Let's continue our discussion. The previous thread is in the link below.
Photos of William at a Child Bereavement dinner. He can relate.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | June 10, 2019 10:30 PM |
Zara is one of George's godmothers, isn't she?
by Anonymous | reply 2 | June 10, 2019 10:33 PM |
Is Anne close with her parents?
by Anonymous | reply 4 | June 10, 2019 10:36 PM |
I posed the question. Just wondering, are godparents usually British? Do they need to be approved? Must they be Protestant?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | June 10, 2019 10:38 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 6 | June 10, 2019 10:41 PM |
The Queen sends out telegrams to her subjects for their 100th birthdays. She sent one to her own mother and signed it "Lilibet". She'll have to send one to her own husband if he lives another two years.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | June 10, 2019 10:42 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 8 | June 10, 2019 10:51 PM |
The godparents have usually been British but they do not have to be. They are very seldom close relatives - traditionally, siblings and first cousins and uncles-aunts aren't chosen. They no longer have to be Protestant but they do have to be Christians. As for approval - I suspect it's like the name of the baby: it's considered courteous to submit the name to the Queen, but she can't really do anything about it if she doesn't like the name. Unless the Sussexes pick a convicted felon, I doubt the Queen would interfere in the choice of godparent.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | June 10, 2019 10:53 PM |
Mocking a woman for looking like her beautiful mother?
by Anonymous | reply 11 | June 10, 2019 10:58 PM |
R10 So , Serena would be out, as she is a JW.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | June 10, 2019 11:02 PM |
Doria is a very attractive woman. Honestly though I don't think Meghan resembles her much, even with a bit of fullness in her face. Meghan looks more like her Dad.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | June 10, 2019 11:03 PM |
R11, yeah, I don’t see it as an insult. Doria is attractive and youthful-looking. Not a fan of MM at all, but it’s stupid. As is the criticism of her not attending the state dinner.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | June 10, 2019 11:03 PM |
It's strange but not surprising to see the envious fraus take glee in a woman who has gained/retained weight one month after giving birth.
I suppose it makes them feel better but it's so pathetic I can't help but feel secondhand embarrassment for them. She will lose the weight and go back to her slim petite self...and then what?
Anyway, I hope she goes to ascot.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | June 10, 2019 11:05 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 16 | June 10, 2019 11:06 PM |
R16 - This is a tad pedantic, but the cross that Kate wears frequently is often referred to as a "crucifix". It isn't - a crucifix includes a design of the body of Christ. Crosses are plain. Although crucifixes are not uncommon amongst Catholics, Protestants vey rarely wear them.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | June 10, 2019 11:09 PM |
Does anyone here lip read? What exactly does Harry say to MM beginning at 1:14 at the clip here, that makes her look so upset? She turned around to ask him something, then turned back around with a fallen face. Harry looked irritated no question.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | June 10, 2019 11:10 PM |
[Quote]Does anyone here lip read? What exactly does Harry say to MM beginning at 1:14 at the clip at [R48], that makes her look so upset? She turned around to ask him something, then turned back around with a fallen face. Harry looked irritated no question.
Harry says: TURN AROUND
by Anonymous | reply 19 | June 10, 2019 11:11 PM |
I didn't know she was JW. However, as it happens, Jehovah's Witnesses are considered a Christian denomination - however, as they reject the concept of the Trinity, they fall way outside mainstream Christianity. Wayyyyyyy outside. I doubt they'd exclude her, the question is rather, as a JW, would Serena agree to be a godparent to a child baptised in a Trinitarian Christian denomination?
by Anonymous | reply 20 | June 10, 2019 11:12 PM |
R17 Was that information meant for me was it general information for posters on the thread?
by Anonymous | reply 21 | June 10, 2019 11:14 PM |
R21 - General information - when you posted the photo it reminded me that a few of the tabloids talked about Kate's Diamond Crucifix at the TCC - so I thought I'd bring it up. The media are so fucking sloppy.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | June 10, 2019 11:19 PM |
Andrew and Sarah will remarry. Sarah is in tight with the family and appears to get along with just about all of them. The RF is fully aware that they are all but officially back together. But they won't remarry until Princess Beatrice marries. Philip won't even object to a remarriage if he hangs on. However, Andrew and Sarah better do it soon while the queen is still alive so as to restore Sarah's HRH status. If Elizabeth were to die before the remarriage, Charles, the bastard, may try and block Sarah's HRH status from being restored. But no one should be denied happiness in their latter years. If Charles can marry the Rottweiler and expect everyone to accept it, then Andrew and Sarah should be allowed to remarry without interference.
If Harry and Markle's marriage falls on the rocks, Andrew and Sarah could be examples of stability.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | June 10, 2019 11:20 PM |
I'm not a lip-reader either, R18, but to me it looks like he says "turn around" and then repeats it twice more. It's an odd interaction given what I'm used to from these two. The stans and the evil hatahs are getting into semantic slapfights over the meaning of "snap" and "bark" etc. (forgive me. gossip gods, for I have sinned - I read the Celebitchy comments yesterday for the first time in months) so I guess I won't wade into that one, but let's just say it doesn't look like a warm or caring interaction on Harry's part. Even if he is just instructing her, there's something kind of weird about it. It's an odd, bossy tone to take with one's wife. No leaning down and whispering it in her ear, or a reassuring touch on the shoulder, just that "turn around" and scowl.
Note: Yes I am fully aware the interaction could be meaningless and upon leaving the balcony they fell upon each other with such lust that Master Archie's triplet siblings grow already in her wokest of wombs.
As for Meg looking like her mom, I think she does, and the more she weighs the more you see it in her face. In that pic of Doria holding newborn MM, she looks exactly like her dad, tho.
I spent my adolescence on the west coast and am very familiar with Doria's type. She almost certainly partakes in the mary jane, is seriously into her yoga, is kind and yet fiercely independent and able to say no. There's an odd disconnect between mother and daughter in that Doria really comes across as self-contained and at ease in her own skin. Not for one moment did she look out of place or unsure of herself at the wedding (or in any of the pap shots of her walking her dogs, which she clearly feels zero need to get dressed up or made-up for). Meghan is the opposite to me. Someone who projects insecurity and not-good-enough-ness even in her attempts to come across as confident and secure. I'd actually love the inside scoop on that mother-daughter relationship, because they seem like very different people and Doria gives nothing away in public (again, opposite of her daughter).
by Anonymous | reply 24 | June 10, 2019 11:23 PM |
Jehovah's Witnesses also don't celebrate birthdays, or holidays such as Christmas, if I remember . . . as these are usually times when godparents communicate with godchildren, it might be a bit awkward for JW to function as godparent. A godparent is supposed to commit to participating in a child's religious life. I think they seldom do these days, so it's probably a moot point. But given this is the Queen's great-grandchild being baptised by a high-ranking Anglican church official there might be some quiet pushback on the suitability of a godparent who doesn't recognise the Trinity. In fact, I'm not even sure the JW's accept baptism itself. I think I remember that they reject a fundamental tenet of baptism: that it washes away original sin. That alone might disqualify Williams.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | June 10, 2019 11:29 PM |
So no for the Clooneys, she identifies as Druze and he has said many times that he is agnostic. Maybe Oprah? I think MM will try to get one celeb in, the rest will be traditional.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | June 10, 2019 11:29 PM |
Where the hell are people getting this idea that Jessica Mulroney nee Brownstein is a Jehovah's Witness? She's old school Montreal Jewish.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | June 10, 2019 11:41 PM |
They aren't. It's Serena they are talking about.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | June 10, 2019 11:42 PM |
r22, thanks for that. Being a grammar prig, I appreciated it.
R24, your comment was a pleasure to read. Sometimes it’s fun to read the more emotionally-invested comments, but a rational one is like a balm.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | June 10, 2019 11:42 PM |
My bad. Skimmed too quickly. It's Serena that's the Jehovah's Witness. Thanks R28
by Anonymous | reply 30 | June 10, 2019 11:43 PM |
R26 - Didn't know that either about Amal Clooney. Hmmm. What is Jessica Mulroney? I have a vague memory that her maiden name was Brownstein?
There is a lot of controversy surrounding the CoE these days, that in its frenzied attempts to be relevant ("inclusive" I think was the euphemism), it ended up drained of its passion and standing for nothing, which proved disastrous. It didn't attract new converts and lost many of its traditional adherents.
Whether the CoE, of which the Queen is titular head, will do what it's been doing under the inclusive "nothing means anything" tent it's erected, and welcome as Christian godparents to a grandchild of the titular head of the CoE two non-Christians, an agnostic, and a woman who doesn't even accept one of the basic symbolisms of baptism, remains to be seen.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | June 10, 2019 11:45 PM |
Beatrice and Eugenie would be lovely choices.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | June 10, 2019 11:49 PM |
R32 - Wouldn't they just. I can hear Charles now, calling Bea and Yuge in as Harry bleats that he and Meghan can't find a set of top-tier, honest to God Christian godparents for poor Archie because all their besties are unbelievers or pagans or heretics.
"Do it and I'll work you each onto the SG with a dozen events each a year; say NO, and once your Gran is raptured I'll see that you never step out onto that balcony again."
by Anonymous | reply 33 | June 10, 2019 11:55 PM |
Zara will be one of the godparents, bet money on it.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | June 10, 2019 11:57 PM |
Well, that leaves the Tindalls or the Phillipses (Zara's brother and sister-in-law, innocuous enough) and a couple of Harry's friends, von Straubenzee and Inskip, if Bea and Yuge can't be strong-armed into it (Andrew might have a thing or two to say about that!). But that leaves, ahem, no one of colour, so perhaps Oprah might have to be hauled in.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | June 10, 2019 11:59 PM |
Oprah would not say “no”. She’s a little short-sighted, that one. And prone to falling for con jobs.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | June 11, 2019 12:01 AM |
R32. Very nicely stated. I like Beatrice and Eugenie a lot. They are nice girls. No scandal about them, never in trouble, and they may not be senior royals, but they are pretty damn close. And they're always there for the family. If Andrew and Sarah did a couple of good things right, those girls are it.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | June 11, 2019 12:02 AM |
There's also Genevieve Hillis, Lindsay Roth and Benita Litt from Meghan's college days. They were at the wedding, the baby shower or both.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | June 11, 2019 12:11 AM |
Don't think we need to worry about Charles dying soon. People freak out about his swollen digits and reddened face but those symptoms independently don't signify life-threatening medical conditions. Chronic maybe yes, life-threatening no. Part of what we do when assessing patients is not only with physical exam but also asking them how they are feeling physically. Level of functioning is a predictor of good health in the geriatric population, in other words it's not just how healthy the elderly person appears that's also important. It's why Phillip looks like the crypt keeper's father and yet was still driving around until he damn near killed somebody.
Anyways, if Charles walks into the exam room, we're not going to assume he's at death's door and prescribe him shitloads. of meds for symptoms management, I'll ask him how he feels physically. We know that he remains active and keeps a full work schedule, and still travels often. He's not incapacitated nor has any decreased level. of functioning for his age (that we know of). The dactylitis (sausage digits) is not in itself life-threatening, if I had to guess it may be due to psoriatic arthritis. From a functional standpoint there may be some decrement. He's still able to pick up the wine glass; can he still tie his own shoe laces with those fingers, who knows? Theres an increased risk of cardiovascular disease with severe, untreated psoriatic arthritis. It's all about keeping systemic and localized inflammation under control in this condition. There may be ocular involvement with psoriatic arthritis, but regular surveillance will prevent that too. He has the best medical team available to him so I wouldn't worry about him croaking anytime soon.
As for his reddened face, hard to tell. Some people when they get older, their skin thins out dramatically thus making every change (broken capillaries, flushing for instance) very noticeable and look worse than it actually is. If we're surmising about a skin condition then rosacea is a possibility. It's a common, chronic condition that affects fair-skinned people of European descent, and one of the causes being vascular dysregulation manifesting as inflamed facial skin. But again it's not life-threatening.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | June 11, 2019 12:17 AM |
Andrew is looking very....stalwart in r18's clip. Kind like a secret service agent standing protectively close to his charge. He gets Duke of Edinburgh when Philip kicks off, right?
by Anonymous | reply 40 | June 11, 2019 12:19 AM |
The Queen's christening, her grandparents, where also her godparents
by Anonymous | reply 41 | June 11, 2019 12:29 AM |
[quote] I like Beatrice and Eugenie a lot. They are nice girls. No scandal about them,
Bea's home wrecking doesn't count? Good lord, if that had been Kate, Meg, Sophie or Autumn the tabloids would have rained such vitriol on them.
Personally, I'm open to hearing more Edo stories. Who was his first kiss? Where are his naughty texts? Give me pictures of his night-after walks of shame. Was he ever on a catwalk in a skimpy sheer outfit? Topless on the beach? Skinny dippy? Sunning himself nude on a balcony? I want all the sordid details.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | June 11, 2019 12:33 AM |
They put up with Meghan while she was pregnant and walked on eggshells. Now that the kid is out, I think they are sick of her BS.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | June 11, 2019 12:42 AM |
Well, if they were smart , they’d ask William and/or Kate, no? Mend fences perhaps
by Anonymous | reply 44 | June 11, 2019 1:09 AM |
Askin' aint gettin'
by Anonymous | reply 45 | June 11, 2019 1:15 AM |
Regarding Charles' fingers... I seem to remember on one of these threads, seeing a picture of a much younger Charles (in his 30s, perhaps) and I noticed that his fingers were chubby then.
Frankly, I never paid much attention to that until these threads and seeing it on a picture of a younger Charles struck me.
Sorry, I don't have a link.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | June 11, 2019 1:25 AM |
R40. Andrew is the Duke of York as is customary for the second son of the monarch. Andrew won't give up that title even when Charles becomes king. Harry will then be the second son of the monarch; however, Harry has his dukedom, and presumably, Andrew is not dying anytime soon. When Andrew passes, the next one in line for York title will be the current youngest one, Prince Louis of Cambridge, as second son of the reigning monarch, which may be William by then. But if Andrew is still alive when Louis is a young man, Andrew retains the title, and Louis may or may not get a dukedom if Charles or William determine it appropriate.
Lastly, rumor has it that the Duke of Edinburgh title will go to Edward after Philip passes away. It is the reason Edward asked for the Earl of Wessex title when he got married, and Sophie became Countess of Wessex--and not a duchess as did Sarah, Duchess of York, Kate, Duchess of Cambridge and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. When Edward becomes Duke of Edinburgh, Sophie will become Duchess of Edinburgh.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | June 11, 2019 1:26 AM |
Re Fergie's reported answer to the Queen's query of what she (Fergie) wanted when she was splitting with Andrew (posted in the last thread)...
[quote] "Your friendship, Ma'am."
I've heard this story several times. Given that Fergie is still around the RF, I would bet the story is true.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | June 11, 2019 1:27 AM |
by Anonymous | reply 50 | June 11, 2019 1:34 AM |
Andrew looked downright mean on that balcony, leering at the crowd as everyone filed out. Would a wave have killed him?
by Anonymous | reply 51 | June 11, 2019 1:39 AM |
Andrew always looks miserable nowadays, R51.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | June 11, 2019 1:53 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 53 | June 11, 2019 1:54 AM |
One nice thing is, “Fergie” once again refers to our gal the Duchess, not this whoeversheis singer.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | June 11, 2019 2:06 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 55 | June 11, 2019 2:07 AM |
I bet there's a bit of sibling rivalry between Charlotte and Louis. She's obviously the kind of kid who loves being the centre of attention, so she probably isn't thrilled that she's no longer the baby of the family. There was a moment on Saturday when she was waving to the crowd with both hands while the adults were fussing over Louis. I'd like to see her reaction once she gets old enough to fully understand that George is the heir and she's the spare!
by Anonymous | reply 56 | June 11, 2019 2:07 AM |
“Duchess of Edinburgh” - gee, that’s a swell title.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | June 11, 2019 2:08 AM |
I’m sure that the current Duchess of Edinburgh would agree with you, R57.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | June 11, 2019 2:24 AM |
R24 Agreed. Doria has a self sufficient, Sphinx-like quality to her which makes her difficult to read. She also hasn’t set a foot wrong publicly throughout this entire process.
“There's an odd disconnect between mother and daughter in that Doria really comes across as self-contained and at ease in her own skin. Not for one moment did she look out of place or unsure of herself at the wedding (or in any of the pap shots of her walking her dogs, which she clearly feels zero need to get dressed up or made-up for). Meghan is the opposite to me. Someone who projects insecurity and not-good-enough-ness even in her attempts to come across as confident and secure. I'd actually love the inside scoop on that mother-daughter relationship, because they seem like very different people and Doria gives nothing away in public (again, opposite of her daughter).”
by Anonymous | reply 59 | June 11, 2019 2:34 AM |
Jehovah Witnesses are not considered christians by other main stream denominations so no Serena would not be a candidate for Godmother. Anglican baptisms like all mainstream Christians are trinitarian.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | June 11, 2019 2:38 AM |
In the last thread people were discussing the white "epaulets" on MM's shoulders while they were standing on the balcony. What they remind me of: the little napkin/towlettes used when actors and newscasters put on makeup, to avoid getting makeup from their neck on the clothing. God I hope that's not what they were, if so she is really having serious personal trouble.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | June 11, 2019 3:07 AM |
R11, I think it was mocking for looking like a post-menopausal grandmother, but you may be reading something different from what I am.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | June 11, 2019 3:07 AM |
R23, I can't speculate on their relationship, but Sarah's hat game is on point.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | June 11, 2019 3:17 AM |
R40, No. Edward does.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | June 11, 2019 3:20 AM |
Serena is no typical JW. Not at all. Her husband is not JW.
JW shun friends and family who are not JW. According to the JW rules, which are similar to Scientology, one cannot keep company with non believers.
JWs only tolerate Serena because of her wealth and prominence. Otherwise they would have chucked her out as she is married to a non-believer, which to them, is akin to being a devil.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | June 11, 2019 3:27 AM |
R16 You have got to be joking. Catholics only wear the cross.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | June 11, 2019 3:30 AM |
Having been baptized in the One True Church, I turn up my nose in disdain to you latecoming Anglicans/CoE who only have your splinter faith because Henry VIII was an unfaithful, self-important twat.
That's right, I said what I said.
Having said it, according to your own rules:
"It is a basic requirement that godparents should be baptized themselves, and ideally confirmed too, but that doesn’t necessarily mean their baptism/confirmation should have been in the Church of England. People who have been baptized in the Catholic, Methodist, Baptist, United Reformed Church and other Christian denominations, can also be godparents at a Church of England christening."
Presumably, that rules out the Clooneys and Serena.
by Anonymous | reply 67 | June 11, 2019 3:30 AM |
R66, I think you have it backwards. Only Catholics wear the Crucifix. Many Christian denominations wear a cross.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | June 11, 2019 3:31 AM |
Yes, Catholics wear the crucifix with Christ's body on it. Protestants wear plain crosses without the body on it.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | June 11, 2019 3:33 AM |
Pointless trivia: Disney's Prince Philip is named after the Duke of Edinburgh, who was in his thirties when Sleeping Beauty was made.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | June 11, 2019 3:33 AM |
Germans used to wear crosses like this, and we all know of the German origins of the members of the Battenberg-Windsors.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | June 11, 2019 3:35 AM |
R69, it's the fact that Christ's body is still on it that makes the distinction between a Crucifix and merely a cross.
Just some uplifting trivia for your next tea party when people want to quibble over religion. Always a sign of good breeding. ;)
by Anonymous | reply 72 | June 11, 2019 3:39 AM |
IME, Catholics LOVE crucifixes. I remember visiting the homes of my neighbors, Italians and Portuguese in blue collar neighborhood. Yes, crucifixes everywhere. And little portraits of Jesus with his crown of thorns pushing into his forehead and making blood drip down. There would be a dried palm frond tucked behind it. Jesus leading two frightened children over a perilous bridge in a dark forest. His bony body pierced all over, grimacing in pain while all his wounds bled 3-paint (wearing only a dinner napkin over his nuggets!). Mary Magdalen bent over his dead body, weeping.
It was so damn gory and dramatic.
