Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Class of 1989

Would you say this is a good representation of the look back then?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 88March 6, 2019 10:05 PM

Yes! Hardly anyone looked good back then - the late 80s and early 90s were a horrible time for hair and fashion.

by Anonymousreply 1March 4, 2019 2:27 AM

The woman on the bottom row, fourth from the left, is hot.

by Anonymousreply 2March 4, 2019 2:30 AM

Those were some of the looks.

by Anonymousreply 3March 4, 2019 2:32 AM

What’s Kurt Wilde doing in that class?

by Anonymousreply 4March 4, 2019 2:34 AM

I think the 1980s produced the worst hair, make up and fashion of the 20th century.

it was as if people intentionally tried to look ugly

by Anonymousreply 5March 4, 2019 2:34 AM

Probably more rural or working-class American than more affluent coastal cities/burbs.

In pre-internet days trends traveled much more slowly, so the looks reflected above were out of date in some places by then, but certainly common enough overall.

People in more affluent areas would have been looking a bit more Friends-like and less 80s

by Anonymousreply 6March 4, 2019 2:35 AM

[R6] is right. I was class of 1991, and my friend group had a more 60s-redux/mid-late 90s look. A few of us had discovered J. Crew and copied the look of the models.

by Anonymousreply 7March 4, 2019 2:37 AM

lol That looks like MY yearbook back then!

by Anonymousreply 8March 4, 2019 2:39 AM

Friends did not happen in 1989. Yes. This yearbook was standard. We looked horrible.

by Anonymousreply 9March 4, 2019 2:45 AM

The girl on the top left looks pretty timeless.

by Anonymousreply 10March 4, 2019 2:49 AM

Looks very familiar alright.

by Anonymousreply 11March 4, 2019 2:52 AM

Yes, I had some older cousins, who graduated around that time, and that is how they looked.

by Anonymousreply 12March 4, 2019 2:52 AM

I miss those days. People took the time to dress up every single day. We looked good.

by Anonymousreply 13March 4, 2019 2:53 AM

I was class of '89.

Shoot me.

Shoot me, now.

by Anonymousreply 14March 4, 2019 2:56 AM

my school made us dress up for picture day, so that was typical for "wear nice clothes" in the late 80s/early 90s.

by Anonymousreply 15March 4, 2019 2:56 AM

good look for the suburbs.

by Anonymousreply 16March 4, 2019 2:58 AM

I had all of them

by Anonymousreply 17March 4, 2019 2:59 AM

Who knew center part feathering was still a look for guys in '89. I would have thought that mess would have been gone by then. I guess real change didn't happen until Nirvana hit.

Half the guys at my school had this look going on. Can't say it's much of an improvement over the 80s.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 18March 4, 2019 2:59 AM

"People took the time to dress up every single day. We looked good."

Uh, no, this was the 1980s, not the 1880s. Plenty of people dressed casually and a lot of them looked like shit - neon, fanny packs, mullets, acid washed everything

by Anonymousreply 19March 4, 2019 3:00 AM

The guy on the lower left reminds me of Brent Corrigan.

by Anonymousreply 20March 4, 2019 3:01 AM

there isn't really a soccer player/wrestler bro

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21March 4, 2019 3:04 AM

OP, class of 90, ABSOLUTELY. The one missing character is the token “long hair” also called a “burn-out” or “stoner.” The burn-out would have shoulder length/collar bone length hair, bad acne, wearing an Anthrax shirt topped with a blue flannel.

The photo montage is also not representative of a single punk rocker/Lisa Bonet/Dead or Alive wanna be.

Aside from that, it is ABSOLUTELY spot-on.

by Anonymousreply 22March 4, 2019 3:04 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23March 4, 2019 3:04 AM

R18, obviously he was a burn-out trying to rebrand himself. He reeks of the drugs, clearly. Poor thing.

by Anonymousreply 24March 4, 2019 3:07 AM

I recall more Nu-Wave hairdos (asymmetrical, undercuts) on girls, though. Many more girls wore their hair short back then, preppy or punk. Almost as many as the ones with the perms and big volume.

And the guys I knew didn’t have mullets (the townies did, though).

by Anonymousreply 25March 4, 2019 3:07 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26March 4, 2019 3:08 AM

R18, he’s high as a kite, no wonder his part looks like that!

