM |
BOOT EDGE EDGE BOOT EDGE EDGE BOOT EDGE EDGE!
by Anonymous | reply 286 | February 4, 2020 5:23 AM |
The Washington Post is saying Trump has won Iowa. I'm sure if that's true but if it is I'm not surprised. It won't be shocking if he gets another four more years, we're too stupid to pull our heads out of our asses and confront the reality that Trump has a lot of support among Americans. Deplorables, but Americans nonetheless. The left needs to start treating him like the threat he is instead of fighting amongst itself and shooting itself in the foot. This is how Trump won in 2016.
by Anonymous | reply 287 | February 4, 2020 5:23 AM |
VICTORIOUS!
by Anonymous | reply 288 | February 4, 2020 5:24 AM |
Clever: Iowa you have shocked the nation.
by Anonymous | reply 289 | February 4, 2020 5:24 AM |
PETE PETE
PETE PETE
PETE PETE!
by Anonymous | reply 290 | February 4, 2020 5:24 AM |
I'm just happy that Bernie wasn't able to have his crowing speech tonight. His supporters are in full meltdown mode. Pete also can't declare victory. Basically, the two candidates most critical, excuse me "disappointed" with Obama and Hillary had their moments taken away! This was a good night!
by Anonymous | reply 292 | February 4, 2020 5:24 AM |
R281 I know, lol. A row of black people on display right behind him. He’s trying so hard.
by Anonymous | reply 293 | February 4, 2020 5:25 AM |
Bold, Pete.
by Anonymous | reply 294 | February 4, 2020 5:25 AM |
[quote]Pete's speaking? Bathroom break!
= Rachel Maddow
by Anonymous | reply 295 | February 4, 2020 5:25 AM |
[quote] the Washington Post is saying Trump has won Iowa.
Sadly true
by Anonymous | reply 296 | February 4, 2020 5:25 AM |
Trampled norm and poisonous tweets, you tell ‘em Pete!
by Anonymous | reply 297 | February 4, 2020 5:25 AM |
R281, that is funny. Pete found this six black people in Iowa for his front row.
by Anonymous | reply 298 | February 4, 2020 5:26 AM |
The Iowa Caucus is white supremecy--"caucus" comes from "Caucasian" which excludes black and brown people of color And contributes to institutional racism. #Boycott #BlackVotesMatter
by Anonymous | reply 299 | February 4, 2020 5:26 AM |
Pete got black women strategically lined up, I cant 😁😂
by Anonymous | reply 300 | February 4, 2020 5:26 AM |
What is this “Reality” he’s touting in this canned rehearsed speech?
There are no results, Pete.
by Anonymous | reply 301 | February 4, 2020 5:26 AM |
[quote]Pete also can't declare victory.
And yet he just did.
"We are going on to New Hampshire victorious."
by Anonymous | reply 302 | February 4, 2020 5:26 AM |
Pete’s turnout blows the others out of the water!
by Anonymous | reply 303 | February 4, 2020 5:26 AM |
Holy fucking shit. This is so amazing. I'm about to Mary! to death.
by Anonymous | reply 304 | February 4, 2020 5:27 AM |
Republicans run the stare of Iowa so we don’t know who won but we know they lost.
by Anonymous | reply 305 | February 4, 2020 5:27 AM |
“President Pete!”
by Anonymous | reply 306 | February 4, 2020 5:27 AM |
‘Them skeptics!
by Anonymous | reply 307 | February 4, 2020 5:27 AM |
MAYOR PETE ALL THE WAY!
by Anonymous | reply 308 | February 4, 2020 5:27 AM |
r287 Trump was always going to win the Republican caucus in Iowa - he will win every republican primary - in the states that are actually having them. Those are separate from the Democratic primaries.
by Anonymous | reply 309 | February 4, 2020 5:27 AM |
R302, it’s clear he’s first or second from the partial results. If they’d show the Somewhat Liberal entrance poll results, it would be clear.
by Anonymous | reply 310 | February 4, 2020 5:28 AM |
“Iowa you have proved those skeptics wrong.”
Again, Pete: there are NO RESULTS. Nothing has “been proven.”
by Anonymous | reply 311 | February 4, 2020 5:28 AM |
The Intercept:
Three different sources say a firm called "Shadow" developed the Iowa Dem caucus app. They haven't responded to comment, neither has Iowa Dem Party. The firm was paid by both Nevada & Iowa Democratic Party, disclosures show. Also by Mayor Pete's campaign.
by Anonymous | reply 312 | February 4, 2020 5:28 AM |
He thanked every supporter, THAT’s us!
by Anonymous | reply 313 | February 4, 2020 5:29 AM |
I wonder if the candidates themselves have some info they can’t release yet. Exit polls maybe? That might be why Pete wanted to speak so late.
by Anonymous | reply 314 | February 4, 2020 5:29 AM |
[quote] [R302], it’s clear he’s first or second from the partial results.
He's currently in third place in the partial results.
by Anonymous | reply 315 | February 4, 2020 5:29 AM |
Did his people actually think putting his black supporters right in front of the camera was smart?
by Anonymous | reply 316 | February 4, 2020 5:29 AM |
Faux News is talking over Pete's speech the entire time so far. Because yes, they want to hear bloviated a-holes over what a real candidate says.
by Anonymous | reply 317 | February 4, 2020 5:29 AM |
Biden is the big winner tonight, everyone else got fucked by the IDP. Pete and Bernie needed this win to create momentum and now it's going to get stomped on by the SOTU and impeachment.
by Anonymous | reply 318 | February 4, 2020 5:30 AM |
They all want to go to bed, so they say screw it, do a victory speech.
by Anonymous | reply 319 | February 4, 2020 5:30 AM |
R316 wants Pete to put screaming neo Nazis with tiki torches in the front row, and is angry and disappointed because he won’t.
by Anonymous | reply 320 | February 4, 2020 5:31 AM |
CHASTEN!
CHASTEN!
CHASTEN!
by Anonymous | reply 321 | February 4, 2020 5:31 AM |
[quote] Pete found this six black people in Iowa for his front row.
Lol. So contrived.
by Anonymous | reply 322 | February 4, 2020 5:31 AM |
Can we just give the nomination to Bloomberg, he looks like the only competent candidate who won't scare half the nation.
by Anonymous | reply 323 | February 4, 2020 5:31 AM |
R315, I was referring to entrance polls.
by Anonymous | reply 325 | February 4, 2020 5:32 AM |
^ LOL
by Anonymous | reply 326 | February 4, 2020 5:32 AM |
When I heard Robby Mook was involved in the counting process it’s no surprise that something nefarious is happening.
by Anonymous | reply 327 | February 4, 2020 5:33 AM |
R318, Biden got destroyed before the world.
by Anonymous | reply 328 | February 4, 2020 5:33 AM |
“Tonight Iowa chose a new path.”
What tf is Pete talking about? The only path Iowa has “chosen” tonight is the path of chaos and debacle.
by Anonymous | reply 329 | February 4, 2020 5:33 AM |
Holy fucking shit.... that's all I have to say
by Anonymous | reply 330 | February 4, 2020 5:33 AM |
BOOT EDGE EDGE!
BOOT EDGE EDGE!
