Sparkle's in-law arrive at Heathrow

hahahahahahahah, they have been invited? Is it the cannabis farmer?

It looks as if they don't believe in packing light.

I'll bet they have not been invited. If they had been invited, I don't think they would be making the rounds of morning shows. Read the comments on DM. The Brits are just gobsmacked by these people. They could unilaterally destroy all good will the brits feel for us! This is gonna be a great wedding!

FFS, "Sparkle" isn't going to happen. Let it go.

Stop calling her Sparkle, you sad Frau.

Where did “Sparkle” originate and why is she called that?

What a circus show....

The Markles are invited in Good Morning Britain.

Sparkles must pay them to tell nice things about her.

And people did an heart attack about the Middleton.... This fucking joke.

You can't tell the players without a scorecard.

How are the Dooleys (who just arrived at Heathrow) related to the bride?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Boy, what a shit show this is becoming.

R10 Classist

I admit that I never had so much fun before a wedding.

I can't figure out if these people are really that trashy or Sparkle created so much ill-will they are willing to go nuclear to smear her big day. Or some combination thereof. Whatever the case, as R11 wisely observed: what a shit show

Maybe they're all angry daddy spent all his lottery money on Meghan rather than sharing. Years of resentment and BOOM : the occasion to get your revenge.

Oh calm down. Sparkle has been used on here for months now.

[quote] They could unilaterally destroy all good will the brits feel for us!

Pretty sure any goodwill the rest of the world felt for America evaporated in November 2016.

I need a scorecard

None of her so-called "In Laws" look like they have any African American blood in them.

R19 They are all related to Daddy

I thought “Sparkle” was her DL name.

As R11 put it so succinctly - what a shit show!

Say what you will about the Middletons (and trust me, there is plenty to say) at least they had the common sense to not invite the trashy relatives, and at least those relatives didn’t go on ever show to bitch about not being invited.

There was a link in the OP’s story about Father Markle not going to the wedding now to save Meghan any embarrassment as it’s come out he was paid $100K for the staged photos??

At these there's no boney assed sister being forced on us as a sex symbol.

The Dooleys, as far as I can figure out, are related to Meghan very tangentially: The Dooley mama was married to Thomas Jr. (the pot grower and girlfriend abuser who wrote Harry the letter last week) and he is the father of her two grown sons.

Really, not even DL could have invented this scenario.

[quote]The family have been enlisted as 'special correspondents' for Good Morning Britain and are expected to report from Windsor, though are thought not to be attending the ceremony.

So they're going to be reporting from a wedding that they weren't invited to, and which is between two people that they don't really know. God how trashy.

The Dooley marijuana grower (who developed a strain of marijuana in honor of his Auntie Meg) and his bro are Sparkle's half-nephews, R24 - that's not so tangential a relationship with Sparkle.

Sparkle used to babysit the nephews, R25. There are pictures of her with the nephews when she's in her teens.

However, now the lot of them are now not "on brand" for our Sparks, so instead she's invited her SUITS castmates to fill up her side of the church. Bet they're surprised since she kissed their asses and the show good bye only three months after meeting Harry, so sure was she that she could "win" him.

Thanks, r26.

R14 I think it's a combination of both .They are trash and Meghan treated them like trash once she hit it "big" with her Suits gig .

Wow, that’s a lot of luggage. Perhaps the Clampetts are planning to stay a while after the wedding.

[quote] Perhaps the Clampetts are planning to stay a while after the wedding.

We hope in the Tower.

At least Markle had a career before marrying into the family. Unlike that parasite loser dog Kate. And, no, MIddletons are not any "classier" - they are white trash with some money.

Butthurt Sugar at R31 pathetically trying to deflect embarrassment...

They’ve never embarrassed Kate like the shitshow surrounding Sparkle have r31.

The Middleton’s unsavory aspects have been covered up because William is the heir to the heir. Harry is so far down the line now it’s irrelevent.

That entire pathetic family should be sent into exile. Maybe to Falkland Islands or St. Helena. Pretending that this girl marrying one of them is somehow embarrassing is beyond laughable. Parasites, all of them.

T or F? There's talks in the works for a Reality TV Show featuring MM relations.

I told myself I wasn't going to get involved in this wedding stuff, but after seeing this thread, I have to comment. I'm with R25. I'm amazed and astounded that British media would invite (and probably pay expenses for) uninvited family members of the bride to appear on television and make comments. It is meant embarrass the bride and just give a low brow feel to the weekend. No wonder British media outlets get law suits filed against them so often. What a disgrace!

As has been mentioned, it IS like inviting the Beverly Hillbillies to a wedding and wait to see what the results will be.

It's telling that all the trash is on the 'white' side.

I bet all the upper class English cunts are saying “this is what you get for picking a commoner”

R37, Harry and Meghan, very early into their relationship, both went after the British press and the ramifications could have been a loss of some freedom of the press in the UK - that's why the press is getting revenge.

Also, oddly enough, very early in her relationship with Harry, Meghan and her mom were papped by the same pap agency that her dad has now admitted paid him for pap shots. Just after these shots emerged, Meghan got Harry to write the infamous "Love Shield" letter to the British press accusing the press of racism and harassment of Meghan and her mother.

The suspicion is that Meghan paid or cooperated with the pap agency to get pictures of herself and her mother, then cried to Harry about press harassment and racism, causing poor, dim, trusting Harry to release the scathing letter to the press.

So, you're 'lil darling Megsy seems to be bit of a sneak, R37.

I saw Andrew Morton interviewed a couple weeks ago and he was warning that Sparkle should deal with her relatives because if she didn't, they would be hired by media outlets to do commentary.

And, here they are.

On an even funnier note, in the OP's link, the first picture shows the sister-in-law making what she thinks is a "Peace" sign, but with her hand positioned as it is, in the UK, that is a rude gesture.

R38, Megs' African American side, including her mother's brother, have also provided pictures and stories, that they most probably got paid for.

Meghan's mother has allegedly met Oprah, the speculation being that she will give an interview to Oprah.

So, is any tabloid paying the way for Thomas Jr. and Samantha to go to London to give commentary? I don't guess there's any chance of these folks getting near the carriage route?

The British press are the trashiest. I feel for her if I married a prince (ha!) my crazy trashy family on my dad's side would sell my ass out to.

The whole family is trash, including the royal family. Fucking garbage on welfare

R40, I have no idea why you are calling her my "lil darling". I just don't see the justification of all this shit throwing.

Btw, fuck you!

R41- How could she deal with them? Invite them, they’d sell the story. Give them money, they’d want more. She’s in a tough spot, but she put herself in this position. The dad claims he had a heart attack, which the DM proved false, so either he lied to Megan or they released a bogus statement to the press

Doesn’t look like this marriage is gonna last, the stress and tension is too much

BS about the heat attack

Her family is nuts. They only way to deal with such dysfunction is to cut all ties.

They probably told him not to come and came up with some BS medical condition. So fake. He would be in hospital if he really had a heart attack

It's going to be awkward at the wedding. One half will be inbred welfare dependent trash, and the other half will be Markle's guests.

Well, she probably forgot all about her “roots” and where she came from ever since she went to Hollywood, so now the family is cashing in big time in any way they can, can you really blame them??

She probably wouldn’t talk to them anyways, she didn’t before and probably not planning to after her wedding. So they get offer of six figures for some pictures, who is gonna turn it down?

13 suitcases when you're NOT invited? LOL

I hope the talk show they're going on paid for the tickets and hotel at least.

R52, yes, I can blame them.

R52, it's not like Meghan was the head of household and ran away leaving the family destitute. She was the child and these were the adults.

I’m guessing the13 suitcases are full of bespoke fascinators.

Those are not even proper suitcases, they are like those you bring for short trips. Stupid

I hope the broadcast booth will be fully stocked with as much trashy beer & boxed wine as these relatives can drink. Bonus points for BYOB...

You often hear about famous celebs buying their parents new house or new car after they achieve some kind of success.

She couldn’t wait to ditch them, they don’t fit the image she’s trying to cultivate. Karma.

Never forget your roots

OMG - now Megs' Sainted Mum has quit her job!

Mama quit her job to start a private practice? Or did mama quit her job because her long conversation with Oprah convinced her to strike while the iron is hot and shop a talk show?

[quote]“Doria is no longer working at the mental health clinic in the Los Angeles area. It was Doria’s decision to leave,” the source explained. “She has talked about starting her own private practice, focusing on working with elderly patients.”

LCSW, that is

Bankrupt 60 + year-old newly minted therapist is suddenly starting her own private practice? All that pap money sure comes in handy, huh Mom?

R59, You don't know what it's like to have trashy relatives who completely lack manners and common sense. Like fair weather co-workers who smile to your face and dis you behind your back no matter what you do.

Payoffs would never work as they're too self-centered to care about anyone else's feelings or views. Or they think that they are just being honest.

Okay you made me laugh, R51.

I bet these trash wanted nothing to do with her until she got some fame. Typical mooching dysfunctional family.

She dumped almost her entire family, her old friends from LA and her husband when she got SUITS, R66.

R63, the clinic may have asked her to leave if only for the sake of patient privacy. She is now a prime paparazzi target as are those who surround her.

The exploitation of the family is simply mean, and in all honesty, it is disgusting. They’re being mocked and they are unaware.

They'll be patted down to check for silverware as they leave the reception.

Where are th 👩🏿👶🏿👩🏿👶🏿👩🏿👶🏿 Relatives?

I thought there was only "bowl food" at the reception.

The article says the decision to leave her job was Doria's own, R68. The family is being paid. And allegedly, even Sainted Doria met with Oprah.

Father Tom Markle is calling TMZ , which seems to be his goto media outlet since his collaboration with the pap agency was exposed. Father Markle this very afternoon called TMZ to tell them that he is having chest pains.

Do you call TMZ when you have chest pains?

Eugh, men wearing tank tops or sleeveless shirts on airplanes is a pet peeve of mine. Is it too much to ask to put on an actual shirt?

Hey, she’s gonna be living in luxury for the rest of her life. She should take care of her family, so they don’t remain trashy.

[quote] Do you call TMZ when you have chest pains?

Yesh!

R73 On an international flight no less. Such slop.

When does Celebrity Big Brother or I'm a Celebrity , get me out of here air ? Because Sparkle family members would be up for it .

[quote]She couldn’t wait to ditch them

And you can completely understand why. All of their behavior vindicates why Meghan would want jack shit to do with them. They are clearly trash that is a negative energy in someone's life, I would've cut them out as well.

[quote] 13 suitcases when you're NOT invited?

They remind me of the Griswalds with Chevy Chase, in European Vacation, who won a trip to London on a game show.

All that they're missing is the pig's ears.

The Markles are the gift that keep on giving. Nobody bought Pop Markle’s bs ‘heart attack’ story after he was papped buying fast food & driving to LA to deliver a heavy pot plant to Mom Markle so now he’s pulling out the big guns.

[quote]R2 It looks as if they don't believe in packing light.

They will be ivited to a lot of events and need various outfits.

[quote] They will be ivited to a lot of events and need various outfits

Sweatsuits, tanks tops, and jeans are not considered "outfits."

What R78 said. If distance myself from those dirt bags too.

I'm dyyyyyyying!

Sparkle's in-laws' luggage (@ Op's photo) screeeeeaams 'HSN/QVC' "Today's Special Value"!

So these people are the ex-wife and children of Meghan's half-brother, correct? I need a socrecard to tell all these grifters apart. Men traveling in tank tops is tragic, might as well wear a bathing suit and flip flops too, and knowing that paps will be photographing you as well....yikes.

Andrew Morton said weeks ago that the Markle's family should be invited to the wedding so they would not comment it and he was right. Now the hillbillies gonna comment the wedding and keep humiliating the BRF.

Kensington Palace did a shitty job all around, anticipating nothing, letting the Markle free to do and say whatever they want.

Now I start believing the BRF gave up on Harry months ago and just let Harry and Meghan alone to deal with the mess. It's not unprofessional.

It was reported that H and M quickly asserted themselves early on over dealings with their own Kensington Palace advisers. They stated that they were determined to manage media and events "their" way, This was commented on with approval. Poor fools. Those with media knowledge will have seen this coming. Shambolic, predictable outcome of multiplying unmanaged stories.

[quote] They could unilaterally destroy all good will the brits feel for us! This is gonna be a great wedding!

Drumpf beat them to it.

[quote] Where did “Sparkle” originate and why is she called that?

"Sparkle" has been happening for months already.

R87 Very true, the Sugars were praising them for being so modern and groundbreaking, lol.

Meghan must have been thinking her great experience as an American Starlet in Toronto was enough to deal with a huge Royal wedding in the Daily Mail country. Her arrogance and his stupidity are paying now.

If I was her, I would have let KP do the job and enjoy my peace of mind knowing real professionals were taking care of my wedding.

Lol, look at this.

This wedding is a huge failure all around.

You should write a sternly worded letter to the palace immediately, r90! It's possible they just haven't thought of it, but YOU, some random commenter, has! It is your duty as an American citizen to let them know their mistakes!!

R91 the random Twitter person includes a "Don't know if true" clarification in his follow up tweet.

R92 Yeah, be sarcastic and all the shit now, won't you?

But compare this mess with William's wedding and y'll understand why PR and wedding planning are real jobs.

[quote]R92 You should write a sternly worded letter to the palace immediately, [R90]! It's possible they just haven't thought of it, but YOU, some random commenter, has! It is your duty as an American citizen to let them know their mistakes!!

Don't waste your breath on those fools. When Meghan and Harry ascend the throne soon, things will be run right.