But I digress.
by Anonymous | reply 73 | June 11, 2019 3:41 AM |
You have a lot of insight, R24, and you express it with eloquence.
by Anonymous | reply 74 | June 11, 2019 3:43 AM |
Oooh, and my little buddy Lisa’s aunt had a portrait of Jesus in her bedroom with optical illusion eyes where, sometimes it looked like his eyes were open, watching you; and sometimes it looked like they were closed in prayer.
by Anonymous | reply 75 | June 11, 2019 3:43 AM |
Not to mention the SAINTS! (Idol worship everywhere!)
by Anonymous | reply 76 | June 11, 2019 3:43 AM |
Thank you, r39. That all sounds logical.
Now do Meghan!
by Anonymous | reply 77 | June 11, 2019 3:45 AM |
Did she wear a cross or curifex.
by Anonymous | reply 78 | June 11, 2019 3:46 AM |
R73 - So is the Pieta to be honest, but presumably you weren't neighbors with any admirers of Michelangelo.
by Anonymous | reply 79 | June 11, 2019 3:47 AM |
Okay, I'm yanking your chain about religion, so I'll stop because I thought it was all in good fun but I'm afraid someone's actually offended. If so, I apologize.
Kate wears a cross. She's CoE, and it's appropriate because she's married to the future head of the CoE for Pete's sake! (see what I did there, though?). She looks beautiful in it, and it likely of great meaning to her.
by Anonymous | reply 80 | June 11, 2019 3:50 AM |
Kate wore her cross to ward off MM the Bride of Dracula.
by Anonymous | reply 81 | June 11, 2019 3:54 AM |
R71, what's really weird is that swastikas are an important Hindu symbol. I bought a collection of vintage saris and was pretty shocked to find one with red & greeen & gold swastikas on it.
The hell? Just what am I going to decorate with that?? Gauzy hangings for the kid's playroom? It's definitely not going to make a nice table runner at an outdoor bbq.
by Anonymous | reply 82 | June 11, 2019 4:00 AM |
R82 it's true. But the problem is that many people won't understand that the traditional Hindu symbol was reversed by the Nazis.
by Anonymous | reply 83 | June 11, 2019 4:08 AM |
This is very cute. Despite all of the chaos and unpleasantness, Prince Louis is on the job bringing smiles.
by Anonymous | reply 84 | June 11, 2019 4:10 AM |
R84, I'm here for it. Pronto
Mr. DeMille, Prince Louis is ready for his close up!
by Anonymous | reply 85 | June 11, 2019 4:13 AM |
It’s nice to see p Charles relaxed and joyful....I’d love to see the family dynamics when off stage and not working.
by Anonymous | reply 86 | June 11, 2019 4:15 AM |
Oprah would convert to any religion including Pastafarian in order to be a godparent to a royal child.
by Anonymous | reply 87 | June 11, 2019 4:43 AM |
Pretty sure she already is a Pastafarian.
by Anonymous | reply 88 | June 11, 2019 4:44 AM |
Pastafarian? Is that someone who rinses their pasta before eating it?
by Anonymous | reply 89 | June 11, 2019 4:51 AM |
They worship the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It's a real group.
by Anonymous | reply 90 | June 11, 2019 4:54 AM |
The Royal Family have always played favourites, I sense Louis the one they all seem to love
by Anonymous | reply 91 | June 11, 2019 5:04 AM |
^^ Louis is the one
by Anonymous | reply 92 | June 11, 2019 5:08 AM |
Charlotte is the spare, not Louis. She seemed like enough of a big sister to not care about the attention shift. Plus, she's the only girl, a 'princess of the blood'- she ll never be treated like Andrew or Margaret.
Kate does seem tight and very affectionate with Charlotte too. I'd bet it's George who's not getting time with Mommy as dad is grooming him. Louis is hands down the fave
by Anonymous | reply 93 | June 11, 2019 5:09 AM |
Charlotte is perhaps the Anne of her generation. Born in a different time, Anne may have been the most suited to the throne.
by Anonymous | reply 95 | June 11, 2019 5:29 AM |
I said on the other thread, I think Louis is a big smiler. One of my niece's kids was like that - even as a small infant. She'd look you right in the eyes and give a huge, big smile right at you. Most babies don't do that.
I would bet that it was Louis' big smile that Kate was reacting to at his baptism. Remember how she was just glowing and smiling down at him in her arms.
That kind of smile is very powerful coming from babies. And natural. Just comes naturally to some babies. And look how Charles is reacting there. And how Camilla reacted to Louis when he was next to her waving on the balcony. Even Princess Anne was looking for Louis.
by Anonymous | reply 96 | June 11, 2019 5:49 AM |
I just don't see the attraction in Doria. She has a face like a pug, and that nose! I think she was likely more into her own interests than being a mother and that's why we see zero warmth between her and her daughter, and little apparent interest in the grandchild. Markle used to praise her dad to the skies, not her mom. I wonder what the real story is there.
by Anonymous | reply 97 | June 11, 2019 6:31 AM |
R97 , Doris isn’t classically beautiful, but she has a lovely aura about her.
Agree with R24, re Doris. I’m a native US west coaster and she reminds me a lot of the chill older ladies there. Good for her for being there for her daughter now, but I‘m sure she’s very happy leading her own life while her daughter chases fame.
by Anonymous | reply 98 | June 11, 2019 7:06 AM |
[quote] Good for her for being there for her daughter now
3 days at the wedding and, what, 10 days for the baby??
That's "being there for her daughter"?
by Anonymous | reply 99 | June 11, 2019 7:10 AM |
It's pretty obvious what the pointing out that MM now resembles her mother is about - that all her efforts to lean white have failed and she's right back where she started, pre-hair straightening and nose job. Schadenfreude on the part of some, wokeness on the part of others.
by Anonymous | reply 100 | June 11, 2019 7:13 AM |
Spot on, R96, I know exactly what you're talking about. One of my cousins was 'that' baby - just the biggest, widest, sincerest (because babies cannot be insincere and this is half their charm when you end up with one of those naturally sweet and outgoing personalities) smile for everyone. And you're exactly right about how powerful that is in a baby. Complete strangers will visibly soften and fall instantly in love. I'm convinced there's some very deep-rooted instincts at play in such interactions, because even professed baby-hating adults usually can't help but break into a big grin themselves when confronted with the embodiment of charm that is a smiley infant. That joy on Charles' face is real.
R98 Ha! I'm glad someone else recognizes the 'type' - I've lived east coast, west coast and UK and it is a west coast type through and through. The self-possession I see in Doria is one I recognize from interactions with upper class and privately educated Brits, weirdly enough. It's rare, in my experience, to meet someone like that from a middle class or lower background. I've always attributed it to public school (i.e. in the wealthy Brits) but it's not a 100% correlation, for sure, and a percentage of those public school types do go on to be 90's Hugh Grant style blithering idiots, so it doesn't work on all of them.
I would love the scoop on Doria. She's more fascinating than Meghan because she's difficult to read (and I think Meghan is one of the easiest-to-read people I've seen in the spotlight for awhile). She was very young when she had Meghan wasn't she? Late teens, early 20s? And never had more children? I know a woman of her exact type who did just that -m oops baby at 19, no more kids, never particularly material but also not abusive or neglectful, just not really interested in 'mom'ing once her one kid was old enough to look after herself, and equally uninterested in identifying as a mom. I like the way Doria just walks her dogs in her casual clothes and doesn't give af about the paps. I genuinely wonder what she thinks of her daughter, underneath it all. Methinks Megs probably takes after her father in terms of character/personality. Thomas Markle's tone in a lot of interviews has been wounded, you can see his pride was wounded at being portrayed as the fat, unworldly oaf getting played by the paps. Meghan radiates that same fear that she will be mistaken for someone other than who she wishes to be.
by Anonymous | reply 101 | June 11, 2019 7:23 AM |
In Doria's appearances in the UK, what I see is embarrassment, just trying to get through knowing how she is being scrutinised. Pretty much how most people would feel.
by Anonymous | reply 102 | June 11, 2019 7:29 AM |
Louis is not only more confident and forceful than his siblings, he is also more attractive. He has escaped the curse of the Middleton eye bags (George has them very badly) and also has Kate's very dark, distinctive arched eyebrows and dark eyelashes. His facial bone structure seems finer than the other two (he doesn't have Lottie's heavy jaw) and the hair on his head is darker. Definitely better looking than George, Wills and Harry. Perhaps will grow up to look like a male version of his mother.
by Anonymous | reply 103 | June 11, 2019 7:31 AM |
Maternal, not material, above. Argh.
by Anonymous | reply 104 | June 11, 2019 7:34 AM |
Way back when everyone argued with me when I predicted a split in a year's time. We all know they've been living apart for months, and that MM bought her own Eternity ring to match Kate's.
Also everyone argued with me when I predicted MM would be heading back to CA, and not Africa. Did you know MM was offered millions not to marry Prince Harry?
Close up shots of the balcony, explanation of what PH said to MM and why, also what happened afterwards.
by Anonymous | reply 105 | June 11, 2019 7:36 AM |
Prince Louis will probably look like James Middleton.
by Anonymous | reply 106 | June 11, 2019 7:39 AM |
Weren't people bagging on PL's looks, saying he looked retarded or like a Portuguese cab driver?
by Anonymous | reply 107 | June 11, 2019 7:40 AM |
R105, most of the posters here don't think they are living apart, nor do they think exile to Africa or Canada is imminent? What gave you that idea?
by Anonymous | reply 108 | June 11, 2019 7:42 AM |
'We all know they've been living apart for months, and that MM bought her own Eternity ring to match Kate's.'
Megxiteer alert!
by Anonymous | reply 109 | June 11, 2019 7:44 AM |
Re video R105 - deranged moronic hick.
by Anonymous | reply 110 | June 11, 2019 7:46 AM |
R105 video is narrated by a Skippie! MM wasn't crying on the balcony, ffs.
by Anonymous | reply 111 | June 11, 2019 7:57 AM |
Serena Williams isn’t much of a Jehovah’s Witness, given her penchant for cursing and fucking married men.
by Anonymous | reply 112 | June 11, 2019 8:17 AM |
I think Louis looks like the actor Bob Hoskins ! That same smile !
by Anonymous | reply 113 | June 11, 2019 8:22 AM |
R108, MM does not want to go to Africa although her husband might. MM wants to go back to the US with the excuse to see her mother. i could see her trying to revive her acting career now that she has a marketable name. Knew from Day-1 she wouldn't like all of the restrictions of being a member of the BRF.
by Anonymous | reply 114 | June 11, 2019 8:30 AM |
I think MM was prepared to give it a go. But it's her nature to move on. I don't think anything prepared her for the scrutiny and backlash she has received.
by Anonymous | reply 115 | June 11, 2019 8:33 AM |
She is supposedly on maternity leave until Autumn, which isn't in the least bit unusual for middle class women in the UK. She has no restrictions really and will be focusing on getting her figure back.
by Anonymous | reply 116 | June 11, 2019 8:37 AM |
Just last week, Harry looked visibly pissed as a result Trump insulting Meghan. So Harry seemed to be defending his wife's honor. If that's truly the case, how could their marriage be falling apart a week later simply because he told her to turn around on the balcony just as the national anthem was about to play?
by Anonymous | reply 117 | June 11, 2019 9:34 AM |
Harry wasn't necessarily defending his wife's honour with Trump; he was defending his own as well. I think the worm has turned with pH after the recent revelations that MM was looking around for a rich or famous British bf. Proof positive that he was conned.
by Anonymous | reply 118 | June 11, 2019 9:42 AM |
Live in Vegas, so going with the (long shot?) odds that all godparents will be Christian and close to royals, except for maybe Oprah? I'm the one posted that Beatrice and Eugenie would be lovely choices.
by Anonymous | reply 119 | June 11, 2019 9:46 AM |
He didn't simply tell her to turn around. He was rude and peevish about it - you can see it on his face quite clearly. She looked upset as a result of his harshness. Other than that he wasn't paying attention to her, or even holding her hand. All this is in stark contrast to how we're used to seeing them behave together.
by Anonymous | reply 120 | June 11, 2019 9:47 AM |
I wonder who else around Harry and MEagain heard him say "turn around".
by Anonymous | reply 121 | June 11, 2019 9:50 AM |
I want more from that insider who said william and rose were not having an affair but knows the real reason kate is so skinny.
by Anonymous | reply 122 | June 11, 2019 9:51 AM |
power shift with the couple was evident on the balcony
by Anonymous | reply 123 | June 11, 2019 9:52 AM |
MM is not known for "lovely choices" so I doubt Bea/Eug have a hope of being godmother.
I agree that the media revelations about MM hunting for a rich British boyfriend have probably sent Harry over the edge. That's just humiliating.
by Anonymous | reply 124 | June 11, 2019 9:55 AM |
Me too, R122. It sounded mysterious and intriguing.
by Anonymous | reply 125 | June 11, 2019 9:56 AM |
I'd rather look like Doria than Thomas myself. She looks young for her age, fit, and healthy. She's not a conventional Hollywood hottie but is a nice looking woman. Some women look better with age, and she seems to be one of them.
Prince Louis is already on schedule for growing up to be a fun, cute playboy. Charlotte will be entertaining too. Louis will grow up to look like Kate, while Charlotte will look like her father with Kate's darker hair. That isn't a bad thing, as William was a heartthrob before he balded. George will be another private, quiet monarch.
by Anonymous | reply 126 | June 11, 2019 10:04 AM |
Spot on, R123. For once she didn't look like she had his balls tucked up inside her lil' hat, so he didn't come across as emasculated. She was probably blinking back tears of anger, surprise and frustration as much as anything else at that point.
by Anonymous | reply 127 | June 11, 2019 10:04 AM |
Louis is going to be handsomer than James Middleton, because he has Di's genes.
by Anonymous | reply 128 | June 11, 2019 10:05 AM |
Anyone who thinks that you can have a reasonable conversation with a narcissist where you can explain why don't want to see them anymore (as you would a normal person), has clearly never actually HAD to deal with a narcissist before. Explanations are for when you are dealing with normal people, ghosting is for trying to extricate yourself from narcissists.
by Anonymous | reply 129 | June 11, 2019 10:23 AM |
PH and PW also have Di's genes. The Middleton children are a damn sight better looking than the Wales kids.
I think James is hot.
by Anonymous | reply 130 | June 11, 2019 10:23 AM |
^^^ WHoops wrong thread but strangely apt
by Anonymous | reply 131 | June 11, 2019 10:24 AM |
Sparkly shiny things alert!
The Edinburgh Wedding Bracelet.
by Anonymous | reply 132 | June 11, 2019 10:26 AM |
The Queen looks amazing in that pic. She has such a beautiful smile! R105 what channel is that YouTube poster called? Would love to see more of her videos.
by Anonymous | reply 133 | June 11, 2019 10:30 AM |
R133, Linked is one of 4 video hosts who post new material almost daily about the BRF and mostly MM for very light entertainment. Best is that she adds beautiful photos.
by Anonymous | reply 134 | June 11, 2019 10:39 AM |
" I still have my baby weight. My baby is 39 years old. People are so mean."
" I still have a baby bloat and my kids are 29 and 30!!! Really people she's a human not a robot."
The megstans on Instagram are making me weep tears of laughter into my breakfast.
by Anonymous | reply 135 | June 11, 2019 10:41 AM |
Re the video I linked in R105, the author says that Prince Andrew and MM pretend not to really know each other well. Does anyone find that fact "interesting?"
by Anonymous | reply 136 | June 11, 2019 10:43 AM |
Even though she got her ass handed to her on a plate I bet that MM is happy she showed up for historical/archival purposes. Harry did the henpecked hubby routine for much longer than I expected to see him snap was gratifying.
@R136 yeh they both traveled in similar circles one as a top one as a bottom, which I won't even touch here.
by Anonymous | reply 137 | June 11, 2019 10:48 AM |
That's interesting, R137. They are unwilling accomplices.
by Anonymous | reply 138 | June 11, 2019 10:49 AM |
R99, I think she has a job? Americans don’t get a lot of leave. I have the feeling that they‘re not close, but she made the appearances. She could’ve done much less.
by Anonymous | reply 139 | June 11, 2019 11:01 AM |
I guess. "Much less" would be not at all.
by Anonymous | reply 140 | June 11, 2019 11:04 AM |
R123 That's kinda what I thought, too. He treated her ungraciously on the balcony. It's not nearly enough to declare their marriage over. But as someone else just said, if the power shift has occurred I'm actually semi surprised it took so long. Royal or not, rich or not, normal person or not, there comes a time in every relationship where you just know the other person. You don't necessarily start to dislike them, but you see their tricks now, you know what they're about and what they're up to. Harry Windsor is a fairly useless toff, in my opinion, and was never the good-hearted 'lad' he was sold as. But he does have the natural power in the relationship simply by being the (by far) richer and more high status of the two. She was a literal nobody before she hooked up with him and as soon as she did her face was on the cover of Vanity Fair.
She's probably reeling post-birth (as many women do) and who knows how he's handling it. I would put money on "not well." These two married too fast, and then they got sprogged up too fast. Again, not claiming to know the future but they've made it more difficult than it had to be.
by Anonymous | reply 141 | June 11, 2019 11:05 AM |
I don"t think Haz was particularly "ungracious" to shut down her chatter and turning her back, twice, as the anthem started. It would have been worse had he started chatting with her at that point. It's all ridiculous though.
by Anonymous | reply 142 | June 11, 2019 11:14 AM |
He married her so she'd mother him and take care of him and pay attention to him, as well as give him someone to "defend" the way he wanted to defend his mother.
Now that she has her lifetime meal-ticket in Archie, Harry's not the most important thing to her anymore. I wonder if that's getting on his nerves?
by Anonymous | reply 143 | June 11, 2019 11:14 AM |
To be fair R141, they didn't have much choice but to move quickly due to MM's age. If they wanted more than one kid they had to get married and knocked up quickly. I've seen other couples in their age group have to do similar and express regret they didn't get more time together before having a baby.
by Anonymous | reply 144 | June 11, 2019 11:14 AM |
I think Harry's bored, the excitement's worn off and now it's cold, hard reality. His popularity has gone down the toilet and his family & friends have been pushed away. All the stories coming out about his wife make him look like a world class fool.
by Anonymous | reply 145 | June 11, 2019 11:15 AM |
Harry probably knew she was dming and dating other guys before him because - doh - that's what single people do! Matt Cardle and Max George aren't wealthy anyway, and she refused to date Ashley Cole the rich ex premiership footballer when she heard about his love rat past with Cheryl. But all three of these men are around her age or a little younger. She wasn't targeting sugar daddy types in their 60s.
Harry was also dating, dming and hooking up.
by Anonymous | reply 146 | June 11, 2019 11:33 AM |
She was specifically looking for a rich British sap, and she found him.
by Anonymous | reply 147 | June 11, 2019 11:37 AM |
I think the rumours about wanting to get on Made in Chelsea are true. She wouldn't go after an older man, to get on that. Hanging out with Millie Mac would have been the first step to get on it, mixing with Millie's aristo friends.
The fact that Matt Cardle and others, well, it would create headlines for her. Create an "arrival" on the UK scene. Not that Matt Cardle is particularly newsworthy ( was he at the time? Can't remember ) , but she would have been calling the paps the minute she got dates with any of these types of guys.
by Anonymous | reply 148 | June 11, 2019 11:38 AM |
Why wasn't she targeting rich men, then?
by Anonymous | reply 149 | June 11, 2019 11:39 AM |
Sorry, the fact that Cardle etc weren't exactly minted...
She needed an arrival on the UK scene, so was probably messaging many, many others. Waiting for someone to bite, perhaps.
by Anonymous | reply 150 | June 11, 2019 11:39 AM |
By all accounts she'd done rich men before...to no avail.
by Anonymous | reply 151 | June 11, 2019 11:40 AM |
She'd have found a rich man through Made in Chelsea.
by Anonymous | reply 152 | June 11, 2019 11:40 AM |
Millie Mackintosh hasn't been on Made in Chelsea since 2012. She left to marry Professor Green, then divorced him.
