Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

How did Beatrice Straight win an Oscar for Network?

She was great in her 10 minutes on screen but she was completely unknown in Hollywood and the competition was really good that year . . .

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19August 30, 2018 12:57 AM

I’m not sure Jodie stood a chance or Piper either, in that role. Jane’s part was also small but not showy enough. I didn’t see Lee. I think Beatrice was swept to victory with the rest of the cast.

by Anonymousreply 1August 28, 2018 1:09 PM

Her husband, Peter Cookson, was very very popular among the academy voters.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2August 28, 2018 1:17 PM

She was brilliant. That's why.

by Anonymousreply 3August 28, 2018 1:18 PM

She gave a really wonderful speech.

by Anonymousreply 4August 28, 2018 1:31 PM

Paddy Chayefsky's writing was splendid. Beatrice Straight's performance was equally splendid. The director had the good sense to capture it all as simply as possible. The collective power of all that good work produced an unforgettable character in an outstanding film.

That's how she won.

by Anonymousreply 5August 28, 2018 1:57 PM

Piper Laurie should have won

by Anonymousreply 6August 28, 2018 2:08 PM

She had been around for a really long time as a actor, mostly stage, and was friends with many. They were rewarding her for her lifetime achievement rather than the performance.

by Anonymousreply 7August 28, 2018 2:53 PM

Theee iconic supporting roles in one year - Beatrice, Jodie and Piper.

by Anonymousreply 8August 29, 2018 2:34 AM

She presented hole.

by Anonymousreply 9August 29, 2018 2:44 AM

She was great... but the voting system was different back then.

by Anonymousreply 10August 29, 2018 2:52 AM

Lee had just won, Jodie was too young, Piper was on over the top and campy, Jane barely registered. That left Beatrice in a film that voters clearly loved by virtue of three acting Oscars in four categories. Thread closed.

by Anonymousreply 11August 29, 2018 2:54 AM

She was not "completely unknown" in Hollywood. She had a solid body of work for a long time. Just not "high profile" stuff. Just saw an old Alfred Hitchcock episode last night with her in it.

by Anonymousreply 12August 29, 2018 2:57 AM

In the context of that time, it’s hard to think the Academy would have dismissed Jodie as too young. They had just given an Oscar to 10 year old Tatum O’Neal in the same category three years earlier. While I’ve read that there was a bit of a backlash about that award soon after, that was based on the charge that Tatum’s performance was artfully created in the editing room. Jodie’s performance in Taxi Driver was clearly the real deal, as evidenced by her turn in Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore two years earlier.

I agree with the obvious interpretation that a stellar performance in a prestige film cancelled out the brevity of the role.

by Anonymousreply 13August 29, 2018 2:49 PM

[QUOTE]They were rewarding her for her lifetime achievement rather than the performance.

No, they weren't, R7. Her performance is extraordinary. She manages to go through about seven different emotions within the space of five minutes. Her Oscar is one of the most deserved and her speech was a total class act. I've always loved how she called herself the "dark horse" of the race because she most certainly was in the most traditional sense of that word.

I also think she benefitted from being one of the only characters in the film who was recognizably human. Everyone else was a caricature (Faye Dunaway's character is described as "television incarnate" at one point) or a demented psychotic (Finch, Beatty) - which is not to say they were not compelling or entertaining. Straight's character was a stand-in for the normal person watching the freak show playing out on UBS.

by Anonymousreply 14August 29, 2018 7:10 PM

Being in a truly exceptional movie, certainly helped.

by Anonymousreply 15August 29, 2018 7:15 PM

The question is how did Rocky win best picture and director preventing Network a clean sweep?

by Anonymousreply 16August 29, 2018 10:16 PM

The way she worked that line about the broads & the booze

by Anonymousreply 17August 30, 2018 12:18 AM

Hollywood didn't yet realize what a hack Stallone would become. He came nowhere with a monster hit he wrote himself. At least he didn't rob Peter Finch or Paddy Chayefsky of their Oscars.

by Anonymousreply 18August 30, 2018 12:33 AM

The editor of Network talks about what might have been.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19August 30, 2018 12:57 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!