R94 I understand you're just making up a bunch of shit and talking out of your ass, and I never said what you are claiming. I suggest therapy for your weird Markle-bashing obsession.

Get to bed Meghan, you're drunk.

Look at all the little Sugars crying now.

Meghan was supposed to be Diana2.0. Meghan was supposed to be everything Kate wasn't. Meghan was supposed to be Queen.

Now, Meghan is just a huge embarrassment who should avoid tunnels from now.

Please, like Meghan would respond to you commoners, or you, Shitty Sleuth Sally. She's ignoring people like you like she's rightfully ignoring the trash in her half-family that are grifting off her big day.

R98 you seem sexually aroused from writing your fantasy ramblings. Do you need some alone time?

Like she must be ignoring Chuck shouting at her and all the Poshos laughing behind her back.

R101 small difference: she's going to be a princess and married to the handsome, fun prince, and they aren't.

Yeah, this show pleases me, cause it's just that : a show for the peasants.

Watching her being built up all those months by the medias and her Sugars and seeing her finally fall is entertaining.

We were tons to see the train wreck coming. We were called jealous and pathetic, but we were right.

R102 She gives up her privacy for marrying some stupid guy thinking Nazism is something you can have fun with.

Sure enjoy your Palace Meghan and some vodka bottles will help.

R104 I have a strong feeling you could give a shit about that "bad taste" party Harry attended and are just concern trolling. So very obviously disengenuous.

R103 "seeing her fall" = "marrying a handsome, fun prince and living in splendor", um okay, I'm sure she's really suffering!

Elegance has a name

Yeah, I'm sure you would just love marrying Nazi Harry.

It's funny that the Middleton family was shit on and they did nothing but conduct themselves with class. MM family is beyond trash. I guess the Queen doesn't care who he marries since he won't ever be King. In the years to come Harry be marginalized as William's kids grow.

Sparkle has already won over two continents, and her rise will continue.

R108 I think many of us would. We know he was young and was wearing the costume to a "bad taste" themed party and don't really care about it, like most humans who aren't concern trolling.

Is it a wave of panic just before the wedding?

If we're just a pathetic bunch being jealous of Sparkle and if Meghan doesn't care, why are you here arguing with us ?

R109 LOL at the Middletons conducting themselves with class. Were you alive when they started dating and got married?

R112 because it's fun seeing you twist yourself into knots trying to justify your weird freakish hatred. Now dance, dance more for me!

The Middlestons were still more classy than the Markles.

R114 Go masturbate with a Harry pic.

R113- They are self made millionaires, who have kept their mouths shut. Kate's family is a solid unit behind her. There's a reason why William is so close to them. If you're trying to compare the Middletons to the Markles then that's just laughable.

R117 you're the one trying to compare them to Markle's half-family. I just implied they weren't the saints you are making them out to be, and reminded you to review the coverage and stories. All families are different. They had ten years to get used to it so it was spread out over a much longer timeframe.

But keep proving yourself delusional by making up stories about what I'm saying too. Just shows how unhinged you are.

Sugars are born of the Middleton's hate.

Nothing new.

Wow, some deluded posters on here lol

Harry is NOT handsome, get your eyes checked

So does the dad have a substance abuse, gambling addiction and/or psychiatric issue? What's the source of his continuing $ problems?

We're on it.

It’s best that the father doesn’t go, he would only make her look low class and trashy. He would be committing faux pas up the ying yang.

And she would be constantly worrying about how trashy her relatives are making her look in front of Harry’s high class family and friends who will be nice to her face but talk shit about her when she turns her back.

Harry's high? class?? Family???

I want to remove the teeth of everyone who says “Sparkle”.

...and Sugars.

Sparkle and Sugars

Yeah the Sparkle and Sugar shit make me cringe, why are adults talking like that. Feels like tumblr speak.

BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

The British tabloids are going to have so much fodder to print, for at least the next 30 years.

Meghan is going to be the new Fergie.

R41. The hand gesture from the ex-sister in law at the airport is not a rude gesture in the UK. It proclaims Victory which is quite telling.

R131, look again.

It means different things depending on whether your folded finger are shown.

See picture below of Churchill giving the "V for Victory" sign.

R109 = Carole Middleton

[QUOTE] BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

The Trump loving tabloid, probably funded by Russians.

Why do y’all call her Sparkle?

What are “sugars”?

Someone please tell me.

Sparkle rhythms with Markle and Meghan loves to be in the light.

I don't know where Sugars come from.

R136 is right. She sparkles when a camera is around. And we are not the only ones using it. Commenters on stories on yahoo, etc,. have used it. It's a natural.

R68, who is mean exploiting them? Are you nuts? That whole family, including dad are using the press to make money. It takes two young tango He called TMZ. And it looks like Sparkle, Harry, and Wills are using the press, too.

Sugars are sycophants (psycho fans) who refuse to see that their idol has feet of clay despite mountains of evidence. US president Don the Con, an obviously crazy person/con artist, has sugars.

Meghan's sugars are an especially vision-free bunch. Two-thirds of them , or at least the Cinderella-fetishists at Celebitchy, seem to pride themselves on being "woke" - so their fandom is based on Meghan being half-Black.

The same bunch of sugars seem to also consider themselves feminists, as does Sparkle, so she's their heroine, even though she's given up everything to marry into one of the most misogynistic, racist, colonialist, classist institutions on Earth.

Her hypocrisy, narcissism, hustle, and ruthlessness is evident in almost everything she does, but her sugars will call her "classy" and "sweet" and make excuses that they would never make for anyone else. That's a sugar.

Old lady braces and a wife beater, lovely.

I love the name Sparkles...lol.

[quote]R138 The same bunch of sugars seem to also consider themselves feminists, as does Sparkle, so she's their heroine, even though she's given up everything to marry

Your mistake is thinking there is only one, cookie-cutter type of feminist. And you don't know what she's giving up...she might still act, she might do anything.

As an American, she's not bound to totally subjugate herself and kiss the ring of Big Liz.

TRASH! On their way to the social event of the year, knowing they'll be photographed at every step. THAT is what they wear? Dear Lord, Harry should kick Ms. Ugly to the curb before saying "I do."

R141 - she won't be a member of the Royal Family for long if she doesn't toe the line. They'll freeze her out so fast she won't be able to scream "FERGIE"!!!!

r138 what's the name for the deranged "Meghan can do no right" fraus such as yourself? Who read horrible things into every action, look, and photo? Whose every post is dripping with venom, disdain, and hatred? Who are convinced she is the coming of the Antichrist? Bitterscold? I don't know if that seems quite dark enough. Are you paid by the snobs at the Palace to post this crap?

[quote]Bitterscold?

No, just Brits.

Are you all responsible for how your estranged half siblings dress when they cross an ocean for an event they’re not even invited to?

Didn’t think so.

r146 logic and reason don't work on the bitterscolds.

Meghan has joined the Church of England, she will soon sport a title as a member of the Royal Family and, in future, she will become a British citizen. You damn right she will have to behave herself. If the royals smell a "rat" in their midst, they will destroy her. The royals seem to have a penchant for female commoner "rats" who get out of line - the examples of Wallis, Diana and Fergie are lessons that Meghan should learn.

A realist, R144.

A person who greatly dislikes ,in no particular order: narcissists, grifters, users and actors, and who hates to see a con succeed.

And I reserve my hatred for the likes of Donnie Dump, Darth Cheney and Bennie Netan-Yahoo; Sparkle and her con are merely a fascination to be dissected as it unfolds - a spectator sport.

R141, Megs has to walk behind her husband for life, so what kind of feminist is that?

She will never be able to voice her opinion on anything, except how lovely the finger paintings are at the latest daycare center she's opened. What kind of feminist is that, R141?

Her only income will be from Harry and his father and brother- I would ask the question again, but I'm guessing you already know what I'm going to ask.

And she won't be an American for long (well, if the marriage lasts more than five years) because the IRS won't let her without having to expose Harry's finances, and they'll find her a tunnel with some paps before they allow that.

R144 - doesn't realize she's on a gay site that encourages the art of "pointless bitchery". Perhaps you should join the other Sugars on Reddit.

[quote]R148 The royals seem to have a penchant for female commoner "rats" who get out of line - the examples of Wallis, Diana and Fergie are lessons that Meghan should learn.

No, the Windsors should learn that times have changed. Last time it ended in death.

The classy thing to do would be for Big Liz to arrange accommodations for her new relatives, and invite the pair over for tea. Meghan doesn't have to be there if she doesn't want to...she's already met them.

[quote] The classy thing to do would be for Big Liz to arrange accommodations for her new relatives, and invite the pair over for tea

Yeah, and they can spill the tea on that thirsty little whore, Meg!

[QUOTE] Her only income will be from Harry and his father and brother

Except for whatever money she made as a cast member on a TV show for five years or so. It wasn’t “Friends” but I doubt she’s penniless.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I am a feminist. I would never walk 2 feet behind a spouse because they were "born" a higher station. It's insulting to the entire human race. But I sure as shit am enjoying this, like R149. And the fact she is bi racial doesn't impress me. Wonderful! We have a biracial woman having to shut her mouth and walk 2 feet behind her husband. Racial progress. I am tired of black people I know going on and on how this is a big, important thing because she is black. I don't care they can immediately tell she is black from the hair around her hairline. She doesn't look black to anyone else. And even they admit there is nothing "black" about how she talks or acts and she grew up "white". If she ever would have made it huge as an actress these same black people would be dissing her that she isnt black enough. It just really irritates me that of all of the important future milestones for black people, anyone thinks this is one. If she really cared about being a "black" royal she would get married in cornrows and jump the broom.

Shouldn't it be Charles and Camilla who host the trashy family members? Why should the queen be on the hook to look at fat rolls and armpit hair?

Cowboy boots and snacks sticking out if a purse?

Tank tee on an international flight???

Country done come to town!

Why do I get the feeling the trashy Markles are gonna "speak now, or forever hold their peace" at the wedding? Meghan better have them seated near the door.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

That hag is not Meghan's sister in law. She's her FORMER sister in law. Of course she's not invited to the wedding. She has no relationship to Meghan since she's no longer married to the brother. She and her trashy son are just looking for a little slice of the fame.

lol @ you idiots trying to label me a "Sugar" because I call you out for your over the top hatred. And cue the "pointless bitchery" reminder troll; I missed you! You girls know that it also means I can be bitchy to you, right, and your ridiculous bullshit? It works both ways - you seem to be able to dish it out but you can't take it. You don't intimidate me.

Your little shtick is tired; just because I think you're being ridiculous doesn't mean I'm Meghan's #1 stan. Although the same minds who think it's cute to make nicknames for everyone they don't like as some sort of weird Othering mechanism probably aren't prone to deep thinking. You're more like children than anything.

[quote] You're more like children than anything.

Truer words have never been spoken!

Meghan's dad is now claiming he was blackmailed.

[quote]I don't care they can immediately tell she is black from the hair around her hairline.

Edges are a big deal among black women.

Um, there's nothing in there about blackmail, r163. The only newish bit of info is him confirming that the half-sister of "Princess Pushy" fame and dollar store Kris Kardashian hasn't been involved in Meghan's life for years and knows nothing about their relationship.

Why did they have so much luggage? How many Dress Barn dresses and pairs of Payless shoes did they bring?

How do you pack for an international trip? 13 overnight bags??

Wow-TMZ has taken it down, R163. The plot thickens.

The Cliff Notes are that Pa Markle told TMZ that the pap agency that staged the shots threatened to release pictures of him drinking and entering a fleabag hotel unless he cooperated with new pictures.

I saw the original TMZ article linked first on the TUMBLR linked below and there are posters talking about the original TMZ article, so go look for yourself.

R161, R162 the DL is not meant to be your or anyone else's safe space. If you are that outraged at the tone of the posters on these threads, you have a few options. You could fight back with proof that Meghan is not the grifting opportunist many think she is.

You could start your own thread, in which the virtues of classy and sweet Meg are extolled.

You could go onto the dozens of other (and since you're apparently triggered by the word "sugar" I will, very kindly, use the word "fan") Sparkle fan sites and voice your more favorable opinions of Sparkle.

One international traveler suitcase, of course!

r168 dear, I'm going to comment when and where I feel like it and you can put me on ignore if you don't want to sully your beautiful mind with a conflicting opinion. If you want an echo chamber, I suggest shouting into the padded walls of your local asylum. I'm sure you know how to get there.

The Churchill photo above is famous because the gesture meant to express victory in fact means to sod off. Don't do it.

R161 Sparkle is a classless cunt, Sugars are stupid. Now fuck off

r172 have you been taking lessons from the incels? Anything to say to the Chads and Stacys while you're at it?

What a nice assortment of luggage. All thats missing are the styrofoam coolers held together with duct tape.

But I said that you should comment R170; you and your pal are the one throwing tantrums and telling those of us who don't think that Saint Meghan was born whole out of Zeus' head to shut up.

r175 the only person throwing tantrums here is you, sweetiechunks. I'm just commenting on the clear mental disorders I see when I read your posts. Does that bother you?

R176 Fraus using terms like 'clear mental disorders', ignoring how grammatically wrong that is, really trigger my mental disorders,

Oh great! Drunk in a flea bag hotel. With a 2 peso hooker no doubt. I really thank him for telling us that because that is what I want in my mind as he walks his daughter down the aisle to marry a prince.

r178 drunk from one beer and some Gas-X?

R163, TMZ has taken down the paragraphs about the blackmail/drinking/fleabag hotel, but the New York Post has the Mr. Markle was blackmailed by the pap agency story, although they're claiming the fleabag hotel was in California.

