Is Meghan Markle truly pregnant?
Take the poll, or add your own guess as to how the latest ploy from our beloved Sparkle is going to play out!
A reminder to the herd of frauen that will inevitably invade this thread: the DL is dedicated to Pointless Bitchery. Keep your pearl clutching at home. Better yet, don't participate and go cradle your mug elsewhere.
by Anonymous | reply 97 | October 27, 2018 11:48 PM
|
This marriage will never last....children or not.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | October 15, 2018 11:07 PM
|
I’m not sure why they felt the need to cover up at the wedding - I’ve just seen her in closeup side profile in a white dress and there is no bump to be seen.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | October 15, 2018 11:08 PM
|
No, it is a pillow baby with a well paid surrogate, likely Mulroney.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | October 15, 2018 11:10 PM
|
She was probably pregnant when they walked down the aisle.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | October 15, 2018 11:12 PM
|
I expect it's a real anchor baby.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | October 15, 2018 11:12 PM
|
Harry and Meghan are both gay so it's a pillow baby with a well paid surrogate
by Anonymous | reply 7 | October 15, 2018 11:14 PM
|
Stupid thoughts here. You old guys must get out of the house.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | October 15, 2018 11:15 PM
|
Merch! Zika! She's not the Duchess of Sussex, she's HRH The Sussex Duchess! Relaxed hair! Weave!
by Anonymous | reply 9 | October 15, 2018 11:16 PM
|
R3- come on. They said the same thing about Kate. Why is it so hard to believe she is pregnant?
by Anonymous | reply 10 | October 15, 2018 11:22 PM
|
Why would she choose a high profile middle aged Canadian mother to be her surrogate? That sounds like ridiculous fan fiction or the setup for a bad film.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | October 15, 2018 11:27 PM
|
Because the are BFFs r11 some say more than BFFs. What is your poll choice (or alternate idea?)
by Anonymous | reply 12 | October 15, 2018 11:29 PM
|
It's possible that both William and Harry received the gay genes from their gay father Charles and possibly their gay mother Diana (Charles is gay and Dodi was gay too)
I am 100% sure that Harry is gay. I do think Kate Middleton faked pregnancies too and both Kate and William ping but I am not sure about Kate and William bc they both look like private persons not fameh-wores like Harry and Meghan
by Anonymous | reply 13 | October 15, 2018 11:29 PM
|
R10 because both Meghan and Harry are gay and in fake marriage
by Anonymous | reply 14 | October 15, 2018 11:30 PM
|
Don't forget the Queen. She's gay, too.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | October 15, 2018 11:44 PM
|
Oh dear, this poll isn’t going the way rightwing Zionist racist OP thought it would.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | October 15, 2018 11:46 PM
|
Oh yeah, you got me r19. What a twat.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | October 15, 2018 11:50 PM
|
Mulroney isn't the surrogate but she probably recommended a good surrogate to Meghan given that Mulroney's husband Ben has likely never entered her pussy once.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | October 15, 2018 11:50 PM
|
Is there anyone famous who is NOT gay according to Datalounge?
by Anonymous | reply 22 | October 15, 2018 11:51 PM
|
R22 Yes Stellan Skarsgard is straight
by Anonymous | reply 24 | October 15, 2018 11:54 PM
|
R20 fuck off back to that rightwing sewer you lurk in, asking people to come here to post anti-markle comments.
She’s black, she’s in the royal family. Cope with it.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | October 15, 2018 11:58 PM
|
Donald Trump is gay, too.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | October 16, 2018 12:00 AM
|
R13, I say this with love: You are insane. Kate is hot as fuck, and I'd love for her to be gay, but she's just not. Neither are the rest of them (flexible, perhaps, but not gay).
George, on the other hand...
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 27 | October 16, 2018 12:03 AM
|
R27 George on the other hand is right! Look at him go! Now that is settled, can we have some non gay non insane speculation?
by Anonymous | reply 28 | October 16, 2018 12:10 AM
|
R26 I think he is and Melanoma totally looks like a breast implanted lesbian beard but I don't understand what's up with the sexual assault claims against him?
by Anonymous | reply 29 | October 16, 2018 12:10 AM
|
Kate Middleton kissed a girl when she was 14
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 33 | October 16, 2018 12:16 AM
|
What is happening to this thread?!