I watch MiC and its cast is mainly under 30s so MM would have been too old for it. It also films 30 episodes a year so wouldn't have fitted in with her Suits schedule at all.
by Anonymous | reply 153 | June 11, 2019 11:42 AM |
There aren't ANY men on MiC over 30 except gay Mark Francis and this has been the case from the start. They move on when they reach their late 20s. The majority of the cast are under 25.
by Anonymous | reply 154 | June 11, 2019 11:45 AM |
Im sure Harry is well aware of how much actresses and actors have to "hustle" in every sense of the term. He must know that a woman in show biz would network and be aggressive about pursuing opportunities... whether romantically or professionally. I think it's the dMs and receipts being made public that he has a problem with as it makes him look like a fool. Otherwise I'm sure he was never under any illusions about MM's past. Idiotic to expect someone in show biz to have his grandma's " 1940s morals".
by Anonymous | reply 155 | June 11, 2019 11:45 AM |
Have the dms been made public?
by Anonymous | reply 156 | June 11, 2019 11:48 AM |
I wonder if he's heard rumours of a sex tape ... and other possible things to come
by Anonymous | reply 157 | June 11, 2019 11:51 AM |
Harry has no idea how hard actresses have to hustle. He's been given everything in life and still feels like he's had to 'work' for it because he's been in the public eye against his will all this time and he resents that. He's the ultimate in shielded and naive while thinking he's worldly, and all the bitterness that ultimately comes with that combination. He had no idea she was chatting up the entire British z-list or there is no way he would have married her, even though she did have the added attraction to him of being half-black (woke-signalling).
Now he feels a fool, and especially feels a fool around those who tried to warn him off her, which is why he was so visibly frosty in the carriage and on the balcony.
by Anonymous | reply 158 | June 11, 2019 11:59 AM |
Sorry, it's not just grandma's morals to view fucking for roles and social climbing to a phony feminist humanitarian peak as odious.
by Anonymous | reply 159 | June 11, 2019 11:59 AM |
No evidence she 'fucked for roles', just R159's inherent misogyny. She spent seven years on one successful show so no need to find other parts.
Harry either knows or doesn't care. He would have to be a very insecure guy to get hyped up by tame articles like that. And there is no sex tape, so the ugly Skippie at R159 can stop salivating.
by Anonymous | reply 160 | June 11, 2019 12:37 PM |
People like R160 crack me up.
by Anonymous | reply 161 | June 11, 2019 12:43 PM |
Photos of Harry having a audience with the Prime Minister of Nepal today at Kensington Palace.
by Anonymous | reply 162 | June 11, 2019 12:44 PM |
Why does he always looked so disheveled? All I can look at are the hundreds of creases in his suit.
by Anonymous | reply 163 | June 11, 2019 12:47 PM |
Casual outfits for the Cambridges today as they arrive in Keswick in Cumbria.
by Anonymous | reply 164 | June 11, 2019 12:48 PM |
I like this photo of the Queen and Prince Philip.
by Anonymous | reply 166 | June 11, 2019 12:51 PM |
r160 she was 7 years on a cable show, that hardly anyone watched. Despite what her stans and PR like to claim she was not the lead. She was one of an ensemble way down the call sheet. There is always a need to find other work. If there wasn't why was she hustling like it was going out of style, trying to blag her way into golden globe parties etc?
by Anonymous | reply 167 | June 11, 2019 12:52 PM |
Lol at the nisogyny troll.
You think you're mad too unstable. Kicking in chairs and knocking down tables.
Markle herself stated in her anonymous blog that a boyfriend of hers fucked her own agent for roles. Her agent was male, at that time.
by Anonymous | reply 168 | June 11, 2019 12:53 PM |
Misogyny ^^^
by Anonymous | reply 169 | June 11, 2019 12:54 PM |
William needs to shave all that ugly thinning hair off. He would look much better.
by Anonymous | reply 171 | June 11, 2019 12:54 PM |
Haz appears disheveled because of his ugly mug I think. He should look better because he's tall, but he has the Markle "uncomfortable in their own skin" disease. Lighten up Haz!
by Anonymous | reply 172 | June 11, 2019 12:56 PM |
An 'anonymous blog' R168? You are hilarious.
'Call the police, there's a Welp Troll around
Running down, underground
To a Tumblr blog in a west end town.'
by Anonymous | reply 174 | June 11, 2019 12:58 PM |
Harry would also look better if he shaved the disgusting hair off his face. It's just not a good look on him.
by Anonymous | reply 175 | June 11, 2019 12:58 PM |
Kate's crow's feet lines are pretty deep. She has ugly bags under her eyes, too.
by Anonymous | reply 176 | June 11, 2019 1:00 PM |
R175, agree. Harry and Wills are both butter faces.
Good bodies, fug faces.
by Anonymous | reply 177 | June 11, 2019 1:01 PM |
Lmao, R174, I'm not the Welp Troll.
You got a heart of glass or a heart of stone
Just you wait till I get you home.
Her blog was The Working Actress. ( not to be confused with a UK version). And nope, it weren't Tumblr.
by Anonymous | reply 178 | June 11, 2019 1:07 PM |
Spank your arse.
“You need to know that you’re enough.”
by Anonymous | reply 179 | June 11, 2019 1:11 PM |
We've got no future
We've got no past
Here today built to last
On every DL thread and every nation
From Lake Geneva to the Welp Troll station
by Anonymous | reply 181 | June 11, 2019 1:14 PM |
Of course, the blog has been scrubbed, but there are archives about.
by Anonymous | reply 182 | June 11, 2019 1:15 PM |
Following 7? 😂😂
HM stans have been saying there's a Meghan sex tape for two years but it has never materialised because it doesn't exist.
by Anonymous | reply 183 | June 11, 2019 1:16 PM |
Its lust not love and Harry doesn't know the difference. They've only really lived together since marriage and don't know each other that well IMO.
by Anonymous | reply 184 | June 11, 2019 1:28 PM |
I wonder if her head spun around and green vomit flew out of her mouth after she read all the internet comments regarding her weight. She has to be reeling from the blatantly negative reaction, but hey! At least it's publicity!
by Anonymous | reply 185 | June 11, 2019 1:30 PM |
r180 "Welcome to the hustle" ????????
by Anonymous | reply 186 | June 11, 2019 1:32 PM |
R161 Please, bitch - you get nowhere in the business she was in if you're reasonably attractive, young, female (which she was), but not particularly exceptional or talented (which she wasn't,) but willing to do anything to get up the ladder (which she was), if you don't fuck for advantage. Her first husband got her the job on "Suits" and her second husband got her the A-list celebrity she craved finally. Suits was a joke show on cable - she wasn't Big Hollywood, she was a c-lister, she wasn't even a primary character on Suits. And was the best she could do after 15 years and it still took a man to get here and then she ditched him. You don't need photographs to know it. She's as hard as nails and she didn't get that way for nothing. Alll those Suitcase Girls on Deal or No Deal played the game.
And you don't know that there isn't or never was a sex tape. You know know that no one has been able to get his hands on it. It may or may not exist, but if it did, it wouldn't surprise anyone but you Meghanstans.
by Anonymous | reply 187 | June 11, 2019 1:34 PM |
Who gives a fuck what she was doing aged 28 in 2010? Harry was prancing around getting stoned in a Nazi uniform or carousing with strippers in Vegas.
by Anonymous | reply 188 | June 11, 2019 1:34 PM |
R187, I do know there isn't one because it would have been sold to the UK tabloids for a huge fee if it existed. Your Victorian type prejudice against actresses is pretty alarming.
by Anonymous | reply 190 | June 11, 2019 1:38 PM |
About Welcome to the Hustle
Personal Information
I am a working actress. And I don't have an entourage. Not a star. Not in tabloids. The kind of girl who is sometimes recognizable-ish. Operative suffix being "ish." I don't wait tables. I don't have a side job. I am in the club of the fortunate few that somehow make a living playing dress up. When it's good, it's f-ing awesome. The other 300+ days, it's harder than most would think. Humbling. Greuling. Sometimes mind numbing. But at the end of the day, it's all worth it. People often describe actors who pop onto the scene as "overnight success stories." Here's the reality -- it's more like years of hustle + a night. Welcome to the hustle.
categories
Artist
by Anonymous | reply 191 | June 11, 2019 1:39 PM |
R190.
What's stopping the UK tabloids from already sitting on it?
by Anonymous | reply 192 | June 11, 2019 1:44 PM |
I do not buy that they did not expect her, she leaked it through Obie. I stated early on that they would have preferred she stay away. If they truly did not want her there, she would have been blocked.
The photos and video further her victim narrative and they were mean racists story arc. Harry should have sad no to her coming rather than have her come and treat her shabbily in public.
I do look forward to this story arc resolving, although thoughts of Archie make me quite sad.
If he knocks her up again he is beyond stupid.
Those white flap things, wtf?!!!
by Anonymous | reply 193 | June 11, 2019 1:44 PM |
R144 - The BRF had a choice. Your friends didn't have to get permission from the Queen to marry whilst retaining their places in the line of succession. When he whinged about her age to get permission not to wait any longer, they should have said, "Your problem, not ours. We don't think she's suitable and we don't think you know each other well enough. You wait a year living together IN England and she stays out of official events, and if you don't like that, you can sod off to Las Vegas and marry her in an Elvis Chapel next week. You're worried about kids? Go find a pretty twenty-something."
by Anonymous | reply 194 | June 11, 2019 1:45 PM |
The "power shift" observation upthread is astute.
Magic 8 Ball, Madame Cleo, Professor Marvel, Johnny Smith and I met and agreed (abstained: 8 Ball. But, he's a quiet sort) : divorce; 24 months, tops.
I have no doubt that behind the scenes, The Duke of Sussex is one immature, moody, miserable, most likely hungover, had to deal with man.
Her ambition exceeded her ability. She simply does. not. get . it.
I see glimmers that it's dawning on her. She has the bigger decisions because, obviously her position and financial situation downgrades at divorce.
He should still be single. He has no business being married. And neither does she.
by Anonymous | reply 195 | June 11, 2019 1:45 PM |
R193- "If he knocks her up again he is beyond stupid."
He will and he is.
by Anonymous | reply 196 | June 11, 2019 1:46 PM |
hard-to-deal-with man.
by Anonymous | reply 197 | June 11, 2019 1:47 PM |
I wonder how many times the papers had to rewrite Phillip’s obituary over the years.
by Anonymous | reply 198 | June 11, 2019 1:48 PM |
The Duchess of the Lovely Hair lets us know she reads DL , when the kids are in bed, by showing us her watch! ( See (previous?) thread ) .
by Anonymous | reply 199 | June 11, 2019 1:48 PM |
All kinds of reasons, R192, an injunction, the power of the BRF, etc.
Her chasing of British z listers was only recently allowed. Had that run before the wedding, the outcome may have been different. Much more to come and much more that will never see the light of day.
by Anonymous | reply 200 | June 11, 2019 1:49 PM |
Lol, R199. I want photos of the sheep shearing!
Can you imagine our Rach shearing a sheep?
by Anonymous | reply 201 | June 11, 2019 1:50 PM |
Sorry R200, it might have come across slightly wrong.
I mean, who is to say that the press do not already have sex tapes and more explosive stuff? I believe they do.
What stops them from releasing is exactly what you have said.
by Anonymous | reply 202 | June 11, 2019 1:51 PM |
R194, these are the people who let Charles divorce Diana and marry the hated Camilla. Charles had only been dating Diana a few months and he was allowed to marry her. Harry was old for a royal marriage.
by Anonymous | reply 203 | June 11, 2019 1:52 PM |
[quote] Markle herself stated in her anonymous blog that a boyfriend of hers fucked her own agent for roles. Her agent was male, at that time.
I've looked at the Working Actress posts on the thread. I'm not seeing anything like that.
by Anonymous | reply 204 | June 11, 2019 1:52 PM |
Della, you've changed your tune a little bit since this whole debacle started. As I recall, you were one who had high hopes for Smugz, as in it seemed like you were really rooting for her to learn and grow into her role. Now you're saying that she simply does not get it. I agree wholeheartedly, but that's a new position for you, right?
by Anonymous | reply 205 | June 11, 2019 1:52 PM |
The tabloids don't sit on things like that. They would have released it or at least described the contents, just as they released the adulterous Fergie toe sucking pics.
by Anonymous | reply 206 | June 11, 2019 1:54 PM |
Lol R204, I'll try and find that particular post, it's archived somewhere. You won't find that on the FB or Twitter leads to the blog, just screenshots from the original.
I'll try my best to retrieve it for you.
by Anonymous | reply 207 | June 11, 2019 1:55 PM |
The writing style of that blog does sound like Meghan, but who knows? I imagine during their courtship she entertained Harry with her Hollywood stories, while he entertained her with behind-the-scenes royal stories. Oh, to have been a fly on that wall.
by Anonymous | reply 208 | June 11, 2019 1:58 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 209 | June 11, 2019 2:06 PM |
R195 - Four years, Della, if MM has anything to say about it. She has to pop out that second kid. It will up her settlement and child support, and the shorter the marriage, the lower the settlement. More importantly, she needs UK citizenship to lock in that HRH title so she has it to trade in a divorce. If she doesn't, she loses iautomatically the moment the decree nisi goes through. Nature being the cruel mistress she is, as a man Harry can wait five years to start a second familly, she can't. With the one kid and no UK citizenship, her prospects in a settlement battle will be more difficult to ensure. And the BRF are going to play hardball, as they did with Fergie - and she was a white English girl with some background. They punished Fergie for her bad behaviour and they'll punish Sparkle, too. She isn't going to end up like Diana, a beautiful charismatic global star with a $20 million settlement.
If Harry had the brains of an ant, which he doesn't, he'd make sure he doesn't knock her up again and goes for the divorce before her UK citizenship kicks in. She'll face losing that HRH. She'll also be between a rock and a hard place re taxes: if she doesn't renounce her US citizenship when the UK one comes in, any settlement will be subject to two sets of taxes. If she does give up her US citizenship, she cuts herself off from an easy return home.
The BRF will be holding all the cards especially if she's not yet a UK citizen, and she'll be royally screwed if she doesn't play ball, agree to drop the "Duchess" title, sign a stiff NDA, agree to shared custody, give up her patronages, agree not to hold herself out as representing the BRF in any way, shape or form. If she plays ball, she'll get more money and Frogmore Cottage until Archie is 18.
She knows she'll have more leverage if they have two kids and that title is hers by right of UK citizenship, not just courtesy. She'll still have US taxes to worry about but she'll have an extra negotiating card, the title.
So, 24 months - no. Meghan doesn't get what she needs without a second kid and UK citizenship. It's only 24 months if Harry refuses to have a second kid and gets his arse moving quickly. And he won't.
by Anonymous | reply 210 | June 11, 2019 2:09 PM |
She looks great in that olive-colored jacket and the Doc Martens. The woman has style.
by Anonymous | reply 211 | June 11, 2019 2:09 PM |
How can Harry prevent her getting knocked up again apart from a vasectomy or celibacy?
I personally think she's on the verge of a breakdown
by Anonymous | reply 212 | June 11, 2019 2:13 PM |
r210 I don't disagree with your assessment but it won't last that long. Don't forget Harry is watching his own popularity fall and fall dramatically. He's never lived in a world wher he wasn't popular with the public. That, and now he knows she was hunting British z-listers right before nabbing him. He is spoiled and not used to thinking himself a fucking fool, but he's getting too many glimpses at the fact that the world now DOES see him as a fucking fool. It will burn a hole right through their 'relationship', and quickly.
by Anonymous | reply 213 | June 11, 2019 2:13 PM |
I'm thinking celibacy, R212. There's been a sea change in their relationship ever since the news broke that she was Brit hunting, and Harry is profoundly pissed off.
by Anonymous | reply 214 | June 11, 2019 2:16 PM |
I’m outing myself as a frau in order to hopefully explain some of Meghan’s recent looks and behavior.
I’m 5’3” and normally weigh around 105-110 but I’m deep into menopause now so I’m probably a bit over 110 right now. So, petite and long-time runner. I’m now 52 and my son just turned 17 yesterday so I was almost 36 when he was born. It was an easy pregnancy but a very difficult delivery (Thank you, Johns Hopkins nurse-goddesses) and a month after the birth, I know I looked exactly like Meghan: puffy, round-faced, scared, alone.
My mom was there, dad and sister arrived a week later then in-laws a month later and my husband was terrific and hands-on but being a new mother is exhausting and terrifying. Everything is off in your body and your mind. I would cry for no reason then laugh so hard that I would start urinating. And I couldn’t stop it so yes, I would be standing in my kitchen with pee running down my legs, which would start up the tears again. It was so frustrating and upsetting and lonely. And it took a long time to feel OK just walking up and down the street - I felt like my insides were going to fall out for weeks. I breastfed for ten months but only lost that last ten pounds when my son was hospitalized for a terrible virus at 22 months then got RSV. I was so stressed that I stopped eating for a month.
When I see that look on Meghan’s face on the balcony, it breaks my heart. It is VERY hard to control one’s emotions right after childbirth. She looks lonely, sad and scared and all are very valid and understandable emotions during new parenthood. And she’s going through them live on the world stage.
TL;DR: Pregnancy and new parenthood: they’re not a fucking cakewalk and they cause a lot of crying and urination.
by Anonymous | reply 215 | June 11, 2019 2:17 PM |
R192 - IF they are sitting on it, and I've always added the IF, they know perfectly well that with some stories they risk killing the goose that lays the golden egg. They also know that whilst throwing shade within the bounds their lawyers have told them to observe is one thing, ruining a life and embarrassing the royal family at this level can bring down enough wrath to destroy whatever give and take is left between them and the BRF, which isn't much as it is. It's not an understanding: at best, it's a truce. And lastly, they know that personal embarrassment at that level, no matter how much they dislike her, can turn her into a victim and them into the villains in a heartbeat. They have to weigh all that carefully when they have a story that hot. It would dwarf Fergie and the toe-sucking photos, which were at least taken outdoors in a public place. There' s huge risk to them in publishing it. If they have it, my guess is, it would neve see the light of day.
by Anonymous | reply 216 | June 11, 2019 2:17 PM |
Harry could just return to his old ways of fucking other girls. Plus her being post-birth and so matronly, I doubt his lust is still as vivid as it once was. It takes serious skills to make a matronly body work when your hook was 'hot sex kitten willing to do anything'.
I'd be hilarious if she just IVFs it at a private clinic without clearing it with him.
by Anonymous | reply 217 | June 11, 2019 2:19 PM |
And I say TOUGH SHIT, R215. She needed to take all that into consideration (the weight gain, the pissing, the crying, the fear and loneliness) before she started alienating every member of the "family she never had". She fucked up ROYALLY, and now she can wallow in it.
by Anonymous | reply 218 | June 11, 2019 2:20 PM |
Is the Givenchy fashion house popular? The clothes they give Markle are awful.
And do we really believe the working actress blog and handle are MMs? And if si why?
PH will verbally abuse her behind the scenes with impunity. I sort of feel bad for her.
Her small petite frame will make it a challenge to lose the weight. Exacerbatibg the abuse that PH doles out.
by Anonymous | reply 219 | June 11, 2019 2:21 PM |
Givenchy is falling reputation-wise, it definitely isn't what it used to.
by Anonymous | reply 220 | June 11, 2019 2:22 PM |
Sorry, r215, but I just don't care. Every woman who has given birth has managed somehow, so to me they are just who they are, not some Special Person Who Gave Birth.
And who is Meghan? She's a Hustler, who is Hustling the RF and more importantly, trying to Hustle the British taxpayer.
She can fuck right off.
by Anonymous | reply 221 | June 11, 2019 2:26 PM |
The tabloids were running the stories about The Working Actress being her blog.
Here's a story about the ex and the agent.
by Anonymous | reply 222 | June 11, 2019 2:36 PM |
Think in the long term.
The interest in Markle will pass fairly quickly as she and Princey age. They'll probably stay married but if they don't all of Markle's hard savvy won't purchase much. She'll look cheap no matter what she does. Her princeling will purchase some relevance, but one look at Fergie shows the future in a divorce.
If they remain married, they'll recede into the background as the new heir apparent and his smart princess take on the Wales roles from King Chuck.
The noise now is just passing cultural boredom masked as interest, doused with the kind of tired bitchery seen here that not only can't pass for light, it carried very little heat.
In the long run Markle will be seen as Walli's final revenge on the Royals. A person who actually is the "adventuress" that Queen Mary quailed at. The nightmare of the 1930s has become the yawn of the 2010s, and it's not misogynistic to note that if this is progress for women it's a sign that things still aren't at sexual parity. She's clever because she parlayed little into a lot, finding just the right golden gander.
Geese aren't smart but they're very loyal, at least at first.
by Anonymous | reply 223 | June 11, 2019 2:38 PM |
R216 Your premise assumes that the tabloids in question are British. If there were a tape, there's no reason the seller would only approach British publications. Even if the British tabloids didn't publish the video, they could publish its existence.