R179, that was a pap shot from last week, the original drinking/ fleabag hotel shots of Mr. Markle were taken by Coleman-Rayner months ago.

This means Mr. Markle was in California before last week, so why couldn't Harry have met him there if Mexico was too risky for combat veteran Harry?

Was it on this thread there was a link to the twitter of a journalist that said KP has lost all control over the message going out concerning her dad? Because we know TMZ works with celebrities not against them, like the Kunts. So there is a reason dad is going to TMZ. I guess KP didn't feel dad being blackmailed for pics of his drunk, flea bag ass was the message they were trying to convey in all this build up to the "historic" wedding. So it needed to be pulled. I wasn't going to get up to watch this shit, but I might have to.

[quote] Was it on this thread there was a link to the twitter of a journalist that said KP has lost all control over the message going out concerning her dad?

Did you mean this...

Fuck the wedding, I want to see the reception. You just know these hillbilly's are going to cause a scene.

Is this going to be the title of a new reality show?

"Meet the Markles!"

[quote] Fuck the wedding, I want to see the reception.

The Marklebillies even brought Granny's "possum stew" for the guests to enjoy!

Didn't Megan Markle "leave" her "family" years ago? Just she and her mother turned away from all the rest, riffraff, and seeing how they are acting now, justifiably so. Megan and her mother are close, to the father she is not close at all. All these relatives? Only half-family at best. The only interesting thing is are they really invited, or just going to Windsor, where are they staying, who is paying? Maybe some British media outlets have shipped them over for "color" commentary. Think about it … she has lived in another country, most o her friends do, how many people does Megan Markle know who will afford to fly to Heathrow, get to London or Windsor, find hotel accommodations and pay for them, stay several days, fly home? No one on D.L.!

In years to come the couple and their kids will always be photographed but within years to come Harry be marginalized as William's children, heirs to the throne, a possible king or queen, grow up.

I suspect the courtiers tried to talk Harry out of an ill advised short engagement and quick marriage to a woman he spent hardly any time with and in a fit of the sulks he said he was in charge. They gave him enough rope to hang himself. He will come to understand that professional PR people are paid for a reason.

OMG, I was totally going to ignore this wedding like I did the other brothers'. But this might actually be fun. Couldn't those nephews have dressed better for the plane trip without those horrendous armpit hair baring shirts? Just a teeeenie tiiiiiny bit of class would have made such a difference! And just one and a half, dumb nice suitcase per person. Couldn't they shop in London? oh please and the moms' weirdo highlights...., the low neck shirt, lace bra and flappy neck. please God. I hope I have the sense not to show that stuff when I get it.

...even if you're trashy, the whole fucking world is watching... What are the odds that someone escapes this kind of background? Just for that one thing I think Meghan is lucky as all hell and I hope she stays lucky. What could these people possibly comment on during the wedding????? I'm sure they know the whole planet is ridiculing them so what's the V sign for? Ugh I was embarrassed when I saw that and i don't even know why...

After the wedding maybe they'll take a dip in the cement pond.

What’s the point of meeting them so late? They should have met the parents ages ago!

They didn’t want to obviously

Stop with the comments of a short engagement. The royal family always does 6 month engagements. Kate and William were engaged in November and married the following April. Diana and Charles were engaged five months.

And now they are reporting that he’s gonna have heart surgery so he can’t go. Utter garbage

He probably didn't want to rent a tux. I'm sure he thought he could just wear one of his ole leisure suits.

How much more of this public spectacle will the BRF endure? They need to act fast.

They should also get Harry fixed ASAP so he cannot get the American trash and her trailer pregnant.

R191 they all knew each other for years. Harry has spent very little time with Megs in comparison, most of the time since he met her they’ve lived on different continents.

R195 Exactly

I was laughing at a previous comment describing the luggage of the Markle's as being QVC. I was thinking more Walmart and Goodwill.

[quote]The family is thought to be staying at the H10 hotel in Waterloo, where rooms are available for as little as £70, or $93, per night.

LOLZ

I was thinking Ross.

[quote]R166 Why did they have so much luggage? How many Dress Barn dresses and pairs of Payless shoes did they bring?

They might be on the lam, and plan to throw themselves on the palace steps, seeking sanctuary (?)

First of all, anti-Sparkle person, Sparkle has already happened.

This wedding ain't happening. Getting clearer all the time.

Second, I can't feel badly for MM's boatload of trashy relatives - they're taking a page out of Meghan's own playbook. Relatives who haven't seen her for years putting themselves in the spotlight, setting themselves up as experts, getting paid. Meghan has always made more of whatever celebrity associations she has in order to make herself look good, she's papped herself more than her daddy ever has, and she's still merching every day of this engagement, and Harry is not immune either. Meghan is just doing the instagram - ish version and her trashy family is doing the springer version.

Funny how people want to just ignore the people who helped her on her way up - you know, the ones that she dropped. For example, the uncle in the Foreign Service who helped her get the Embassy internship despite Sparkle being late with her application.

Please stop with the Poor Sparkle shit.

Yeah, some of her family are trashy and dealing with the paps. Where do you think Little Old Sparkle learned that game?

Sparkle and those trashy apples all fell from the same tree.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R191, STOP IT. Diana and Charles failed. They were miserable, in part because they rushed in without knowing each other. OTOH, William and Kate not only knew each other since university - she attended his 21st bday party and they married when he was 29 - but lived together for years. Lived together at University. Lived together in Wales. Years.

The Harkles rushed into this engagement before living together or even living in the same country. It was all cloak and dagger, self-aggrandizement in social media, Harry grandstanding, Meghan being coy on instagram and implicitly threatening in Vanity Fair ("We'll have our stories to tell") all the while dropping unflattering, made-up blinds about Kate. Did Harry know she'd blunder through her very very basic series of royal engagements prior to the wedding? Who knows. This has certainly backfired on him. You can see her from space, that's the problem. She's not good at her hustle. Hubris has gotten her this far, but she'll find out after the wedding - if there is one - what it's like to live on Harry's in come. He's a cheap bastard, and going by this clusterfuck wedding now that the bride and groom have gone rogue, Charles isn't about to waste his money on them. Don't expect George and Charlotte in the wedding party either.

She's definitely merching. Nobody carries a bag that awkwardly - perpendicular to your body so the logo can be seen instead of alongside - unless they're merching. The car was seen going through a private entrance at LAX. Question is, did she actually board a plane or did the ride turn around and take her back home after a decent interval.

[quote]Don't expect George and Charlotte in the wedding party either.

It's already nearly confirmed they're in the wedding party and if so , they won't be pulled out at this late minute. Any plans made were firmed up weeks ago, fittings made, etc.

I don't fully agree with r205 but lol at "the Harkles". Trademark that.

There's still time for an unfortunate accident. Megan, no cars, boats, planes, helicopters til you got that ring, gurl.

It has not been confirmed they're in the wedding party. The only confirmation re the wedding personnel so far is William will "stand up" for Harry. So again, no George and Charlotte. There is no confirmation whatsoever. The best KP pr could come up with was that Meghan would have "children" as her attendants. 10-1 she's trying to pressure Kate. "If it's not G&C, I won't have any children!" But William and Kate will be resolute.

If you can find me the confirmation, I'll stand corrected, but you won't be able to do that.

Thank you, R209. I was posting the same thing but saw your post.

If George and Charlotte were definitely going to be in the wedding, it would have been "confirmed" by an announcement from Kensington Palace. It has not been.

I believe the son of her colleague on Suits is in the wedding.

One of her female Suits colleagues has an instagram pic of herself with her small son in London. Unfortunately, as with so much of this wedding, People can assume it's current but who knows if it is. Anyhow, it's a creepy pic as her toddler son has grasped her face with both hands, has tilted his head to the side, and is about to plant a major one on her lips. Think she lets him watch too many of her love scenes, or, if not her own, too much TV. Also creepy is she thought the pic was cute enough to instagram.

r212 you don't have any kids do you?

R213, that is a creepy picture, not a cute picture.

R205 slays me. As if a wedding to a family of this magnitude would be cancelled in just a week. All because of what, the trashy half sister causing trouble? Is that cunt happy now? What’s her end game anyway? Does she think BP will pin an award on her for averting disaster? Then what? She wheels her fat fraubromyalgia trash ass back home. With no possibilities of ever reaping any reward of being the sister of a royal duchess in Europe’s premier monarchy.

Charlotte is a little young for this sort of thing, you can’t predict how small children will behave in these kinds of events. Gay George would be better, but we won’t know until the day.

If George and Charlotte are in the wedding party will everyone here who says no be contrite on Saturday and admit you didn’t have any idea?

When the wedding goes off without a hitch on Saturday will all of you who SWEAR this wedding will be cancelled be contrite and beg everyone’s forgiveness for being wrong?

Will you admit being wrong to ALL the shit you e been writing? Because guess what? You will be. And all of us will be laughing at you.

Everyone here who says no has no reason to be contrite, because we're just pointing out they have not been confirmed, and, this close to the wedding, it's notable. It's those who insist they will be in the party based on nothing but assumption and media assumption who need to be contrite.

Yes, I am doubtful of the wedding. I am doubtful the plans are actually plans. Seems a lot of smoke/mirrors and cheap bullshit so far, helped along by lies. Of COURSE they would cancel the wedding if it were a disaster in the making - it's already that even if it goes through. But to be clear, when I say that I suspect it won't happen, I'm saying I suspect everybody involved in the planning already knows that and is basically bullshitting, spinning, and going through the motions. All the planning? We have no evidence ANYTHING has been planned. The reception details keep changing. Now it's standing around a bunch of bowls, not sitting. Only one detail has been confirmed - William says he will stand up for Harry. That's it. We have rumors about the dress - it could not even exist. There were tabloid photos of the flowers being loaded - the pics were feeble and could be anybody's flowers. The guest list is a complete mystery - pure speculation. As is everything about this thing.

They are all such trash. It's like they were invented by John Waters.

Come on, there's a wedding.

You don't do a giant poisonous cake, 1 billion petits fours and clean Windsor streets if there's no wedding.

Well now it's time to say good bye to this scheme by Meghan...

The cake is rumor, as is everything else. Hey, just today a press release claimed work had "started" on the cake. This is as bogus as it gets. I don't know if the wedding itself is going to be as broken as it previews to be, and Meghan and her bedazzled, re-worked, 2015 wedding dress as bizarre, OR if there's no wedding, but my money's on the latter.

Swarovski v j j.

The fucking Queen doesn't write official stuff for an non existant wedding.

Get over it, there's a wedding on Saturday and believe I can't stand H&M either.

The Queen's official consent looks like someone on acid crayon'd an imitation of Kate and Will's consent. So no, still suspicious it ain't on.

You're definitely crazy.

As if the Queen would not have react if someone was doing forgery and published it on twitter and every newspapers.

Hey, listen, we'll know by Saturday. No need to get your knickers in a twist. I think it's not happening. We'll know in days, so I wouldn't get so riled up.

You think the queen is way more involved than I do. And giving more shits.

If the father did die, what would they do? It seems very bad taste to me to proceed with the big thing. I would expect they would marry privately and discreetly, family and the closest of friends, but would seem so bizarre to do the whole show with fresh death hanging over it all.

You queens predicting no wedding are insane. You think all the major US news stations would be sending their top.people for something not happening?

Talking out your prolapsed assholes, and have more in common with the hillbilly Markles than you would care to admit.

Wow, that's effective talk on a gay site, R228.

[quote]R205 Did Harry know she'd blunder through her very very basic series of royal engagements prior to the wedding?

Had that happened, would he have even cared? No.

He, along with many of us, are of a different generation, and don't take the crumbling, musty old monarchy too seriously. It's really just a gravy train for the Windsors at this point, nothing else.

You must know him very well, R230. Y

Here's some dish:

[quote]They are all such trash. It's like they were invented by John Waters.

LOL

Our Dear Leader says that the unemployed need to work, and that’s what this shithouse rat crazy family is doing. They are going to go on Royal Welfare, and our little bride and gift to England will be handing out the checks. If I were a Brit, and I missed it by one generation, I would be ROYALLY pissed putting up cash for this stampede of rabid disease gang of backwoods raccoons.

The royal family totally missed the control knob on this. All anyone had to do is say “trailer trash” and have the queen watch some TLC family of fine family shows and she would of got the picture sooner or later.

I feel sorry for Harry. He’s marrying what will become a quite quickly a gold digger and worse yet, a snob. This will not be a happy marriage. Why is he doing it anyway? Its just stupid.

Now you understand why i tell young gay men who come to Europe to marry a nice man from a nice family.

Who is the loon that insists the wedding plans are fake and there's not going to be a wedding?

That's not how the Royal Family works.

As for the awkward in-laws, Harry and Sparkle will just have to grin and bare it for a few days until the Marklebillies go back home.

It's not like any of them LIVE in the UK.

[quote]You don't do a giant poisonous cake, 1 billion petits fours and clean Windsor streets if there's no wedding.

You forgot to mention that the official commemorative earrings have already been made.

No way would I have a public wedding if I had a family like this. It would be private, just close friends, or an elopement. Markle is crazy to flaunt this event and all the talk of the attendees will be about her trashy relatives and their antics.

So very embarassing. How does M cope when all the world is laughing? What kind of twit is Harry to bring this upon his family?

What's funny about all this is that Sparkle has been manipulating her "brand" to create an image according to those who knew her. So, that whatever she told Harry fit the picture she thought she had created.