BOOT EDGE EDGE!
by Anonymous | reply 331 | February 4, 2020 5:33 AM |
I hate to be cynical, but it does seem like a bit too craven and obvious to have him standing in front of a line of black women when everyone knows that's the demographic he is struggling the most with and has the most ground to make up. Optics doesn't equal action.
by Anonymous | reply 332 | February 4, 2020 5:33 AM |
Pete’s row of Black wimmins waving tiny flags is hilarious.
by Anonymous | reply 333 | February 4, 2020 5:34 AM |
Peter is more professional and polished. Joe tonight was horrible, sulking, looking down at his notes throughout his speech. Awful. Pete talks like a winner.
by Anonymous | reply 334 | February 4, 2020 5:34 AM |
r328 Oh yea? Show me the results
by Anonymous | reply 335 | February 4, 2020 5:34 AM |
The chanting and large loud crowd is so effective though. Lots of enthusiasm for somewhat hot air
by Anonymous | reply 336 | February 4, 2020 5:34 AM |
[quote]Optics doesn't equal action.
You mean like decreasing black poverty in SB by 70 % or their unemployment by 40%? That sort of action? 🙄
by Anonymous | reply 337 | February 4, 2020 5:34 AM |
Dont campaigns always out diverse people out front or beyond the candidate? Why is it a problem when Pete does it? I love the meltdowns, lol. GO PETE!
by Anonymous | reply 338 | February 4, 2020 5:34 AM |
app was created by DNC pac
by Anonymous | reply 339 | February 4, 2020 5:35 AM |
I like the fact that Pete just called out Trump's draft dodging.
by Anonymous | reply 340 | February 4, 2020 5:35 AM |
That dustbin. You tellem henny!
by Anonymous | reply 341 | February 4, 2020 5:35 AM |
Tonight has been a demonstration in the crumbling infrastructure of the Democratic party and an apt example of why the big fat orange monster will likely be winning again in November. If we truly want to take on the GOP we need to look inward.
by Anonymous | reply 342 | February 4, 2020 5:35 AM |
I’m surprised at how sharp and clear his voice is. Amy Klobuchar sounded hoarse, which is not surprising considering how much speaking they have to do at the end.
by Anonymous | reply 343 | February 4, 2020 5:35 AM |
[quote] [R316] wants Pete to put screaming neo Nazis with tiki torches in the front row, and is angry and disappointed because he won’t.
Oh my! You're so edgy, calling me a Trump supporter for noticing what anyone with eyes and any critical thought can see. This is such a transparent attempt to appear like his supporters are in any way diverse, it's embarrassing.
by Anonymous | reply 344 | February 4, 2020 5:36 AM |
r343 You do realize he's 37 right, 30 years from now when he's Amy's age he won't sounds as good.
by Anonymous | reply 346 | February 4, 2020 5:36 AM |
r343 Yep, his voice sounded pretty busted last week, glad it's recovered. Still, I wouldn't be surprised if he had some permanent vocal cord damage from this primary.
by Anonymous | reply 347 | February 4, 2020 5:37 AM |
The Warren bros in this thread 😂
by Anonymous | reply 348 | February 4, 2020 5:37 AM |
Thanks r277.
by Anonymous | reply 349 | February 4, 2020 5:37 AM |
So sweet to see miss Warren get creamed.
by Anonymous | reply 350 | February 4, 2020 5:37 AM |
They all do it, R338. Some people just want to criticize every single thing Pete does.
“He wore a shirt and shoes and went into a diner? THAT BASTARD!!!!11!! !
by Anonymous | reply 351 | February 4, 2020 5:37 AM |
Ciau sports fans. Almost 2:00 am where I am.
by Anonymous | reply 352 | February 4, 2020 5:37 AM |
[quote]I’m surprised at how sharp and clear his voice is.
Yeah, Pete does have a good speaking voice.
by Anonymous | reply 353 | February 4, 2020 5:38 AM |
BOOT EDGE EDGE!
by Anonymous | reply 354 | February 4, 2020 5:39 AM |
He should keep this brief. It’s late, after all. He just needs a few good sound bites.
by Anonymous | reply 355 | February 4, 2020 5:39 AM |
Pete, don't scream.
by Anonymous | reply 356 | February 4, 2020 5:39 AM |
Poo Shoes belongs!
by Anonymous | reply 357 | February 4, 2020 5:39 AM |
Chasten is going to be so fucking sore the next couple of days...
by Anonymous | reply 358 | February 4, 2020 5:39 AM |
Nighty night R352, sleep tight!
by Anonymous | reply 359 | February 4, 2020 5:40 AM |
Robby Mook denies having anything to do with the app or its alleged failure tonight.
[quote] It’s not clear what the problems might be (at the Iowa caucus), but one thing is known. People are upset with Robbie Mook, Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager.
[quote] However, in a statement, the Iowa Democratic Party said the delays were a result of the reporting inconsistencies and not the app.“ The app did not go down,” said IDP Communications Director Mandy McClure.
[quote] But Mook, who received outsized ignominy for being behind Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 strategy, worked with the team who made the app, according to the Des Moines Register, focusing on dealing with misinformation.
[quote] In a tweet, after people were repeatedly tagging him on Twitter, Mook said he had nothing to do with the app. “Sorry, folks. I did NOT have anything to do with building the Iowa caucus app. I dont know anything about it, had no role in it, and dont own a company that makes mobile appa. Please contact @iowademocrats with questions about it,” he wrote.
[quote] While reporters have said Mook had nothing specifically to do with the app, he was nonetheless getting savaged by people online for the delay.
[quote]
by Anonymous | reply 360 | February 4, 2020 5:40 AM |
Cleaning in Las Vegas!
Knew Pete cruised the DL!
by Anonymous | reply 361 | February 4, 2020 5:40 AM |
I wish he would speak off the cuff, he's so programmed like a robot.
by Anonymous | reply 362 | February 4, 2020 5:40 AM |
Pete waited too long for his speech. Everyone is in bed.
by Anonymous | reply 363 | February 4, 2020 5:40 AM |
He sounds presidential.
by Anonymous | reply 364 | February 4, 2020 5:40 AM |
Ok, save it for the inaugural, Kennedy. Jesus. He talks.
by Anonymous | reply 365 | February 4, 2020 5:40 AM |
“Lacing up my boots in the dust of a war zone.” Lol you had an office job, bitch.
by Anonymous | reply 366 | February 4, 2020 5:41 AM |
I actually predicted a month ago that Pete would win Iowa but the media would find a way to discredit the results. I should go work as a professional psychic or something.
by Anonymous | reply 367 | February 4, 2020 5:41 AM |
Pete with a row of African American women behind him. Nice move.
by Anonymous | reply 368 | February 4, 2020 5:41 AM |
His speech is not about people tonight, but for headlines and news clips in the morning that he is the presumed winner.
by Anonymous | reply 369 | February 4, 2020 5:42 AM |
Pete creamed it!
by Anonymous | reply 370 | February 4, 2020 5:42 AM |
Taniel is starting a crowdsourced spreadsheet with the Iowa results:
by Anonymous | reply 371 | February 4, 2020 5:43 AM |
r363 His team was rechecking the numbers so he could declare victory!
by Anonymous | reply 372 | February 4, 2020 5:43 AM |
Pete really needed a clear victory in Iowa and at a time before people went to bed, this pretty much ends his campaign unless he can figure out a way to win New Hampshire and that looks like it's headed in Bernies direction.
by Anonymous | reply 373 | February 4, 2020 5:43 AM |
[quote] So sweet to see miss Warren get creamed.
