Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Reasons we need Greenland

With Greenland, we encircle Canada. Just in case.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9August 17, 2019 12:53 AM

It embiggens us.

by Anonymousreply 1August 17, 2019 12:00 AM

We're ready for a fight with American barbarians!

- CANADA

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2August 17, 2019 12:05 AM

Because green is a pretty color?

by Anonymousreply 3August 17, 2019 12:11 AM

OP, that upper left side on the map seems to not be consistent with your “surrounding” proposition. Will there be a line of aircraft carrier groups for that flank?

Wouldn’t it be more efficient to hold the Christmas Moose hostage in Stonheham, MA?

by Anonymousreply 4August 17, 2019 12:17 AM

R4, the Mercator projection can be so confusing to the geographically illiterate. Perhaps this polar projection is more your speed? Alaska hooks around and covers the “upper left” more than adequately, considering what’s up there.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5August 17, 2019 12:21 AM

In actuality Greenland is less than a half the size of how it appears in OP's pic

by Anonymousreply 6August 17, 2019 12:21 AM

Better look.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 7August 17, 2019 12:22 AM

Anybody up for a game of Risk?

by Anonymousreply 8August 17, 2019 12:28 AM

With global warming, the Arctic will become an increasingly exploitable region. We have only a tiny wedge of Arctic exposure - the north coast of Alaska. The Canadians have more, but both the Mercator and polar projections show us who has the most. That can't be good.

Also, you know who has no Arctic waterfront? China. Greenland has only 58,000 people. There's no way they can properly make use of their future extremely desirable location without essentially becoming a dependency of another country. China will be waiting with open arms. That's not good, either.

I think we should leave Greenland alone, but the idea that it should become a wholly owned subsidiary of the USA is not strategically crazy.

by Anonymousreply 9August 17, 2019 12:53 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!