But, dropping people as you climb the ladder apparently worked with her acting career and move to Toronto, but, all those "non-brand" people still existed in the real world. Not in Sparkle's cable TV celebrity world, but in flesh and blood.

Anyone with any smarts would have realized that teaming up with such a prominent member of the Royal Family AND starting right off by antagonizing the press with lawyers, etc., AND followed by the rude and ridiculous Christmas remark "the family she never had" provided a triple reason for the UK press to investigate her and for any family (whether dropped for being "off brand" or not) to speak up and disagree.

This whole thing is a mess made by Sparkle, aided and abetted by Harry. No sympathy for either of them.

Funny how that works. You may conveniently drop people, but they still exist. They still have the memories, the stories, photos, the videos, the secrets. You may have thought you had made them disappear, but they are still out there.

R240 = Fat, jealous, Frau.

No, R240 just says it as it is.

Even Royal correspondents on twitter have enough of KP lies and manipulations and start asking open questions about the very well-informed photographs following Doria.

If KP keeps going like this, the Daily Mail will attack again and will expose this time Doria's and Meghan's pap game, while KP is crying about their lack of privacy.

It really is the gift that keeps on giving.

Megs was smart to ditch these hillbillies years ago. At some point they will run out of stories- there is only so much to say about someone you haven't seen in years or decades. People will be bored with them (if they aren't already) and Megs will still have her Prince.

R244 People are waiting you at Celebitchy. Kaizer is counting on her minions.

Go now.

This fiasco shows the Queen is not on top of things as she once was. Megan and her family should have been fully vett ed before consent to marry was granted.

At this age, The Queen must have mild dementia.

At 92 years old, she should retired. Even the Pope did it.

I propose we merge the crazy in this thread with the crazy in the al-qanon thread and imagine a Saturday morning where during the marriage ceremony the priest whips off his mask, revealing himself to be Robert Mueller, who proceeds to arrest Prince Andrew and begin the international takedown of all the Trump Mob's enemies, finally clearing the way for the return of the coal jobs.

Oh course the wedding is really planned. That's why the palace is in an uproar and the PR office in KP has lost total control. I am sure the Queen would love to call this off. Someone keeps saying she's 92 and doesn't care. You don't know much about her if you believe that. Her entire being has been her job, making sure protocol is followed, trying to keep her family's dirty laundry out of the press. It is all about appearances. She has invested her life in this and in the future of all this. And this just doesn't bode well for the future. Especially if it's true Wills and Harry tried to do damage control concerning the dad's pics without consulting the palace pros. But I don't think they will call it off because she is part black. I'll bet if Prince Phillip was younger and in better health he would get the Queen to call it off for the good of the family. He must have visions of Fergie at this point, not Sparkle specifically, but the whole tawdry mess of it. And it will keep going. And the press will keep going. Like in the 90s. They might not personally dislike Megan, she can't be blamed for these nuts, but I would think they feel there is a bigger problem here in terms of The Firm.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Or parading around topless in the South of France?

I'd sure hate to be judged by the actions of my trashy family just because I was engaged to someone with some fame. I got dragged, at 19, for having a convicted felon in the family, as if I put him up to the crime or something.

She's worked hard to get some distance, they didn't give a shit about her when she was younger, so she owes them nothing.

Apparently you get a bit of money and now you have to drag along the whole coterie of questionable cunts. Let them find their own prince!

And how do you know they didn't give a shit about her when she was young, you asshole.

There's plenty pictures of them with her.

They wouldn't be acting like uncivilized dicks if they cared about her. No wonder she ditched them years ago.

She ditched them before, because hillbilles didn't match her shitty useless half naked acting career and her Mulroney's shitty friends.

R254 knows that pictures are momentary, R253. I've posed, smiling and happy, with a lot of deplorable relatives.

Sure, R255, she ditched them? I hear a lot out of their mouths regarding her 'being spoiled' etc. She aspired to more and that's fine. You don't look back at jealousy and ugliness if you don't want to go back. Confident, happy people do not behave the way these relatives are behaving.

I grew up poor and have nice family members I speak with. The others can blow it out their asses. Any success they have is great and I applaud it, but I am not obligated to pull them up behind me.

This is a classic case of crab bucket.

It's been confirmed that George and Charlotte will be in the royal wedding party as page and flower girl. Also, all three of the Ben and Jessica Mulroney children will be in the wedding as well.

Article on the children in the wedding party. 10 children is trouble and overkill.

Ages 2 to 7. This could be interesting.

'trouble, overkill'

I look forward to your geriatric wedding, R259, where the memaws and pepaws enjoy the warm milk cocktails and their gift bag of exlax and depends.

Why do you care? So what if they have one hundred children screaming in the pews, that's their business. What a judgy little thing you be.

R261 - triggered Sugar, do take some meds to calm yourself down.

Oh, so now you're pushing drugs? Not all of us are judgy little tools, CUPCAKE. They like kids. Get over it.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I love it! Kids are often the best part of weddings. Loads of youtube vids on their dgaf attitudes for all the pomp.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[quote] Some members in the Royal Family are supposedly NOT invited.

Likely, Princess Michael of Kunt.

Why would Meghan want that old racist whore at their wedding?

Piers Morgan destroyed the cunty half sister on his show. That whore would be better off packing her plastic suitcases and going back home before she embarasses herself any further.

Oooh, link please R268!

I'd love to see that.

Re R266 link

Who are the 2 Markle family members who will attend? Her mother, but who else?

They also appear to be saying that the people from Suits were not invited either.

R268 - The half sister Samantha has been talking to British TV shows from Florida. I don't think she's in Britain.

Does Sparkle have any friends?

I'm guessing that she would have 10 guests on her side of the family - MAX.

The rest are all Harry's people.

I have been watching this train wreck since Harry's stupid letter accusing the British press of harassing Meg and her family and of racism in November 2016.

Megs is no innocent. She uses people, including family members and old friends, and then discards them. She discarded her dogs, who she used to call her "world." She railroaded Harry into the relationship, and into marriage.

Harry is a dim, entitled fool. He used the same MO on Megs that he's used on dozens of other women: bombard them with texts, whisk them off to Africa.

Usually, it is just a casual relationship, but Megs may or may not have used a pap agency, the same one her father used, to pretend to harass her in order to get Harry to write the November 2016 letter that made her his "official" girlfriend after only a few months of long distance dating. From then on, the die was cast and Megs wasn't going nowhere.

Three months after meeting Harry, living on different continents and having spent maybe a week total together, she told her agent she was quitting her job.

So for all of those feeling sorry for her because of her nutty family, don't. She is just as grasping as they are, just better at the con.

Piers is a piece of shit with a lot more ugliness in his background than Sparkle's half sister. For him to name call anyone else is obscene.

[quote]It's been confirmed that George and Charlotte will be in the royal wedding party as page and flower girl.

Wasn't this obvious? I mean of course this would be the case.

Poor R273 is being ghosted. lol

R273, how many times do we need to hear the same thing? You are too invested in people you don't know. Take up a hobby.

Nothing has been obvious about any of this.

I’m worse than Hitler, sorry.

Not until after the wedding, R277 - this is better than when Marlena became the Devil on DOOL.

That cunt doesn’t even have the goodness to sit up straight for a TV interview? Fuck her MS. She dragged her tired ass all the way across the Atlantic with her shitty dye job and plastic jewelry and can’t keep her shit together for 15 minutes on TV?

Go HOME fibrofrau.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Wow you guys are so emotionally invested in this. This is just a circus show as far as I’m concerned.

The marriage isn’t off to a good start. But she’s probably already on fertility meds to get pregnant ASAP.

[quote]R239 So very embarassing. How does M cope when all the world is laughing? What kind of twit is Harry to bring this upon his family?

It's not all nearly as dramatic as some are making it out to be.

That Jessica Mulroney woman looks like a complete plastic surgery freak show. She looks like she'd be right at home on a Real Housewives franchise.

The Suits actress who was seen kissing her toddler is none other than Jacinda Barrett of Real World London fame. Kind of funny that this trainwreck reality show wedding would have actual reality show cast members as guests.

Lick my taint fags. I will be a real Princess.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

r287 you obviously never read DM, they hate on everyone, also it is a right-wing site, of course they don't like the mother. Let your frautrage go, they are getting married no matter how big of a knot you get your panties in.

R287 made a fair point about the RF's elderly fan base. This dying generation is leaving its collective Royal commemorative mug and plate tat to charity shops and auction houses up and down the country. Next generations may prove increasingly disaffected. Anecdotally I have noted disinterest.

[quote] she’s probably already on fertility meds to get pregnant ASAP

I'm guessing that her hateful uterus is dried up, and full of cobwebs.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R259 - Is anyone surprised that none of the children are black? Does Nutmeg actually hang around any black people other than her mother? Psk, Serena Williams doesn't count because I think they're only acquaintances. I would have loved to have seen some black children walking down St George's Chapel. The look on Prince Philip's face would have been priceless. I may just have to be happy with the mother walking her down the aisle.

I don't see this marriage lasting more than 5 years. What a shitshow.

Was reading comments on the DM. Many think the two , especially since she's divorced, should have had a modest wedding and are pissed at paying for this. The comments pretty much mirror here. Brits noticing Doria merching the Burberry logo on the bag and hoping she will take the nose ring out for the wedding. Some think Doria is the only good relative, but someone mentioned she had already visited with Oprah and is going to receive $400,000 for the interview. Anyone know if that is true? Also, is it just gossip she was arrested twice? I knew she filed for bankruptcy, but some said she filed more than once. It is hard to tell what is just rumor about Doria and what are perturbed brits (pointing out at least Kate's parents paid for her wedding). Lots of Americans commenting, too.

Re: Some Windsor family members not invited

Meh. I don’t think it’s uncommon to not invite 2nd or 3rd cousins to your wedding. Is Harry even close with any of them? I’d be more surprised if it was any of the remaining “HRH” members that were not invited.

[quote] Some Windsor family members not invited

So why aren't their faces plastered all over the Daily Fail, or being interviewed on British media?

I smell a setup. They're purposely trying to take her down.

Harry doesn’t need to invite any of those people. They are important to his grandmother, but not to his father and not to him. In the future after Charles succeeds, the Queen‘s cousins and their descendants will fall into obscurity. The focus of the royal family will strictly be Charles, his wife, and his children and grandchildren. As well it should be.

R296 - scroll up, their faces are being plastered in the papers. The difference between the Windsor family members who haven’t been invited and the Markle family is none of the Windsors are talking about it, giving interviews, going on TMZ, trying to monetize it, etc..

R297 - agree to a point - the Queen’ cousins - the two Royal Dukes, the Prince, and the Princess - are the only HRH’s outside the immediate family who in addition to their own charitable activities, often represent the Queen or accompany her to events. So while not inviting Lord Windsor isn’t really a shock, not inviting HRH the Duke of Gloucester for example would be, regardless of how close a relationship they have with the groom himself.

Look. There's a faint bit of the romanticist in me that the realist in me mocks. I hope that all works out for the two key players, I really do. That said, Markle has let her mask slip here and there. That looking in the camera where ever she goes is very telling. If her intentions are NOT what she indicates, then she's barking up the wrong tree. They'll destroy her utterly if it ever comes to that point. To quote Martha, the fictional characters grandmother from the 1981 motion picture "Arthur" - "We are RUTHLESS people, Arthur! DON'T FUCK WITH US!" I've never been big on astrology, but the three most important people in my life are Leos - I've known them from the time I took my first breath. Markle is a Leo, and they are very self-centered, self-absorbed people. Huge attention seekers. Drama queens/kings. They're the bull in the antique shoppe - wreaking all sorts of havoc to the point of destruction and completely OBLIVIOUS to the fact they've caused so much harm. I think she's an opportunist. I think that this marriage is her star vehicle. I think she's in love with ascending to the rank and status of being a British royal. I think she's very, very calculating. Whatever the case, there is no way she can ever compete with the Palace machine if it ever comes to that. Diana found that out. So did Fergie. She'd better watch her step.

So Charlotte is going to be a Bridesmaid and George will be a Page

Yes it is very weird that a ‘woke’, feminist, mixed race social activist like Meg doesn’t have ANY black or minority friends. Serena Williams probably wouldn’t recognise Sparkle if she tripped over her.

Sparkle is black only insofar as her Sugars need to defend her, R301.

She's Nilla.

Not mulatto and not Oreo.

You Bitterscolds need some new material.

R281 is posting from the short bus. The bitch is in Florida, Rose.

The BBC in conjunction with the Palace machine is laying it on thick with programmes leading up to the weddi!ng. You'd think MM is Mother Teresa II according to their reporting. Still Saturday will be fun as its a good excuse to drink all day and vomit in Leicester Square later.

I read somewhere Charles had a say in which minor royals to invite and this is his paring down of The Firm. Hes letting them know now. Would have been funny as hell if Andrew and his family weren't invited.

[quote]Article on the children in the wedding party. 10 children is trouble and overkill.

How tacky; the future Princess of flippin' Wales didn't have this many attendants; who does this Markle chick think she is, anyway? I'll bet her dress cost more than Kate's, also.

The children are there as secret assassins should any relatives or commoners breach the barriers. Their little fingers can wield stilettos much easier!

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

That girl from the tv show Quantico was on WWHL and Andy was asking her questions about the royal wedding as she is one of Meghan's close friends. She didn't answer much but I think she is attending the wedding.

