Kind of freaky, no? They couldn't have been all that accurate.
They're still around
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 20, 2018 8:03 AM |
Isn't eye testing all digital now, R1?
| by Anonymous | reply 2 | May 20, 2018 8:05 AM |
R2 No, not that I'm aware of...tell me of this Black Magic you've encountered
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | May 20, 2018 8:17 AM |
Better...or worse?
| by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 20, 2018 8:35 AM |
They’re still used. They’re precision instruments. Any specialist worth their keep has more than one form of technology and knows how to use all of them.
| by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 20, 2018 8:45 AM |
I feel I got better prescriptions, or at least more see-through-able glasses in the 1960s than I get today. I don't know if it's the progressive/non-progressive issue, the Crizal coating (which draws fingerprints, it seems), or what, but I'm never completely happy with my eyeglasses.
| by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 20, 2018 11:57 AM |
[quote]I'm never completely happy with my eyeglasses
How’s your cataract situation, r7?
| by Anonymous | reply 8 | May 20, 2018 12:01 PM |
I believe I have one, early stage, r8. Thanks.
| by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 20, 2018 12:08 PM |
I guess they're better than old timey dental equipment.
| by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 20, 2018 12:22 PM |
They’re still used.
OP = idiot Zllennial.
| by Anonymous | reply 11 | May 20, 2018 12:31 PM |
R11, I like Zllennial.
| by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 20, 2018 12:38 PM |
Eye care seems to use really cool-looking instruments!
| by Anonymous | reply 13 | May 20, 2018 12:44 PM |