R25, this is true, Cyndi Lauper had a huge influence on shorter hair.

by Anonymousreply 27March 4, 2019 3:08 AM

R25 worse than mullets on guys, were the mullets on girls.

by Anonymousreply 28March 4, 2019 3:08 AM

R22 - LOL at the wanna-be Lisa Bonet reference!

by Anonymousreply 29March 4, 2019 3:09 AM

I guess we lived in a different world R7 -- DL does skew very middle America.

by Anonymousreply 30March 4, 2019 3:09 AM

Was Heathers supposed to be class of ‘89?

by Anonymousreply 31March 4, 2019 3:16 AM

I agree with r7, I posted about burn-outs. Where I grew up had some “rich” kids (laughable, just upwardly moving middle class families) but was predominantly working class and overflowing with drugs, though the drugs were trending out. That was the Chicago suburbs. In towns that were coastal and middle+ class, it was much more prep, at least on the east coast.

by Anonymousreply 32March 4, 2019 3:18 AM

Looking back over the past 100 years I still say men of the EARLY 60s had the best cuts and styles. Classic, clean- cut and masculine.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33March 4, 2019 3:21 AM

R32 There are always and always will be preppy kids. I was one in the late 1990s-early 2000s . The great thing is that the preppy look is fairly timeless, so I can look back at my yearbooks and not feel embarrassment.

by Anonymousreply 34March 4, 2019 3:21 AM

As bad as it is, it's nothing compared to the early 2000s:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35March 4, 2019 3:27 AM

Oh I agree r34. But the 80’s also had their own special sub-species of preppy. Preppies are forever, but true 80’s preppy looked a little different, more vivid. The most extreme preppies looked like they had a splash of Katy Perry, or something. Those who lived through it know of what I speak. There were preppies, and then there were Preppies.

by Anonymousreply 36March 4, 2019 3:30 AM

Where is Martha Dumptruck?

by Anonymousreply 37March 4, 2019 3:35 AM

Ok, better description. There were preppies, and then there were Valley Girl Preppies. Closely related but vastly different.

by Anonymousreply 38March 4, 2019 3:35 AM

The 80s had fake preppies R36

It was a fashion trend for a few years, trickled down to Old Navy level stores and then it disappeared and the fake preppies became grunge or whatever trend came next.

There were real preppies too, as there always have been, but they were not a "type" at Flyoverstani high schools like the one in OPs photo

by Anonymousreply 39March 4, 2019 3:36 AM

I liked the fashion in the '80s, not so much the hair.

by Anonymousreply 40March 4, 2019 3:42 AM

The '80s-early '90s was the last period hen girls/ women had short hairstyles, and they were considered to be pretty and fashionable, even desired. A lot of big stars sported short hairstyles: Sharon Stone, Madonna, Molly Ringwald, Demi Moore, Winona Ryder, Linda Evangelista, so on. Many women look better, younger, sexier with short hair, Sharon Stone being one of them, same for Princess Diana who knew what worked for her. Now girls mostly have long hair or shoulder length cuts, even if they don't look good with long hair.

by Anonymousreply 41March 4, 2019 3:59 AM

I like the hair.

by Anonymousreply 42March 4, 2019 4:51 AM

[quote][R25], this is true, Cyndi Lauper had a huge influence on shorter hair.

Cyndi Lauper a huge influence? Bitch, where was SHE in '81?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43March 4, 2019 6:40 AM

Nailed it.

by Anonymousreply 44March 4, 2019 8:11 AM

I miss the power pixie /Annie Lennox short hairstyles from the late 80’s /early 90’s!! Now there was a hot look.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 45March 4, 2019 9:25 AM

Our style in my high school was from Valley Girls (Deborah Foreman/Nicholas Cage) movie from 1983. That was what the majority of kids in my high school looked like. We actually used her as the example of the haircut we wanted. I graduated in 1984 and by then I was growing out my cringe worthy mullet and moving on to the Flashdance look for college.

by Anonymousreply 46March 4, 2019 10:08 AM

r34 my school was also into the Preppy look in the late 80's so our pictures are pretty classic

by Anonymousreply 47March 4, 2019 10:24 AM

I was Class of '89. OP, for a second I thought those photos were from my yearbook! Everyone looked like that. Well, I didn't. I was a "skater" and had a half shaved head with long hair over one eye. Also a hideous look.

by Anonymousreply 48March 4, 2019 10:31 AM

Hot.

by Anonymousreply 49March 4, 2019 6:24 PM

That looks dated for ‘89 unless we are talking about the Midwest where 1989 would look like 1982 everywhere else

by Anonymousreply 50March 4, 2019 7:59 PM

R50, do you have an example of what average teenagers who didn't live in the midwest looked like in 1989? Genuinely curious.

by Anonymousreply 51March 4, 2019 8:08 PM

In 1989, every teenager had access to MTV which is what influenced popular style from coast to coast. Even the goths and punks and stoners were influenced by MTV. The only kids who weren't were the ones wearing traditional religious or ancestral garb.