Except for how it's not at all clear that she did.
by Anonymous | reply 374 | February 4, 2020 5:44 AM |
Final speech rankings— Amy>Bernie>Pete>Biden>Warren
Pete is very Obama-like per usual. Great performance; however, long winded, somewhat too polished, and overinflated sense of self.
I can see why Pete drives Amy, Reid, Warren and Maddow crazy. He’s too well-packaged and under-credentialed. He’s the natural result of electing lightweights*—Obama and Trump. Lowering the experience bar will come back to bite everyone eventually.
Pete’s my candidate, BTW.
* Before 2008, Obama’s experience for presidential consideration was too light. It worked out wonderfully in the Obama case, but gave us Trump.
by Anonymous | reply 375 | February 4, 2020 5:44 AM |
I am tearing up watching Pete and his Husband on stage, I could have never imagined in my entire life time this would actually happen.
-Eldergay
by Anonymous | reply 376 | February 4, 2020 5:45 AM |
Someone upthread owes Robbie Mook and apology and datalounge for spreading bad information.
How many times did you falsely accuse him?
by Anonymous | reply 377 | February 4, 2020 5:45 AM |
r373 You're ridiculous. Pete needed to come ahead of Biden and Amy and Warren. Which he did.
by Anonymous | reply 378 | February 4, 2020 5:46 AM |
Twitter just needed another gay villan.
by Anonymous | reply 379 | February 4, 2020 5:46 AM |
I want to see how bitchy Bernie supporter Van Jones casts shade on Pete. Van is the Joy Reid of CNN.
by Anonymous | reply 380 | February 4, 2020 5:46 AM |
Between the DMR fail and this, I think it's safe to say that Iowa is #canceled as the leader next cycle.
by Anonymous | reply 381 | February 4, 2020 5:46 AM |
This is why links are nessesary ...for when trolls make stuff up. It’s not like we need any more false information and propaganda. There is plenty as is.
Robby Mook is owed a full-throated apology.
by Anonymous | reply 382 | February 4, 2020 5:47 AM |
Bernie trolls are so obsessed with anything everything Hillary 2016, inventing some rumor that he was involved with this AP
by Anonymous | reply 383 | February 4, 2020 5:47 AM |
Love him. Like Macron, he’s a young and shameless striver with the intelligence and temperament to do this job.
by Anonymous | reply 384 | February 4, 2020 5:48 AM |
My expectation: Pete needed a win, he so far doesn't have a clear win from their internals but its so close that if he actually won, he gets to say his speech and wring as much as he now can from it, and if he didn't win, the campaign can say 'oh guess we made a small mistake'. Iowa is crucial enough for him that it'd be cynically justified to get as much from this night as possible.
Regardless, if he got a 2nd place, that's still something he may be able to work with. And softly announcing a win should set a fire under the DNC to get taht data out. I think its slimy, but I think everything of Pete is slightly slimy anyway, sue me.
by Anonymous | reply 385 | February 4, 2020 5:48 AM |
R373
Bernie has gone from having a commanding lead in New Hampshire to the latest poll showing him only a few points in the lead. He's actually dropping.
by Anonymous | reply 386 | February 4, 2020 5:48 AM |
From Taniel's current tally:
Final allocation:
Sanders (32.12% )
Buttigieg (31.40%)
Warren (24.32%)
Biden (11.98%)
by Anonymous | reply 387 | February 4, 2020 5:48 AM |
Pete is so inspiring
by Anonymous | reply 388 | February 4, 2020 5:48 AM |
What the Democratic Party sorely needs tonight is to hire a transparency consultant and fast! Maybe Hunter Biden is available.
by Anonymous | reply 389 | February 4, 2020 5:48 AM |
Where is the Robby Mook troll now? They were so prevalent earlier?
by Anonymous | reply 390 | February 4, 2020 5:49 AM |
Iowa is like so lame
by Anonymous | reply 391 | February 4, 2020 5:49 AM |
Van is speaking up for Pete.
by Anonymous | reply 392 | February 4, 2020 5:49 AM |
So Amy is done now?
by Anonymous | reply 393 | February 4, 2020 5:49 AM |
[quote] Final speech rankings— Amy>Bernie>Pete>Biden>Warren
No one cares about your speech rankings.
by Anonymous | reply 394 | February 4, 2020 5:50 AM |
People who keep saying Pete needed a CLEAR win in Iowa need to understand that's not possible because there are three people hogging the moderate lane and only two people in the super-left lane.
by Anonymous | reply 395 | February 4, 2020 5:50 AM |
[quote]Robby Mook is owed a full-throat
OK, I'll do it.
by Anonymous | reply 396 | February 4, 2020 5:50 AM |
And what about Tom?
by Anonymous | reply 397 | February 4, 2020 5:50 AM |
Van said Pete was robbed of his moment.
by Anonymous | reply 398 | February 4, 2020 5:50 AM |
R394, I was hoping for others to share theirs while were live posting reactions to this shitshow.
by Anonymous | reply 399 | February 4, 2020 5:51 AM |
Ana Navarro:
[quote]This @PeteButtigieg is a thing of beauty. It’s inclusive, inspiring, very, very strong. He sounds downright presidential. It’s a damn shame the Iowa Caucus Debacle robbed him from the chance of giving it while most Americans were still awake.
by Anonymous | reply 400 | February 4, 2020 5:51 AM |
Poor Mook. Why is political twitter so homophobic? No wonder they love Warren so much.
by Anonymous | reply 401 | February 4, 2020 5:52 AM |
Van Jones recognizing the history making nature of a win by Pete and said Biden got an "undeserved lifeline". Praising his consistency across groups, too.
by Anonymous | reply 402 | February 4, 2020 5:52 AM |
[quote] So Amy is done now?
Jesus, you fucking dumbasses. We have no final results so we don't know who won, who's done, how many delegates anyone got, etc. Saying something over and over on DL is not going to make it true.
by Anonymous | reply 403 | February 4, 2020 5:53 AM |
If only the Iowa Dems had just one more week, they could have pulled this off flawlessly. As it was, three years wasn't enough time.
by Anonymous | reply 404 | February 4, 2020 5:53 AM |
As an amusing aside, I just watched a clip from a woman who does political tarot card throws. Earlier today she pulled a spread on how Biden would do, and by the time she was finished she looked at the camera exclaiming "Oh my gosh, it looks like he's going to be dropping out in the near future!"