First of all, since DL is mostly composed of gay men (naturally) and a lot of straight Frauen (please go away), the few lesbians here are the experts on whether Kate is hot. And I'm telling you that she rows crew, she plays lacrosse and field hockey ― if she appeared at a lesbian singles event, she'd be snapped up.
Second, can we get back on track and discuss MM's pregnancy? I agree with R2: The maternity coat at Eugenie's wedding was for show.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 37 | October 16, 2018 12:40 AM
|
I wonder if she is going to double down and do twin pillow babies with a well paid surrogate (or two). No half measures for our girl! Except when it comes to wearing clothing that looks good and fits well...
by Anonymous | reply 38 | October 16, 2018 12:43 AM
|
Well said R37! And yeah that maternity coat was most certainly just for show which disturbs me. Why does she have to be fake even when it doesn't behoove her? It's like she can't help herself.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | October 16, 2018 12:46 AM
|
Before we get back to the topic at hand, the Queen Mother was a major carpet muncher.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | October 16, 2018 12:48 AM
|
She had IVF and will have at least two in the oven. Her own uterus because she is competing with natural Kate.
She could have conceived naturally, probably, but they weren’t leaving anything to chance. It needed to happen right away.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | October 16, 2018 12:48 AM
|
r41 But you would think she wouldn't want two risk wrecking her tiny waistline...oh wait.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | October 16, 2018 12:53 AM
|
ugh, "to risk" but you bitches knew what I meant...
by Anonymous | reply 43 | October 16, 2018 1:08 AM
|
Tiniqua, bring me the sceptre!
by Anonymous | reply 44 | October 16, 2018 2:32 AM
|
If the world needs an obnoxious celebrity baby debacle, let's be glad Lens Dunham is unable to ever get pregnant.
That said, in keeping with the BRF tale: I'd rather have seen Eugénie herself be knocked up while getting married.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | October 16, 2018 2:52 AM
|
Unimportant and irrelevant. Who cares if she's pregnant? It won't alter or influence the lives of a single person here, and they couldn't care less what you people think.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | October 16, 2018 3:01 AM
|
I wasn't aware you knew them, R46. Do tell.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | October 16, 2018 3:05 AM
|
R46 hates being unimportant and irrelevant, let alone people not caring what they think.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | October 16, 2018 3:16 AM
|
Even BBC World News was shading Markle's timing today.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | October 16, 2018 3:51 AM
|
Oh you're just being sweet, R48 . Let's hear from you why the lives of Royals ought to matter to me. Or anyone.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | October 16, 2018 4:05 AM
|
No, I think Harry knocked her up the old fashioned way. And she must be 8 weeks preggars.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | October 16, 2018 4:08 AM
|
Starting to think pillow baby. She is not showing more than her fireplug shape, and she is acting like her normal asshole self. If she would have been knocked up by now, would't she be resting more on her fainting couch? Not my area of expertise, just a gut reaction.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | October 18, 2018 8:36 AM
|
This time around at least, she's in a better position if she passes on surrogates and does the birthing herself. She's still in the process of fitting herself into the royal family and royal life, no sense letting anyone think that she's shirking her royal duty!
That doesn't mean that this pregnancy didn't have a little help from a fertility clinic, so I'd put real money on her putting out boy-and-girl twins.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | October 18, 2018 10:12 AM
|
I agree r53 she got knocked up pretty fast which reeks of IVF at her age. She also needs to outdo the rest of the family and have a cute (well) set of twins.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | October 18, 2018 10:17 AM
|
Yeah, R54, betcha she asked the IVF doctor for the Amal Clooney Special.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | October 18, 2018 10:37 AM
|
My mother had me at Megan's age. I was her second child, and she had her third and last, my brother, two years after me.
You people are fucked in the head.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | October 18, 2018 10:45 AM
|
That you’re fucked in the head.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | October 19, 2018 2:19 PM
|
BLIND ITEM ……
It looks like the news is starting to spread that this alliterate former actress who is far more famous now than she ever would have been from acting had to use IVF to get pregnant. I told you from the very beginning that she had always told her exes she didn't even think she could get pregnant. Apparently with the help of science she could. Meghan Markle
by Anonymous | reply 59 | October 19, 2018 5:23 PM
|
She was probably seeing the fertility doctor the day after she got back from her honeymoon.