Remember that OP's photo is from Yearbook Picture Day which is when most kids tamed their look in response to their parents' wishes. On non-picture days, the hairstyles and facial hair could be wilder.

by Anonymousreply 52March 4, 2019 8:12 PM

Nobody, except maybe the heavy metal stoners, still had the feathered hair in 1989 unless they called Des Moines or Omaha home...

by Anonymousreply 53March 4, 2019 8:49 PM

r26 as a straight dude, I thought that was gonna be a hot chick playing soccer. Thanks now I'm all kinds of messed up.

by Anonymousreply 54March 4, 2019 8:55 PM

[quote]the late 80s and early 90s were a horrible time for hair and fashion.

Agreed. America never looked trashier.

by Anonymousreply 55March 4, 2019 8:58 PM

The bangs could be higher.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 56March 4, 2019 9:08 PM

Photos taken in American shopping malls in 1989.......

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 57March 4, 2019 9:11 PM

I'm with r50. I grew up on the East Coast (and not in a rich area), and I would say the OP's yearbook looks a lot more like 1982 than 1989 to me. Very dated for a late-80s yearbook.

by Anonymousreply 58March 4, 2019 9:15 PM

[quote]I think the 1980s produced the worst hair, make up and fashion of the 20th century.

[quote]Agreed. America never looked trashier.

Thanks for taking the heat off of me, guys!

by Anonymousreply 59March 4, 2019 9:44 PM

R51 -- this is Scarsdale (affluent NYC burb) yearbook from 1988. A lot of the photos are small, but you can get the idea.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 60March 4, 2019 11:44 PM

Rachel Maddow circa 1989

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 61March 4, 2019 11:51 PM

Rachel Zoe, circa 1989

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 62March 4, 2019 11:52 PM

I graduated in 1988 in South Florida. My class definitely looked more like r60's Scarsdale pics than OP's. Kids at my school would have been ruthlessly made fun of for looking like that.

OP's pic looks like a small rustbelt town that was 4-5 years behind the coasts. Like Pittsburgh. Or Appalachia.

by Anonymousreply 63March 5, 2019 12:13 AM

[quote]Photos taken in American shopping malls in 1989.......

Looking at those photos the only things I would like to see make a comeback are big bulge jeans for guys:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 64March 5, 2019 1:18 AM

Levi 501s 35% off sale at Penny's.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 65March 5, 2019 1:19 AM

Cut to 1990 and the Beverly Hills 90210 looks are more timeless.

by Anonymousreply 66March 5, 2019 1:27 AM

The feathered, parted in the middle hair on the guys in OP's post was definitely more early 80s than late 80s. As others have said, this must've been a small town that was several years behind the times.

by Anonymousreply 67March 5, 2019 1:54 AM

It is a small town-- if you look at OP's photo it is from the town of Coos Bays, Oregon -- the website address for the link starts: www.marshfield.coos-bay.k12 and Google reveals Coos Bay as a small city on the Oregon coast, population 16,000

Perhaps some DLers more familiar with Coos Bay can fill us in

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 68March 5, 2019 1:59 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 69March 5, 2019 2:06 AM

Those tight 80s perms with the big skyscraper bangs were considered déclassé in more affluent areas.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 70March 5, 2019 2:15 AM

How can OP photo be from 1989??? I agree with others who say it's more like 1982. Guys in 1989 were Ralph Lauren/Polo devotees, worn with khaki pants/Levis and Wayfarers or Aviators, or if you were really cool "Vuarnet" sunglasses. They had preppy classic hair. Think "Dead Poets Society" instead of the arcade at your local mall. Cut off khaki Duckhead shorts in the summer for both guys and girls. Girls had long hair with bangs but not too high, and wore clothes from the Gap, Limited Express and J Crew. Perms were not that "in" in 1989. If you had big hair at all you were trying to emulate supermodels like Cindy Crawford with your hair. Of course, I grew up in a relatively affluent area in the South.

by Anonymousreply 71March 5, 2019 2:24 AM

r71 it depended on region and class. Mullets and big perms lasted well into the 1990s in certain areas.

by Anonymousreply 72March 5, 2019 2:28 AM

[quote]Nobody, except maybe the heavy metal stoners, still had the feathered hair in 1989 unless they called Des Moines or Omaha home...