Either she skipped Pete, or I missed it, but she did spend quite a while gushing about how well Amy was doing and similar with Elizabeth Warren, although the latter's cards weren't quite so rosy.
by Anonymous | reply 405 | February 4, 2020 5:53 AM |
Lining up the sisters in a row was lame, but, Pete got me harder than Chinese arithmetic!
by Anonymous | reply 406 | February 4, 2020 5:53 AM |
r395 He needed a victory tonight because his campaign is nowhere to be found other than Iowa and New Hampshire so momentum was very important in his campaign strategy, that's clearly not happening because America has gone to bed even if he wins.
by Anonymous | reply 407 | February 4, 2020 5:53 AM |
Ana navarro is so sweet. I wish she'd take the plunge and join The View full time. But I can understand if she doesnt want to see Mccunt 5 days a week.
by Anonymous | reply 408 | February 4, 2020 5:54 AM |
When the state was run by democrats, the caucuses went off fine.
They need to turn blue again so this doesn’t happen anymore.
by Anonymous | reply 409 | February 4, 2020 5:54 AM |
fucking shithole flyover mess
by Anonymous | reply 410 | February 4, 2020 5:54 AM |
It does appear that the app is an OK, Boomer moment.
by Anonymous | reply 411 | February 4, 2020 5:54 AM |
[quote] When the state was run by democrats, the caucuses went off fine.
Democrats still run the Democratic caucuses. Obviously.
by Anonymous | reply 412 | February 4, 2020 5:55 AM |
America largely will go to bed figuring that it'll be sorted out in the morning. At that point, they'll be greeted with clips of Pete's claiming victory.
by Anonymous | reply 413 | February 4, 2020 5:56 AM |
I first heard (incorrectly) that Mook was involved in Iowa fuck-up from a tweet from the political correspondent from the National Review. He was one of the people passing bad information along without questioning it, apparently.
by Anonymous | reply 414 | February 4, 2020 5:56 AM |
If he gets elected, will he go by President Pete?
by Anonymous | reply 415 | February 4, 2020 5:56 AM |
r409 States aren't involved in caucuses, hopefully Iowa wakes up and get's rid of this caucus bullshit.
by Anonymous | reply 416 | February 4, 2020 5:56 AM |
r413 Nope apparently some precincts are going to wait and report tomorrow so i doubt you'll have full results before noon.
by Anonymous | reply 419 | February 4, 2020 5:58 AM |
Clearly our overlords in Iowa have shown us that the state deserves its outsized influence on the election.
by Anonymous | reply 420 | February 4, 2020 5:58 AM |
[quote]He needed a victory tonight
Yes, a win, but not a CLEAR win, i.e. sweeping the state. That's impossible with so many candidates.
[quote]because his campaign is nowhere to be found other than Iowa and New Hampshire so momentum was very important in his campaign strategy, that's clearly not happening because America has gone to bed even if he wins.
For the love of god, that's been his campaign strategy from the start. A no-name mayor from Indiana can't run a national campaign, what part of that do you not understand? Carter and Obama were both successful using the exact same slingshot strategy. Beto, Booker, Castro... were all banking on it as well. If you think it'll all fall apart because he delivered his speech late, you are sadly mistaken.
by Anonymous | reply 421 | February 4, 2020 5:59 AM |
This wouldn't be happening if Buden or Warren won. They're deliberately sabotaging Pete to Save Biden and Warren's asses. I suspect Klobuchar came in 3rd and Warren and Biden came in 4th and 5th place.
The establishment cant have that happening to their two favs.
by Anonymous | reply 422 | February 4, 2020 6:00 AM |
r421 What exactly are you arguing because i'm saying he didn't get what he needed and you're saying he did? You're saying this went well for pete?
by Anonymous | reply 423 | February 4, 2020 6:01 AM |
[quote] Direct link to Taniel's Iowa spreadsheet:
That shit's loading about as quickly as the Iowa reporting app. Who the fuck is "Taniel" anyway?
by Anonymous | reply 424 | February 4, 2020 6:01 AM |
R424, it's because a lot of people are trying to access it.
Taniel is a well-respected numbers cruncher, like Dave Wasserman.
Taniel's current results page from Iowa shows Pete & Bernie in a close race, with Warren in 3rd.
by Anonymous | reply 425 | February 4, 2020 6:04 AM |
A month from now on Super Tuesday, no one will even remember this Iowa clusterfuck.
by Anonymous | reply 426 | February 4, 2020 6:04 AM |
Tens of thousands of ballots all for Joe Biden being shipped to Iowa from Broward County Florida as we speak. “Don’t worry folks we got this covered”
by Anonymous | reply 427 | February 4, 2020 6:05 AM |
Hillary comes out the winner in this. Now she can step in and save the party.
by Anonymous | reply 428 | February 4, 2020 6:05 AM |
Iowa alone is not important, however there are hundreds of thousands of Iowa’s in the middle of the country and the Democrats need a strong candidate to win all of them. Congratulations Pete!
by Anonymous | reply 429 | February 4, 2020 6:07 AM |
[quote] [R424], it's because a lot of people are trying to access it.
I know; I'm just cranky as shit waiting for official results and reading the hundreds of astonishingly stupid comments in this thread.
[quote] Taniel is a well-respected numbers cruncher, like Dave Wasserman.
I don't really know who the hell Dave Wasserman is, either, but I will take your word for it, Poll Troll, that they know their shit.
by Anonymous | reply 430 | February 4, 2020 6:07 AM |
Perhaps Pete's Speech writer did not write "what if we have no results" version.
by Anonymous | reply 431 | February 4, 2020 6:08 AM |
This is why they don't want Voter ID!
by Anonymous | reply 432 | February 4, 2020 6:10 AM |
R425 Before I sign off, thanks Poll Troll--as always--for your contributions!
by Anonymous | reply 433 | February 4, 2020 6:10 AM |
Sorry if I missed this, but I thought it was Booty-judge. Where did Boot-edge-edge come from?
by Anonymous | reply 434 | February 4, 2020 6:11 AM |
Thanks, R433. : )
by Anonymous | reply 435 | February 4, 2020 6:11 AM |
R430, the numbers that Taniel & his colleagues are gathering from the Iowa precincts appear to match up well with what the media & the candidates were saying tonight.
Eg. it's looking good in Iowa for Pete & Bernie, with Warren likely 3rd.
by Anonymous | reply 436 | February 4, 2020 6:12 AM |
R434, You're an misinformed idiot. It's always been Boot Edge Edge.
by Anonymous | reply 437 | February 4, 2020 6:12 AM |
CNN: Officials hope for results "some time Tuesday".
by Anonymous | reply 438 | February 4, 2020 6:13 AM |
Bernie's you get free everything to the Bernie Bro Freeloaders is so laughable.
Just imagine how that will go down in you more moderate,swing and conservative states. Electoral annihilation.
by Anonymous | reply 439 | February 4, 2020 6:13 AM |
It was completely unexpected, but the message out of Iowa is if you can’t successfully run a caucus, how can you run a country. What a disaster.
by Anonymous | reply 440 | February 4, 2020 6:13 AM |
Klobuchar came in third place ahead of Biden and Warren. That's why she spoke first and was so happy in her speech
by Anonymous | reply 441 | February 4, 2020 6:13 AM |
[quote]Chaos. Biden has already left Iowa. Sanders camp is about to release their own results. Buttigieg camp points to their internet’s data +8 points ahead of projections. Out of 1301 precincts, Pete reached viability in 1064 (83%), they said.