So the fact that Harry is making the decisions tells us a lot about the two of them. Even the appearance of family is not important to either of them. They want a huge, splashy, expensive wedding with celebrities like Beckham. I'm sure Elton John will be there. And Serena Williams. And the Spice Girls. These are the people they want to impress and be a part of. Not cousins he grew up with or an uncle who helped advance her career. He's coming off as a spoilt brat, too. They could be perfect for each other.

Does it, R311? You seem to know them well, Princess.

So according to the DM article - not only have the courtiers not been given instructions on what the hell their roles will be on Saturday - almost none of them have even met Sparkle Markle. Interesting.

My lord, this coupling has been a hot mess from the word go.

If "sugars" is a thing, then how come it's only used in relation to Meghan? Why isn't there talk of "sugars" on the Liza and Mariah Carey threads?

One couple makes love, the other fucks

r292 two of the attendants are at least half-Indian. The Lett children, whose parents are pals of Markle's.

It's obvious she's a ruthless climber, he's a complete idiot and this is going to be an epic disaster until the divorce.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Piers Morgan is the worst, he can't seriously called anyone a vulture.

I expected better of my boy.

What KP has said is that 10 children have been "chosen". I always watch the wording of this crew because all of the planning, and ALL of the "official" statements since the actual engagement have been shifty has hell. 10 kids, no adults? No way. Jessica Mulroney just landed in London, being papped all the way (she called). Why London? Wedding is a 100 miles away. Same with Doria. Amy, the assistant, a driver carrying the Burberry bag flipped to the other side, no actual Doria sighting.

When did Jessica's kids get fitted for their bridesmaid and pageboy kit?

This is a clusterfuck and Friday/Sat morning will be when it blows up.

Don't worry Diana, Sir Elton will sing Candle in the wind while Meghan's wears the Spencer tiara and Charles walks her down the aisle.

Gonna be epic.

Why does the estranged, older half-sister who blabs to the press seem to hate Megan? They didn't seem to have a relationship when Megan was a child and the older sister an adult. Does she resent her father for marrying a black woman and his having a child with her? I hope they don't drop a bombshell on Saturday to ruin the wedding. The Markle side of the family is so tacky. It's gruesome to watch how they could be a thorn in her side and the Royals' side for decades. Live and let live. Megan doesn't owe them. And frankly, I'm surprised Harry didn't marry a standard-issue, blonde British society girl. He had to have known marrying an American divorcee, based on past history in his family, is not happily ever after.

[QUOTE] Hes letting them know now.

So he doesn’t have to let them know THEN.

R323 Because you Sugars are too dumb to get that planning such an event is not about fairness but efficiency.

If it's more efficient to invite the hillbillies so they will shut up the wedding day, you do it even if you think it's unfair.

For fuck sake it's a semi-State event and Sugars treat it like their's cousin weeding. "But, she's not nice with her!!!!! Megahn would be upsetttttttt!!!!!!"

R11 Wait till the kids arrive-bright red frizzy hair.

That's her friend Priyanka Chopra, R310.

They appear to be close.

[quote]r311 So the fact that Harry is making the decisions tells us a lot...

Prince Harry is having NONE of it! The distant, freeloading royal relatives can fuck RIGHT the FUCK OFF!

It's funny how every Maghan's "friends" are famewhores: Jessica, Priyanka, Serena, the Clooneys, etc.

R328 Go take your pills, the men in white are waiting you.

[quote]Why does the estranged, older half-sister who blabs to the press seem to hate Megan?

Because Real Housewives.

[quote]r323 The Markle side of the family is so tacky. It's gruesome to watch how they could be a thorn in her side and the Royals' side for decades.

Sparke is an ACTRESS. They're USUALLY scrappy mongrels with slightly checquered pasts. That's what makes them vibrant and exciting. As Joan Crawford said, "If you want the girl next door, go next door."

Harry didn't want a dewy, dead-boring husk of a debutante like inlaw Kate. He's probably fallen asleep a million times listening to her, and knew he personally wanted something different.

R332 is probably right.

And by that theory certainly proves Harry is an idiot.

He wanted an Hollywood famewhore you mean?

It's not like Harry would choose a surgeon or a University professor.

IMHO, Harry is finding out about this shit show (Sparkle's past and her family) at that same time we are, guaranteed.

I rather think Harry and Sparkle are underestimating Kate. Not only personally, but Kate's behavior only makes Sparkle's look more unfocused, unpolished and unprofessional. And I suspect opinions of Kate have skyrocketed when insiders have been watching recent events.

Though I shall not be in attendance (I'll be on holiday, regretfully), I have sent a wedding gift. I'm sure she's ready for a new one.

Is Princess Michael going to show up in FULL Blackamoor getup this time...or just the brooch again?

[quote] Harry didn't want a dewy, dead-boring husk of a debutante like inlaw Kate

Harry is definitely "down with the swirl!"

This isn’t going to stop with the wedding. It’s just beginning.

[quote] This isn’t going to stop with the wedding. It’s just beginning.

I think you are right.

The thing is, though, in the past Royal Scandals, I usually had one side I sympathized with. One of the partners I liked.

With this pair, I am starting to dislike them both intensely.

[quote]One couple makes love, the other fucks

MARY!

I bet poor Harry is getting an education these days. She'll be out of control in private...

Yes they absolutely deserve each other. He supposedly had trouble finding someone who will accept the baggage that comes with being his wife. And she loves the limelight and attention. She is of average looks and terrible body. No tits to speak of.

Harry will be cheating very soon as he wants to get away from her baggage.

[quote]r344 She is of average looks and terrible body. No tits to speak of.

Ummm, that's not the type they usually cast as the love interest on a TV show.

She has no tits and by the day of the wedding she'll look like a skeleton.

Since the older sister won't shut up, how long before the chronic illness she has does it for her?

[quote]Ages 2 to 7. This could be interesting.

Oh, you have no idea.

They'll find they have had fookin' sufficient, wot?

[quote]Why London? Wedding is a 100 miles away.

Windsor is 25ish miles from London.

Oh my, what a freak show. They expect these people to be commentators for the live coverage? Or, more likely, they would like to offer their viewers with additional spectacle and something to snark about

[quote]The late-breaking stars are Tracy Dooley and her large adult sons, Thomas and Tyler. Dooley, a former florist and “aspiring radio and TV personality,” according to what appears to be her LinkedIn account, was once married to Thomas Markle Jr. and knew Meghan when she was a child. In a bizarre appearance on Good Morning Britain in January, Dooley sits between her sons and extols preteen Meghan for being “talented” and “vivacious.” Tyler, an Oregon pot farmer reportedly developing a strain called Markle’s Sparkle, magnanimously extends his blessing on her decision not to invite the trio to the wedding. Thomas Dooley chimes in with “Yeah!” to his family’s statements, sometimes speaking over them to echo their phrases exactly. The overall effect is excruciatingly awkward:

More catnip for us.

It's official Daddy will not be at the wedding.

Daddy's little ghoul is sad but still hope you'll watch her wedding on tv.

The crazy sister is now claiming that KP officials have left her father all alone in hospital and should have paid his bill. Why does she think complete strangers on another continent are responsible for taking a bunch of grapes to HER father?

Cause, maybe, they're full of cash and "humanitarians" with a concern for "mental health".

Give up, Meghan is over even before her wedding. That must be a new record in the BRF.

How does Medicare work for someone south of the border? Do retirees relinquish it once they leave the states? Was he part of a union as lighting director and would he still receive some sort of insurance benefit?

Why isn't Samantha spending time with her father? She clearly has time on her hands has the cash to travel thanks to tabloid and pap payments. Plus, she could recuperate from her broken ankle sitting bedside with him at the hospital.

Has anyone heard anything about Thomas and Samantha's mother, the other ex-Mrs. Markle? I haven't heard word one about her. Assuming she's alive, she must be mortified and hiding because we haven't heard a peep.

Samantha just broke her ankle and is in a wheelchair, I'm sure it's super easy for her to travel right now.

Stop given her excuses, she fucked up all. The British newspapers are turning against her.

I give this weeding 2 years top, she won't be able to deal with the press hate when she wanted to be Diana2.0.

Giving her excuses?

I just look at Samantha Grant with complete astonishment on my face. How did she ever equate Meghan's marriage to Prince Harry as a link to all that ails her and her family?!! Then, I have to keep reminding myself that she absolutely IS a grifter cashing in, no doubt about it.

In other news: What the hell are the nephews going to be commenting about during the wedding? "Oh she looks pretty. That's the way I remember her when she babysat me 18 years ago." "I remember when she babysat me 18 years ago, she used to wear her hair like that sometimes." "Btw, did I mention that she used to babysit me 18 years ago?" Someone needs to call out "Good Morning Britain" or whatever the hell it's called, because the show is just trying to make a mockery of the whole affair with the inclusion of these yokels. "Shit Show" indeed.

R357 It's as if she and Harry are only victims, not actors of their wedding. They have never been proactive in this mess. They let everything happen cause Meghan prefer to hide her head in the sand than face her deplorable family.

But here you are being sorry for those incompetent idiots who rejected the Palace help and decided they could manage everything themselves.

Well, we see the result.

[quote]Samantha just broke her ankle and is in a wheelchair, I'm sure it's super easy for her to travel right now.

[quote]Stop given her excuses, she fucked up all.

Oh, I agree with you R359. It sounded like you were referring to Samantha

Samantha is some fucked up human being.

Harry and Meghan were supposed to be the future of the BRF, the new Super-Stars who must eclipse William and Kate.

They are supposed to be above the Markles. They have huge staff and tons of money. They should have been able to avoid the circus but they prove day after day they're just stupid famewhores.

Are the pot farmer and his brother biological relatives of Markle's? I wonder why they go by the name of Dooley. I assume she and Thomas had an acrimonious divorce (I read he was arrested for domestic violence last year) Mom remarried and they took step-dad's name or she went back to her maiden name? Or are they just not Thomas Markle's kids?

[quote]Has anyone heard anything about Thomas and Samantha's mother, the other ex-Mrs. Markle? I haven't heard word one about her. Assuming she's alive, she must be mortified and hiding because we haven't heard a peep.

You haven't been paying attention. She's already sold her story. She and her granddaugher (Samantha's daughter) sold their story to a tabloid newspaper and some tv show. They had nothing by nice things to say about Meghan. And nothing but bad things to say about Samantha. The daughter said Samantha was a bitter, abusive, horrible mother. Her own mother said the same thing. She also added Meghan was always a sweet, lovely child

I've said it before and I'll say it again, the markle's are pure shit and they will ruin Meghan's wedding. I was right

Thanks, R363. Missed that entirely. At least they didn't do it to trash MM.

Wrong R336. Kate is NOT universally beloved. Her and William are seen as distant, lazy, and unengaged in royal duties. They are NOT popular like you think. Kate and her family are seen as gold-diggers and her mother Carole is viewed almost as a Kris Kardasian type figure.

Comparing a less than perfect royal bride (Meghan) with Kate is unfair because Kate came into the game with her own baggage. If you want to make a better comparison, try Bridgette, the dutiful Duchess of Gloucester.

I love how the sister in the wheelchair changes wigs for each tv appearance. That's a STAR baby!

But Kate has three beautiful trump cards to play.

Ha! The "family" was dropped from the TV commentary. I hope they were paid up front or I feel another BK coming.

I bet Daddy gonna crash the wedding.

Does anyone actually think HARRY is a "control freak"? The image of him as the somewhat dim, fun-loving prince would beg to differ. It sounds more like the palace courtiers are getting flack from above for not handling this well (And probably infighting and making it worse) and are trying to place blame. I could see William, perhaps, and that seems to be in line with what other reports have said, but they also have their own staffs who are part of the palace apparatus so it's not like they've gone rogue or something.

I also love the poster(s) above who traces every bad decision, no matter how big of a jump in logic it requires, back to Meghan the Mastermind and some imagined psychosis he's dreamed up for her. Talk about confirmation bias.

It looks like the palace put pressure on news outlets not to give interviews to Meghan's family, which I'm not really surprised about. It sounded like they had some offers but they got pulled once the palace got wind of it. I'll bet they are still getting paid for the trip though, maybe not as much as they wanted. Hope Samantha, the wanna-be Kris Jenner, was smart enough (lol) to get the cash up front.

The father Markle just seems sad and if he actually is having heart surgery it is rather surprising that his other daughter isn't there for him, but is blaming Meghan and the palace for not doing something (?) instead. She is a real piece of work. She's been trying to leverage this into some sort of paid presenter gig for herself but she doesn't have the personality for it. Although she is crazy, so perhaps she'll end up on a shitty reality show like Big Brother.

He's like his brother, he's a control freak when it comes to the press.

Otherwise I think Meghan's was the control freak of the wedding and Harry made sure the Palace conformed to her orders.

[quote] Hope Samantha, the wanna-be Kris Jenner, was smart enough (lol) to get the cash up front.

Samantha isn't the one who went to the UK with her doofus sons. That was Thomas' ex-wife, who goes by the surname Dooley now.

r370 based on what proof?

And yes, we know, you think Meghan is some Mastermind and has orchestrated everything. I think you give her way too much credit in some areas and not enough in others.

r372 you're correct, I guess she's still in Florida. She's giving so many interviews it seems like she's RIGHT THERE. Well, she's dying anyway!

The idiot family members who flew to London will not be doing wedding commentary for any TV shows. I guess they'll have to stand outside the barriers and wave.

I CANNOT believe stupid fucking English people camping on the sidewalks days before this circus of a wedding.

What a waste of taxpayers money! The royals are welfare garbage. She is jumping from one trash family to another garbage dump. She will fit right in

[quote] The idiot family members who flew to London will not be doing wedding commentary for any TV shows. I guess they'll have to stand outside the barriers and wave.