TMZ. BILD, The National Enquirer and others would pay for the tape regardless of what the British papers would do.
by Anonymous | reply 224 | June 11, 2019 2:38 PM |
No worries about any of that scenario, r233, because they won't remain married.
by Anonymous | reply 225 | June 11, 2019 2:41 PM |
Here she comes! Slap bang as the Cambridges start their visit and steal the headlines. But it's not just her Insta.....it's a flurry of puff pieces over a new photo. ....
by Anonymous | reply 226 | June 11, 2019 2:47 PM |
Ooh, I wonder who insisted on that photo being there?
by Anonymous | reply 227 | June 11, 2019 2:48 PM |
How does his suit look so bad when he supposedly lives right there. I've seen better on new junior staff that need to bus in.
by Anonymous | reply 228 | June 11, 2019 2:50 PM |
I don't think MM will be able to get all her ducks in a row. The press have had the knives out for her since the baby mystery and the public is baying for blood. I give it a year tops.
by Anonymous | reply 229 | June 11, 2019 2:51 PM |
I agree with Markle being Wallis' revenge from beyond the grave. In fact, I'm going to go full MARY!!! and posit that it's interesting to watch the BRF get its full karmic just desserts at every stage. Did Your Royal Highnesses think Wallis, Koo Stark and Fergie were embarrassing, licentious, grifting, adventuresses? Well, you'll get Markle all rolled into one and not only will you openly embrace the 'adventurous' American(!) Divorcee (!!!!) this time, you will watch as she tries (poorly) to win the public over with one PR offensive after another. Did you think it was immoral for the sister of the Head of the Church of England to marry a divorced man in the 1950s? Wait till each and every one of the Queen's kids except Edward get divorced. Did you find it despicable that the public chose your beautiful teenaged wife over you? Well, watch as your mother lives long enough to make you the longest running apprentice in the history of the BRF. If they go in too hard on Meghan (though she IS an utter grifter and pill), expect the same lessons to be learnt through Louis and Charlotte marrying spouses who are more grasping and attention whore-y than Auntie Meghan. All because Nature is the best leveller and teacher of karmic lessons when you try to play god and control everything.
(i know i know, MARY MARY MARY!!!!!!)
by Anonymous | reply 230 | June 11, 2019 3:04 PM |
R215 Oh, I don’t disagree but I do understand the ready tearfulness. She shouldn’t have gone to TTC. She shouldn’t have done a LOT of things she has done so yes, she has made her bed and she’s a big girl so she’ll have to figure it out on her own.
by Anonymous | reply 231 | June 11, 2019 3:11 PM |
R218 Your handle almost made me shoot coffee through my nose. Well played, good sir.
by Anonymous | reply 232 | June 11, 2019 3:12 PM |
R226 - shit, talk about a tossed word salad. There really wasn't any need to go into all of that shit in multiple paragraphs and how many fucking photographs does she have to post to prove her word salad? She could have done it in a couple of sentences.
"Harry met the PM of Nepal today. He visited Nepal after the earthquake. He really loves Nepal".
The end. You see, Megsy, easy peasy.
by Anonymous | reply 233 | June 11, 2019 3:20 PM |
Kate is ready for some traipsing through farm communities.
by Anonymous | reply 234 | June 11, 2019 3:21 PM |
Well whaddaya know..Willy'.s actually beaming at her!!! Either Wills has started warming up and being more affectionate in public or he's trying to dispel the Rose rumours- fake as the news might still be.
I've always thought he has seemed private about his feelings but incredibly protective when it comes to Kate. Just their engagement interview was proof enough. But yeah, I can see why people might think they're cold.
by Anonymous | reply 239 | June 11, 2019 3:31 PM |
He was still trimming rose's bush until very recently.
Threw poor meg to the wolves hence harry being angry and the affair causing the rift between the brothers.
Rose will not go down without destroying them. I have a feeling she is upset. Heard wills had a german lawyer and a banker on the roster, not sure rose was aware of them and now, well, all hell is about to break loose and the cambs are going down. You reap what you sow.
by Anonymous | reply 240 | June 11, 2019 3:37 PM |
Let's take a ride,
and run with the trolls tonight.
In Suburbia
by Anonymous | reply 241 | June 11, 2019 3:42 PM |
LOL @ Harry being upset about the affair. This is fan fic. Harry really would not care where Will's peen has been. And MM has leaked the affair rumours- make no mistake.
by Anonymous | reply 242 | June 11, 2019 3:42 PM |
By the looks of it, Harry is getting ready to have an affair of his own
by Anonymous | reply 243 | June 11, 2019 3:45 PM |
Harry has cheated all his previous flings, and you think he has the ability to give a fuck? I wouldn't be surprised if he's already been fucking around, with his wife being out for the past few months + her looks now.
by Anonymous | reply 244 | June 11, 2019 3:46 PM |
R242 Learn how to read you thick fuck.
Harry is upset because the cambs/kp threw meg to the wolves, used her as distraction to cover for wills wandering peen. He found out. He's mad.
Get it now?
by Anonymous | reply 245 | June 11, 2019 3:48 PM |
"White knight" Harry jumping in to defend his lady's honour, gasping in shock at William's lack of honour in cheating on his wife!!!!!!!!!!!! When the royals are all known to lead such chaste, abstinent and upstanding private lives! starting with Harry himself!
Please can you take this tedious frau nonsense elsewhere? This thread takes off and zooms when oldish gays bring in their 2 cents about Diana, Fergie, HM, Margaret and Mary as a register to compare Megs' grift. It crashes to the ground when we become judge-y fraus in the Megs is a ho/Kate is a ho/Rose is a ho vein.
by Anonymous | reply 246 | June 11, 2019 3:49 PM |
The Welp Troll is a lonely child, who's waiting in the park
The Welp Troll is in charge of finding treasure in the dark
And watching over lucky clover, isn't that bizarre?
And every little thing the Welp Troll does
Leaves an answer with a question mark
by Anonymous | reply 247 | June 11, 2019 3:51 PM |
It also crashes when we get judgy old crones telling us what to say, r246
by Anonymous | reply 248 | June 11, 2019 3:52 PM |
R254- You are exhausting and have way too high an opinion of Harry. Right now the only person he cares about is himself and the only person who's getting him bad press is Meghan which is why he's mad at her. The affair rumours mysteriously leaked when MM's bad press was its peak? Pray who could it be...
by Anonymous | reply 249 | June 11, 2019 3:52 PM |
Meghan didn't leak fuck all.
The affair rumour came from other sources. It got wings after the sun, but especially after dm hinted about it in their something-eden (forget name) column. And kp and wills laywers threatening to sue using EU human rights law. Bad move by cambs. Streisand effect. Remember, they said nothing about an affair, simply that there was a rift between kate and rose but that was enough to set them off. Rose camp said nothing.
by Anonymous | reply 250 | June 11, 2019 3:54 PM |
'Get it now?'
Lmao the Welp Troll at R245 lost it because another poster dared to question their batshit conspiracy theories.
by Anonymous | reply 251 | June 11, 2019 3:54 PM |
Meg leaks everything like a sieve, but now she's supposed to be seen as an innocent little flower who did nothing wrong. Even if she didn't leak it, this is literally of her own making since she's made her image to be synonymous with leaks.
I wouldn't even be surprised if they're playing this up to make her seem worse and worse, nobody would even question that the divorced attention-whore hollywood starlet is doing it at this point. Would be smart and long game af
by Anonymous | reply 252 | June 11, 2019 3:58 PM |
Yep, "sources" leaked about Rose as soon as news of a certain someone's salad tossing video started doing the rounds. Hmm. Interesting.
Proof is in the pudding though. There's been nothing to prove the Rose rumours beyond a whisper campaign- which is what gave William's lawsuit legs. You can make the same argument for all of MM's yachting rumours and you would be right to- but this is why this whisper campaign game is dangerous and will not end well for Markle. The BRF WILL use their arsenal and opp. intel if pushed.
by Anonymous | reply 253 | June 11, 2019 4:00 PM |
Sometimes, you're better off dead
The Welp Troll's going crazy all over the thread
The Welp Troll's mad, so unstable
Calling Meg a hoe and saying Archie's a fable.
by Anonymous | reply 254 | June 11, 2019 4:00 PM |
R249 Perhaps you should go back to analyzing 3 second clips.
by Anonymous | reply 255 | June 11, 2019 4:01 PM |
As recently as the Archie photo call Prince Dimwit had no problem letting Meggy Sharp conduct that whole scenario including her trademark patronizing patting of his back as they walked away. Wonder what happened between then and TTC.
by Anonymous | reply 256 | June 11, 2019 4:01 PM |
She just used PH as a tool to come in the,RF . Her eyes where always on the prize and that prize is PW with all his money that will come to him once PC is king and he has the duchie of Cornwall .She wants to be the future queen and have glorie and power and money !
by Anonymous | reply 257 | June 11, 2019 4:04 PM |
What happened, r256, was the revelation that right up until she met Harry, she had been begging any UK z-lister she could find to date her.
by Anonymous | reply 258 | June 11, 2019 4:05 PM |
(T)roll Call Thread 71 BRFG
Salad Tossing Troll
Yuge's Wedding Was Ruined Troll
Meg Was Thrown to the Wolves to Distract from Rose and William Rumours Troll
Adderall Troll
Welp Troll
Meg Leaks Like A Sieve Troll
Kate Does Everything Right Troll
by Anonymous | reply 259 | June 11, 2019 4:05 PM |
What happened, R256, was that she looked fat and frumpy at that photo call. Kate was practically back in shape hours after giving birth.
by Anonymous | reply 260 | June 11, 2019 4:07 PM |
Oh and R258:
All Z Listers Turned Meg Down Troll aka Even Footballers Weren't Interested Troll
by Anonymous | reply 261 | June 11, 2019 4:08 PM |
That boy in front of Me-Gained-Four-Stone is going to grow up beautiful.
by Anonymous | reply 262 | June 11, 2019 4:10 PM |
OMG yes R262 I noticed him too. Adorable
by Anonymous | reply 263 | June 11, 2019 4:12 PM |
Max already denied it. Meghan never texted him, they have never even met. He said:"i dont know why they're '[the media] are doing this [making up shit] to her".
Yeah, r260, she should have used a surrogate like Kate not-so-keen.
by Anonymous | reply 264 | June 11, 2019 4:15 PM |
'She just used PH as a tool to come in the,RF . Her eyes where always on the prize and that prize is PW with all his money that will come to him once PC is king and he has the duchie of Cornwall .She wants to be the queen'
Skippy, Skippy, Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
by Anonymous | reply 265 | June 11, 2019 4:16 PM |
a picture of pregnant kate in a bikini v. daily changes in baby bump and looking 9months pregnant in the 2nd trimester.
by Anonymous | reply 266 | June 11, 2019 4:20 PM |
If PH really has fallen out of love because Meg is still carrying baby weight one month out, he really is Shallow Hal.
And Saint Kate of the Solent Yachts is not the only woman Harry has observed go through pregnancy, so he'll be very aware that not all women snap back within weeks.
by Anonymous | reply 267 | June 11, 2019 4:20 PM |
Harry IS shallow. MM and Kate don't get a pass on anything in the press- their hemlines, their accents, their extended families. But no a peep on William Sir-Hunts and Fucks-A-Lot and Harry the Nazi-arm-band-wearing-nude-poker-playing Prince.
by Anonymous | reply 268 | June 11, 2019 4:25 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 269 | June 11, 2019 4:26 PM |
Will isn't very good at sheep shearing but I'll give him a pass for being game to try it.
by Anonymous | reply 270 | June 11, 2019 4:26 PM |
Kate used a surrogate.
I've already posted photos of her collapsed bump. She smoked during the pregnancy and pap caught her smoking at the airport without any visible bump. She played basketball shortly after having george and her stomach got exposed. She never carried him. Probably not the others either.
She was at the hospital and the rumour is she was doing ivf, getting her eggs out hence the "morning sickness".
It will all come out in due time. It always does.
by Anonymous | reply 271 | June 11, 2019 4:27 PM |
Now it's Catherine's turn. She's even more hesitant than Will.
by Anonymous | reply 272 | June 11, 2019 4:29 PM |
[quote] William Sir-Hunts and Fucks-A-Lot and Harry the Nazi-arm-band-wearing-nude-pok - er-playing Prince.
Glad I wasn't drinking anything when I read that.
by Anonymous | reply 274 | June 11, 2019 4:30 PM |
Visiting Keswick market and sampling the goodies.
by Anonymous | reply 275 | June 11, 2019 4:31 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 277 | June 11, 2019 4:35 PM |
Jack seems like a good sort. No news of Edo and Bea, hurtling towards the aisle?
by Anonymous | reply 278 | June 11, 2019 4:38 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 279 | June 11, 2019 4:39 PM |
Gert needs to get out more. I'm shocked she's only 26. I thought she was Skippy's age.
by Anonymous | reply 280 | June 11, 2019 4:40 PM |
Diana on Lady Pamela Hicks (nee Mountbatten)
"She was really spiteful"
by Anonymous | reply 281 | June 11, 2019 4:45 PM |
If MM had anything to hide, why would she leak the Rose story to divert attention? Wouldn’t she know they would dig her dirt up? None of this make sense to me. There’s no connection here.
by Anonymous | reply 283 | June 11, 2019 4:49 PM |
The Rose story suddenly came out straight after the news of her licking some guys arse out on tape.
by Anonymous | reply 284 | June 11, 2019 4:53 PM |
Eldergays, tell me about Princess Anne? Was she considered the beautiful princess in her time, before Di waltzed onto the scene? I can imagine that Diana stealing so many people's thunder would NOT have gone down well. Did Anne like her?
by Anonymous | reply 285 | June 11, 2019 4:56 PM |
Anne was the ultimate fug. Looked like a horse so it's no wonder equines loved her so much. She was never considered beautiful.
by Anonymous | reply 286 | June 11, 2019 5:12 PM |
'The Rose story suddenly came out straight after the news of her licking some guys arse out on tape.'
She comes from LA where everyone has sex tape rumours or exposes. She's not losing sleep over that. If any outlet had such a tape, it would have been out there by now.
by Anonymous | reply 287 | June 11, 2019 5:15 PM |
princess anne with long hair was pretty for a short while, like most windsors. Peaked young, but it was a peak.
by Anonymous | reply 288 | June 11, 2019 5:24 PM |
Not everyone in LA ends up marrying the Queen's grandson, though, R287, by fair means or foul.
by Anonymous | reply 289 | June 11, 2019 5:25 PM |
My god. I would've been seething if it were me. Imagine being THE Princess Anne, dutifully picking up all the slack and being the least dramatic royal spawn and in walks this gorgeous 19 year old who doesn't know her head from her arse and the people are absolutely besotted!
by Anonymous | reply 290 | June 11, 2019 5:34 PM |
Bea is Harry all over again and worse. Seems like Edo was just recently engaged to the mother of his toddler and dumped her to hop on Bea.
Now that is truly a disaster in the making. Bea, a stepmother to a child whose mother is gorgeous, smart and well-established in her profession.
Edo is really the bottom of the barrel.
by Anonymous | reply 291 | June 11, 2019 5:34 PM |
I was watching Piers Morgan interview Michael Barrymore the other night, and they talked a bit about Barrymore's bizarre friendship with Diana. It starts around 2:43, if anyone's interested.
by Anonymous | reply 292 | June 11, 2019 5:46 PM |
R250 peevishly says, "Rose camp said nothing."
Bullybullshit. She was out there the next day denying it.
Y'all gotta up yr shill game.
by Anonymous | reply 293 | June 11, 2019 5:47 PM |
Eugenie's eyes welled up with tears on the balcony during God Save the Queen. She seems like a lovely person who loves her grandmother.
by Anonymous | reply 294 | June 11, 2019 5:51 PM |
Meghan used hr own father as a punching bag and a scapegoat. Whenever she did something bad, she would trot out a story about him, e.g., to announce, yet again, that TM would never see his grandchild. It was almost sadistic. Then, when public sympathy shifted to her father, Meg started on Will and Kate. I mean, why would Wm cheat with an unattractive woman, model or not? The important thing is whether the British people believe the rumors or recognize Meg’s modus operandi.
by Anonymous | reply 295 | June 11, 2019 5:53 PM |
We don't need no stinking tab to tell us about Sparkles "Working" Actress scam. There's this nugget paraphrased:
My blog is everything. "I write as if no one is reading."
by Anonymous | reply 296 | June 11, 2019 5:54 PM |
Photos and videos of Will and Kate on the northern England trip.
by Anonymous | reply 302 | June 11, 2019 6:01 PM |
Correct, r205
by Anonymous | reply 304 | June 11, 2019 6:08 PM |
A fashion miss - and mess - for Princess Anne.
by Anonymous | reply 305 | June 11, 2019 6:13 PM |
This is a little better but not much. Anne really doesn't care.
by Anonymous | reply 306 | June 11, 2019 6:14 PM |
A young Charles with his parents. I think Charles may have inherited his big ears from Philip.
by Anonymous | reply 307 | June 11, 2019 6:16 PM |
r271 So you're saying that the three doctor's who signed off on her birth lied as did everyone in the hospital. Can you provide the pics of the collapsed bump and her smoking during pregnancy? Thank you.
by Anonymous | reply 308 | June 11, 2019 6:17 PM |
A deep curtsey from Anne for King Felipe of Spain.
by Anonymous | reply 309 | June 11, 2019 6:17 PM |
R308 - why do you bother to ask for evidence? You'll never get it.
by Anonymous | reply 310 | June 11, 2019 6:18 PM |
Doesn't Princess Anne have a Lady's Maid like Lady Cora on Downton Abbey? Cora would tell Baxter to choose "something medium smart" and Baxter would know exactly what outfit to lay out for her.
by Anonymous | reply 311 | June 11, 2019 6:19 PM |
I'm going to copy and paste these little tidbits of Princess Michael of Kent and her relationships with Diana and Anne. Enjoy the photos.
Princess Michael of Kent, who infamously did not get on with Princess Diana. 2017 Amazon Prime documentary “Princess Diana – The Woman Inside” heard from friends of the late Princess of Wales, who revealed that Diana used to play outrageous pranks on her fellow member of the Royal Family in the early Nineties.The Daily Mail’s Richard Kay said: "She certainly liked a joke, she had particular targets of her jokes.“Poor old Princess Michael of Kent, who was her closest neighbour, often was on the receiving end." Mr Kay continued: "Diana rushed out in a very revealing gym kit and surprised Princess Michael as she and a whole bunch of rather stuffy friends were going off to the races." Ms Brown added: “She wanted to embarrass them – which I think she did achieve!” Although the frosty relationship between the two royal women was well-known, it was not until 2005 that Princess Michael of Kent’s own words about Diana became public knowledge. She was caught in a sting by notorious “Fake Sheikh” Mahzer Mahmoud, who also duped Sophie, Countess of Wessex in 2001, causing another scandal for the Palace. Speaking in Channel 5 documentary “The Royal Family at War", which aired in March, royal author Katie Nicholl said: “Princess Michael of Kent described Diana as nasty and bitter.“She alleged that Charles was jealous of his wife’s fame.” In the sting, Princess Michael also said that Diana was merely a “womb” for Charles, and gave her opinion that Prince William was then “too young” to marry Kate Middleton. There was no love lost between Princess Michael of Kent and Princess Anne either, it seems. Former royal aide Dickie Arbiter revealed in the documentary that it was Princess Anne who came up with her now-infamous nickname. Mr Arbiter said: “She is very assertive, so Princess Anne nicknamed her Princess Pushy.”
by Anonymous | reply 312 | June 11, 2019 6:22 PM |
Princess Anne was beautiful when young. At least in photos.
by Anonymous | reply 313 | June 11, 2019 6:32 PM |
R312 - Princess Anne calling another woman "push". Well, she would know since she's her father's daughter.
by Anonymous | reply 314 | June 11, 2019 6:41 PM |
R224 - I agree with that. Naturally, I was speaking of the British press. Which would also be a replay of Wallis and Edward and the 1930s - the UK press embargoed stories that were circulating in the foreign press about the two until the Abdication was practically upon them - all of society new (cf. Chips Channon) and the BRF knew and the foreign press knew - only the British public was kept in the dark, much as JFK's incessant womanising was kept out of the US press in the 1960s in a sort of Gentleman's Agreement, although all the press in Washington, which were mostly men at the time, knew.
BILD or TMZ or one of those outlets would certainly have no moral qualms about running it - if they could get their hands on it, and IF it exists. That said, remember, William sued a foreign publication and won for invading his wife's privacy by photographing her topless at a rural private residence, on holiday, by climbing a tree with telephoto lens.