What a fucking mess. 🤦♂️
by Anonymous | reply 442 | February 4, 2020 6:14 AM |
Everyone is laughing at DNC app
by Anonymous | reply 443 | February 4, 2020 6:15 AM |
^^More:
[quote]Warren camp says they are in the top 3. Klobuchar camp said they believe they’re close to Biden.
by Anonymous | reply 444 | February 4, 2020 6:15 AM |
r441 No she won't be third
by Anonymous | reply 445 | February 4, 2020 6:15 AM |
Taniel has Klobuchar 5th.
Pete & Biden nearly tied for 1st-2nd.
Warren 3rd.
Biden 4th.
by Anonymous | reply 446 | February 4, 2020 6:16 AM |
Pete & BERNIE nearly tied for 1st-2nd.
by Anonymous | reply 448 | February 4, 2020 6:17 AM |
Warren is the big loser tonight.
by Anonymous | reply 449 | February 4, 2020 6:19 AM |
I sitting back with my second glass of wine watching Bernie supports collectively meltdown and shit themselves!
by Anonymous | reply 450 | February 4, 2020 6:19 AM |
Just In: Biden campaign wants to withhold official numbers...
This is crazy. He wants to muddy the waters as much as possible until NH votes. What a piece of shit.
by Anonymous | reply 451 | February 4, 2020 6:19 AM |
Thanks for the info, Poll Troll.
by Anonymous | reply 452 | February 4, 2020 6:20 AM |
1. Buttigieg ( 28.39%)
2. Bernie (27.34%)
3. Warren (22.11%)
4. Biden (13.94%)
5. Klobuchar (7.72%)
by Anonymous | reply 453 | February 4, 2020 6:20 AM |
1. Buttigieg ( 28.39%)
2. Bernie (27.34%)
3. Warren (22.11%)
4. Biden (13.94%)
5. Klobuchar (7.72%)
by Anonymous | reply 454 | February 4, 2020 6:21 AM |
^ Final allocation
by Anonymous | reply 455 | February 4, 2020 6:22 AM |
Pete's gonna get it from all sides at the next debate? Is it this friday?
by Anonymous | reply 456 | February 4, 2020 6:22 AM |
Poor Vaughn should be asleep by now.
by Anonymous | reply 457 | February 4, 2020 6:22 AM |
[quote]Here we have a Democratic member of Congress and a New York Times employee spreading conspiracy theories. Our institutions are quite healthy.
by Anonymous | reply 458 | February 4, 2020 6:22 AM |
Pete's getting dragged on Twitter, especially Black Twitter though not soley, for declaring victory with no results
by Anonymous | reply 459 | February 4, 2020 6:23 AM |
So did Biden supporters go to Buttigieg because they didn't fear him stealing away the nomination?
by Anonymous | reply 460 | February 4, 2020 6:23 AM |
r456 Yes, debate is this Friday.
by Anonymous | reply 461 | February 4, 2020 6:23 AM |
The Democratic Party should strong-arm Iowa, and tell them that if they insist on having their weird, cluster-fuck "caucus", they have to do it in June behind everyone else. Otherwise they need to convert to a simple Primary vote system.
The Iowa caucus seems like something designed by (The Office's) Dwight Schurte and held on his beet farm, where votes are tallied with geese eggs and counted by Michael Scott. Just cut it out, Iowa.
by Anonymous | reply 462 | February 4, 2020 6:23 AM |
[quote]for declaring victory with no results
Except he has results because he had a precinct captain in every precinct. Unlike the other campaigns.
by Anonymous | reply 463 | February 4, 2020 6:24 AM |
R459, They would drag him for breathing. Who cares? Twitter just hasn't got as much influence as they'd like.
by Anonymous | reply 464 | February 4, 2020 6:24 AM |
Delegates:
1. Buttigieg (31.22%%) (59)
2. Sanders (22.22%) (42)
3. Warren (19.05%) (36)
4. Biden (17.46%) (33)
5. Klobuchar (9.52%) (18)
by Anonymous | reply 465 | February 4, 2020 6:26 AM |
[quote]These conspiracy theories are killing me. The Iowa caucus is run by old white volunteers--what's more likely, that they rigged the entire primary or they had trouble with an app?
by Anonymous | reply 466 | February 4, 2020 6:26 AM |
R464 Very true, just reporting what I'm seeing.
by Anonymous | reply 467 | February 4, 2020 6:26 AM |
[quote] Pete's getting dragged on Twitter, especially Black Twitter
African-Americans have indicated that he is the one candidate they don’t want, so if he’s the nominee, it’s going to be a slap in the face.
by Anonymous | reply 468 | February 4, 2020 6:26 AM |
Considering campaigns usually have internal polling, I would think most of not all of the candidates know who won by now, it’s just not official.
by Anonymous | reply 469 | February 4, 2020 6:27 AM |
Black Twitter is demanding the DNC promise a "state of color" go first next time... OR ELSE!
by Anonymous | reply 470 | February 4, 2020 6:27 AM |
R462, obama never would have been the president that way. But ok. Change it around because it chose a candidate that you dont like. Whiny ass baby.
by Anonymous | reply 471 | February 4, 2020 6:27 AM |
If this went badly, I dread Nevada’s caucus, which could end up in the same mess.
I hate caucuses.
by Anonymous | reply 472 | February 4, 2020 6:28 AM |
[quote]African-Americans have indicated that he is the one candidate they don’t want
*Some* African-Americans *on Twitter* have indicated that. And don't you see how homophobic it is, singling him out as the only candidate they don't want?!
by Anonymous | reply 473 | February 4, 2020 6:28 AM |
R470, the color they’re thinking of is a red state with a low Democratic population, but a high black population, probably in the South. Which would be useless in the general.
by Anonymous | reply 474 | February 4, 2020 6:30 AM |
[quote] Buttigieg (31.22%%) (59)
Buttigieg may become known for being the candidate whose outcome finally forced the DNC to select a different, less overwhelmingly white, state to be first.
by Anonymous | reply 475 | February 4, 2020 6:30 AM |
If South Carolina - apparently the seat of blackdom in America according to some - voted first in 2008, Hillary would have been elected president. Food for thought...
by Anonymous | reply 476 | February 4, 2020 6:30 AM |
R470, the criticism is fair. I like Chris Matthews’ idea of starting with California—significant in size and diversity. I also like a round robin similar to the old Bowl Champion Series.
by Anonymous | reply 477 | February 4, 2020 6:30 AM |
[quote]Buttigieg may become known for being the candidate whose outcome finally forced the DNC to select a different, less overwhelmingly white, state to be first.