But we brought all that KMART luggage, y'all!

How in the hell are we gonna git it back to the farm??

He worked lights on a soap? They hire union and they have pension and Heath insurance

He did the entire run of Married With Children too.

I read an article that the palace PR pros are blaming Harry. He wanted to micromanage, especially the press because he blames them for his mom's death, and wouldn't listen to the pros. They would have invited tge family to shut them up. Even if they spoke after, it couldn't have been as bad as letters to Harry in InTouch. But Harry wouldn't listen. It makes sense he thought he was protecting her from these horrible people. Remrmber when he said the BRF would be the family she never had? That is what started the half siblings going off to the press. That started it right there. It does seem he made missteps in trying to protect her but he should known better. It would have looked and calmed things down if dad, the half siblings, and the uncles who helped her were invited. A family both white and black. But she told him something that made him think she was basically an orphan.

Well, the Ragland family is not there either it seems, so forget the Black and White reunion.

Harry is an arrogant fool and she's no better, that's the key.

She orchestrated pap strolls then got Harry to fire off warning letters to the press about “intrusion” and “racism” when the fact was nobody in the UK and precious few in the US had ever heard of her. That was the start of the clusterfuck.

Actually, she was smart to cut these losers off. They can only sell so many stories from years ago.

R380, judging from their attempts to embarrass and humiliate her, she was. I invited my horror show family to my wedding and regretted it. Mother showed up in a Chinese silk dress, tight as hell. Sibling showed up in a stolen outfit that she lifted from an artist friend of mine and tried to guilt us all about the non-vegan menu. Another one was drunk from the minute she showed up. No, they made the right decision. They'd have embarrassed the hell out of themselves from the minute things started.

Sure, cause your wedding is the same as a Royal wedding where everything is checked 15 times.

It's not your fucking sister's wedding with 50 guests and a 10,000$ budget.

Harry and Megs don't want that trash, and who could blame them? Their camera phones would explode- texting pictures during the wedding for whatever money they could get. Even Good Morning Britian wised up to the pot-growing group and cancelled them.

Cause Meghan's guests are not INstagraming everything right now?

If they had been invited it would have calmed them down and they would be happier. It is obvious at this point that the two half siblings wanted to be invited. Seriously, nothing is worse then what is going on now and initially I didn't believe they should be invited because they wouldn't shut up and it was like giving in. But the pros have said rising above the fray and inviting them and stopping the most negative aspects of what they are doing would have been better and Harry and Meghan should have viewed it as controlling the fallout instead of giving in to shitty relatives. Now, it wouldn't have been as much fun for us! But the couple wouldnt be dealing with this now. I think the palace pros were right. They would still talk to the press, but it wouldn't be the negative tone it is now and with an invitation the KP had something to hold over their heads.

If the trash relatives were invited to the wedding, I'm sure their cell phones and cameras would've been confiscated until after it was over.

Yes I agree, all guests would be asked not to bring their phones. Many celebs have this requirement at their wedding

R388, you have no way of knowing that. Based on their actions and past ignorance, I'd say she was better off not inviting them. Giving them the negative attention platform is not her or Harry's doing. Do keep trying, however, to blame them.

What ever happened to the baby she was pregnant with in late 2013? Stillborn? Gave it up for adoption? Toilet baby? You need to check out the photos further down the page in the link to see her from the side.

[Quote] It's funny how every Maghan's "friends" are famewhores: Jessica, Priyanka, Serena, the Clooneys, etc.

Serena and the Clooneys?? Really?

She looks like she is "with child" in this photograph.

I'm not up on the Clooney arrangement. That marriage was always so weird to me. Of course, no one would bat too much of an eye if he married an accomplished woman, but he chosen someone so out of Hollywood's scopes who had questionable political ties, despite her overt resume? This is the sort of thing the Trump administration would have orchestrated for itself if they thought they could get away with it.

Meghan Markle’s Sister in Hospital After Paparazzi Crash

I kind of feel sorry for the little Sparkle tart.

Sparkle's "family" are such grifting trash that nothing would ever satisfy them. Had they been invited to the wedding and put up in a posh hotel, they would have documented everything. They are just like blackmailers. Better to ever refuse to pay, because then it never ends. They will drop out of sight soon enough. How many times does one have interest in what she did 10+ years ago?

Old saying...

[quote] It's better to have your enemies IN the tent, pissing out, than to have them OUTSIDE the tent, pissing in.

I'm sure the real professionals at Buckingham Palace know and understand this.

The pair of nitwit at Kensington Palace didn't believe it, but should have been learning it in past weeks, but I doubt either of them have the brains to comprehend.

How far and often can the egregious Markle relatives make a living from Tabloid payoffs?

One can only assume that a) they know they won't be invited based on the self-accumulated dried spittle on their shirts, and b) Samantha, alleged daughter, is batshit crazy which would set off any British intelligence agency to monitor her.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

The fact that Sparkle invited no one from either side of her family, including those she spoke glowingly of in her social media life, tells the story.

A sick father, who she praised to the high heavens on social media, she hasn't even talked to him.

That dolt, Harry, never even bothered to arrange to meet her father before the wedding.

The State Department uncle who got her the embassy internship (despite the fact that her application was late, meaning that she really wasn't entitled to be considered) - he didn't rate an invitation either.

People may rightfully be shocked at the relatives peddling their stories, but after that birdbrain Harry quoted the brown nosing Sparkle that the dysfunctional Mountbatten-Windsor family was "the family she never had", it's not really a shock that those who were there when she was growing up and are now not only ignored, but insulted.

Sparkle painted the picture of herself and it is not a pretty one.

She's an actress, you tired whore, not Mother Theresa. You're all so bitter and angry and spitting venom. Who hurt you?

Why does the UK media keep insisting that she's the "star" of a "big TV show" when Suits is a low-rated cable series most Americans hadn't heard of and that had an average rating of 1.3 million viewers this past season in a country of over 300 million people?

The way they puff up her resume you'd think she was the lead on The Walking Dead (6.3 million viewers) or Game of Thrones (12.1 million viewers).

I just watched the opening credits of Suits on Youtube. She's fourth-billed. And her face never appears. Certainly not the star.

Here's Jane Moore this week on Loose Women once again referring to Suits as a "big TV show." Do people in the UK think every show airing in America is "big"? Are they aware of how many channels there are here? Or how many people there are here?

It reminds me of when Australian soap opera (Neighbors) starlet Kimberley Davies attempted to conquer America in the late 1990s and her PR people laughably billed her as a sitcom star (she was the host for one year of a Candid Camera rip-off called Just Kidding) and an award-winning playwright (no idea whose asshole they pulled that one from).

It's all so absurd but it fits into her sociopathic behavior and how manufactured she is. Yes, her family is trash but good for them for chipping away at Madam Markle's not carefully enough crafted bullshit image.

I doubt that the taxpayers are only paying for half the wedding, and if they're paying for anything, I would say that the Brits are dumb "cucks" but we pay for Donnie Fatso to golf. Which is actually probably the safest options, unless we could send the Orange Outrage to Gitmo or something.

[quote] British taxpayers footing half the bill for $83M royal wedding British taxpayers will be expected to pick up as much as half of the estimated $83 million royal wedding tab, according to reports.

The cost of security, estimated at between $32 million and $40 million — including snipers on rooftops and anti-drone technology — will fall to the commoners, CNBC reported.

The security estimate is higher than the close to $27 million spent on safety for Prince William and Kate Middleton’s 2011 wedding in central London, because of heightened terrorist threats, the Independent UK reported.

Charles is probably keeping a tab.

Whenever the dim duo ask him for funds in the future, he'll point to the total already spent and shake his head.

Harry will have a lot more holes in his shoes before this fiasco is forgotten. And if the tale of Sparkle's huge shoe wardrobe is true, she better hope they stay in fashion.

From R401 's "explosive" link:

[quote]Recently-unearthed pictures show Prince Harry's fiancée wearing hotpants

Because we all know feminists CAN'T wear hotpants...!

LOCK 'ER UP!

I wonder what surprises the UK press is saving for the next two days.

How long can this family keep up the negative press.?Wait till she gets pregnant. Has the baby. They will scream dad was last to know. None of them invited to Christening, etc. Will dad be there for Christening, how will they handle that? You see, pissing these people off is going to affect every milestone. It doesn't go away. BP was right, invite them, you have things to hold over them. Keep them from documenting everything by dangling a carrot in front of them. And so what if they document their hotel on social media? The nephews are already documenting. Is that worse than this? Letters to H&M in InTouch?

I certainly would have opted for a quieter event, myself...especially if it wasn't my first wedding.

But this is what the Brits want. They love their royals, no matter how fusty and backwards the whole system is. They especiaally lap up anything associated with their precious Shy Di, and this is all about her little baby boy, so...well, DIG IN.

......

Nice try, R407, but Megs is stripping in the video @ R401 , looking at the camera as if she's an $8 an hour plus tips dancer at the Slip Sliding Slut Shack in Tulsa.

Sexually demeaning oneself for fame is apparently a pillar of Third-Wave "feminism" but most people (outside of their fellow travelers, Men's Rights Activists) who had even a modicum of self-respect would call it #SAD and #DESPERATE.

A good % of the Brits don't want this., R410. Much has been made about how few Brits are going to watch the wedding, much less care. Shoving this rodeo down their collective throat, while making them pay for it, could have ramifications for the monarchy.

r412 is very concerned with how women should and should not present themselves.

Controlling, much?

You're right, R413, my bad.

There are pics of Megs embracing at least two older and distinguished looking gentlemen that she apparently accompanied to events, so if, as alleged, she is a lady for hire, why shouldn't she embrace it?

I feel sorry for Meghan regarding the family situation. She is only close with the mother who is by all accounts a remarkable woman who sacrificed a lot for Meghan. She has had a difficult, but ultimately loving, with her father, who seems to have a lot of problems, and whom the media has really exploited for cheap news. His children from the other marriage don't seem to have played much of a part in her life, and yet she's forced now to have to read them criticizing her, and then see fat snobbish never-was Piers Morgan criticizing THEM.

Kate's family is pretty normal. When people call them trash I wonder what the fuck they're talking about: they're quite wealthy and respectable, and are very close with her. Kate is from the wealthy middle class--she makes no bones about it, and does not apologize for it. We are no longer in an era when princes of any country have to marry the daughters of royalty or aristocrats. Anyone on DL who snarls the Middletons are "trash" is almost certainly from no more of an exalted class position than they are, so a great deal of self-loathing must be involved. And the Middletons are a much happier and less embarrassing family overall than the dysfunctional aristocratic Spencers whose daughter Charles married, or the miserable and much-divorcing Windsor-Mountbattens themselves.

Meh, I like the Markles. They're providing all the fun and drama. It would be boring as fuck without them.

Meghan can fuck off, there's nothing exciting about her. She's not enough to bring good entertainment.

I know this is off-topic, but why do people STILL refer to Diana as Lady Diana? I understand why people still call the Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton - the public knew her by that name for 9 years. But from what I've read, Diana was only in the public eye for roughly a year before she married Charles. She then spent the remaining 16 years of her life as the Princess of Wales. On the other hand, I suppose "Princess Diana" isn't accurate either, because "Prince/"Princess" should only precede your first name if you were born into royalty.

I can't help but wonder if the Middletons (what a perfect name for a new import into the out-of-touch "Royal" family) are really the saving grace of "Royalty" nowadays. They actually worked for their money, unlike the sovereign's immediate family, except for the Princess Royal who busts her ass everywhere over the U.K.

Cause her nickname was LadyDi.

[quote] Kate's family is pretty normal. When people call them trash I wonder what the fuck they're talking about

No one cares about the Middletons' nouveau-riche status, R415. It's just that they groomed their daughters to be social-climbing Stepford Wives - no distinctive career, wait around for a super-rich husband, marry, reproduce, avoid any other work. Many fraus do that, to be fair. Including Media Meg, who quit her job, gave up her pet, changed religion - all to be a full-time trophy wife.

But it's nothing to respect either - especially for UK taxpayers, most of whom work actual jobs and have to fund the RF's harem of trophy wives.

If Samantha had to go to the hospital after her car crash, she's going to have some medical bills. Will she probably announce, through the press, that Meghan should be responsible for the bills since Meghan is the reason for the press' interest? I wouldn't be surprised if she tried to sue the driver of the car she claims was chasing her.

What happened to those two older Markle kids? Each is estranged from so many family members, and the two are estranged from each other, even. But they're saying that it's Meghan's fault that neither gets along with Meghan? It makes no sense.

If Meghan hadn't peddled lies to Harry ("poor widdle me, I'm practically DL's resident darfur orphan, adopt me!") and Harry hadn't gone on the radio to proclaim that his family was the "family she never had" little of the ensuing drama would have happened.

You can ghost problematic members of your family or those you just aren't close to but it's something else entirely to have your soon-to-be-spouse shit all over them in the media. That tends to get people pissed off. In an effort to pass herself off as a victim (to the royal family and the world at large), all she did was open the floodgates.

Shhh, R420 - don't bring up that Waity and Sparkle plotted and schemed and pranced around half-naked to land their Princes, because the fun fem at R413 will soon be here to call you controlling and reverse slut shame you. It seems it's a tenet of Third Wave "feminism" that women should use their God-given bodies to get ahead.

Speaking of God (and Meg's ever-changing religions) one of the Royal Dishers claims that she has a relative (friend?) who knew Sparkle and said that Sparkle did present as Jewish during her marriage to the Jewish producer.