So it's also not necessarily the case that a foreign tabloid couldn't be punished, either. The BRF has very deep pockets. They also have MI6. I'm not so sanguine that any such tape would make it to publication - rumours that it was about to surface would almost certainly start circulating, and don't think for a moment that the BRF, however much they wish she would go away, wouldn't pull out every stop to keep Harry and the child and themselves from the humiliation. They don't care about Meghan, but they do care about Harry, the child, and the hapless fools they themselves would be made to look like.
by Anonymous | reply 315 | June 11, 2019 6:41 PM |
^ pushy.
by Anonymous | reply 316 | June 11, 2019 6:41 PM |
r210, What an informative, delicious, post. I enjoyed reading that.
by Anonymous | reply 317 | June 11, 2019 6:45 PM |
R122 and R125, I'll keep my eyes out to see if that poster mentions anything else on the other gossip site. My feeling though is that someone with real inside knowledge would probably not be sharing much, and someone sharing a lot would be a fake.
by Anonymous | reply 318 | June 11, 2019 6:48 PM |
R281 - I think you meant Lady Pamela Mountbatten on Princess Diana, not the other way around. And, yes, Diana was known to be quite spiteful.
by Anonymous | reply 319 | June 11, 2019 6:57 PM |
I don’t think a sex tape would shock me much. We’ve already seen Meg without her clothes on.
by Anonymous | reply 320 | June 11, 2019 8:04 PM |
R308 - R271 is a well-known troll here. Logic is useless on her, she's mental. Just block her.
by Anonymous | reply 321 | June 11, 2019 8:06 PM |
I enjoyed the Youtube item linked above about supposedly went on behind the scenes at TOTC. This is a gossip site, so I admit it. Bits and pieces of truth can make their way here, after all, mixed in with the less than believable. Lip readers should check to see if Harry's first comment to Sparkle really was "Fuck Off" as she turned around the first time while he was talking to his cousins.
Another, earlier video from that Youtube poster also about TOTC day, claims that Sparkle was not expected by the RF and they had to scramble to decide where to put her - hence the difference from last year when she and Harry had their own carriage. Claimed that Camilla refused to even look at her.
by Anonymous | reply 322 | June 11, 2019 8:09 PM |
Her entire conversation on the balcony was her pretending to be part of other conversations, and laughing at nothing.
by Anonymous | reply 323 | June 11, 2019 8:15 PM |
....and Talking to no one, r323.
by Anonymous | reply 324 | June 11, 2019 8:19 PM |
The video of Kate talking to the family today contained a rather nice exchange with 2 little girls on the farm who had flowers for her. They seemed rather shy and after talking with them, a man I took to be their father said "They wanted to know if you were going to wear your Princess Elsa dress."
by Anonymous | reply 325 | June 11, 2019 8:26 PM |
Charles' Highgrove garden - before and after photos.
by Anonymous | reply 326 | June 11, 2019 8:28 PM |
Any guesses whose shoulder(s) PH is crying on?
by Anonymous | reply 328 | June 11, 2019 8:30 PM |
What's wrong in this video of Harry at Hampton Court? He looks like a slob while the man who greets him has a bow tie. He can't even be bothered anymore.
by Anonymous | reply 329 | June 11, 2019 8:37 PM |
British Journos talking about media ban on talks of rose and wills affair
They are not happy.
Expect more to come out soon.
by Anonymous | reply 330 | June 11, 2019 8:37 PM |
This African charity is close to his heart but he can barely crack a smile for the camera.
by Anonymous | reply 331 | June 11, 2019 8:38 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 334 | June 11, 2019 8:44 PM |
R333 - again, no concrete evidence of an affair. It's just rumors until I hear something more substantial.
by Anonymous | reply 335 | June 11, 2019 8:47 PM |
Lovely gardens at r326. Thank you for posting that.
I call bullshit on the “long walks”. Maybe she forced him to take a long walk on one of his visits to see his bairn, so she could browbeat him while out of earshot of the staff. I don’t think it’s a regular thing. And I don’t think they’re enjoyable.
As other women have posted here (to the chagrin of our tolerant gay hosts, probably), postpartum is a stressful time. It’s a big adjustment for even a stable couple who’s been through a lot already. The hormones, Jesus. When it’s two immature, selfish assholes, I can’t even imagine the drama.
by Anonymous | reply 336 | June 11, 2019 8:50 PM |
they are not allowed to report on it but apparently they are sitting on video evidence. It will come out soon enough, remember this comment when it does :) (france,germany,usa etc are reporting on it and british journalists complained on twitter there is a blackout media ban on any mention of the affair.
For now...
by Anonymous | reply 337 | June 11, 2019 8:51 PM |
and lol at the fraus screeching about eViDeNcE when you resort to lip readers and analyzing tumblr clips and edits. Don't need much proof to believe any negative rumours about meg,do you.
The phantom sex tape. WHERE IS IT? That rumour literally started on tumblr but sure...evidence...eye roll.
by Anonymous | reply 338 | June 11, 2019 9:02 PM |
Long walks could happen if it was at the rumoured Cotswold home, but 100% not at Frogmore or KP.
by Anonymous | reply 339 | June 11, 2019 9:04 PM |
No one knows where they're staying while frogcott renovated but they know all about their marriage and now meg leaks everything, including breast milk!! That leaking hoe..
by Anonymous | reply 340 | June 11, 2019 9:13 PM |
So we have in coitus evidence of Prince Wills and Rose? They had a sex tape?
by Anonymous | reply 341 | June 11, 2019 9:25 PM |
If William did have an affair (and for the record I don't see any evidence of a Meg sex tape OR a William affair, yet) Kate is a better actress than Meghan because she has looked as settled and happy as she ever has, this past year.
Thank you for the link R325 - I've often, in those "what would you do if someone dropped a half a billion into your bank account tomorrow" conversation, said I would buy a property of many acres and set to gardening, drinking wine, reading books and having friends to stay. I suspect this is quite close to Charles' actual life, with a few appointments being nice to the riffraff thrown in which I, not being royal, would be able to avoid. I love those stone columns (do they have a name? I love gardens but am not very knowledgeable).
Speaking of stones, did I see Will and Kate chipping on a dry stone wall today? I love dry stone walls.
by Anonymous | reply 342 | June 11, 2019 9:26 PM |
Oops, meant to thank R326, above.
by Anonymous | reply 343 | June 11, 2019 9:27 PM |
A timeline of news coverage outlining rumors isn’t news. It’s beating a dead horse. Might he have had an affair? Maybe. But they look as though they’ve come to some sort of resolve based on their interactions. They aren’t that talented at acting.
by Anonymous | reply 344 | June 11, 2019 9:27 PM |
Here’s a little bit of inside info... choose to believe it or not, doesn’t matter to me. The Cambridges are getting along better, not great, but they’re in a better place. William did have an affair with Rose. It was the reason for the turmoil. I have no insight re any other affairs, but Kate believes it is the only one William has had. It was also more than just a dalliance, but not full blown “in Love.” It’s not nearly enough for the Cambridges to split up, and it’s been over for awhile. They’re trying to mend everything now.
by Anonymous | reply 345 | June 11, 2019 9:28 PM |
Megs has been reading her press again hence the PR rubbish about them "nesting", going for long walks and devoted Harry making tea for their many visitors. Next it'll be an article on how she's deliberately chosen not to lose the baby weight too quickly in order to inspire her millions of devoted fans! And of course Harry adores her no matter what size she is!
by Anonymous | reply 346 | June 11, 2019 9:30 PM |
R45 - I can buy this. Last year Kate was postpartum with 3 small children. I can see William feeling ignored and straying. I can also see him regretting it and apologizing and Kate dealing. She’s never going to leave him.
I
by Anonymous | reply 347 | June 11, 2019 9:33 PM |
Photos of Frogmire to be in September's issue of British Vogue, guest edited by Meghan. The shoot is reportedly occurring next week.
by Anonymous | reply 348 | June 11, 2019 9:33 PM |
Just popping in to give some more inside info. Up to you whether or not you believe it! There is a Meghan sex tape, complete with enthusiastic rimming and a sloppy blowie, but the UK tabloids are currently keeping it all under wraps for fear of legal reprisals from the royal family who are desperate to shield Harry from the fallout the release of the tape would cause. Things between Meg and Harry are tense at the moment, as she continues to insist no such tape exists and Harry has been informed by sources he trusts that it most definitely does.
by Anonymous | reply 349 | June 11, 2019 9:35 PM |
R349 - OR how to answer a troll's lies! R349 for the win . . .
by Anonymous | reply 350 | June 11, 2019 9:38 PM |
Charles' gardens. Sigh. I am at that point in life, that yes, spending time in a heavenly garden, sipping wine and reading books would be paradise. Forget having people over, though. I'm a misanthropic introvert and would just hide behind one of those stone columns until everyone left me blissfully alone. On another note, if William strayed, I really don't care. That's between him and Kate. They never over sold their "twu wuv" with excessive PDA, so they don't come off as holier than thou hypocrites to me. Like millions of other people, they might be dealing with infidelity and a rough patch in their marriage, so more power to them for working it out.
by Anonymous | reply 351 | June 11, 2019 9:40 PM |
I'm dead, R349.
by Anonymous | reply 352 | June 11, 2019 9:44 PM |
My palace sources..
by Anonymous | reply 353 | June 11, 2019 9:46 PM |
I agree with some of the other posters that MM looked uncomfortable because she didn't feel she looked her best. And I am not so sure Harry was really mad at her on the balcony although she might have taken the brunt of it when he told her to turn around. Harry is like Andrew and they feel slighted by their birth place. Harry already looked annoyed and I would imagine he did not like being in the back and felt he should be closer to his dad and brother. I think he was already pissed about that when he had to tell MM to turn around for GSTQ. I don't think he is over her yet, I think that is wishful thinking right now.
by Anonymous | reply 354 | June 11, 2019 9:53 PM |
I hope you're not implying, R350 and R352, that I would just come anonymously onto this anonymous gossip board on the internet and just TELL LIES about PEOPLE I DON'T EVEN KNOW! I hope you're not insinuating that my 100% REAL sources INSIDE THE PALACE(S) are FAKE!!!
I am OUTRAGED.
HOW DARE YOU.
by Anonymous | reply 355 | June 11, 2019 9:56 PM |
It's always possible Kate wouldn't care that much if William has discreet affairs. Whatever did or didn't happen, they have looked more relaxed and happy together than usual in recent photos.
by Anonymous | reply 357 | June 11, 2019 9:59 PM |
Does anyone know where Chelsy Davy lives these days?
by Anonymous | reply 358 | June 11, 2019 10:05 PM |
I think what Kate cares about more is being an object of pity or scorn. I am convinced that the Rose drama was to deflect the salad tossing tape rumours, and it did actually work.
I have nothing against the continuation of the BRF but I do object to their enormous unearned wealth and lives of untrammeled luxury. If they can't even be counted on to behave in a circumspect fashion, then they are really just pigs at a trough.
by Anonymous | reply 359 | June 11, 2019 10:06 PM |
R348 I wouldn’t give much credence to a rag that thinks that her style is “Duchess Meghan”.
by Anonymous | reply 360 | June 11, 2019 10:09 PM |
The Imperial State Crown in the workshops of Garrard's, London
Days before the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II on June 1953
by Anonymous | reply 362 | June 11, 2019 10:14 PM |
So will MM include her photos in Vogue? I would think she would wait until she was thinner? Does the BRF scorn interior photos of homes paid for by the taxpayers?
by Anonymous | reply 363 | June 11, 2019 10:16 PM |
Answering my own question, Chelsy seems to spend a lot of time in Africa. Some of the photos on her IG are amazing (there are usually several in each post.)
by Anonymous | reply 364 | June 11, 2019 10:17 PM |
I am no fan of MM (and find her even more obnoxious after seeing that godawful burger video for the first time--barf) however, a still shot of the carriage ride does show Catherine engaged in animated conversation with her. https://www.instagram.com/p/BykhvBWAjtK/
by Anonymous | reply 365 | June 11, 2019 10:18 PM |
R363-We've seen interior photos of Clarence House, so I'm guessing no.
by Anonymous | reply 366 | June 11, 2019 10:18 PM |
R362 nice find.
Compared to St Edward's Crown, the Imperial State Crown is rather irrelevant, though.
by Anonymous | reply 368 | June 11, 2019 10:19 PM |
R355 - Clearly, I've misjudged you.
Re the September VOGUE Inside Frogmore Story - is she being paid? And, er, isn't there a slight security issue?
by Anonymous | reply 369 | June 11, 2019 10:24 PM |
HM Queen Elizabeth II with HRH Prince Charles and HRH Princess Anne watching a polo match at Windsor Great Park, 13th May 1956.
by Anonymous | reply 370 | June 11, 2019 10:26 PM |
R308 - it's a troll. Just block it. Makes the thread so much more readable.
by Anonymous | reply 371 | June 11, 2019 10:28 PM |
I love this picture.
Maids of Honour at the Coronation of HM Queen Elizabeth II.
by Anonymous | reply 372 | June 11, 2019 10:28 PM |
R365 - I watched several videos on that, and what appeared to happen is that they smiled at each other politely as they set out, exchanged a pleasantry (Kate: "How is dear little non-HRH Archie?" Meghan: "His dick is already longer than George's.") and then Meghan took over.
Meghan started talking AT Kate. Kate's head and hands don't move, Camilla looks away for the whole time, and Harry sits there also looking away as his wife chatters on, not even bothering to try to make it look as if it's a family conversation. It's more Camilla and Harry, who seem never once to look Meghan's way, who give the game away.
I wouldn't call it a two-way animated chat between Kate and Meghan.
by Anonymous | reply 373 | June 11, 2019 10:30 PM |
Sonething must be up if the crap PR is going into deflection mode with the OMG ROSE nonsense.
by Anonymous | reply 374 | June 11, 2019 10:30 PM |
Since some of you like gardens, here's the one at Kensington Palace.
by Anonymous | reply 375 | June 11, 2019 10:32 PM |
R367 - Sarah Anne Jacklin looks like a far superior article than Meghan Markle. And ooohhhh the shade! She was too clean living for dissolute Harry, but not our Smegs - she's a game girl!
by Anonymous | reply 376 | June 11, 2019 10:32 PM |
Elizabeth wipes Anne's nose. I love the look Anne is giving her mother: "Who the fuck are you again?"
by Anonymous | reply 377 | June 11, 2019 10:34 PM |
Photos and a video of Camilla and family at the funeral of her father in 2006. The blonde, buxom woman with the low cleavage is Camilla's daughter Laura.
by Anonymous | reply 378 | June 11, 2019 10:37 PM |
R376 Her IG is also basically interchangeable with pre-Harry Meghan's, with slightly less of a whiff of desperation because she's already a successful model but still pretty much the same thing. Healthy food! Blue-ass water on my travels! Smiling! Yoga! More brightly coloured healthy food! Harry likes 'em basic.
Also, by "brief relationship" the Mirror means "fucked," right? Harry fucked a model after meeting MM but before falling completely under her spell? This is my shocked face.
Kensington palace gardens too stiff for me. I like Highgrove, though. There has to be an element of "rambling" to a garden, at least as far as my own personal taste goes.
by Anonymous | reply 379 | June 11, 2019 10:38 PM |
I see Gemma Arterton is at the Sentebale concert. She was very close to Harry at some point, too. She was always a guest at his polo matches, and at events he put on.
by Anonymous | reply 380 | June 11, 2019 10:38 PM |
I don't find George as cute as he once was. His features have sharpened and I think he's going to have the Windsor nose.
by Anonymous | reply 381 | June 11, 2019 10:40 PM |
It's not even up for debate that Harry fucked his way through the young actresses and pop stars of the UK, is it?
by Anonymous | reply 382 | June 11, 2019 10:40 PM |
They look like they're alone but they're not.
by Anonymous | reply 383 | June 11, 2019 10:42 PM |
And page 3 girls. I'm looking at you, Lauren Pope, for a start.
by Anonymous | reply 384 | June 11, 2019 10:44 PM |
R381 He's certainly lost his round baby features. He's quite a masculine-looking child (good), but he's also got those genetic dark circles which seem to be the curse of the English (I have them too, thank god for concealer). I suspect he'll have a very handsome period around his late teens/early 20s and that Louis will be the looker between the two brothers.
Does anyone know if the footage of Kate, Meg, Cams and Haz at the beginning of the carriage ride is on Youtube? Links? I'll go have a quick search myself.
by Anonymous | reply 385 | June 11, 2019 10:45 PM |
R367 - if Harry had a dalliance with this woman AFTER meeting Meghan then I guess he lied about how smitten he was with her right from their first meeting. He has a lot in common with his Duchess "I knew nothing about Prince Harry. Is He Kind" Yoko. Lying runs in the Sussex family.
by Anonymous | reply 386 | June 11, 2019 10:46 PM |
I'm curious does Madam have permission from a) The Crown Estate and b) Security to have photographers round photographing inside the property and highlighting any security features, exits etc. ? I thought the Vogue article was supposed to be about her chairty works, why would they need to photograph Froggy Hollow?
by Anonymous | reply 387 | June 11, 2019 10:48 PM |
George <3
by Anonymous | reply 388 | June 11, 2019 10:48 PM |
Sorry for hitting the Post button way too early ...
I also like Charlotte and Louis, but out of the three, George is my favourite.
by Anonymous | reply 389 | June 11, 2019 10:50 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 390 | June 11, 2019 10:56 PM |
R385 - here's one video of the Trooping carriage ride.
by Anonymous | reply 391 | June 11, 2019 10:56 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 392 | June 11, 2019 10:59 PM |
R387 - I just can't see HM or her press officers, to whom allegedly Sarah Latham must report, allowing a photoshoot of Crown Estates property around which security is a major concern. The property doesn't belong to Harry and Meghan: it's on permanent loan to them. If any revenue results from such a story, it goes to the Crown Estates as payment back into the Sovereign Grant. So the Sussexes being personally paid for it I don't believe is something they can even keep. As for a story on her charity works - she's barely been there one year, and she's been on maternity leave since March. She has four patronages. This sounds, if it is true, like another How Do We Sell Meghan To An Increasingly Unresponsive UK Public? effort. And by the way, has it been announced on SussexRoyal?
by Anonymous | reply 393 | June 11, 2019 11:01 PM |
Who's R392?
I'm told a woman who wears rings on all her fingers has been fucked in all her orifices - some of which you never imagined.
by Anonymous | reply 394 | June 11, 2019 11:04 PM |
R362 - Holy Mary, look at the size of that piece of the Cullinan (which is what I assume it is - or is it the Star of India?) in the foreground.
Chelsy is Zimbabwean - she was born in Bulawayo and her mother is a former Miss Rhodesia. Spending a lot of time in Africa wouldn't be unusual.
by Anonymous | reply 395 | June 11, 2019 11:07 PM |
R379 - I think Highgrove is stunning and if you look at photos of the back, it's fairly formally laid out with a nod to classicism in the architecture. The front gardens are more wildflowers but the back is quite formal. I like both aspects equally.
by Anonymous | reply 396 | June 11, 2019 11:10 PM |
Charles, for all his faults, seems to have quite an eye for aesthetics.
by Anonymous | reply 397 | June 11, 2019 11:11 PM |
R397 - "Charles, for all his faults, seems to have quite an eye for aesthetics."
Except in one glaring area.
by Anonymous | reply 398 | June 11, 2019 11:18 PM |
Harry wants to be nesting in Rita Ora's tits, judging by the second photo.
by Anonymous | reply 399 | June 11, 2019 11:19 PM |
Here we go.
It was for a different cause only yesterday. Has she got a cob on over Rita Ora's tits , or something?
by Anonymous | reply 400 | June 11, 2019 11:24 PM |
Kate covered VOGUE in 2016, but it was in connection/collaboration with a piece on the National Portrait Gallery, of which she is Patron. According to the news, neither Harry nor Archie will appear nor does Harry have anything to do with the story, and Meghan will not appear on the cover (probably because of the way she looks right now).
by Anonymous | reply 401 | June 11, 2019 11:30 PM |
Once again, a self proclaimed "royal blogger" who just happened to be a Meghan supporter named Nicole Cliffe made up the rumors about Prince William and she admitted it herself on her social media. I was on Twitter when Meghan numpties all were encouraging each other to share the Prince William affair hashtag to make it go viral. As usual, their seething jealousy of William and Catherine has been the root cause. Gotta distract from Meghans dirt you know.
by Anonymous | reply 402 | June 11, 2019 11:45 PM |
I wouldn't be surprised if the Rose rumours was the killing blow that the internal dynamics
by Anonymous | reply 403 | June 11, 2019 11:47 PM |
R402 - Oh the fraus on CB accept as gospel that the rumours about William and Rose were true. Of course, if the rumours had been about Harry and someone, or Meghan and someone, they would denounce them as "baseless unproved smears".
by Anonymous | reply 404 | June 11, 2019 11:48 PM |
What is up with Lainey these days? She's got a big question at the end of her post on Will & Kate today, that she's posed several times before: WHERE'S LUPO? regarding the Cambridge dog that hasn't been seen in some time.