We need to swing PA, Michigan and Wisconsin in November. It'll be white people who decide this election. Stop being so obtuse. And stop using black people as a cudgel against the first gay candidate, for fuck sake.
by Anonymous | reply 478 | February 4, 2020 6:32 AM |
The problem is Iowa and New Hampshire will move up if any other state tries to take over the first position. After this i'd say people have had it with them.
by Anonymous | reply 479 | February 4, 2020 6:33 AM |
R476 Fuck South Carolina, deplorable land that always goes to Republicans every election
by Anonymous | reply 480 | February 4, 2020 6:33 AM |
The warren supporter tears taste so good. I can't wait to see it all over again next Tuesday when she once again comes in third place!
by Anonymous | reply 481 | February 4, 2020 6:34 AM |
[quote]I like Chris Matthews’ idea of starting with California
That is RIDICULOUS. Only someone with a huge Name ID like Bernie or Biden and a billionaire like Bloomberg would be competitive in California. It would be a race to who can buy the most ads the fastest, nothing more. I swear to god the costals live in another reality...
by Anonymous | reply 482 | February 4, 2020 6:34 AM |
The problem with those deep southern states is 90% of white people vote repug and 90% of blacks vote democratic so the election results are always the same.
by Anonymous | reply 483 | February 4, 2020 6:35 AM |
I swear people on twitter are so fucking stupid. All of the candidates are white so why does it selecting Pete prove it's too white? They only have white people to choose from. I have had it with that homophobic shithole.
by Anonymous | reply 484 | February 4, 2020 6:35 AM |
How do these people on CNN keep a straight face while giving us the same bullshit excuses?
by Anonymous | reply 485 | February 4, 2020 6:36 AM |
[quote]The problem is Iowa and New Hampshire will move up if any other state tries to take over the first position.
Yes, Iowa has a law on the books that it has to be first, and New Hampshire would need to change its constitution, which currently states it has to be the first primary in the nation. I'm sure SC would adjudicate that if there was a clash with another state...
by Anonymous | reply 486 | February 4, 2020 6:36 AM |
r484 They hate pete because he's not woke
by Anonymous | reply 487 | February 4, 2020 6:37 AM |
R476, you act like that would have been a bad thing. Between McCain-Feingold shifting Congress from pork-based negotiation to ideological-based gridlock and the racist, homophobic backlash to Obama, we got Trump. Hillary would have been a great incrementalism leaded and Obama should be running for re-election now.
by Anonymous | reply 488 | February 4, 2020 6:38 AM |
[quote]you act like that would have been a bad thing
r488 No, I was addressing the people want a majority black state to go first. Well, guess what? Black people in SC didn't rally behind Obama... until he won Iowa.
by Anonymous | reply 489 | February 4, 2020 6:40 AM |
*people who want
by Anonymous | reply 490 | February 4, 2020 6:40 AM |
Poll Troll have you looked at the google doc since you posted R465? The numbers on it have changed multiple times I've refreshed it since that post.
by Anonymous | reply 491 | February 4, 2020 6:41 AM |
r486
The party could simply choose not to count votes. They should run the biggest states first.
This is stupid, what people think, I don't know who to vote for until I see who's winning?
by Anonymous | reply 492 | February 4, 2020 6:42 AM |
R482, California is like 6 states (and in the long-game should likely become 6 states to provide electoral fairness). Candidates would be on the ground for a year having the opportunity to build diverse coalitions across a wide array of industries tech, entertainment, agribusiness and groups (gays, POCs, ages, etc.).
by Anonymous | reply 493 | February 4, 2020 6:42 AM |
The Donald has a very small caucus.
by Anonymous | reply 494 | February 4, 2020 6:42 AM |
Interesting tidbit R463.
by Anonymous | reply 495 | February 4, 2020 6:43 AM |
Obama won because Oprah said to vote for him. Without Oprah he would not have even run. He didn't do anything for Illinois. Even his co-Senator, a Democrat said all Obama did as Senator was to run for President.
by Anonymous | reply 496 | February 4, 2020 6:43 AM |
r483
That isn't even close to being true. If you are going to make things up make them believable.
by Anonymous | reply 497 | February 4, 2020 6:44 AM |
[quote]This is stupid, what people think, I don't know who to vote for until I see who's winning?
That... is literally what most people will tell you if you're canvassing right now in Nevada and South Carolina. "It's too early, come back to me when someone has won a state or two." People are like that. They like backing a winner and not all of them are super political.
by Anonymous | reply 498 | February 4, 2020 6:45 AM |
r497 Oh really, where was the lie exactly?
by Anonymous | reply 499 | February 4, 2020 6:46 AM |
Yes, R491.
Sanders appears to have moved ahead of Pete in Final Allocation, but Pete was still ahead in Delegates last time I looked.
We'll probably see more changes until we get the final numbers from the DNC, but it's a start.
by Anonymous | reply 500 | February 4, 2020 6:47 AM |
Sanders now leads in final allocation and delegates.
by Anonymous | reply 501 | February 4, 2020 6:48 AM |
NEWS: A campaign aide says that the IDP will release results today. They are hand checking results, according to a person on the call. The IDP plans to release a statement soon.
by Anonymous | reply 502 | February 4, 2020 6:48 AM |
R492, that’s exactly what they do. They vote for the winner.
The big problem with running big states first is that if a candidate implodes on the trail, they’ve already got the California delegates under their belt and they can’t be taken away. So what do you do if someone wins California and then we find out he’s a rapist, or he dies on the trail? No one can win those votes because they’re taken by a guy who hasn’t got a chance in hell of winning.
by Anonymous | reply 503 | February 4, 2020 6:48 AM |
God, I love Yang. He’s on the right stack of mail.
by Anonymous | reply 504 | February 4, 2020 6:48 AM |
They’re supposed to use the same reporting app for the Nevada caucuses on Feb 22.
The same app which is funded by Mayor's Pete Pac
by Anonymous | reply 505 | February 4, 2020 6:49 AM |
I thought Sanders would overperform at sites where he has strong support (superfluous attendees).
by Anonymous | reply 506 | February 4, 2020 6:49 AM |
The current results don’t look accurate. According to that there are very few moderates in Iowa, which doesn’t seem possible.
by Anonymous | reply 507 | February 4, 2020 6:52 AM |
Gays really have to get it through their heads that the Left hates them. They hate them the same way the Right hates them. The Left now hates gays, whites, and Jews with a passion.
by Anonymous | reply 508 | February 4, 2020 6:53 AM |
Thanks R500. I think I misunderstood where it said "final allocation" above I was thinking that was the final results.
by Anonymous | reply 509 | February 4, 2020 6:53 AM |
[quote]Sanders now leads in final allocation and delegates.
That makes sense.
Sanders may finish 1st (which would be in line with expectations), Pete 2nd, Warren 3rd, Biden 4th & Klobuchar 5th.
by Anonymous | reply 510 | February 4, 2020 6:54 AM |
R508 Sure, troll.
by Anonymous | reply 511 | February 4, 2020 6:55 AM |
Who won the cock asses?
by Anonymous | reply 512 | February 4, 2020 6:56 AM |
The Iowa Democratic Party is holding a press call in five minutes. No results expected until after sunrise.
by Anonymous | reply 513 | February 4, 2020 6:57 AM |
Looks like Warren has pulled ahead of Pete now.
by Anonymous | reply 514 | February 4, 2020 6:58 AM |
Yeah, kinda unfortunate for Pete... he likely won the absolute vote and came in second in delegates. And no one knows, no great media message...
by Anonymous | reply 515 | February 4, 2020 6:59 AM |
Really, r514? Awesome news if true.
by Anonymous | reply 516 | February 4, 2020 7:00 AM |
[quote]I think I misunderstood where it said "final allocation" above I was thinking that was the final results.
Final allocation means the numbers after the 1st round of voting has been completed and then the reallocated numbers for candidates who pick up more votes from the candidates who didn't meet the 15% threshold for qualification.