How many men in Parliament or members of the aristocracy will be wearing fishnet stockings and lady panties under their suits?

[quote]How many men in Parliament or members of the aristocracy will be wearing fishnet stockings and lady panties under their suits?

I don't know, R424. Why don't you start a thread about it and let us continue talking about Meghan Markle here?

[quote] I know this is off-topic, but why do people STILL refer to Diana as Lady Diana?

Why shouldn't they? it was one of her names, and it was the one the public first became came to know her by. We still call Sarah, the Duchess of York "Fergie," yet she hasn't had "Ferguson" as a last name for nearly 32 years now--but "The Duchess of York" is a mouthful and "Sarah" is too generic.

The problem with royalty is that they are given so many names it's hard to know what to call them. The eldest son of George V and Queen Mary is filed under "Edward VIII" on wikipedia, because that's the highest title he ever held; most of us would call him "The Duke of Windsor," because he held that title the longest (and certainly while all the rest of us who were alive when he was were alive); but if you read old novels from even the 50s he will sometimes be referred to as 'The Prince of Wales" since that's how most people thought of him (since he was Prince of Wales for so long). And of course to his family and to Wallis, he was usually "David."

"Kate Middleton" is known as "Kate Middleton" even though she's not been called "Kate" for years because 1) that's the name the public first knew her by, 2) "Catherine" is too generic, and 3) "The Duchess of Cambridge" is too much of a mouthful. I don't know what we're going to call her when the queen dies: "the Princess of Wales," or still "Kate Middleton"? Eventually she'll be "Queen Catherine" and people will call her (and think of her as) that, but there will still be many who think of her as "Kate Middleton."

[quote] You can ghost problematic members of your family or those you just aren't close to but it's something else entirely to have your soon-to-be-spouse shit all over them in the media.

How vivid.

So there is something weird about her facial expression, other then that it oexnt change much. People call it smug, but that's not quite it. Some one commented on the DM her facial expression was simpering. I think it is a mixture of simpering and smug. Like she's smug in being the victim.

Botox and fillers?

I wish they married quietly, and didn't make such a song and dance about her. It would be better if she sort of slipped in and you slowly discovered that she's sort of cool, biracial, etc. Right now, I'm completely sick of her and her mess and ludicrous simpering. Familiarity does breed contempt.

I'm author of comment R299, and I am now wondering if I have judged Meghan too harshly with the tone of said comment. In fairness to her, any woman from the past who has married into the Royal family has certainly considered the extraordinary benefits of such a match. Diana did it against her better judgement, for example. Harry needs a wife - it's time. She's willing and able. She has her motives, but then so does he. I suppose the question to ask is this: Would these two people still have been attracted an in love to the extent of marriage if they were just Harry, the HVAC technician, and Meghan, the elementary school teacher? Alas, it must be stated that in the final analysis it really is none of my business.

[quote]So there is something weird about her facial expression

And her eyes almost always find the camera so she can smirk right into it usually while making sure the ring on her finger is prominently displayed.

Meanwhile...

^^^ Photoshopped. Come on.

OK would never stoop so low.

R408 Its usually on a Sunday when they best like to strike, but they'll have all the wedding pics this weekend. They'll hit her with something big at some point though. They're just waiting for the perfect moment.

Amy Schumer just compared the royal wedding to the Westminster dog show.

Amy Schumer is a talking pig.

I wonder if the Idiot Ginger Prince and his beloved Nutmeg will follow tradition and do a second interview before the wedding? Both previous royal couples (Diana & Charles as well as William & Catherine followed this pattern). These two could be so pissed off with the press right now I can see them not bothering at all.

The couple after their wedding rehearsal today. Both wearing dark glasses.

Jeez, she really looks a mess!

I hope she doesn't wear her hair like this on her wedding day. It's a mess.

Excuse me, what kind of fucking wedding is this? Some guests are supposed to bring their own food!!!

I certainly hope they ain’t expecting those guests to give them presents, what a fucking scam!!!

I hate the way she finds every camera and smirks directly into it. It’s gauche and trying far too hard. She’s such an attention whore.

Ol' Sparky is merching again. The jewelers who made the $12,000 (IIRC) earrings Megs has on today - who she's been merching for throughout the "courtship"- put out a press release claiming them.

End poverty now, y'all!

In the meantime, the homeless are being cleared to make way for the 20 million pound carriage ride.

She makes so much money yet the father is living in a shit hole in Mexico, the least she can do is pay back the education fees so he can enjoy the rest of his days, I don’t think he’s gonna last long, he has a lot of health problems

R432 did sparkle trap her man? If she did, that would make a lot of sense as to why Harry is putting up with her Jerry Springer roots.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Florida police are saying there’s no record of a collision as claimed by nutbag sister Samantha.

We know, you've posted it in every Markle thread.

No, I’ve posted it here and one other thread stalker r456. Please give a list of “every Markle thread”.

R447 - r454 - you're just posting every Mail Online article about it. If we want to read all of them we can just go to that website.

R457 we get it, you can't stop thinking about Markle!

The mother was taken for tea with Charles and Camilla directly from the airport! Sounds like they just want to hurry and get this done as fast as possible.

[quote]R420 ...Media Meg, who quit her job, gave up her pet, changed religion - all to be a full-time trophy wife

1. She fell in love, and many will convert faiths if it’s important to older in-laws. (No one really believes in gods anymore, so what’s the difference?)

2. No one knows if she’s given up her career or not.

3. You look ridiculous when you gripe about her former pet...whatever happened to it. It’s not like she secretly ran it over with a car at midnight and buried it in an unmarked grave.

She dumped one dog, she admits that. The other dog disappeared after it was reported it broke two legs. So yeah, given the ease with which she's disposed of people and pets, she could have run over her puppy and buried in an unmarked grave.

She fell in love with the last husband and (according to a Royal Dish) poster, presented as Jewish. There are photos of her at Jewish charity events.

She "fell in love" with Harry and converted to Church of England. Almost immediately, she wore a diamond cross bracelet, that, surprise, surprise, was made by the jeweler she continues to merchandize. Now that is devotion to a faith.

Not much higher to go than Harry, however, I would not be surprised if we see her shrouded in an abaya in a few years after she marries a Saudi prince, after which I shall come back here to rub your nose in it, R461

[quote]2. No one knows if she’s given up her career or not.

Her career as an actress is over and she's pretty much said as much. Not only did she quit her job, but she bailed on all of the charitable organizations she once worked for (and ghosted the agent who got her those gigs), shut down her social media and blog and ditched all endorsements. She has one career now and that's being a wife and duchess. She can look forward to a life of walking behind her husband and cutting the ribbon at supermarkets.

Which is fine, because that's what she aspires to be. A trophy wife. I guess at 37 it beat trying to hustle in Hollywood after being a 4th tier actress on a low rated cable show.

She told her agent that she was quitting SUITS three months after meeting Harry, she was that certain that she was going to one day be Mrs. Harry Princess.

That ring is so ugly and SMALL!

They must be kicking themselves that they didn’t elope - what a debacle.

The wedding is bringing millions of pounds to the British economy - it's for that more than it is for them, I think. That's one of the duties of the royals.

Where are these millions coming from r467? The taxpayers are paying around £40 million I understand, where is the money being paid in to the economy? There is tourism day in day out year after year and it doesn’t depend on royalty so where is this economic boom?

[quote]The wedding is bringing millions of pounds to the British economy

Probably paid for by doting elderly folks buying tea towels and commemorative ceramic chotchkies, the thousand plus travellers who came to sit on the Windsor lawn without even so much as a bottle of water who paid premium for hotels around the area. How many Americans flew in for the ceremony who wouldn't have otherwise been there for a vacation? It just looks like too many older fools dumping their money.

It actually isn't a net gain for the British economy, R467. The Financial Times among others have broken down the cost of Drippy and Dopey's wedding and it was a huge loss to the economy.

The wedding of Dim and Desperate will be more expensive with less attendance and enthusiasm, so big old drain.

The figure was that it was a gain of about eighty million pounds.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Behind a pay wall but here's the Financial Times blurb:

[quote] Prince Harry's wedding holds scant promise for UK economy The wedding of Prince Harry and the American actress Meghan Markle — set for next spring — is unlikely to do much to boost Britain's sluggish economy. Past royal weddings have had little impact on the economy, or even held back growth, as was the case with Prince William and Kate

I still think it's funny that their gigs all got cancelled once they arrived. Trash! Also never trust the British.

Tracey Dooley looks like Morticia.

R473 this isn't the article I read originally but it has much of the same reporting. The figure is from the tourism board or something.

Can someone link me to an image of Doria Ragland - Markle's mama - actually in London. There's a pic of her merching a Burberry garment bag in L.A., and we're told she was en route to LAX to go to Heathrow. Description of the VIP entrance at the airport the car used. Nobody gets a pic of her on the plane. We get a pic of Harry's assistant, Amy, a few cars, and a driver carrying the presumed Burberry garment bag, but facing the other way without the logo showing. There's activity, idling cars, packages, carried, but not the woman herself. Rehearsal today, no sign of Doria (or the 10 kiddos supposedly in the party, or Prince Charles). Kensington Palace "insiders" chirp that Doria met the queen, PC and Camilla, but PC and Camilla were out of town on all day engagements the day this was said to have happened. It's the weirdest. The Daily Mail says Kate and Will, and Camilla and PC, and the Queen, were heading out of London in their cars to Windsor, and showed them in cars (or, in the case of PC and Camilla, standing around) without actually establishing they went to Windsor.

Where's a pic of Doria? Any more TMI from KP press office, which has clearly been taken over by Ms. Markle?

Dying to know if she met them with the nose ring. Isn't she a little old for a nose ring.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[quote] Why the fuck would the sixth in line to the throne need all these people marching in the wedding procession?

To keep out the protesters and the drunken louts. A lot of people are not fans of the Monarchy or the idea of a Monarchy. During William, Sophie/Edward and Charles/Camilla's wedding the police were out rounding up protesters

Her Markle uncle got her the embassy internship, R479. She wouldn't have gotten it otherwise, can't remember the details but she either missed the application deadline or wasn't qualified. He's been quiet the whole time only breaking his silence recently to express his disappointment.

That's another rumor to add to the rumor post on the Royal Wedding thread - the DM hinted that she had a fling with some older, rich Argentinian guy while at her internship, but the rumor is that she abandoned the internship to go off with a rich man.

And R479, her dad paid for private schools all the way through Northwestern. That's a lot of money. She used to adore her dad, even recently she sang his praises, but then, as she herself admits, he treated her like gold.

Ok Boris at R445. Because you know everything about the bloated drunk father and his relationship with the family. Totally HER job to drag him back over the border after he declined to pay his taxes and, by the looks of IMDB, hasn’t worked since the late 90s.

But keep on pushing that line. Maybe your man Trump will get a last minute invite and cancel a golf game at Mar a Lago to attend.

What old timey actor does Tracey Dooley look like? The long face and eyebrows remind me of someone I've seen on screen a long time ago, but I can't place the face.

I believe Sparkle is a Russian mole. First Russia destabilized the U.S. by putting the unqualified Mr. Trump in the White House....now they are destabilizing the U.K. by putting the unqualified Sparkle in Kensington Palace, and that much closer to the throne.

Big Liz, Charles and William are all marked for death.

Does anyone need "qualifications" to be a female royal, other than being a brood sow and whiteish?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Ted Cassidy, R483.

R487, Lon Chaney? Mary Woronov?

I didn't see anything racist about that article, R486. This is why we have Donnie Shitstain as president: because an article that merely points out that Markle's mom lives in a notoriously crime-ridden area of LA, so notorious that it and the surrounding areas have been the subject of many famous rap songs, is termed "racist" by sensitive souls like R486 People resent constantly being called racist when they are simply remarking on something, in this case the high crime rate near Doria's house, as opposed to Harry's origins in some of the most expensive real estate in the UK, if not the world.

Harry was born into privilege, and Meghan was not (well, she kind of was because her dad sacrificed everything to treat her like his princess) If anything, the article seems to imply that Meghan had some kind of inner grit to escape those surroundings.

[quote]r485 Does anyone need "qualifications" to be a female royal, other than being a brood sow and whiteish?

According to the aunties in this thread, there are many.

Foremost, one cannot look into the camera when your picture is being taken.

Of equal of even greater imprtance...something about side tendrils of hair being [italic]verboten.

[quote]Of equal of even greater imprtance...something about side tendrils of hair being verboten.

It's an unkempt, lower-class look.

It will be very jarring to see only one sole relative of the bride - her mother - standing on her side of the aisle in St Georges, while the Groom's side will have at least a half dozen or more people.

Apparently she didn't even invite the relatives she's been close to and praised even recently on social media, and who've kept their mouths shut: her maternal half-uncle, a graphic designer in LA (his mother told the DM today he didn't get an invite) and her Markle niece who's a DC-area attorney. I find that very strange.

[quote] I find that very strange.

Not for Sparkle. She has a history of dumping people as she climbs. And they've been dumped.

Just look at the 2 events after the wedding on Saturday. The first event with "bowl food" and no seating is for the the circle of people who are being dumped. Thanks for the help. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

The evening dinner (apparently seating is provided) is for her (oh, and Harry's too) "new circle".

Sparkle has England at her feet, and will be just fine.

I don't think this wedding is happening.

So many drama queens in this thread...

Wow, sparkle has so many PR interns in this thread bashing her family.

I don’t care about her half siblings but how she treated her dad speaks volumes about her. Poor fella spent a fortune educating her and the ungrateful cunt can’t even say she loves him, in that latest statement.