I agree that she'll endure one pregnancy and pop out boy-and-girl or boy-boy twins. It's the only possible way she can one-up Kate.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | October 19, 2018 6:11 PM
|
I'd be very surprised if she didn't use IVF. She's 36, and IVF is extremely common the UK. I also wouldn't be surprised if she froze her eggs if she'd been focusing on her career and suspected she'd be in her 30s before she could have a baby.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | October 19, 2018 6:17 PM
|
Markle is 37 and is probably clinically underweight, both factors that greatly decrease fertility.
Fine, they can afford IVF and nannies.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | October 19, 2018 7:30 PM
|
If she got pregnant right away, like on their honeymoon, the baby would be due between early-mid February.
But she is saying she is 3 months along, going into her fourth month. That means if it's not a pillow baby, and she really is pregnant, she would be due sometime in April.
If she delivers early (before late January) instead of nine months from their wedding/honeymoon, and claims to have had a preemie, then chances are she conceived before they married. We'll see.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | October 19, 2018 8:28 PM
|
Most women are still fertile and don't need IVF at age 37. I really don't know where people get the idea that fertility stops for all women at age 35. There's ample evidence of women over 35 having babies before IVF existed. My great great grandmother had her first baby at 20 and her last at 40.
If she got pregnant on their wedding day she would be 5 months pregnant. Most women show at 5 months. If she was pregnant before that she'd definitely be showing. She's most likely around 3 months. That's when most people announce.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | October 19, 2018 8:48 PM
|
I think she's truly pregnant, I think it's by IVF - I'm going by someone who months back swore Meghan looked like she was getting IVF because she looked fucked up in ways that IVF can do to women (hair and skin). I also thinking she's playing it up by padding her boobs and arching her back. Some people thinks she's padded her stomach as well, but she's short waisted, always had a stomach, and with a little bit of pregnancy plus what was already there it's what we have now. I have no doubt she'll use shapewear and other cosmetic enhancements to look like the pregnant madonna she wants people to think she is if her own body doesn't cooperate.
That move she pulled at Eugenie's wedding with the Jackie Kennedy bullshit maternity coat when her stomach was the size of a pea was epic cuntiness and I think will backlash on her forever. People won't forget. She showed her ass for that one - there is no pretending she was doing anything else.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | October 19, 2018 8:58 PM
|
R65 it is not about her age, it is about the rumored fertility issues of both Harry and Meghan, which I believe. I believe if of him, and I believe it of her.
by Anonymous | reply 67 | October 19, 2018 8:59 PM
|
R65 No one here said that women past 35 are infertile. Most of us know someone who got pregnant in her 40s and either had the child or miscarried or had an abortion.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | October 19, 2018 9:04 PM
|
R66 And if she did not wear the coat and people noticed a bump she would also be on the shit list with a lot of people for not "covering up" and taking the attention from the bride.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | October 19, 2018 10:06 PM
|
Nobody's said that all women over 35 are infertile, but fertility does start to diminish at that point in the life cycle.
For an underweight woman over 35 to get pregnant the instant she wants to, like a month or two after the wedding, is... unusual.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | October 19, 2018 10:27 PM
|
pillow baby and surrogate mother
by Anonymous | reply 71 | October 19, 2018 10:38 PM
|
R66 That last part of your comment is dead on. She will never live that down, nor should she. She really showed exactly the sort of person she is with that coat maneuver. What. A. Cunt. I always had the side eye for her, but didn't find her detestable. I do now.
by Anonymous | reply 72 | October 20, 2018 5:33 PM
|
R69, at 12 weeks the fetus is the size of a baby carrot. THERE IS NO BUMP except the one she creates. Maybe bloating. It’s like saying that you can tell someone’s holding in a shit because you can see a bump.
by Anonymous | reply 73 | October 20, 2018 5:47 PM
|
The bump isn't just the fetus it's also amniotic fluid. Pregnant women also gain fat so they have energy to breastfeed. She doesn't really have much of a bump now.
by Anonymous | reply 74 | October 20, 2018 10:35 PM
|
I can't believe 44 percent of you think she's really pregnant.