Umm dearie, WHERE'S EFFING GUY? Like that isn't a big mystery too. Both dogs haven't been seen in, well, a dogs age.
by Anonymous | reply 405 | June 11, 2019 11:50 PM |
Nicole Cliffe did not start the William/Rose affair story. Eden confidential in the DM floated a balloon and then the Sun carried it in their Sunday edition. The Sunday Times carried its own story independent of the Sun story.
Several non Brits on were wondering what the toff codes meant "rural rival" and all that. Nicole explained it online. She was never the source of the original story. Nicole's only contribution to the saga is her interpretation of the news stories. You may disagree with her interpretation.
FWIW I read the Giles Coren tweet before it was deleted and the thread between the American journalists in the UK who were confused by the Times story as it was happening in real time.
by Anonymous | reply 406 | June 11, 2019 11:58 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 407 | June 12, 2019 12:05 AM |
Hilarious DM comment about Rita Ora pic:
Someone in Toad Manor is smashing them Soho plates.
by Anonymous | reply 408 | June 12, 2019 12:11 AM |
To whoever is still posting Pet Shop Boys lyrics: I love you.
by Anonymous | reply 409 | June 12, 2019 12:14 AM |
R325 That's a fascinating little clip. Although, It does look like there's more than one 'Princess' in there...... OMG!
by Anonymous | reply 410 | June 12, 2019 12:21 AM |
I wonder what kept madam away from the red carpet with the stars, tonight? She could have worn that 90 odd grand Moroccan / Oscar tent dress. I wonder if it wasn't her choice to stay away.
by Anonymous | reply 411 | June 12, 2019 12:23 AM |
Regarding William's rumoured infidelity: I don't know if it happened or not. My instincts say it didn't, but again, and obviously, I don't know.
I also don't believe Kate would ever leave Will, but that doesn't mean she's powerless. In fact, as the years go by and the children are born she gains power, slowly but surely, in the relationship. Pre-marriage she had none, just as any commoner in a relationship with a royal but sans ring has none. Early in the marriage, when she was a target for the tabloids and snarkers, and had not yet produced an heir, she had little. But she is sitting pretty right now, as I see it. The automatic assumption even from people who dislike her is that any trouble in the relationship with Will is Will's fault. If Will was outed as a cheater, if anything I think it would raise Kate's popularity figures even higher as people sympathized with the wronged but dutiful wife and loving mother to the future king. I could even see Will's own family taking Kate's side (not publicly, obvs.) and let us not forget that Kate has her own tiger mother and much-tighter-and-more-functional-than-the-Windsors family behind her.
There are also other ways to signal displeasure than divorcing or kicking Will in the dick in full view of the paps. Kate's been married in for coming up on a decade now and I bet she has a better understanding of their "say nothing, but opaquely signal what you will" ways. She just seems too genuine in her happiness and contentment this past 6 mos - 1 year to be secretly harbouring pain. It's also the reason I don't think they'll have another child (although I frauishly want them to) - she just has an air of a woman who has done everything she was being pressured to do and is now going to enjoy the family she's created.
by Anonymous | reply 412 | June 12, 2019 12:24 AM |
Exactly r404. It's embarrassing really. There is documented proof in some very cozy photos of Harry with a pretty blonde at a concert in summer 2017. Well after he was dating Meghan. Harry is also a known cheat. To project that onto William is appalling. R405, didn't Harry and Meghan get a couple new dogs also? Where are they? Lainey in an idiot. She's a personal friend of Meghan's from Canada, so that explains a lot.
by Anonymous | reply 413 | June 12, 2019 12:30 AM |
She probably doesn't want any photos of herself next to any pilates-ed to perfection starlets. Can't really blame her, either.
Speaking of mothers (and my earlier musing on Doria), I confess I find Ma Middleton equally if not more fascinating. I'm sure everyone here has read the stories of her perfectly middle class mothering, the neatly hand-sewn nametags in their school uniforms etc.? Marlborough for Kate and Pip (where did James go to school?)? The flawless advice to Kate upon her break-up with William (refuse to hide away, let yourself be seen having a good - chaste - time in public, remind him what he's missing, do not breath a fucking word to anyone about any of it)?
We talk about Meghan's come-up, and some of us who aren't fans will admit with a begrudging shrug that she did indeed land her man successfully (eminently land-able as he was, ha ha), but if we want to move beyond individuals to whole families, surely no one comes close to touching Kate's mother for come-ups? It's her side of the family that was mining coal a mere 2 generations before, isn't it? And now her grandchild will be the goddamn King of England. And her other daughter's child will inherit billions, as long as daddy doesn't totally fuck it up? And her bloodline is now securely written into the DNA of the RF for generations? I mean... damn, lady!
I'd love to know when she got the fire lit under her ass to marry her daughters well. Like, where did that instinct come from? It's so 18th century, so totally out of the current norm. Like Doria, she's another one I'd love to see interviewed in-depth. And, also like Doria, I suspect that's the last thing she'll ever do. Damnit.
by Anonymous | reply 414 | June 12, 2019 12:35 AM |
R395, I realize Chelsy is Zimbabwean, but I wondered how much time she spends in the UK as her jewelry company is based there. From the photos on her IG, it looks like she spends most of her time in Africa. She was reportedly launching a luxury travel service for various African destinations but I don't know if it's still in the works.
R392, Poor Meghan.
by Anonymous | reply 415 | June 12, 2019 12:36 AM |
Lainey rolling out "where's Lupo?!?" is as basic and transparent as a 3 year old yelling "no u!" when accused of stealing cookies. Come the fuck on.
by Anonymous | reply 416 | June 12, 2019 12:39 AM |
Random thought whilst perusing Chelsy Davy's IG: Harry should have married her. Should have tried to, anyway. Not sure, once they aged out of their mid 20s, that she didn't eventually see through him. What's charming and forgivable in a 22 year royal hottie boyfriend may not be so easy to overlook in a 30-something manboy who might be father to your kids.
by Anonymous | reply 417 | June 12, 2019 12:46 AM |
Harry was too thirsty for someone to bolster his profile. Ironic consider his popularity is in freefall now.
by Anonymous | reply 418 | June 12, 2019 12:52 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 419 | June 12, 2019 12:54 AM |
R413 Lainey and Ben Mulroney are co-hosts on the Canadian TV entertainment show, eTALK.
by Anonymous | reply 420 | June 12, 2019 12:57 AM |
So Meghan has the cover of British Vogue! Hilarious. Her detractors here thought nobody was interested in her.
The Welp Troll is melting down over on the One Direction thread:
'He is all over another thread here, hundreds of posts (cumulatively thousands including 1D). That principal is Sunshine Sachs client, is Harry Styles? His tactics are classic social media management schlub, as is his volume. Some do pay a bonus based on volume.'
by Anonymous | reply 421 | June 12, 2019 12:57 AM |
R379-Agreed on the difference between the gardens. Kensington does nothing for me. It lacks spontaneity and charm. Clarence House's gardens are more whimsical.
by Anonymous | reply 422 | June 12, 2019 1:01 AM |
Harry's blonde friend is a real butterface.
by Anonymous | reply 423 | June 12, 2019 1:07 AM |
The Invictus Games appearance is also around when Harry lost his personal secretary, Edward Lane Fox, who was apparently blindsided and pissed off.
Edward Lane Fox is who cleaned up Harry's image post naked vegas
by Anonymous | reply 424 | June 12, 2019 1:20 AM |
Prince William left Kate and Prince George at home to meet Taylor Swift at a charity gala in Kensington Palace in 2013. They appear to be mesmerized by one another in the clip below. You can cut through the sexual tension with a knife.
by Anonymous | reply 425 | June 12, 2019 1:20 AM |
R423 A poster upthread said Harry was with a pretty blonde. I didn't include one of those adjectives in R419.
by Anonymous | reply 426 | June 12, 2019 1:23 AM |
Looking at Harry's face and understanding that he has some very deep, untreated issues, I expect a Mayerling Incident once the full disaster of his marital choices hits him.
By the way, any bets on that DNA test?
Funny how some people who seem to lack any understanding of context and place in landscape gardening or, apparently, aesthetic depth, have somewhere to turn for that "spontaneity and charm" needed, so that the gardens can "do something" for them.
When living in West Ken I found the Kensington Palace gardens amazingly accessible, and an admirable mix of old plantings and renewed/modernized works. There are several spots off the main walks that are secluded, woodsy and "loose." On a recent visit, I appreciated the new Princess Diana Garden very much, loving the white (moon garden) theme. It seemed very "charming" to me.
Visitors needing so-called spontaneity and charm are advised to visit, at least, Kew, where many gardens are available that have been carefully designed to appear the way. Such appearances take as much work as the geometrics of the formal. HIghgrove also should be a destination, and there are plenty of parts of Windsor Great Park to enjoy.
But some people will clamor for a cartoon weed patch when offended by such creepily controlled settings as, say, Versailles.
Sigh.
by Anonymous | reply 427 | June 12, 2019 1:25 AM |
I overheard a bunch of fraus at work discussing the RF. They were excitedly talking about how Harry and Meghan have been advised to have another kid immediately because the Queen plans to retire and give the throne to Harry and Meghan in 2020.
by Anonymous | reply 428 | June 12, 2019 1:27 AM |
R425 may not be able to distinguish between politeness and sexual tension.
Someone should warn HR.
by Anonymous | reply 429 | June 12, 2019 1:28 AM |
R429 and R425 - the tension was particularly thick when he said “it was nice to meet you” and backed away. The moment was dripping I tell you. Dripping.
by Anonymous | reply 430 | June 12, 2019 1:31 AM |
The R425 clip was when Wm was still relatively handsome and didn’t have the jowly Easter Island head yet.
by Anonymous | reply 431 | June 12, 2019 1:42 AM |
R427. There is no way a Mayerling type of conclusion will happen for Harry. He's too vapid. Crown Prince Rudolf was a tortured, sensitive soul caught very much in the mood of fin-de-siècle Vienna. He'll go through a messy divorce and trot along his merry, fuckwit way.
by Anonymous | reply 432 | June 12, 2019 1:43 AM |
Anyone who has not blocked, R254, what are you waiting for?! Block him and enjoy the thread, like the rest of us. When you do, check out his post history, quite ugh, voluminous.
by Anonymous | reply 433 | June 12, 2019 1:48 AM |
R429 and R430 Notice the way that Prince William kept staring at Taylor with his eyes popping out as he was trying to play it cool in the video at R425. Compare that with the way that he interacted with Jon Bon Jovi and his family. With Bon Jovi's family, he was relaxed and his eyes weren't popping out.
by Anonymous | reply 434 | June 12, 2019 1:56 AM |
Guys, we are slipping on our snark. Just wandered over to GOMI on which the following was posted on Markle’s Trooping appearance:
“Yeah, I’d be devastated if I looked like she did at Trooping…”
“Pfft I'd be devastated if I looked like that at the grocery store. Poor Duchess Potatoface, pregnancy brought out every ounce of all the Thomas Markle she'd kept dormant with starvation diets and botox.”
by Anonymous | reply 435 | June 12, 2019 1:56 AM |
R435-And this in response to the Vogue article and photo shoot: "every time i start to feel a little sympathy for her, she reminds of why she's such an obnoxious, attention-seeking a**hole." Yeah-we're slipping for sure.
by Anonymous | reply 436 | June 12, 2019 1:59 AM |
R434 I'm dialling HR...
by Anonymous | reply 437 | June 12, 2019 2:02 AM |
Harry doesn't have enough class for a Mayerling scenario. You have to have imagination and despair. Harry's imagination is severely liimited and he's petulant rather than despairing.
Charles, Diana, and Camilla would have been much closer and even they couldn't quite pull it off.
Kenneth MacMillan would never have done a ballet around the tragedy of Harry and Meghan.
by Anonymous | reply 438 | June 12, 2019 2:18 AM |
R420, Canadians may be the nicest in the world and God Bless them. They're not tastemakers though.
by Anonymous | reply 439 | June 12, 2019 2:35 AM |
R428 Wherever do you work? It sounds like the Wallmart cashier line in the North of Hell.
by Anonymous | reply 440 | June 12, 2019 2:38 AM |
R438-I think we can anticipate a comedic rock opera called around the event. Meghan's ballads would be epic. Harry could have a whole show-stopping "What Meghan Wants" number. Can you imagine the fun of casting Papa Markle? Doria would literally be a walk-on role. The actress could periodically walk on the stage, blink around sphinx-like and then exit without a word. Oh the fun! I'd buy tickets.
by Anonymous | reply 441 | June 12, 2019 2:38 AM |
Since Megain is only 5 weeks out that means she has not had sexy times with Harry, the power of the pussy not yet in play. I think she was able to keep him in line with her tricks for his dick but not now!!!
by Anonymous | reply 442 | June 12, 2019 2:41 AM |
R433, you're so very right. I had to scan your post to even find out whom you were talking about.
by Anonymous | reply 443 | June 12, 2019 2:43 AM |
R254 Has also disgracefully stolen the Pet Shop Boys Lyrics schtick from the real Pet Shop Boys Lyrics Troll, who we all love. Get lost, Pet Shops Boys Lyrics Schtick Stealing Troll!
by Anonymous | reply 444 | June 12, 2019 2:46 AM |
Lainey being a Chinese Canadian and a friend of Mulroney called out on the racism of Katie Hopkins and the British press.
Katie Hopkins tweeted the following about the Trooping,
"Classy future Queen Kate looking radiant and regal
And Meghan .... also in the carriage"
Lainey responded to Hopkins' tweet on Lainey Gossip with the following excerpt:
"Still, despite the fact that the Sussexes kept a pretty low profile at Trooping, Meghan still made conversation. Here’s an example of the kind of grossness that people have been calling out where the British press is concerned, despite their attempts to deny their bias...
LOL. Katie Hopkins is a professional troll so she knew what she was doing. But you can read the undertones there in the word choices: “radiant, regal”, in comparison to Meghan’s lack of adjectives – basically she’s the “other one” here, and that’s the dog whistling, her “otherness”, non-whiteness, being the messaging, a message that is instantly familiar to people of colour who’ve been enduring it, well, for forever."
by Anonymous | reply 445 | June 12, 2019 2:49 AM |
It doesn't look like MM's going to take a break until autumn after all. She'll obviously have to work on the September issue well in advance of publication.
by Anonymous | reply 446 | June 12, 2019 2:52 AM |
I disagree that she does not get it. I think she set up a brand as the opposite to the BRF - shaking it up, modernizing, etc - so cannot fall into line, lest she be seen as off brand, un-woke, complying.
If by does not get it, you mean, cutting off her nose to spite her face, then we are in total agreement.
I do not think she ever intended to stay in the family.
Kate and Wills spoke of Lupo this morning, when they met some lovely spaniels. Lainey really wants to open that line of questions???
by Anonymous | reply 447 | June 12, 2019 2:58 AM |
Maybe she's working on her next career. When she leaves the BRF, maybe she'll go into publishing.
by Anonymous | reply 448 | June 12, 2019 3:00 AM |
"I've been following you from the VERY BEGINNING.". (0.30 minutes)
MM to Rachel Ray (2018). Yet little or no claimed knowledge about Harry - the world's most "eligible bachelor."
by Anonymous | reply 449 | June 12, 2019 3:02 AM |
So can you explain just what she would "edit?"Does She decide what photos are used?
by Anonymous | reply 450 | June 12, 2019 3:02 AM |
R443, I couldn't care less about this Lainey person or the Katie person.
It is factually true that future Queen Kate looked radiant and regal; and also that Meghan looked like she was also in the carriage.
It's factually true that future Queen Kate looked amazing one month after giving birth to her third child, Prince Louis, at her first post-partum appearance, which was Meghan's wedding. It's factually true that Meghan looks more... round? heavy? facially unstructured? than the Meghan of yore even though she's only had one child and she's had a month to try to get back into shape. It's factually true that Meghan is middle aged (37 x 2 = 74, whereas the lifespan of the average African American woman is 78 so this is her peer group), older than both Kate and her husband.
There's plenty of editorializing done, but these things are absolutely true.
by Anonymous | reply 451 | June 12, 2019 3:12 AM |
Is she is envisioning a movie all about her new career? The Devil Wore Zippa.
by Anonymous | reply 452 | June 12, 2019 3:12 AM |
R446, yes the hard work of guest-editing Vogue will no doubt help work off some of that baby weight that obviously is not responding to breastfeeding. (Everyone knows breastfeeding is how moms make the pounds fall off so quickly. Oh, and it's good for the babies too.)
by Anonymous | reply 453 | June 12, 2019 3:15 AM |
This was helpfully explained on Quora:
Why did Prince Harry ride in a carriage with all the Duchesses (Catherine, Meghan & Camilla) at the 2019 Trooping the Colour instead of on horseback like Prince Charles & Prince William?
Those who rode on horseback are the honourary colonels of the regiments of the household divisions - Charles (Welsh Guards), William (Irish Guards), Andrew (Grenadier Guards), Anne (Blues and Royals). The Duke of Kent used to ride. He is the honourary colonel of the Scots Guards.
When Harry is the honourary colonel of one of these five regiments he will ride but until then he will be in a carriage.
The Duke of Kent doesn’t ride anymore so he was in the second carriage- but he was the person sitting on the dias next to the Queen while the other royals had to watch from inside the building behind.
by Anonymous | reply 454 | June 12, 2019 3:31 AM |
Someone is very upset that Harry was caught with his eyes on the prize(s).
by Anonymous | reply 455 | June 12, 2019 3:33 AM |
In the picture of Harry mesmerized by the cleavage of Rita Ora, his hair looks beyond pathetic. If he ever stops being a working Royal, he will have very little going for him. The poor kid has 2 parents with problem hair - although Me-Gain probably caused those problems for herself, as usual.
by Anonymous | reply 456 | June 12, 2019 3:51 AM |
R451 Does it matter that Kate lost weight faster than Meghan did about one month after giving birth? Asians lose weight faster than whites do. Does it make Asians better than whites?
It's easier for a tall person to lose weight than it is for a short person. Jessica Simpson's youngest child was born on March 19, 2019. Jessica, who is rather short, still had a lot of baby weight about a month after giving birth as shown in the picture below.
by Anonymous | reply 457 | June 12, 2019 3:54 AM |
Wasn't Jessica Simpson's baby the size of a watermelon, r457?
by Anonymous | reply 458 | June 12, 2019 4:00 AM |
The sex tape WILL see the light of day. It's already seen the light of day. The end is nigh, beeyatches.
MM is in the public humiliation stage. Did she think she could have continued henpecking, clutching, smacking and emasculating the grandson of the Queen? Narcs don't do the long game well.
The Cambridges have it on lock, Louis stole the show was better behaved than a middle-aged biracial grifter, MM is just a runny nose in their game of thrones.
Looking forward to Ascot. If I were her I'd stay my ass home.
by Anonymous | reply 459 | June 12, 2019 4:04 AM |
I think most posters here give Meghan a pass on her 5-week postpartum figure. I have no doubt that she'll regain her actress figure eventually. It takes longer for some than others, but she's highly motivated.
by Anonymous | reply 460 | June 12, 2019 4:04 AM |
She even smacked him on the leg in the carriage, R459. She needed attention.
That poor child with these 2 as parents. Sad.
by Anonymous | reply 461 | June 12, 2019 4:08 AM |
Excellent points raised by R459. The thought of her chasing Z listers then marrying into the BRF and thinking she should --shake it up-- would be implausible if it were a tv show. Think about the cuck Toronto chef. She tends to leave people and situations worse for having been there.
by Anonymous | reply 462 | June 12, 2019 4:12 AM |
R457
Does it matter that Kate lost weight faster than Meghan did about one month after giving birth?