Or rural Ohio. Half of my graduating class had that haircut, in various lengths, regardless of gender. R72 is correct that the rest of us, myself included, were rockin' the mullets and poodle perms right on past graduation.

by Anonymousreply 73March 5, 2019 3:24 AM

Rachel Maddow looked better then

by Anonymousreply 74March 5, 2019 9:37 AM

Middle guy on top row is hot. I preferred the feathered hair of the 70s, though.

by Anonymousreply 75March 5, 2019 10:07 AM

Those "skyscraper bangs" we're known as a bitch flip.

by Anonymousreply 76March 5, 2019 10:32 AM

Class of 90 here and I recall two girls already into 90s hippie redux by the time we had senior pictures, with peace sign necklaces and vests and blousy poet shirts. Don't see anything like that in these pictures, and no token punks either.

by Anonymousreply 77March 5, 2019 10:41 AM

r76 in the Northeast we called those bangs "the Jersey Claw."

by Anonymousreply 78March 5, 2019 12:14 PM

Interesting R78

I grew up in Westchester and never heard that.

"Big guido hair" was probably the closest we had to a name for it.

by Anonymousreply 79March 5, 2019 8:13 PM

R18's photo is circa 1993, not 1989, and is Howard Donald who was/is in Take That.

by Anonymousreply 80March 5, 2019 8:19 PM

We just called those bangs/hairstyle Mall hair.

by Anonymousreply 81March 5, 2019 10:18 PM

The young woman in the bottom row, second from the right has a late-80s look. The three men with middle parts and feathered hair appear more early-80s.

by Anonymousreply 82March 6, 2019 12:05 AM

Tons of kids had feathered hair through mid/late 80's in my high school. And different groups sported it. Burnout metal heads, preps, jocks, and a few nerds.

by Anonymousreply 83March 6, 2019 12:19 AM

[quote]Perhaps some DLers more familiar with Coos Bay can fill us in

I grew up in Myrtle Point which is about 23 miles south of Coos Bay. What do you want to know?

by Anonymousreply 84March 6, 2019 12:51 AM

I'm class of 88 from rural Northern California. There is one guy in my senior yearbook who had the middle part feathered hair as did his twin sister. They were stoners. My yearbook is a mix of OPs and that Scarsdale yearbook. There were more alternative types all though we didn't call ourselves that. Arty with punk and hippy influences, vintage clothes. Kind of Lisa Bonet style I guess. We didn't have a label for ourselves because we were way to cool and complicated for a single label. My home town isn't racially diverse but it has a mix of people. Rednecks, back to the land hippies, white flight gated community types, fundies, and gay men who liked Victorians but didn't want to live in SF anymore. My yearbook reflects that cultural socioeconomic diversity.

by Anonymousreply 85March 6, 2019 2:39 AM

Many of the Lisa Bonet girls were exotically beautiful, they truly owned their look and were really into “originality.” Being Original bought one social poeer, the more Original you were (without looking desperate or silly), the more reverence one received from one’s peers.

Of the many unique Lisa Bonet’s I ran with, one was a northern Italian redhead who looked similar to the picture below. Another redhead was Irish/Scots and the same color hair but straight (often dyed or partially dyed and shaved short except for her bangs), and another was Egyptian Muslim with light hazel eyes. Many other races/creeds, and many in that crowd were gay, it was where being gay was ok, safe, and fun. Those girls were a hybrid of a Lisa Bonet Wanna-Be crossed with a fag hag.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 86March 6, 2019 3:00 AM

[quote]There were more alternative types all though we didn't call ourselves that.

Oh, dear!

[quote]We didn't have a label for ourselves because we were way to cool and complicated for a single label.

Oh, DEAR!

by Anonymousreply 87March 6, 2019 11:40 AM

Grammar Troll strikes again, and I am in full support.

by Anonymousreply 88March 6, 2019 10:05 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!