One of the great classic New York '70s movies. In fact the first one and probably my favourite.
Very well received at the time, but now largely forgotten and one of those 'Why no DVD?' movies.
Who's seen it?
How much did you love it?
Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
One of the great classic New York '70s movies. In fact the first one and probably my favourite.
Very well received at the time, but now largely forgotten and one of those 'Why no DVD?' movies.
Who's seen it?
How much did you love it?
by Anonymous | reply 27 | February 23, 2020 12:42 AM |
I have watched it over 30 times.
Used to have a tape of it....haven't seen it in years though.
Would like to see it again and see it has held up.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | November 8, 2014 1:22 AM |
LOVED it.
Not of the same caliber, another obscure early 70s must-see NY movie is The Possession of Joel Delaney, with Shirley MacLaine and Perry King. Shot mostly on the UES and Washington Heights, it ends at Fire Island Pines in a blithering mess of camp and trash.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | November 8, 2014 1:26 AM |
I'll have to check that one out, R3.
Shirley was really trying to get with the NY movie scene in the early '70s, but couldn't really make it happen .
Desperate Characters was another one. It was just depressing.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | November 8, 2014 2:03 PM |
Saw it numerous times when it was first released, having read the book. Frank Langella was smoking hot and Carrie Snodgress should have had a much more successful film career afterwards.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | November 8, 2014 2:45 PM |
Yes [R4}, I saw Desperate Characters about three years ago and it is gloomy alright! All I recall was Shirley's dimly-lit brownstone in Carroll Gardens, a cat that was a metaphor for something, and a scene where she boards a subway in midtown.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | November 9, 2014 12:47 AM |
I watched Desperate Characters about years after it was released as a late movie on tv. I couldn't turn away from it, depressing as it was.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | November 9, 2014 12:50 AM |
This was one of those movies "we" ("we" = my college clique) watched over and over on TV. I watched it on youtube and was surprised to see how much more explicit the unedited-for-TV version was.
Great performances from eccentric (by today's standards) performances.
"With a touch of grenadine?"
The movie might have been better if the Richard Benjamin character had been a little less revolting.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | November 9, 2014 1:01 AM |
"How about a little old role in the hay?".
by Anonymous | reply 9 | November 9, 2014 1:17 AM |
"Tina!!!!"
by Anonymous | reply 10 | November 9, 2014 1:18 AM |
TEEN!!!!
by Anonymous | reply 11 | November 9, 2014 1:43 AM |
"Would you like to take me to lunch?"
"Oh, God...you don't expect me to go through all that, do you?"
by Anonymous | reply 12 | November 9, 2014 8:32 AM |
I remember it as a great title with a movie that doesn't live up to it.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | November 9, 2014 8:34 AM |
[quote]The movie might have been better if the Richard Benjamin character had been a little less revolting.
Having read the book, the story makes more sense when you see them before the relationship went sour.
I agree, Benjamin could have been toned down...but he was funny.
The two version thing is so strange. The TV version has whole other scenes that weren't in the VHS version.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | November 9, 2014 8:37 AM |
[quote]I remember it as a great title with a movie that doesn't live up to it.
Oh, no...it lived up to it.
Interesting tidbit:-
There are a lot of published interviews with John Lennon & Yoko....and there's a reference to them having seen the movie on their first visit to NY together.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | November 9, 2014 8:40 AM |
Saw it, fell in heavy lust with Frank Langella.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | November 9, 2014 8:40 AM |
Actually I think I'm confusing it with Up The Sandbox. I don't remember Mad Housewife, it's possible I once like it but forgot.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | November 9, 2014 8:45 AM |
[quote]The TV version has whole other scenes that weren't in the VHS version.
That seemed to be common with so many Universal movies in the 1970s. There are a bunch of TV cuts with footage not in the theatrical releases.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | November 9, 2014 12:05 PM |
your mother wants to have a poodle party
by Anonymous | reply 19 | November 9, 2014 1:50 PM |
Carrie Snodgress was excellent, so vivid and original.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | August 15, 2016 8:48 AM |
Great movie. There is a high quality torrent on RARGB. Frank Langella looked almost native american. Crazy.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | February 22, 2020 8:21 PM |
The humor is very New York Jewish even though it's never referred to...much like the other NYC classic of that time, Heartbreak Kid.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | February 22, 2020 8:29 PM |
Desperate Characters is available for rental on Amazon.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | February 22, 2020 8:35 PM |
When Sondgress realizes that Frank Langella's character is really gay (a fag is what she calls him), some thought it was the worst kept secret in the movie.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | February 22, 2020 9:11 PM |
Read the book, (Housewife) saw the film then at some point I had it on a video tape and saw it again. It was a wonderful film. Desperate Characters was one of the most depressing movies I'd ever seen. I saw it once and that was enough. Shirley looked like hell in it too.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | February 22, 2020 9:22 PM |
The book was excellent. It really gave you an idea of the pressure to be part of the “in” crowd in NY professional society, and how shallow and phony it was. I felt so bad for Tina, living with that jackass husband and having that affair with a prick .
by Anonymous | reply 26 | February 22, 2020 9:33 PM |
But at least in the book you knew them when they got along. In the book they hate each other from the start and why they're together doesn't really make sense. He's SO horrible to her.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | February 23, 2020 12:42 AM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!