That Tracey woman is horrible, is that a wig she’s wearing? Looks like something died in her hair.

Her trashy mess of a family is the only thing making this wedding interesting.

The Middletons must LOVE this circus. It makes them look like angels from heaven.

I agree with R498. They are the redeeming quality of what would be a boring sugary show without them.

I hope the idiot yokels have something planned for Saturday.

[quote]Apparently she didn't even invite the relatives she's been close to and praised even recently on social media, and who've kept their mouths shut: her maternal half-uncle, a graphic designer in LA (his mother told the DM today he didn't get an invite) and her Markle niece who's a DC-area attorney. I find that very strange.

Maybe this is Charles' doing, thinking that if he invited the worthy and classy Markle relatives, he'd have to invite the other side, the circus sideshow. Either way, Charles is known to be not just thrifty, but cheap. Maybe he didn't want to pay the expenses for a half dozen or so relatives, thinking that they would be as tacky and up to shenanigans as the diseased Markles.

Like it's Charles who is controlling her guest list.

Even when it comes to making her guest list, she's the victim of other vile people.

Now that Andrew is out of the "needs the consent of the Monarch to marry" range, he and Fergie should elope TODAY!

Think of the headlines! And Philip's reaction.

[quote]Like it's Charles who is controlling her guest list.

They're his purse strings being undrawn and his pounds slowly dripping out. A ridiculous, tacky engagement dress is £70K? Well, let's just pare away the wedding guests to make up the gap, regardless of American relatives or British aristocracy that normally get a front row seat at such events.

Charles has always been cheaper than cheap and it radiates.

Anyone tuning in for the wedding?

If Charles and Clarence House had been controlling this mess, the in-laws would have been kept on a leash from the start.

It's Harry and Meghan's choices even if Dad pays for it.

I need to know if...

Savile Collins de Montenay FitzAlan de Dinan Lord

Eleanor Louise De Peverel Collins Lord

Wallis Jennings dePantulf Lord-Hart

Stavely Hampston deHodnet Lord

Dorian Warfield d’Amours Lord

Ella Louise FitzWarin Lord-Hart

and

Hayes Alexander FitzWarin Lord

...have arrived yet.

R507 that makes as much sense as the theories invented by you Bitterscolds where Meghan is the Antichrist. You've cherrypicked facts and figures to suit your agenda and straight up invented motives and methods that are pure fantasy.

R509 Oops, one angry Sugar here.

You can't read between the lines, in your opinion why the courtiers refer to this wedding as the "Markle debacle"????? Why are they complaining they have been kept in the dark by Harry and Meghan????

Those guys know some heads will fell as soon as the wedding is over and they're beginning to speak to protect themselves from the coming storm.

I can't wait for the books about this disaster.

Official, Chuck will walk her.

Doria, apparently, is no Queen Victoria.

Doria is not on brand.

What Meghan wants, Meghan gets.

"This is what you get for marrying an American"

Meghan's walk won't be NEARLY as memorable as my sister's!

No, but seriously.

Doria isn't good enough for the job? Must it be absolutely a man? Is there some rules about it? Charles is not even part of her family? Doesn't she have some African American uncle able to do the job if they need a man?

Now, imagine her walking down the aisle with Chuck and wearing the Spencer tiara. That would be magnificent.

She can’t walk herself?

No, she's a delicate fragile flower who needs a strong man to protect her and walk her, preferably white and rich.

I don't know if Meghan is an evil temptress or they're just two crazy kids in love, but I do know this whole thing has been way messier than it had to be. That bodes well for the future.

Fergie is only hoping Phil lives long enough for him to hate someone more than he hates her.

You mean "doesn't" bode well, R519?

"You should have let me marry Peter"

They may be two kids crazy in love, but those around them are not.

It would have been "diverse & feminist" if Doria did it, and clearly she would have earn it being mute and classy.

But no, we have Charles so she can play Diana2.0. I think we won't see much of Doria in the future.

R522 is right. Bye, Doria!

Surely one of these fine Brits could've walked the new Duchess of Suits

Lol, she's really a psychopath.

She's ghosting her mother like the rest of her family.

I mean THESE fine Brits

THESE FINE BRITS

For the new Duchess

They're the british hillbillies.

OMFG, I KNOW THE TMZ QUEEN WHO HAS MEGHAN'S DAD ON SPEED DIAL

He's single AND a bottom, ladies.

Do I get a last minute invite?

TMZ has someone on the ground...at a royal wedding.

New edict: "No more Americans...ever!"

R527 those people look like the homeless they were removing from the carriage route. Did they just outfit them with wedding memorabilia and let them stay?

LOL.

R527 - They look like homeless folks who picked up wedding tchotchkes they either shoplifted or found in dust bins.

The true crazies were outside the hospital holding plastic baby dolls, waiting for Kate and William to emerge

Oh my a mouth breather in a wife beater and luggage from a QVC closeout. LOL at the picture in the OP

BTW whoever is the one trying to push "Sugars" (clearly not a Brit), as soon as I see that in a comment I stop reading. Sorry honey, but you're boring, and the gleeful know-it-all venom schtick is tired.

You know, reading through the comments on this thread shows that a fair number of people here are bat shit crazy and need professional help.

This is going to be called off the morning of.

IKR, R535? I just read that Meghan's half-brother, Thomas, is on site after being photographed standing outside Windsor Castle. What the hell is HE up to? It has been glaringly evident that her family have no sense of dignity OR self-respect. Who goes where they know they are not welcome? I hope he doesn't try to drop a bomb shell at the very last minute. Yesterdays media appearance by the sister, Samantha, was interesting. I think it was via some Australian television program, though it could have been British. I was struck by something she stated at the tail end of the interview. She said "You know, this is all about MORE than just Meghan." The three interviewers did not follow up on that assertion, unfortunately. They should have grilled her on that statement, but they didn't. How does she feel that she and her father and brother deserve consideration in this whole ting? Why? I think that aside from the money for her appearances, her main motivation has been jealousy.

You didn't just read, it makes 5 times that you post the same news.

You should find an other tune now.

^^^ Yes, I DID just read it, and I have not posted this information prior. Excuse me, but I'm just not invested in this topic to the point of obsession. WTF is up with the DL comments Nazis?

This info is everywhere since two days, but you think it's time to share it again.

The BBC wedding specials have put forth the story that Megan's father hit a 750k lottery and this enabled him to pay Megan's school fees.

So one can easily interpret that this is meant as a bit of a take down of Papi Markle.

That's a lot of money for someone who lives basically like a tramp.

As I predicted, Prince Charles will walk Nutmeg down the aisle.

You're somewhat correct. Megan walks alone until she meets Charles at the choir.

Lol, she puts on the same show as Jupiter Macron.

French DLers will understand.

As Meghan's nephew, he is officially a part of the Royal Family, like it or not.

Markle wants to ensure that SHE SPARKLES as she walks most of the aisle with her wedding party.

I must admit I'm kind of disappointed that her mother won't do the deed. Now, that would be truly historic!

CNN's headline touts her as making a bold feminist statement by walking alone halfway down the aisle. Wouldn't the only bold feminist statement be if she walked entirely alone? How is it feminist to walk half way down? Is she half a feminist?

You’ve already posted that same theme elsewhere, Ivan anti feminist at R548

Yeah ok R536. That’s Troll Farm 101: keep repeating story enough and people will believe it.

How’s the weather in Russia?

[QUOTE] She can’t walk herself?

Yeah ok, because most Western brides walk alone down the aisle. Idiot.

Why not ? R551 She's supposed to be disruptive, no?

I hope she wears a magnificent silver gown. White is ridiculous at this point.

R551, I didn’t have anyone “give me away” when I got married because I’m not a piece of fucking property. My husband didn’t ask my father for my hand, either. Same reason.

But it’s a deeply entrenched tradition that’s somehow considered “romantic”.

As far as “feminism” goes, let’s not start the contest of who’s “feminist” and who’s not. It’s just another way to divide women, once they’re all more or less equal.

So Mrs Goldman-Giuliani-Engelson-Windsor is ever so suddenly a 4th wave Riot Gurlll- aye Columba, give me a F-ing break!

R554, why follow we care what you did at your wedding?

I can smell your pussy over the net. It stinks.

Will she wear the veil in front of her face, whatever that is called, like other non royal brides I wonder, and will she lift it herself, or will her FIL do this as well for her? Questions questions.

Actually, R549, I didn't. And I am a female you asshole, and would never let anyone "give" me away. What bothers me is the BS narrative Sparkle is pushing. If Charles is walking her part way down the aisle, she is not walking herself down the aisle alone in a bold feminist statement.

Shut up labia lips. Don't you have some floors to scrub? Laundry? The View?

The relatives are crashing the wedding. Or hoping to.

Her mother is walking her down the aisle. It's not Charles place.

Shouldn't you be more concerned about your latest school shooting coverage happening RIGHT NOW, and your "do nothing about it" President than our highly anticipated Royal Wedding?

And.......we know you'll be watching.

And her "friends" are milking the wedding like crazy.

Imagine the scandal if Kate did 10% of what Meghan's doing.

Fuck off r559 you tedious cunt.

Yes, her ‘friends’ are famewhores just like her. Birds of a feather....

What does that make you, r563? An anthropomorphic cunt?

Yes.....birds of a feather, just like jealous gay men.

Wow, being homophobic here....

You bitches will all be up @4:00 a.m., munching on fake scones and sipping lukewarm Lipton tea, watching the wedding, and swooning over Harry, and dreaming that you were the lucky one who was Harry's husband.

You're not fooling us, bitches!

R567 - I've been getting up early for royal weddings since I was a kid (Princess Anne and Mark Phillips' wedding in 1973 was my first). I'm not very enthusiastic about this match but I will be getting up at 4:00 am to watch. I don't want to break my perfect record. Watching the guests arrive with outrageous hats is just as much fun as the wedding itself. I will not be having tea and scones. I will be lounging in my caftan saying bitchy things at the TV as is my custom.

I don’t know R557, and what’s your custom back home in Russia?

Two questions need to be answered:

1) Will Ginger and Nutmeg do an interview before the wedding as is custom?

2) Will the Queen give Harry a dukedom (the evening before or the day of the wedding)?

I think the person who’s calling us “jealous” is projecting their own envy.

I’ve been around the block enough times to know what Meghan’s in for, sunshine. I know what’s good, and wouldn’t want her life.

R571 I don't think you ever have to worry about marrying a handsome prince.

R572, I did.

R573 that's not what he told me the other night!

I was in London last week, & I didn't really see a lot of Harry & Sparkle merchandise. I mean it was at the stores around Buckingham palace, post cards & small amount of stuff at Heathrow. I get it that Harry is the "spare" but he's always been the more attractive, charismatic one - even before William went totally bald and gave Kate his balls to keep in her purse. He's the one most like Diana and I would think people have some affection for him because he was so young when she died. I'm kind of surprised at this "meh" reception to wedding in London. At least Sparkle is age appropriate - not some 20 year old-model type hanging around Burberry for freebies.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[quote]Funny you should mention Burberry - Megs' Sainted Mum prominently displayed a Burberry garment bag as she was papped on the way to the airport.

Well, what else is this lady supposed to carry her garment in, aside from the garment bag it came with? She's just an ordinary person...it's not like she has racks of spare Vuitton garment bags lying around to transfer it into, like wealthy people have.

Is she supposed to put duct tape across the brand name on the bag, to make you happy? Try to fade it with nail polish remover? Use a black plastic garbage bag??

The problem isn't what kind of garment bag she transports her clothes in, but that strangers care, and zoom in on photos to get all up in someone else's business.

[quote]it's not like she has racks of spare Vuitton garment bags lying around to transfer it into, like wealthy people have.

You type poor.

You type poor.

Oh, dear....

She could have turned the label away from the paps and carried it normally instead of holding it up like a carnival prize r577.

New here, r579?

Label is on both sides of the bag.

Ginger and Willnot greet the crowds at Windsor today.

Nutmeg and Mom arrive at Cliveden to spend the night.

Sparkle just loves the camera!

Don't know what happened in my post at R385. This is the photo for "Nutmeg just loves the camera".

That is not a good picture of Sparkle. Her nose looks enormous there.

But, yes, R585 and R585, she just can't NOT look at the camera. Very annoying. But at least she isn't handling her hair.

[quote]R578 You type poor.

Look...I've got MY own little trust fund, and I've got MY own little garment bag...but that doesn't mean I judge or criticize others who don't have those things.

The lady's just trying to make a transatlantic flight...maybe the first in her life. What kind of garment bag she uses or how she carries it isn't relevant to anything.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Ugh, Doria keeps the grey hair to meet the Queen? How hippie of her....

Doesn't the queen have grey hair?

The Queen has white hair.

Doesn’t Princess Alexandra have grey hair? And Prince Andrew? and the Duchess of Kent?

R593 on the subject of the carpooling beagle:

[quote]Please be seated for the most important announcement about the royal wedding: Meghan Markle's dog, Guy, was just in Windsor with the Queen. The bride-to-be's beagle was seen living his best life yesterday, peeking out the window while hitching a ride with her Majesty. (They're carpool buddies now. No big deal.)

[quote]We haven't even seen Meghan alone in a car with the sovereign, but here's Guy, four legged and all, riding in the back seat with the Queen.

This is probably the first thing Big Liz has ever done that I've liked. Perhaps there's hope for that family, after all.

[quote]R599 and the Duchess of Kent?

[italic] Her [/italic] hair will be covered with a festive Blackamoor turban, probably.