Once all 1,700 precincts have reported their final allocations, the overall final numbers will be known. Until then they will keep being updated.
by Anonymous | reply 517 | February 4, 2020 7:02 AM |
I think Pete fucked up tonight, he embarrassed himself.
by Anonymous | reply 518 | February 4, 2020 7:02 AM |
r516 No, it's not true. It's just partial crowdsourced results. We have to wait for the official ones.
by Anonymous | reply 519 | February 4, 2020 7:02 AM |
r518 We'll see in a couple of hours.
by Anonymous | reply 520 | February 4, 2020 7:03 AM |
Another call with the campaigns by the IDP happening now.
by Anonymous | reply 521 | February 4, 2020 7:03 AM |
Yes, as R519 says, these aren't the official DNC numbers but they give an indication of what the order of candidates will probably be.
These numbers are coming in from all the numbers crunchers from the precincts that have reported in Iowa throughout the night and collated together in the Taniel spreadsheet.
by Anonymous | reply 522 | February 4, 2020 7:05 AM |
This is good for Amy, who arrived after being locked down in the impeachment trial, and she gave a good speech.
by Anonymous | reply 523 | February 4, 2020 7:05 AM |
R518, Sometimes he forgets to douche.
by Anonymous | reply 524 | February 4, 2020 7:05 AM |
R518, Sometimes he forgets to douche.
by Anonymous | reply 525 | February 4, 2020 7:05 AM |
Pete's team is a genius for waiting until the end. As someone said upthread, all the headlines say that Pete has declared victory even if he hasn't won. It will be the first thing everyone reads when they wake up. This mess is so confusing that Pete left the night with something clear and concrete. I am so proud of him and have always thought that his team is always 10 steps ahead. Pete is extremely calculating in the best way possible. The end of the night is all about him. He had the final word.
I do not understand the hate for Pete. Gays hate seeing other gays have success, they always have. Hopefully that will change in the future. Pete is making history.
by Anonymous | reply 526 | February 4, 2020 7:06 AM |
[quote] [R516] No, it's not true. It's just partial crowdsourced results. We have to wait for the official ones.
Oh, I know none of these results are official; just pleased to hear she’s pulled into second in the crowd-sourced results for now.
by Anonymous | reply 527 | February 4, 2020 7:06 AM |
How did he embarrass himself R518?
by Anonymous | reply 528 | February 4, 2020 7:07 AM |
r528 He declared his campaign "victorious." Which some are interpreting as meaning he said they had won (the most delegates). We'll see in a couple of hours if that's the case.
by Anonymous | reply 529 | February 4, 2020 7:09 AM |
This Buttigieg speech remind me of that episode of the office where Pam becomes office administrator just by saying she was promoted to office administrator and forcing people to believe it
by Anonymous | reply 530 | February 4, 2020 7:13 AM |
This Buttigieg speech remind me of that episode of the office where Pam becomes office administrator just by saying she was promoted to office administrator and forcing people to believe it
by Anonymous | reply 531 | February 4, 2020 7:13 AM |
Oh, they basically all declared themselves winners in their speeches, r529. We’ll see tomorrow how that works out for them.
by Anonymous | reply 532 | February 4, 2020 7:15 AM |
Doesn't that Buttigieg speech remind you that episode of the office where Pam becomes office administrator just by saying she was promoted to office administrator and forcing people to believe it?
by Anonymous | reply 533 | February 4, 2020 7:15 AM |
BTW, MSNBC is reporting that results will arrive “sometime Tuesday,” which sounds like “not early.”
by Anonymous | reply 534 | February 4, 2020 7:16 AM |
Did you really have to post that three times, r533?
by Anonymous | reply 535 | February 4, 2020 7:17 AM |
R525 dominant tops dont douche..
by Anonymous | reply 536 | February 4, 2020 7:17 AM |
Jeff Weaver of the Sanders campaign was on the phone call with the IDP, and was stirring things up, according to Dan Merica, talking on CNN.
by Anonymous | reply 537 | February 4, 2020 7:22 AM |
*hits refresh again* OK, this spreadsheet is getting depressing now. *hits fresh again*
by Anonymous | reply 538 | February 4, 2020 7:22 AM |
R534, C U Next Tuesday?
by Anonymous | reply 539 | February 4, 2020 7:22 AM |
"victorious" PETE LOL
by Anonymous | reply 540 | February 4, 2020 7:23 AM |
Don't think of it as the Democratic Party stealing the election from Bernie. Think of it as vote redistribution.
by Anonymous | reply 541 | February 4, 2020 7:23 AM |
According to that spreadsheet, Klobuchar is beating Biden. I doubt that.
by Anonymous | reply 542 | February 4, 2020 7:24 AM |
R538, what is the spreadsheet saying now?
by Anonymous | reply 543 | February 4, 2020 7:25 AM |
r541 Well Bernie should welcome some socialism, it's his lifes philosophy
by Anonymous | reply 544 | February 4, 2020 7:26 AM |
Who's running South Bend while Pete's away campaigning?
by Anonymous | reply 545 | February 4, 2020 7:26 AM |
R545, the mayor who replaced him when his term ended.
by Anonymous | reply 546 | February 4, 2020 7:27 AM |
When they said there could be multiple candidates claiming victory at Iowa this year, I didn’t expect it to be literally all of them.
by Anonymous | reply 547 | February 4, 2020 7:27 AM |
r545 Pay attention bitch.
by Anonymous | reply 548 | February 4, 2020 7:28 AM |
Jeff Weaver being angry on the phone with the IDP means the Bernie camp isn't happy right now...
by Anonymous | reply 549 | February 4, 2020 7:28 AM |
Don’t kid yourself that this doesn’t have international coverage on our incompetence of America’s election process. Not sure we need foreign meddling.
by Anonymous | reply 550 | February 4, 2020 7:29 AM |
r549 How can you tell, that whole campaign is paid professional trolls
by Anonymous | reply 551 | February 4, 2020 7:31 AM |
r551 😂😂😂
So true.
by Anonymous | reply 552 | February 4, 2020 7:32 AM |
[quote]African-Americans have indicated that he is the one candidate they don’t want, so if he’s the nominee, it’s going to be a slap in the face.