Yes. Because women tend to gain weight with each successive pregnancy. That's on average about 5 pounds per child. Women who breastfeed lose the weight quickest, and that's the surest way to get it off. Kate, being athletic (and with good genes) can apparently pull it off. Kate has never pretended to be anything other than what she is. It's harder to tell with Meghan, but she should be slimmer by now. That's just factually true of how breastfeeding works.
It's easier for a tall person to lose weight than it is for a short person.
That's utter nonsense. People gain and lose weight in much more complex formulae than HEIGHT. It's really more about genetics, metabolism, habits, epigenetics, health, diet, lifestyle, and many other factors we're learning more about all the time. Weight loss has nothing - repeat, nothing - to do with height.
Perhaps you're bitter that Kate's height, sense of style and fashion, and personal grace make her appear slimmer and lovelier than Meghan (even though Kate has had 3 children and Meghan only 1). One can only imagine why you'd feel so tetchy. Regardless, if anyone could place a call to Duchess Kate and ask for fitness advice, it would surely be Meghan. Kate appears to genuinely love family and would probably have good advice for her new SIL.
by Anonymous | reply 463 | June 12, 2019 4:18 AM |
r451 But I thought it wasn't about race and all the dislike and vicious comments were about her smug smile and something something fakeness.
lol....
Katie hopkins represents most of you in both looks and opinion.
And the miss piggy look alike that gayle interviewed already revealed she wanted harry with an english rose (her words) and she will not stop punishing him for his choice in bride.
A lot of (white) british women are angry and fuming because meghan represents something that scares the hell out of them. You see, it's okay for them to date/marry black and half black or whatever colour strikes their fancy, but black and half black women better not do the same or else!!1
there's a word for people like that....hypocrites.
by Anonymous | reply 464 | June 12, 2019 4:20 AM |
@R460 she got cocky and of course, she's high AF on various meds who else would be so bold as to smack the grandson of the Queen in front of his stepmother and sister in law. I LAUGH at those who say she can't get drugs she will always be drugged up good.
@R462 the folly of the narc they think they can outsmart the world it's a serious mental illness as MM has demonstrated. I bet she drowned in wine after TTC, it was an utter embarrassment for her 'insanely smart' persona.
And I don't think she was pregnant in the first place, so keep blocking me and call me names IDGAF. Some of you obviously have never been around pregnant women they don't have bumps like MM presented.
If MM was so damn whip-smart she would have taken the same drugs to swell up that Beyonce did when she used a surrogate.
by Anonymous | reply 465 | June 12, 2019 4:20 AM |
While one poster called me out for linking an anti-Markle gossip video, I did get several "Likes." So here's another one from the same Southern woman. I just love her voice & positive, humorous style. What do you think of her allegations of financial fraud against MM and Doria? Something's about to blow up. No wonder MM wants to go back to CA ASAP.
by Anonymous | reply 466 | June 12, 2019 4:25 AM |
Meghan looks like a child next to kate.
She looks even younger with the weight. I admire her for carrying and birthing her own child unlike not so keen kate who used a surrogate. So much for "the actress" being the shallow one.
by Anonymous | reply 467 | June 12, 2019 4:30 AM |
R460
Why would you have no such doubt? 5 weeks is a long time in a partum/postpartum cycle. Your opinion is in contradiction of medical evidence. Women who are going to lose weight and regain their figures? Do so by beginning to lose weight and regain their figures. Truth hurts, perhaps? You say she's highly motivated, and I ask "well then why isn't she motivated to start last month?" The majority of women who breastfeed find weight loss to be automatic.
The most logical assumption is that she can't breastfeed because of post-partum drugs that are making her look worse and interrupting the normal cycle of make baby/have baby/raise baby.
by Anonymous | reply 468 | June 12, 2019 4:34 AM |
Link to someone on Oh No They Didn't who claims to know for a fact that Will and Rose didn't cheat with each other. I don't get the feeling will did and in any case I don't think Kate is faking her apparent happiness and contentment now.
by Anonymous | reply 469 | June 12, 2019 4:36 AM |
R469 - Always thought it was a "look over there!" water balloon sort of lob to distract attention from a bitter, more serious problem that was all about the Sussexx.
by Anonymous | reply 470 | June 12, 2019 4:40 AM |
My heart breaks not for our Me-Gain. I do not think she looked sadder at TTC than she did on the balcony with the wife of the German politician.
The way she looks at Catherine is creepy AF. I hope the RPOs are wary of our own Duch Fruitcake.
Adderall troll, what do you make of Arch then? I have seen the blowing up you describe when script speed is stopped. I do not know why people think taking it is rare. Lots of middle class mommies take it, they get --diagnosed-- after little spawn does in 4th grade, and stay on it for the energy and weight loss. Our own beloved DL icon, Linds Lohan herself, famously takes Adderall. Or was it Ritalin? Welp, one of the two. So - what say you about the spawn? The way Dim was pressing his thumb into the arm (where there is a button on the creepo dolls to activate fake breathing was curious, esp since the baby did not seem to move in response. They sure do everything they can to feed conspiracy theories, anything to keep people talking, I suppose.
by Anonymous | reply 471 | June 12, 2019 4:40 AM |
Ontd? LOL how low can you sink. A site for teenagers, that's your source!? Yeah, I'm sure they'd know {heavy sarcasm}
by Anonymous | reply 472 | June 12, 2019 4:40 AM |
R471, yes she does look creepy when staring at Kate. Tons of pics. wTf? Is that about?
Wish someone would do a photo collage.
by Anonymous | reply 473 | June 12, 2019 4:46 AM |
R468, 5 weeks isn't a long time. Some women snap back faster than others, even if they breastfeed. It doesn't take a medical degree to understand this. We'll see in time, so no need to get upset.
by Anonymous | reply 474 | June 12, 2019 4:48 AM |
This thread has been invaded by a new sort of crazy. Where are the tiaras?
by Anonymous | reply 475 | June 12, 2019 4:49 AM |
Why does Markel look puffier now than she did a couple of days after the kid's birth when she looked like she always had. But now she had all this weight. Shouldn't she be less puffy now than two days after the birth when she didn't look puffy at all?
by Anonymous | reply 476 | June 12, 2019 4:50 AM |
R466, that video is great! So entertaining. And possibly, quite informative. Is Doria really worth that much, so suddenly? The mind wonders!
by Anonymous | reply 477 | June 12, 2019 4:52 AM |
Did the Rottweiller Camilla attend Diana;s funeral, or did she have the decency to stay the fuck out of sight? Something the Rottweiler never did before and the entire time Diana was married.
by Anonymous | reply 478 | June 12, 2019 4:53 AM |
R463 I don't care whether Kate is skinny or Meghan is chubby. Bulimia and anorexia are more common among women than men because people especially gay men are more judgemental about a women's appearance and weight. Women are more understanding about baby weight due to their own personal experience.
Not all men like thin women. Edo left his slender ex-fiancee for the tubby Beatrice.
by Anonymous | reply 479 | June 12, 2019 4:57 AM |
R472 What year do you think this is? ONTD hasn't been for "teenagers" in years, if it ever really was. There are some, like most places on the internet, but it's mostly people in their late 20's and 30's at this point.
by Anonymous | reply 480 | June 12, 2019 5:01 AM |
@R471 the doll... that is the crazy part of the puzzle. Sure she wasn't pregnant IMHO! Stick legs no tits reverse inflating bump... No biggie, surrogacy has commonly lied about BUT Harry pressing on the deathly still doll, MM rubbing its fucking HEAD even I know you don't mess with a newborn's head! And the woman in brown, pregnant standing outside the even where she was in the white nurses drag, so many questions. I can assume either a surrogate lost a baby and they had to start over or some other surrogacy complication.
MM's porn tape being leaked will be the equivalent of Fergie's toe-sucking scandal, shocking but not earth-shattering.
by Anonymous | reply 481 | June 12, 2019 5:08 AM |
Jealousy is an ugly emotion...not megs fault she looks like a kid next to old looking kate.
Harry obviously wanted a wife with youthful looks, someone who'd age gracefully without having to inject chemicals into her face. He adores her babyface. I think it's cute how chubby her cheeks are now and obv. She feels safe and comfortable enough in her own skin and marriage to not lose the weight as quickly as possible, plus, they're having another one soon.
by Anonymous | reply 482 | June 12, 2019 5:11 AM |
Sure you think its cute. Im sure MM thinks she looks cute too.
by Anonymous | reply 483 | June 12, 2019 5:12 AM |
Wait R481, do you think she used a surrogate? How to explain her bloat? Although the baby did look fake ....yet I know it was a real baby. So I don’t know what to 🤔!
by Anonymous | reply 484 | June 12, 2019 5:13 AM |
Guys cmon. The Queen was in the baby pictures. She gave birth to the baby and it WAS a real baby. They separated KP and the Sussexes in every way because they don't want the fallout of MM's grift and eventual departure to have any impact on the Cambridges. You really think they would involve the freaking QUEEN if the baby was an elaborate grift?
by Anonymous | reply 485 | June 12, 2019 5:15 AM |
Doubt she will birth another baby, maybe they'll do a trendy adoption before they call it quits?
by Anonymous | reply 486 | June 12, 2019 5:24 AM |
@R481 duh, I've clearly said I think she used a surrogate. The bloat is hustling backward she was too vain to bloat up when appropriate, now it's the fake breastfeeding bloat. How can you explain her reverse bump size and the bump deflating when she sat in the crotch high black and white minidress and many other instances of bullshit? All videos on youtube.
@R485 this is GOSSIP not fucking church. That was an obvious photoshopped photo IMHO.
The RF has been dealing in skullduggery for 1,000 years you're naive to assume they don't.
And...of course, Will fucked Rose, gimme a break that is what the aristos DO and he'll fuck whom he pleases, Kate knows the score she's in it for the long game. Harry is fucking around MM knows the score in the cage of her own design, I'd almost pity her if not for her underestimating the world with her initial lies about not knowing Harry, disowning her father she used to praise and the worse fake pregnancy in history.
The video link below from the panel discussion is proof of surrogacy her belly clearly deflates!
by Anonymous | reply 487 | June 12, 2019 5:25 AM |
GM is reporting the guest Vogue editing gig, so it's most likely true (did US Weekly actually get the scoop on this? interesting if so, they're usually 100% one of the rags I think of as pulling everything they publish right out of their asses). Also not at all surprising, if anyone knows one Edward Enninful, famously Woke (seriously, it was kind of a scandal when he took over because the old editor seemed to take some shots at him in the press for only being hired for 'we're so woke' reasons and his people fired back that she was the old guard and should make way for the new cool kidz) current editor of UK Vogue and person who I strongly assume is firmly on team "everyone who thinks Meghan Markle is anything less than the second coming is a racist."
Because I'm going to take shit for this: my comments on Enninful are based on his public statements and the crowd he hangs with (super progressive/woke British fashion types), not his race.
I think we might be in for quite a treat, given Enninful and Markle being behind the September issue. And by 'treat' I mean 'eminently snarkworthy wokestravaganza/virtue signalathon.' No one at Vogue is going to be holding her back on this, or suggesting any softening of tone. She's going to be given free rein to go for it and I have a feeling it might be some campy, wordy, hilarious shit. Look out haters, Meggy is gonna take 6000 words to tell us all we're mean and she doesn't even care what we say because some children in a poor country need saving and she's ON IT.
But seriously, I think it'll be pretty great.
Oh and R482? Anyone who thinks there is a single 30-something actress who hasn't had her face shot full of the 'tox and her proto-wrinkles jammed full of the 'stylane is delusional. I agree Meg looks younger than Will, Harry and Kate. I disagree that the reason is anything other than cosmetic work. Come onnnnn. Fwiw and if it makes you feel better, I do believe her procedures are flattering and well done.
by Anonymous | reply 488 | June 12, 2019 5:27 AM |
After the way Harry treated MM at TTC and the fact that he finds any excuse to leave the house, I think their marriage is toast. For a while now his vanity in not wanting to admit he made a mistake in marrying her has kept things together. That he was so publicly disdainful of her shows that he wants everyone to know he's done.
R488, I hope the press drop something juicy, maybe the purported video, when her Vogue issue is dropped. As much snarky delight is to be had in her "fridge magnet philosophy", I'm tired of people giving her a platform.
by Anonymous | reply 489 | June 12, 2019 5:33 AM |
I'm sure Kate doesn't give a shit about MM's antics. And Kate is the much better actress in public, just smiling, ignoring MM's attention-seeking behavior, and moving on with her day (even when she's seated across from her in a carriage). Meghan was actually sneering at Kate and Kate had no fucks to give.
by Anonymous | reply 490 | June 12, 2019 5:44 AM |
I see all the crazy Megastans are on here defending their plumpy darling and trying to reignite the whole Rose bullshit. I knew this would happen because unfortunately their idol wasn't very glamorous at TTC, looked fatter and the Cambridges looked like an adorable, happy glamorous good-looking family.
Plus where on earth are some of you getting information about pregnancy? First of all most women can actually walk after a baby and aren't incontinent either. I'm not aware of any drugs you are put on after having a baby nor am I aware of being puffy 5 weeks after a baby. If she was that oedematous she would have some sort of serious illness which she doesn't appear to have. Yes you are puffy for a little while but it really decreases very fast. Also if you have a normal delivery you can actually do things like a normal functioning human, you aren't sitting there puffed up, crying, wetting yourself with milk dripping on the floor. You can actually go out of the house and have fun and do things, you are not pathologically ill.
Unfortunately MM is just big and fat, not puffy, that's just a polite way of saying fat. My thinking is she was fucking enormous at the last stages and she actually has lost a lot of weight already. I'd say she put on the navy dress and she looked good in comparison to 4 weeks ago but it's unfortunate when you have to sit opposite the model like Kate. MM would have thought she looked pretty decent until she went home and saw the actual footage and now the backlash against Kate and William begins though I thought she would have been more creative than the Rose shit again.
Finally if the Rose thing was real do you honestly think the tabloids wouldn't have published it? do you have any idea how tabloid journalism is in Britain? They would publish it in a heartbeat if it was true and they had evidence. They have neither, their defamation defence wouldn't work, they don't have the proof. Let it go Stans it's not going to happen. Now bring on the tiaras and some photos of Randy Andy please!
by Anonymous | reply 491 | June 12, 2019 5:49 AM |
R488 Meg looks younger than Will, Harry and Kate because black don't crack. Halle Berry, another biracial, looks younger than a typical 52 year old white woman. Even Eurasians like Keanu Reeves age better than whites.
by Anonymous | reply 492 | June 12, 2019 5:50 AM |
R492 haha MM is no Halle Berry in fact MM looks older than Halle. Neither did Halle look like a beached whale after she had her kid.
by Anonymous | reply 493 | June 12, 2019 5:52 AM |
R490 It's ironic isn't it that Kate is actually a better actress than MM. I love Kate's big wide grin in the carriage, though I too would be grinning if I looked like Kate and had my narc fat sister in law sitting in front of me talking animatedly to herself. In fact I'd find it hard not to piss myself laughing, Kate and Camilla always look like they are giggling amongst themselves at her.
by Anonymous | reply 494 | June 12, 2019 6:00 AM |
Kate doesn't look like a model to me- she looks like the chain-smoking bulimic.
And Camilla- the less said about the whore the better. Everyone had her, before and after Charles.
by Anonymous | reply 495 | June 12, 2019 6:02 AM |
That DM article at R334 screams PR campaign. Nesting, long walks, Meghan breastfeeding while Harry changes nappies, Doria being incredily close .... I'm not one of those who believes that after one tense moment between M and H that they're on the verge of divorce, but this is a bit much.
by Anonymous | reply 496 | June 12, 2019 6:02 AM |
R493 Will looks like a 50 year old, bald man. Kate has a lot of wrinkles for a woman under 40 years old. Harry has a growing bald spot and a lot of wrinkles due to his pale complexion.
by Anonymous | reply 497 | June 12, 2019 6:09 AM |
R495 Oh dear, I see someone has escaped their restraints and is out of the basement.
Maybe MM should think about sticking her fingers down her throat and refunding a few doughnuts, I would if I looked like her.
by Anonymous | reply 498 | June 12, 2019 6:12 AM |
R491 I agree, I think she got legit huge before giving birth, and that's why we didn't see her for a couple of months beforehand. She was already very big by the time we stopped seeing her, I bet she was the size of a small truck the day before. Also agree that she's probably already lost a significant amount of it. She carries babies like Jessica Simpson - just balloons up.
Also agree R496 - obvious PR is obvious. I also sometimes think the DM likes to publish a nicey-nice article every week or two just to a)trigger a lively comment section and b)give themselves deniability for the next time some public figure criticizes them for being all mean and shit.
by Anonymous | reply 499 | June 12, 2019 6:14 AM |
Why is Markle puffy now, but she wasn't puffy two days after giving birth when she presented the kid to the media?
by Anonymous | reply 500 | June 12, 2019 6:15 AM |
Was there video with the baby, or just the pictures? That would explain a lot.
by Anonymous | reply 501 | June 12, 2019 6:19 AM |
She's not puffy, she is fat which I have no doubt she will lose eventually. Your post partum swelling goes down after a week, you are at your peak puffiness 3-4 days post delivery. I never understood why MM didn't do the photo on the hospital steps a few hours after the delivery because she would have looked a lot better than she did a few days later. Kate was clever, got her make up and hair done, posed for a few minutes and went home to her bed and probably swelled up a few days later away from prying eyes.
by Anonymous | reply 502 | June 12, 2019 6:26 AM |
Another author with a book to promote but, hey, it's gossip. Allegedly Harry dated Burberry model while seeing MM.
by Anonymous | reply 503 | June 12, 2019 6:36 AM |
The only women who look like MM did post partum are the ones who let themselves go during pregnancy. She's just fat. She also does not look younger than Harry and the Cambridges. Her wrinkles, grey hair and bad skin have been on display since we first saw her. In fact, I always thought she looked older than her age. Neither she nor Doria age well.
by Anonymous | reply 504 | June 12, 2019 6:41 AM |
Slow Motion video of the RF exiting BP out onto the balcony. Sparkle trying for great position behind the Queen, but.....
Love the comments on the screen.
And the Princess Anne's move.
by Anonymous | reply 505 | June 12, 2019 6:50 AM |
^ nice, thanks
by Anonymous | reply 506 | June 12, 2019 6:53 AM |
R357, my opinion also. I think her position and her family are more likely to be important to her than true romantic luv. As long as she’s not publicly embarrassed.
by Anonymous | reply 507 | June 12, 2019 6:58 AM |
She's not puffy in the pic below two days after giving birth. What is she puffy five weeks after giving birth?
by Anonymous | reply 508 | June 12, 2019 7:34 AM |
3 years ago, everyone who now bullies meghan, used to bully kate...sorry, duchess doolittle...or was it frog legs? Hmm, what was that characters name with the long torso and short legs? And how could I forget Mrs Wiglet. They accused kate of using a surrogate, of having ps, sex tape, and being a fake user with grifting hillbilly family. Uncle gary was accused of financially supporting them with his drug money and underage prossies at mansion le bang bang. #neverforget
by Anonymous | reply 509 | June 12, 2019 8:32 AM |
I don’t see what’s the big mystery about Meghan’s weight. She’s been eatin’, that’s all. Nothing wrong with that.
by Anonymous | reply 510 | June 12, 2019 8:40 AM |
R509 I feel like most of what you just said could be and can still be found regularly on Celebitchy (for example). People who disliked Kate, especially those who seemed to strongly dislike her, pretty much seem to make up a large part of the pro-Meggy crowd these days. Not sure I've ever met someone (irl or online) who was hardcore anti-Kate and is now hardcore anti-Meg. I dislike MM but my feelings on Kate were neutral/non-existent (i.e. I just didn't think about her except when she was mentioned in the news and even then had basically no strong feelings.). I feel that I "like" Kate more than I used to, and that is admittedly in large part down to how MM's awful job of her first year has also served to highlight how well Kate actually does her own.
by Anonymous | reply 511 | June 12, 2019 8:47 AM |
I think Kate most certainly does give a shit about MM's antics, if it is true that MM is about the Rose exposé, whether it's true or not. I know I would! Kate and Wills clearly had a tense moment in the car, but Kate was positively radiant when she saw how shit MM looked. I would be too! Karma's a bitch.....
by Anonymous | reply 512 | June 12, 2019 9:00 AM |
Can anyone explain why the BRF tolerate Prince Harry's over-the-top party boy antics? Sounds like it's not just an occasional splurge when on vacation. Wills doesn't seem to have the same rep. Are they all functioning alcoholics? Recall tales of how much the Queen Mother drank and yet she lived to a very old age. How?
by Anonymous | reply 513 | June 12, 2019 9:15 AM |
I love the description of MM as the carrion crow with a rictus smile @ R525's video. So apt.
by Anonymous | reply 514 | June 12, 2019 9:16 AM |
When's the Christening? At what age are baby boys usually baptized in the BRF?
by Anonymous | reply 515 | June 12, 2019 9:16 AM |
MM didn't look that bad. People love to exaggerate when it comes to her.