She's a fake, phony bullshit artist and if she said the sky was blue i wouldn't believe her. She's not pregnant and will fake a miscarriage for sympathy. All this cradling of her non-existent 'bump' is revolting.
by Anonymous | reply 75 | October 22, 2018 9:02 PM
|
R69 And if she did not wear the coat and people noticed a bump
can someone please post the picture
by Anonymous | reply 76 | October 22, 2018 9:09 PM
|
Is she going to wear one of this like Mangelina Jolie, Kidman, Holmes, ... ?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 77 | October 22, 2018 9:12 PM
|
Awesome. It's the Duchess of Sussex hate trolls! All three of them. We call them "Saccharins," because they're artificial, bitter and widely out-of-fashion.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 78 | October 22, 2018 9:13 PM
|
What is this site’s obsession with this woman???
by Anonymous | reply 79 | October 22, 2018 9:31 PM
|
The baby will arrive in a warming pan.
by Anonymous | reply 80 | October 22, 2018 9:35 PM
|
r79, it's not this site. It's a lunatic conspiracy theorist with a pregnancy fixation from LipStickAlley. She's a middle-aged, black, church lady with either schizophrenia or schizoid tendencies who believes that all paparazzi photos (and social media posts) of celebrities are actually those celebrities "advertising" their availability as whores. She's particularly obsessed with MKUltra mind controlled beta sex kittens, secret color and pattern and number communications, IVF, foetal sacrifices to Satan and her belief that celebrities force their children to be trans. She particularly hates other black women and refuses to believe there is any possible way they could have become successful on their own merits and good fortune but, instead, must be sex slaves. Behold:
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 81 | October 22, 2018 9:45 PM
|
R78 artificial
not as artificial as Meghan and Harry
by Anonymous | reply 82 | October 22, 2018 9:52 PM
|
The last photo I saw she was wearing a very thin, thigh high slit sundress, practically see through so yes, she's pregnant. And no she probably didn't use artificial, fertility treatment means as there's no way in the gossip world that is the UK and the royals, that that would or could be kept a secret.
by Anonymous | reply 83 | October 22, 2018 10:02 PM
|
Yes, R75, we're well aware that she's a top-flight social climber, with all the ability to strategize and lie that that implies.
But unlike you, we're also aware that top-flight social climbers think nothing of having children, when doing so would strengthen their position.
by Anonymous | reply 84 | October 22, 2018 10:17 PM
|
R13 you are a very sad person. Have you any connection to reality? Little wonder DL is such a joke to real Internet forums.
by Anonymous | reply 85 | October 23, 2018 9:28 PM
|
Prince Harry and Polo Player Nacho Figueras
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 86 | October 23, 2018 9:47 PM
|
Do you know where you are r85? It's like you wandered in from the desert or someplace.
by Anonymous | reply 87 | October 23, 2018 10:14 PM
|
Previous posters on this thread, Are you serious re your list of gay/lesbian RF members? Princess Diana and the Queen Mother? Seriously? I've heard wild rumors that most of the RF go to super elite swing parties, and even Prince Harry was papped at one wild nightclub but really?
by Anonymous | reply 88 | October 23, 2018 10:56 PM
|
Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII = gay
by Anonymous | reply 89 | October 23, 2018 11:02 PM
|
the book's most shocking passages claims that Britain's disgraced King Edward VIII abdicated the throne and married American divorcee Wallis Simpson because both were gay and "the whole myth of the great royal romance was a fabrication, a giant cover-up".
"Essentially, he was gay and she was a dyke," Bowers writes.
Cecil Beaton (with whom Bowers, inevitably, describes having sex) brought the pair to visit him. Bowers says he discreetly set "Wally" up with a string of women and "often tricked Eddy myself".
by Anonymous | reply 90 | October 23, 2018 11:02 PM
|
R85, do NOT push R87! That one has her hands on her hips, lips pursed, ready to strike! YOU'LL BE TOLD!
by Anonymous | reply 91 | October 23, 2018 11:28 PM
|
people have noticed that her fake baby bump is changing size
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 92 | October 27, 2018 11:41 PM
|
The truth about the Duchess of Sussex's disappearing baby bump
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 93 | October 27, 2018 11:42 PM
|
Surrogate. No way she would sacrifice her figure.
by Anonymous | reply 94 | October 27, 2018 11:45 PM
|
I don't know if she's pregnant or not but her ass seems to be siding with her critics.
by Anonymous | reply 96 | October 27, 2018 11:48 PM
|
Agree - pillow baby. She's not the type to sacrifice her figure.
by Anonymous | reply 97 | October 27, 2018 11:48 PM
|