Is there any reason given or is it just inherent homophobia?
by Anonymous | reply 553 | February 4, 2020 7:33 AM |
R468 no they haven’t.
by Anonymous | reply 554 | February 4, 2020 7:34 AM |
Bernie 34.12%
Elizabeth 28.90%
Pete 18.69%
Amy 9.07%
Joe 6.89%
by Anonymous | reply 555 | February 4, 2020 7:37 AM |
The only ones who have decided AAs don't want Pete are Biden's, Warren's, and Bernie's camps, lol. The longer this false narrative can be sustained, the safer they are.
by Anonymous | reply 556 | February 4, 2020 7:37 AM |
R555, where are those numbers from?
by Anonymous | reply 557 | February 4, 2020 7:39 AM |
The real story is the collapse of the Biden campaign. His cognitive impairment has been to great to ignore.
by Anonymous | reply 558 | February 4, 2020 7:39 AM |
Daily Mail headline about Pete's victory claim
[quote] Trust me, I won.
by Anonymous | reply 559 | February 4, 2020 7:40 AM |
Re-posting link to the ever changing spreadsheet.
by Anonymous | reply 560 | February 4, 2020 7:40 AM |
r557 They're just just partials from that crowdsourced document. You can go insane looking at those, so just wait for the final result.
by Anonymous | reply 561 | February 4, 2020 7:40 AM |
r557 I can vouch for the "go insane" part of r561 's post.
by Anonymous | reply 562 | February 4, 2020 7:42 AM |
The #MayorCheat hashtag is funny. Him paying the app maker will have to be investigated.
by Anonymous | reply 563 | February 4, 2020 7:44 AM |
Biden's campaign will continue to claim the Iowa results are inaccurate.
by Anonymous | reply 564 | February 4, 2020 7:45 AM |
“No, but seriously, let us run your healthcare,” they said.
by Anonymous | reply 565 | February 4, 2020 7:45 AM |
According to that, it’s around 65% extreme liberals, about 35% moderates, in Iowa. Iowa is not Berkeley.
So I’m guessing they’re counting precinct by precinct, the way John King does on his magic wall, and the figures change as the more liberal or more conservative precincts check in.
by Anonymous | reply 566 | February 4, 2020 7:45 AM |
r563 He paid for the text-banking app from the same manufacturer. There's nothing to investigate.
by Anonymous | reply 567 | February 4, 2020 7:46 AM |
And by the way, the Russians are pushing this app crap hard on Reddit and Twitter. It's the perfect conspiracy theory to delegitimise the DNC and the caucus and rob the first gay candidate of his victory.
by Anonymous | reply 568 | February 4, 2020 7:47 AM |
R566 I think Poll Troll explained it upthread. I think..., however my Ambien is kicking in.
by Anonymous | reply 569 | February 4, 2020 7:47 AM |
[quote]Him paying the app maker will have to be investigated.
He arranged it so the reporting app would crap out on caucus night, thus taking the victory away from him? 🥴
by Anonymous | reply 570 | February 4, 2020 7:48 AM |
Andrew Gillum on CNN is amazing, saying that everyone should calm down and, especially, to dial back on the conspiracy theories.
by Anonymous | reply 571 | February 4, 2020 7:51 AM |
I never know for sure when threads are going to close these days, so posting the link to Part 3 now just in case.
by Anonymous | reply 572 | February 4, 2020 7:52 AM |
So the Sanders campaign was actually seriously pissed in that meeting with the IDP?
by Anonymous | reply 573 | February 4, 2020 7:53 AM |
I literally just created Part 3 seconds ago...
by Anonymous | reply 574 | February 4, 2020 7:54 AM |
r573 Yes, he said it's all a bust and has been a sham for a hundred years...
by Anonymous | reply 575 | February 4, 2020 7:55 AM |
R574 I put a "redirect" notice in the other one to go to your Part 3 OP.
Link to the official Part 3 here:
by Anonymous | reply 576 | February 4, 2020 7:58 AM |
Biden paid that Shadow company for similar services as well and they also worked with Obama and Clinton. Of course, Bernie Twitter conveniently omits that. Even Rep. Omar, a fucking congresswoman is spreading it on Twitter at r458.
by Anonymous | reply 577 | February 4, 2020 7:59 AM |
r576 What a darling sweetheart you are. 😘
by Anonymous | reply 578 | February 4, 2020 7:59 AM |
r578 No, YOU are! *smooches*
by Anonymous | reply 579 | February 4, 2020 8:01 AM |
The county chairs are waking people up to get results. That's the latest.
by Anonymous | reply 580 | February 4, 2020 8:06 AM |
In other news, Caroline Kennedy just endorsed Biden.
[quote]She is an American author, attorney, and diplomat who served as the United States Ambassador to Japan from 2013 to 2017. She is a prominent member of the Kennedy family and the only surviving child of President John F. Kennedy and First Lady Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy.
by Anonymous | reply 581 | February 4, 2020 8:08 AM |
[quote]Pete Buttigieg precinct captain in rural Iowa responds to a caucus-goer flipping out upon learning that he has a same-sex partner. It’s a masterclass in patience, persistence, and love.
by Anonymous | reply 582 | February 4, 2020 8:10 AM |
R581 did she not see the dead-ringer for her late father and uncle giving a speech tonight?
by Anonymous | reply 583 | February 4, 2020 8:21 AM |
Ew... Bernie won? I was so excited for Pete :(
by Anonymous | reply 584 | February 4, 2020 8:21 AM |
Results come out in the morning...
by Anonymous | reply 585 | February 4, 2020 8:22 AM |
Amy's voice reminds me of someone, and I could never place it....
Until tonight, during her 'victory' speech (Iowa's fuck up is the best thing to ever happen to Amy) it finally hit me
Jeannie Berlin
Amy Klobuchar IS Jeannie Berlin
by Anonymous | reply 586 | February 4, 2020 8:23 AM |
r586 Omg, YES, totally!
by Anonymous | reply 587 | February 4, 2020 8:25 AM |
I think Faye Dunaway should declare the Iowa winner
by Anonymous | reply 589 | February 4, 2020 8:59 AM |
It’s amazing how mild most of the headlines are. Most are saying it’s just a slight delay, no problems here. There seems to be an effort to avoid calling it a colossal clusterfuck, indicative of the party’s management of the race in general.
by Anonymous | reply 590 | February 4, 2020 9:09 AM |
I blame caucus, not the Party.
Though hopefully this will make the Party do away with them.
Stupid system
by Anonymous | reply 591 | February 4, 2020 9:13 AM |
r590 Yeah, at the end of the day, it really is just a technical glitch in the reporting app. The paper trail remains intact. As long as New Hampshire wakes up to a clear delegate winner, it'll all be fine. I'm just sad that the Iowa winner - whoever it ends up being - was robbed of their proper victory speech.
by Anonymous | reply 592 | February 4, 2020 9:15 AM |
r591 The caucus actually worked fine, much as I hate to admit it. It's the reporting app, forced onto Iowans by those rule changes in 2016, that is to blame. And Nevada is using the same supplier, so that should be fun...
by Anonymous | reply 593 | February 4, 2020 9:17 AM |
[quote] As long as New Hampshire wakes up to a clear delegate winner
We know already that will be Sanders.
by Anonymous | reply 594 | February 4, 2020 9:19 AM |
No, we don't. IDP is currently manually verifying the results.
by Anonymous | reply 595 | February 4, 2020 9:21 AM |
The voters in New Hampshire would be surprised to hear that the IDP is currently verifying New Hampshire’s results, which don’t exist yet.
by Anonymous | reply 596 | February 4, 2020 9:31 AM |
Erm... what ARE you on about? Look at my quote again...
[quote]As long as New Hampshire wakes up to a clear delegate winner [out of Iowa, d'oh], it'll all be fine.
by Anonymous | reply 597 | February 4, 2020 9:34 AM |
R581 Caroline Kennedy endorsed a dead horse.
by Anonymous | reply 599 | February 4, 2020 9:47 AM |
He might recover yet but damn, what timing for an endorsement - just as he bombs in Iowa...
by Anonymous | reply 600 | February 4, 2020 9:54 AM |