She looked awkward, as she always does, wearing clothes that look too old for her. It emphasised her very youthful looks and made her look like a kid playing dress up in her mothers clothes.
Especially next to the very old 36 year old in front of her with the crazy rictus grin, which btw, she needs to stop as it makes her look creepy. She did it again when they visited that farm. She had that huge gurning smile whilst everyone else had a neutral face.... She does it so her face won't collaps and get all jowly, melting candle like. But again, it makes her look disturbed and crazy.
by Anonymous | reply 516 | June 12, 2019 9:16 AM |
The Kate haters sound deranged. No, MM doesn't look horrible in the way, ie, Fergie does, but compared to her past photos, eg last year's TTC, she looks really bad.
by Anonymous | reply 517 | June 12, 2019 9:20 AM |
R511 the thousands of commentators on the daily heil, RD, tumblr etc say Hi!
3 years ago you couldn't find a single nice comment about her. I doubt all joined the meg train.
by Anonymous | reply 518 | June 12, 2019 9:26 AM |
The christening is going to happen approximately 60 kilos from today.
by Anonymous | reply 519 | June 12, 2019 9:29 AM |
The christening will be in July. MM will be attired in heavy funereal garb as usual, with matching leather gloves.
by Anonymous | reply 520 | June 12, 2019 9:34 AM |
The Kate haters sound deranged? They post like saints compared to MM haters.
Anyone with eyes can tell that a few staged pictures (and most likely photoshopped) are going to look better than video.
by Anonymous | reply 521 | June 12, 2019 9:34 AM |
Did anyone else practically piss themselves laughing when they saw MM at TTC? I know I did, then pity kicked in.
by Anonymous | reply 522 | June 12, 2019 9:36 AM |
No, it was just you.
by Anonymous | reply 523 | June 12, 2019 9:41 AM |
Ha ha I had a good laugh too R522. Those clothes, and the Granny Clampett hairdo and chapeau!! I still think the white nurse's hat, homage to Jackie Kennedy, was Sparkles' very best, though. So many happy moments..
by Anonymous | reply 524 | June 12, 2019 11:14 AM |
Of course she used a surrogate, people! Then she puffed up post baby because she’s a method actress.
You know, if she really wanted to create a feminist bend, she’d embrace her plumpness with pride and go full in on loving your body. But that would involve self awareness and I’m not sure she could pull that off. Instead she’ll hide it while making some faux feminist speech about it
by Anonymous | reply 526 | June 12, 2019 11:31 AM |
Prince Philip with Prince Charles at the Badminton Horse Trials, Gloucestershire, 9 April 1965.
by Anonymous | reply 527 | June 12, 2019 11:32 AM |
Humorous look at MM half-brother raising money for charity via boxing match and etc from Skippy.
by Anonymous | reply 529 | June 12, 2019 11:53 AM |
That slo-mo vid at R525 is amazing. You can see Anne block Yoko. She tells Andrew what she's had to do, Andrew turns and glances at her. And back at Anne. They both look amused at the job done, but it intensifies Andrew's disgust for her.
by Anonymous | reply 530 | June 12, 2019 12:04 PM |
Princess Beatrice, youngest daughter of Victoria and Albert, in her crib, May 1857, at three weeks old.
by Anonymous | reply 531 | June 12, 2019 12:07 PM |
It all took a wrong turn when someone in the family (who?) started to call prince Henry, Harry.
It did something to him psychologically.. formal things don't count for him. Imagine we had Prince Billy instead of William.
by Anonymous | reply 532 | June 12, 2019 12:09 PM |
Diana and Elton.
And a whole lot of brocade going on.
by Anonymous | reply 533 | June 12, 2019 12:10 PM |
Epsom Derby and fancy hats, 1968.
Markle should bring these hats back.
by Anonymous | reply 534 | June 12, 2019 12:13 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 535 | June 12, 2019 12:25 PM |
Meghan had a really successful acting career and lifestyle blog, both of which she gave up to marry Harry, so I'm not sure why people here think she's so keen to go back to what she willingly left behind.
Meghan had a sold out clothing line with Reitmans, which she had to end in order to marry Harry. She was also running a very lucrative blog called Tig, which she also had to close down to marry Harry. AND she had to leave Suits two seasons before it ended, another thing she had to quit so she could marry Harry. But sure, she was in need of Harry saving her, and in need of his money.
She was doing more than fine before she met Harry, giving speeches in UN summit, after UN invited her because of her work in her blog, Tig. She was doing charity work, in fact building a nice career to carry on for herself when Suits was going to end.
Putting her down as an "aging actress" just doesn't work. It's not based on facts.
by Anonymous | reply 536 | June 12, 2019 12:31 PM |
So R536, how is it that MM is so incompetent at fulfilling the role she signed up for with the RF? Others who have married in have managed fairly well. Hell, even I, a gay male with no training, could put on a tasteful frock and hat, and walk where I was told and say the right things.
by Anonymous | reply 537 | June 12, 2019 12:35 PM |
Notice no pics of Rita Ora, Harry and Rita Ora's tits, even though they are all over the press. We do get forget-me-nots, though, and a whole tossed word salad. Again.
by Anonymous | reply 538 | June 12, 2019 12:38 PM |
Archie's first words:
Annulment
Paternity
STD
by Anonymous | reply 539 | June 12, 2019 12:40 PM |
Are you paid to post?
If so, how often?
Which do you choose
The bot or shill option?
by Anonymous | reply 540 | June 12, 2019 12:51 PM |
Welp Troll's First Words
DNA
High Treason
Divorce
Sunshine Sachs
Paid to post
Russian Bots
by Anonymous | reply 541 | June 12, 2019 12:53 PM |
Hot dang! The pictures with Rita were hilarious and DM clearly cunted off on them. But Gemma Atterton too? Weren't we just talking about her propensity for low-key showing up wherever Harry was, through the years? Uh oh.
by Anonymous | reply 542 | June 12, 2019 12:57 PM |
R537, she isn't incompetent. She has actually proved herself to be charismatic, focused and articulate, especially on the royal tours. All you can do is criticise her for very superifical things like having a price tag dangling
She was worth $5m before the marriage and has spent some of that on designer clothes.
by Anonymous | reply 543 | June 12, 2019 12:57 PM |
Her grammar is atrocious for a woman who blogged for a living! The insta account regularly misuses the word 'whom', misspells colour (ok, she's american) AND now again today :
"in which both Princes’ are able ..."
by Anonymous | reply 544 | June 12, 2019 1:01 PM |
R544 Makes me wince. It's awful.
by Anonymous | reply 546 | June 12, 2019 1:02 PM |
r536
"Meghan had a really successful acting career and lifestyle blog, " She was low down the call sheet on an ensemble show, she was sucessful in that she was in work when more than 90% of her profession is out of work. Her ex-husband got her the job. However compared to acting actor's she was low, low, low down the totem pole. As for her knock off goop blog, a large percentage of her followers were from Kazakhstan aka known as paid followers.
"Meghan had a sold out clothing line with Reitmans, which she had to end in order to marry Harry." Evidence? And what percentage did she make from the clothing line? " She was also running a very lucrative blog called Tig, which she also had to close down to marry Harry. " Evidence that it was lucrative? "AND she had to leave Suits two seasons before it ended, another thing she had to quit so she could marry Harry. " No the creators were very clear she had been written out. So she was an aging actor with no other gigs lined up. She needed Harry she had nothing else.
"She was doing more than fine before she met Harry, giving speeches in UN summit, after UN invited her because of her work in her blog, Tig. She was doing charity work, in fact building a nice career to carry on for herself when Suits was going to end." She gave ONE speech at the UN, went on ONE white saviour trip to Rwanda and another one to India. I have seen no other evidence of charity work. She used these trips as PR to hook Harry.
"Putting her down as an "aging actress" just doesn't work. It's not based on facts." I'm afraid it is, Sugar.
by Anonymous | reply 547 | June 12, 2019 1:04 PM |
Actually, it's worse than that...
"way in which both Princes’ are able to keep their mothers’ legacy... "
by Anonymous | reply 548 | June 12, 2019 1:05 PM |
R543, I'll give you that standards for intrepid and articulate celebrities are currently on the floor, what with Kylie, Kendall, Selena etc but Meghan is still too GOOP-y and basic to qualify for 'charismatic'. Sorry. Hell, even GOOP is more charismatic because at least she has something original to say- even if her brand of jade-egg/consciously uncoupled wellness is grating.
by Anonymous | reply 549 | June 12, 2019 1:06 PM |
Edward Enninful is the gay, black editor of UK Vogue. He spends all his time partying with Naomi Campbell and fame hungry Liam Payne from One Direction, whose profile EE keeps trying to raise to compete with Wintour's deification of Harry Styles.
So I can see Enninful being interested in giving biracial Meghan the opportunity to co edit Vogue.
by Anonymous | reply 550 | June 12, 2019 1:10 PM |
Severe Eighties fashion on a sombre day in Italy, 1985, at the War Cemetery in Anzio.
by Anonymous | reply 551 | June 12, 2019 1:14 PM |
Let's take a ride, and run with the trolls tonight
In Suburbia
No, you can't hide, run with the trolls tonight
In Suburbia
Broken window by the Toad hall
Listen, the siren screams
There in the distance, like a troll call
Of all the suburban dreams
by Anonymous | reply 552 | June 12, 2019 1:15 PM |
When I look back upon these threads
It's always with a sense of shame
The Welp Troll is the one to blame
For everything he tries to do
No matter when or where or who
Has one thing in common, too
It's a, it's a, it's a, it's a TROLL!
by Anonymous | reply 553 | June 12, 2019 1:27 PM |
R441 for the win!
R438
P.S. - One could also look forward to the plaigiarism lawsuit from the estates of the writers of "Damn Yankees" on the "What Meghan Wants" song. Of cour se, the very source, "Damn Yankees" might add that last touch of delicious irony, don't you think?
by Anonymous | reply 554 | June 12, 2019 1:32 PM |
R474, 5 weeks is actually a long time post-partum. She should be obviously slimmer, instead she is obviously fatter/more bloated. A typical baby weighs between 6-10 pounds. So that should be gone. The weight of the amniotic fluid should be gone. The extra blood volume (heart pumping for two) = gone. And, she should be feeding two now (baby is bigger than ever) without having to tote it around inside her own body.
Really, there should be significant weight loss by now. Just look how Catherine appeared at Meghan's wedding. That's how it works.
by Anonymous | reply 555 | June 12, 2019 1:33 PM |
R555, is your precious 'Catherine' (who hates that name, btw) your sole reference point for pregnant women? Never seen any others, Mr Friendless?
Meg's face is already thinner than it was when she introduced Archie, but her hair was loose then so it framed her face and the extra fullness wasn't so obvious as it was on Saturday with her hair scraped back.
by Anonymous | reply 556 | June 12, 2019 1:39 PM |
I could leave you, say goodbye
Or I could troll you, if I try
And I could
And left to my own devices
I probably would.
by Anonymous | reply 557 | June 12, 2019 1:41 PM |
Sophie Wessex is the first British Royal to visit Lebanon. She's meeting refugees.
by Anonymous | reply 558 | June 12, 2019 1:43 PM |
R551 - One of Diana's howlers, except for the hat. And more suited to a wedding. That was the Italy, tour, I think, and her wardrobe on that one, except for the all-black in which she met the Pope, was disastrous. I seem to remember a huge floppy pirate hat in green with a blanket coat, and a truly ugly tea-length evening gown that a critic at the time described as two dwarves, one standing on the other's shoulders.
The ribs ache just looking at this one.
Isn't Ascot coming up? We should be getting some serious hat gossip shortly.
by Anonymous | reply 560 | June 12, 2019 1:44 PM |
Driving the girls round the bend.
The Queen driving Princess Sofia of Greece and Denmark (later Queen Sofia of Spain), Windsor Great Park, 1961
by Anonymous | reply 561 | June 12, 2019 1:45 PM |
Good for Sophie! I also loved her gamely climbing the tree house at the Chelsea garden show too. No wonder she's HM's favourite. Nobody can be Diana of course but she's a very very low rent and well adjusted version
by Anonymous | reply 562 | June 12, 2019 1:45 PM |
R560, yes it was the Italy tour. I must look for those outfits you mentioned!
Ascot is from the 20th June, so I'm looking forward to hats galore! I'll get the Pimms in, and join in the Royal Ascot Party on DL.
by Anonymous | reply 563 | June 12, 2019 1:48 PM |
R559 - Indeed it is. The photo shows what earlier photos of the Windsor women used to miss and that gave them their claim to prettiness: the Celtic colouring they got from the Queen Mother. The gorgeous petal smooth fair skin contrasting with the dark hair and large blue eyes. Margaret, despite being somewhat prettier than Elizabeth, went to seed much quicker. Odd how that turns out, sometimes. At 50, the Queen had held up much better than the prettier younger sister.
by Anonymous | reply 564 | June 12, 2019 1:48 PM |
R563 - Cheers. Add in some early strawberries and Devon cream.
by Anonymous | reply 565 | June 12, 2019 1:50 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 566 | June 12, 2019 1:54 PM |
R555 - No Meghan fan here but just the same, I think it's unfair to make the comparison on general principle, women shouldn't have to add that kind of competition into the body shock of childbirth. Women's bodies, I would guess, respond differently to the raging hormones that linger after childbirth, and these two women have completely different body types. One is tall and slender who carried all the baby weight in the front belly area, the other short and boxy who carried it also in her hips, thighs, and arse. It's much harder to lose the latter sort. Kate was athletic and 31 when she had her first child; Meghan 38. That makes quite a difference.
Women shoulder enough burdens for the continuation of the species - even women we want to slap.
by Anonymous | reply 567 | June 12, 2019 1:58 PM |
R565 I was at a local farm shop this morning and brought home some delicious strawberries, and forgot cream!
Probably best to save the indulgence of cream for Ascot, maybe, otherwise once I get started, I can't stop.
C'est la vie.
by Anonymous | reply 568 | June 12, 2019 2:00 PM |
R505, that video is GOLD. Well worth a watch to see how the family manages her.
by Anonymous | reply 570 | June 12, 2019 2:03 PM |
Geez, are we really bashing a woman for not losing baby weight fast enough? Too fat, too thin, too short, on and on. What a bunch of self hating women, honestly I don’t see men bashing this.
by Anonymous | reply 571 | June 12, 2019 2:04 PM |
Our Megs loves all that Alpha male dick PW is throwing around 😂 .
by Anonymous | reply 572 | June 12, 2019 2:07 PM |
Here are some other photos of the Highgrove garden. It may have changed since these photos were taken.
by Anonymous | reply 573 | June 12, 2019 2:08 PM |
Young Edward and Michael, 1952. (The Kent brothers, sounds like a gangster film! ).
by Anonymous | reply 574 | June 12, 2019 2:10 PM |
Four generations of royal males - Philip. Charles. William and George
by Anonymous | reply 575 | June 12, 2019 2:10 PM |
"Alpha Dick" and "Sugar" makes me cringe. Stop trying to make up slang you old frauhags. No one uses these cringey words outside ofyour echo chamber.
by Anonymous | reply 576 | June 12, 2019 2:11 PM |
R56868 - I share your gluttonous response to Devon cream. Does Harrods still have that all you can eat cream tea it had for a mere 3.50 about 40 years ago, opened at 3PM I think? Once in a while I'd drop in and indulge, it had a trestle table collapsing with pastries but all I ever went for was the endless pots of tea and the excellent fresh-baked scones and cream. But I'd with amusement see American and German tourists loading up their plates with the pastries when the best thing in the room was the least decorative and most homely and unassuming.
by Anonymous | reply 577 | June 12, 2019 2:11 PM |
Nutmeg and her hat are supposedly attending Wimbledon.
by Anonymous | reply 579 | June 12, 2019 2:13 PM |
R583 'Lor, that photo is enough to turn one into a Socialist and drag out the pitchforks and torches. Imagine waking up in the morning in a place like that through a lucky accident of birth.
by Anonymous | reply 580 | June 12, 2019 2:14 PM |
R578 - Meghan hasn't looked like that in a verrryyyy long time, and when she did, the photographer had just stepped away seconds earlier.
by Anonymous | reply 581 | June 12, 2019 2:15 PM |
Oh my!
Diana serving some serious Eighties Escada, and a hat reminiscent of Devo, in the Isle of Wight, 1989.
by Anonymous | reply 583 | June 12, 2019 2:16 PM |
R571 seriously cry me a river, this is a gossip site not some forum to cheer postpartum whining woke bitches. If you want that go to Mumsnet.
Where is the self hating btw? MM is fat for a "celebrity" who has had a baby 5 weeks ago. This isn't bitchy it's just a simple fact. Even everyday fraus who don't have her resources are a lot thinner than her. Kate is not that unusual to be honest most women I know including myself were a hell of a lot thinner than her after 5 weeks after kids.
by Anonymous | reply 584 | June 12, 2019 2:16 PM |
R576 doesn't get out much.
by Anonymous | reply 585 | June 12, 2019 2:17 PM |
This photo of The Queen and Prince Philip in Scotland was used for their 1996 Christmas card.
by Anonymous | reply 586 | June 12, 2019 2:18 PM |
R583 - I never cared for Diana in yellow - it fought her hair. The coat is hideous. I think she wore it in Berlin, as well. The tabloids said it was louder than the band.
by Anonymous | reply 587 | June 12, 2019 2:19 PM |
The Queen with her black labs on the lawn of Balmoral in Scotland.
by Anonymous | reply 588 | June 12, 2019 2:19 PM |
Please use this thread Part 72 after we fill this one up.
by Anonymous | reply 589 | June 12, 2019 2:22 PM |
I love the shower cap hats R534, and agree that Meg Markle should adopt the style to keep her flawless millinery run going. Or at least put it in the rotation for veddy important engagements. Which they all are, when it comes to our Meg. It's a special time; such fashion splendor may never be seen again.
by Anonymous | reply 591 | June 12, 2019 2:23 PM |
Margaret looked like a princess in this dress.
by Anonymous | reply 593 | June 12, 2019 2:26 PM |
Who has had a bite at the Café Diana restaurant in London?
by Anonymous | reply 594 | June 12, 2019 2:27 PM |
Photos of the wedding between Queen's cousin, the Earl of Harewood and Marion Stein.
by Anonymous | reply 595 | June 12, 2019 2:30 PM |
R574 Edward the current Duke of Kent was an unfortunate looking child, this is why kids you shouldn't marry your second cousin.
His father George was very handsome and stylish and married the equally chic and beautiful Princess Marina. He led a very decadent life, having multiple affairs with both men and woman. One of his more famous affairs was with Barbara Cartland and it was rumoured that he was the father of her daughter Raine who later would become Diana's stepmother.
by Anonymous | reply 596 | June 12, 2019 2:30 PM |
Mr Asscher making the incision on the Cullinan Diamond February 1908.
by Anonymous | reply 598 | June 12, 2019 2:32 PM |
The Queen was like a Flower Fairy, too, in this hat and outfit.
On a walkabout in the Mauritius, March 1972, with the Mauritian Prime Minister .
by Anonymous | reply 599 | June 12, 2019 2:35 PM |
Sometimes you're better off dead
The Welp Troll is screeching
And is trying to ruin the thread.
by Anonymous | reply 601 | June 12, 2019 2:37 PM |
Well I delivered a baby myself and I had no such big belly like M or such bloat after that . I did give breastfeeding . When M was pregnant it was If she was pregnant with twins but hey just one popped out . Very oddd things happened in that pregnancy . All that circus surrounding that birth . You would think it was the second coming of Jesus . But still no pics of Archie . How you explain that ! I thought People would première the baby pics but nothing also . We just have a pic from afar with the queen and PP and a pic in the Windsor Castle what looked like a doll . So we are still waiting to see him .
by Anonymous | reply 603 | June 12, 2019 3:01 PM |